Business
While “Team Canada” attacks Trump for election points, Premier Danielle Smith advocates for future trade relations

“Today, I addressed the Legislative Assembly and spoke to the actions that the Government of Alberta has taken and will continue to take to advocate for Alberta and Canada’s interests in the U.S. as we continue to face the threat and imposition of tariffs.”
Mr. Speaker,
When U.S. President Donald Trump first announced his threatened tariffs against Canada, and began musing about our country becoming the 51st state, many Canadians – and Albertans – feared for their futures.
Why? Because, regardless of our political stripe, we all knew the imposition of 25% tariffs on all Canadian goods to the U.S. would cost the jobs of hundreds of thousands of Canadians, would depress our economy, devastate our budget and damage the sovereignty of our country.
And in the roughly 4 months until just before last weekend’s federal election call, Premiers, party leaders and Canadians were united (other than perhaps the Alberta NDP) in working as hard as we could to convince the U.S. President and Congress to reconsider these unjustified actions against our country.
In fact, Premiers were all encouraged by each other as well as the former Prime Minister and his ministers, to visit the U.S., get on U.S. media, speak with every U.S. official and influencer we could find to convince the U.S. President to refrain from imposing these tariffs.
It was all about working as ‘Team Canada’ for the greater good.
Enter Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney.
Now, all of a sudden, it is treason to talk to American media personalities that we disagree with. It is disloyal to try and persuade high-profile Republicans holding influence with the President to abandon his tariff policies on Canada. Indeed, it is a high crime to try and convince U.S. officials to refrain from imposing tariffs until after our country has an elected leader with a strong mandate.
Shame on all who dare to speak with the enemy, they say!
These are the Team Carney and Nenshi NDP talking points.
Their endgame is quite obvious. Frighten and divide Canadians. Try and make Canadians forget the utter incompetence of Liberal and NDP policies inflicted upon this country over the last 10 years. Associate conservatives with President Trump. And if they play their cards just right – and sprinkle in just enough anti-Alberta rhetoric – presto – Canada can elect another Liberal majority government.
Well – the Carney Liberals and Nenshi NDP are right about one thing…our country is indeed vulnerable right now.
And the reason why is as clear as a sunny Alberta day.
It is because for the last 10 years, Liberal and NDP leaders across this country – both federal and provincial – have repeatedly sold out Canada and Alberta with policies that have landlocked our immense natural resources, made nation building projects impossible to finance and build, and have made securing access to our ports an exercise in frustration and futility.
These Liberal and NDP leaders – from Trudeau to Singh and now to Prime Minister Mark Carney – have done everything in their power to sow investment uncertainty, add impossibly high costs on the development of our resources, and have disastrously weakened our security and military – and all in the name of their green extremist religion and its cult leaders named Guilbeault, Suzuki, Gore and Thunberg.
And the results are obvious – Canadians are poorer than Americans – overly-dependent on the Americans – and vulnerable to many nations including the Americans.
Canada has indeed been sold out – big time – and it’s been sold out by the utter incompetent, self-righteous and extreme policies of Liberal and NDP leadership across this country – including the Nenshi NDP here in Alberta. From C-69, to oil and gas production caps to tanker bans to a dozen other examples – the Liberals and their allies have attacked the Alberta and Saskatchewan economies mercilessly.
But despite all that – despite the 10 year attack on Alberta by our own federal government – when tariffs were threatened on our fellow Canadians and the federal Liberals realized they had no contacts or allies anywhere in the new U.S. administration…what did the Alberta Government do?
Did we cower in the corner madly texting our tweets about hating Donald Trump on X?
Did we turn into part time TikTok rage farmers to stir up as much fear and loathing of Americans as humanly possible?
Did we give up, throw our hands in the air, express righteous indignation – but do nothing to fight against the threat posed against our province and country?
No – that’s what the Nenshi NDP did of course – but we, Alberta’s UCP government, did not.
Instead, our government did exactly what Albertans expected us to do – we decided to fight tooth and nail for Albertan and Canadian jobs and sovereignty.
My ministers, officials and I have spent hundreds of hours over the last several months talking with, lobbying, educating, and persuading every U.S. lawmaker and media influencer that was willing to listen, about how damaging and wrongheaded imposing tariffs on Canada would be for Americans, and the millions of American jobs that would be lost because of them.
I’ve made this case repeatedly to the American people and their leaders – especially Republican leaders – from the President of the United States personally, to members of his Cabinet to Senators to governors to members of congress to podcasters to media personalities.
I’ve lost track of how many nights I have spent in uncomfortable hotel beds and in airports – doing everything humanly possible to stand up for Canadian and Alberta workers and families.
Convincing U.S. Officials to refrain from putting tariffs on any Canadian goods. Asking that they respect the current free trade agreement and not begin renegotiations until Canadians elect a new Prime Minister with a strong mandate.
Doing all we could in Alberta to secure the U.S. border and urging the Liberals to do the same across the country so we could further delay the implementation of tariffs.
And it hasn’t just been Alberta – several other Premiers – particularly conservative Premiers – from Premier Scott Moe to Premier Tim Houston to Premier Doug Ford – have been doing the same thing.
And the results – it has been almost 4 months since the President first threatened tariffs on Canada, and although steel and aluminum are being wrongfully tariffed at this time – the tariffs on remaining Canadian goods sit at zero today – rather than the threatened 25%.
And what has the Nenshi NDP done to contribute to this effort? Not a single thing other than raging against this government for every effort made to protect Albertans.
Needless to say, there is not a doubt in my mind that had the Nenshi NDP been in charge during this period, we would likely have long ago been hit with across the board 25% tariffs and lost thousands of Alberta jobs already.
Because the NDP have no idea what diplomacy is as they don’t know how to talk constructively and effectively with anyone they disagree with.
Glad we never need to find out.
Our government’s advocacy has made a massive difference for Albertans and Canadians.
That’s a fact.
But now, we have another tariff deadline looming on April 2nd – and I am off to the U.S. yet again to try and speak to Americans this time through the 2nd largest podcaster in the world whose audience is made up of exactly the people we need to persuade to convince their president to change course on tariffs against Canada.
And what does Team Carney want me to do?
They want me to abandon my post, remain in Alberta and do absolutely nothing to defend our province.
They want me to cower in the face of eastern media pundits and politicians who favour political grandstanding to effective diplomacy.
I’m fiercely criticized for going into the lion’s den to change the hearts and minds of the very Americans we need on Canada’s side to avoid a trade war with the most powerful economy on Earth.
They want this lady and Alberta to just sit down and shut up.
Well…here is my response to that.
I will not be silent. Alberta will not be silent.
We will not be pushed around and called traitors for merely having the courage to actually do something about our nation’s and province’s predicament other than merely indulging in self-righteous tantrums.
And I for one will never be silenced by the party in Ottawa that has sold out our beloved province for the last 10 years with the help of their NDP collaborators.
I have and will always put Albertans first.
And until this danger to Alberta and our economy is past, they’re going to have to roll me off in a stretcher before I stop fighting for this province and our people.
So call me and my caucus whatever name in the dictionary you want.
As long as Albertans know we’re fighting for them and their families – we could care less what the members opposite or Liberal politicians in Ottawa have to say about us.
Because Albertans expect their Premier and government to always put Albertans first and to lead them through this storm with fearless determination.
As Winston Churchill once said: “Fear is a reaction. Courage is a decision.”
We on this side of the house have made the decision to act with courage…So that Alberta may remain forever strong and free.
Thank-you, Mr. Speaker.
Danielle Smith
Danielle Smith was sworn in as Premier of Alberta and Minister of Intergovernmental Relations on October 11, 2022.
Business
Cuba has lost 24% of it’s population to emigration in the last 4 years

MxM News
Quick Hit:
A new study finds Cuba has lost nearly a quarter of its population since 2020, driven by economic collapse and a mass emigration wave unseen outside of war zones. The country’s population now stands at just over 8 million, down from nearly 10 million.
Key Details:
- Independent study estimates Cuba’s population at 8.02 million—down 24% in four years.
- Over 545,000 Cubans left the island in 2024 alone—double the official government figure.
- Demographer warns the crisis mirrors depopulation seen only in wartime, calling it a “systemic collapse.”
Diving Deeper:
Cuba is undergoing a staggering demographic collapse, losing nearly one in four residents over the past four years, according to a new study by economist and demographer Juan Carlos Albizu-Campos. The report estimates that by the end of 2024, Cuba’s population will stand at just over 8 million people—down from nearly 10 million—a 24% drop that Albizu-Campos says is comparable only to what is seen in war-torn nations.
The study, accessed by the Spanish news agency EFE, points to mass emigration as the primary driver. In 2024 alone, 545,011 Cubans are believed to have left the island. That number is more than double what the regime officially acknowledges, as Cuba’s government only counts those heading to the United States, ignoring large flows to destinations like Mexico, Spain, Serbia, and Uruguay.
Albizu-Campos describes the trend as “demographic emptying,” driven by what he calls a “quasi-permanent polycrisis” in Cuba—an interwoven web of political repression, economic freefall, and social decay. For years, Cubans have faced food and medicine shortages, blackout-plagued days, fuel scarcity, soaring inflation, and a broken currency system. The result has been not just migration, but a desperate stampede for the exits.
Yet, the regime continues to minimize the damage. Official figures from the National Office of Statistics and Information (ONEI) put Cuba’s population at just over 10 million in 2023. However, even those numbers acknowledge a shrinking population and the lowest birth rate in decades—confirming the crisis, if not its full scale.
Cuba hasn’t held a census since 2012. The last scheduled one in 2022 has been repeatedly delayed, allegedly due to lack of resources. Experts doubt that any new attempt will be transparent or complete.
Albizu-Campos warns that the government’s refusal to confront the reality of the collapse is obstructing any chance at solutions. More than just a demographic issue, the study describes Cuba’s situation as a “systemic crisis.”
“Havana (Cuba, February 2023)” by Bruno Rijsman licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 DEED.
Business
Tariff-driven increase of U.S. manufacturing investment would face dearth of workers

From the Fraser Institute
Since 2015, the number of American manufacturing jobs has actually risen modestly. However, as a share of total U.S. employment, manufacturing has dropped from 30 per cent in the 1970s to around 8 per cent in 2024.
Donald Trump has long been convinced that the United States must revitalize its manufacturing sector, having—unwisely, in his view—allowed other countries to sell all manner of foreign-produced manufactured goods in the giant American market. As president, he’s moved quickly to shift the U.S. away from its previous embrace of liberal trade and open markets as cornerstones of its approach to international economic policy —wielding tariffs as his key policy instrument. Since taking office barely two months ago, President Trump has implemented a series of tariff hikes aimed at China and foreign producers of steel and aluminum—important categories of traded manufactured goods—and threatened to impose steep tariffs on most U.S. imports from Canada, Mexico and the European Union. In addition, he’s pledged to levy separate tariffs on imports of automobiles, semi-conductors, lumber, and pharmaceuticals, among other manufactured goods.
In the third week of March, the White House issued a flurry of news releases touting the administration’s commitment to “position the U.S. as a global superpower in manufacturing” and listing substantial new investments planned by multinational enterprises involved in manufacturing. Some of these appear to contemplate relocating manufacturing production in other jurisdictions to the U.S., while others promise new “greenfield” investments in a variety of manufacturing industries.
President Trump’s intense focus on manufacturing is shared by a large slice of America’s political class, spanning both of the main political parties. Yet American manufacturing has hardly withered away in the last few decades. The value of U.S. manufacturing “output” has continued to climb, reaching almost $3 trillion last year (equal to 10 per cent of total GDP). The U.S. still accounts for 15 per cent of global manufacturing production, measured in value-added terms. In fact, among the 10 largest manufacturing countries, it ranks second in manufacturing value-added on a per-capita basis. True, China has become the world’s biggest manufacturing country, representing about 30 per cent of global output. And the heavy reliance of Western economies on China in some segments of manufacturing does give rise to legitimate national security concerns. But the bulk of international trade in manufactured products does not involve goods or technologies that are particularly critical to national security, even if President Trump claims otherwise. Moreover, in the case of the U.S., a majority of two-way trade in manufacturing still takes place with other advanced Western economies (and Mexico).
In the U.S. political arena, much of the debate over manufacturing centres on jobs. And there’s no doubt that employment in the sector has fallen markedly over time, particularly from the early 1990s to the mid-2010s (see table below). Since 2015, the number of American manufacturing jobs has actually risen modestly. However, as a share of total U.S. employment, manufacturing has dropped from 30 per cent in the 1970s to around 8 per cent in 2024.
U.S. Manufacturing Employment, Select Years (000)* | |
---|---|
1990 | 17,395 |
2005 | 14,189 |
2010 | 14,444 |
2015 | 12,333 |
2022 | 12,889 |
2024 | 12,760 |
*December for each year shown. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics |
Economists who have studied the trend conclude that the main factors behind the decline of manufacturing employment include continuous automation, significant gains in productivity across much of the sector, and shifts in aggregate demand and consumption away from goods and toward services. Trade policy has also played a part, notably China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 and the subsequent dramatic expansion of its role in global manufacturing supply chains.
Contrary to what President Trump suggests, manufacturing’s shrinking place in the overall economy is not a uniquely American phenomenon. As Harvard economist Robert Lawrence recently observed “the employment share of manufacturing is declining in mature economies regardless of their overall industrial policy approaches. The trend is apparent both in economies that have adopted free-market policies… and in those with interventionist policies… All of the evidence points to deep and powerful forces that drive the long-term decline in manufacturing’s share of jobs and GDP as countries become richer.”
This brings us back to the president’s seeming determination to rapidly ramp up manufacturing investment and production as a core element of his “America First” program. An important issue overlooked by the administration is where to find the workers to staff a resurgent U.S. manufacturing sector. For while manufacturing has become a notably “capital-intensive” part of the U.S. economy, workers are still needed. And today, it’s hard to see where they will be found. This is especially true given the Trump administration’s well-advertised skepticism about the benefits of immigration.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the current unemployment rate across America’s manufacturing industries collectively stands at a record low 2.9 per cent, well below the economy-wide rate of 4.5 per cent. In a recent survey by the National Association of Manufacturers, almost 70 per cent of American manufacturers cited the inability to attract and retain qualified employees as the number one barrier to business growth. A cursory look at the leading industry trade journals confirms that skill and talent shortages remain persistent in many parts of U.S. manufacturing—and that shortages are destined to get worse amid the expected significant jump in manufacturing investment being sought by the Trump administration.
As often seems to be the case with Trump’s stated policy objectives, the math surrounding his manufacturing agenda doesn’t add up. Manufacturing in America is in far better shape than the president acknowledges. And a tariff-driven avalanche of manufacturing investment—should one occur—will soon find the sector reeling from an unprecedented human resource crisis.
Jock Finlayson
Senior Fellow, Fraser Institut
-
Business1 day ago
28 energy leaders call for eliminating ALL energy subsidies—even ones they benefit from
-
2025 Federal Election1 day ago
Carney’s Cap on Alberta Energy Costing Canada Billions
-
Business1 day ago
Trump Tariffs are not going away. Canada needs to adapt or face the consequences
-
Economy22 hours ago
Support For National Pipelines And LNG Projects Gain Momentum, Even In Quebec
-
Health1 day ago
Dr. Pierre Kory Exposes the Truth About the Texas ‘Measles Death’ Hoax
-
Economy23 hours ago
Solar and Wind Power Are Expensive
-
Business24 hours ago
Why a domestic economy upgrade trumps diversification
-
Bruce Dowbiggin1 day ago
From Heel To Hero: George Foreman’s Uniquely American Story