COVID-19
US Energy department and FBI agree on Lab leak
From British Health Researcher John Campbell
February 26, the NY Post and the UK’s Telegraph both reported a lab leak lead to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
The US Energy Department and the FBI are among nine different intelligence agencies looking into the origins of the pandemic.
The FBI had concluded earlier the COVID-19 Pandemic started at the Wuhan Institute of Virology where research on bat-based coronaviruses was taking place at the time of the outbreak.
Prolific British health researcher and instructor John Campbell explains in this video presentation.
Dr. Campbell’s presentation notes:
US Energy department, pandemic is most likely to have originated from a lab leak
https://nypost.com/2023/02/26/chinese…
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-new…
Oversees a network of 17 laboratories, research in advanced biology
Overseas biodefence labs
Oversees US nuclear weapons program
Based on new intelligence, additional study of academic literature, and consultation with experts outside government
The Covid-19 pandemic is most likely to have originated from a lab leak
Accidental leak
low confidence
(In 2021, FBI had moderate confidence in a lab leak)
Covid-19 was part of a Chinese biological weapons programme, unfounded
FBI chief Christopher Wray says China lab leak most likely
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-c…
FBI Director Christopher Wray
The FBI has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential lab incident
China has been doing its best to try to thwart and obfuscate efforts to identify the source of the global pandemic.
Details of the agency’s investigation were classified
(FBI has a team of experts focusing on the dangers of biological threats)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisade…
March 7, 2020
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/la…
A group that has been involved in China at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which some saw as a conflict of interest
The rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins.
We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.
17th March, 2020,
Patrick Vallance shuts down debate
UK experts helped shut down Covid lab leak theory
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022…
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022…
https://www.nature.com/articles/S4159…
Natural spillover event caused the pandemic, was hugely instrumental in stifling debate into the origins of the virus.
By the time the paper was published, all reference to biosecurity problems in Wuhan had been removed
April 18, 2020,
President Trump a lot of people are looking into the possibility of a lab leak,
the theory seems to make sense
Dr. Anthony Fauci the virus’ mutations are consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human.
4th June, 2020,
Sir Richard Dearlove, former head, MI6
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo…
Seen a scientific report by a British-Norwegian team indicating that the virus was man-made
January 15, 2021
https://2017-2021.state.gov/fact-shee…
State Department fact sheet
Some researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, became sick in fall 2019, three researchers were hospitalized before the first coronavirus case was reported.
February 9, 2021
World Health Organization team
the possibility that the virus escaped from a lab in Wuhan extremely unlikely
February 9, 2021
https://www.nature.com/articles/d4158…
Close relative of SARS-CoV-2 found in bats in Thailand, China and Laos
2025 Federal Election
Conservatives promise to ban firing of Canadian federal workers based on COVID jab status
From LifeSiteNews
The Conservative platform also vows that the party will oppose mandatory digital ID systems and a central bank digital currency if elected.
Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party’s 2025 election platform includes a promise to “ban” the firing of any federal worker based “solely” on whether or not they chose to get the COVID shots.
On page 23 of the “Canada First – For A Change” plan, which was released on Tuesday, the promise to protect un-jabbed federal workers is mentioned under “Protect Personal Autonomy, Privacy, and Data Security.”
It promises that a Conservative government will “Ban the dismissal of federal workers based solely on COVID vaccine status.”
The Conservative Party also promises to “Oppose any move toward mandatory digital ID systems” as well as “Prohibit the Bank of Canada from developing or implementing a central bank digital currency.”
In October 2021, the Liberal government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced unprecedented COVID-19 jab mandates for all federal workers and those in the transportation sector. The government also announced that the unjabbed would no longer be able to travel by air, boat, or train, both domestically and internationally.
This policy resulted in thousands losing their jobs or being placed on leave for non-compliance. It also trapped “unvaccinated” Canadians in the country.
COVID jab mandates, which also came from provincial governments with the support of the federal government, split Canadian society. The shots have been linked to a multitude of negative and often severe side effects, such as death, including in children.
Many recent rulings have gone in favor of those who chose not to get the shots and were fired as a result, such as an arbitrator ruling that one of the nation’s leading hospitals in Ontario must compensate 82 healthcare workers terminated after refusing to get the jabs.
Beyond health concerns, many Canadians, especially Catholics, opposed the injections on moral grounds because of their link to fetal cell lines derived from the tissue of aborted babies.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
As millions of Americans anxiously await action from the new HHS leadership against the COVID-19 mRNA injections—injected into over 9 million children this year—Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has finally gone publicly on the offensive:
Let’s go over each key point made by RFK Jr.:
The recommendation for children was always dubious. It was dubious because kids had almost no risk for COVID-19. Certain kids that had very profound morbidities may have a slight risk. Most kids don’t.
In the largest review to date on myocarditis following SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. COVID-19 vaccination, Mead et al found that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not only significantly more common but also more severe—particularly in children and young males. Our findings make clear that the risks of the shots overwhelmingly outweigh any theoretical benefit:
 |
The OpenSAFELY study included more than 1 million adolescents and children and found that myocarditis was documented ONLY in COVID-19 vaccinated groups and NOT after COVID-19 infection. There were NO COVID-19-related deaths in any group. A&E attendance and unplanned hospitalization were higher after first vaccination compared to unvaccinated groups:
 |
So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk? We’ve seen huge associations of myocarditis and pericarditis with strokes, with other injuries, with neurological injuries.
The two largest COVID-19 vaccine safety studies ever conducted, involving 99 million (Faksova et al) and 85 million people (Raheleh et al), confirm RFK Jr.’s concerns, documenting significantly increased risks of serious adverse events following vaccination, including:
- Myocarditis (+510% after second dose)
- Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (+278% after first dose)
- Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (+223% after first dose)
- Guillain-Barré Syndrome (+149% after first dose)
- Heart Attack (+286% after second dose)
- Stroke (+240% after first dose)
- Coronary Artery Disease (+244% after second dose)
- Cardiac Arrhythmia (+199% after first dose)
 |
And this was clear even in the clinical data that came out of Pfizer. There were actually more deaths. There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group. We need to ask questions and we need to consult with parents.
Actually, according to the Pfizer’s clinical trial data, there were 43% more deaths in the vaccine group compared to the placebo group when post-unblinding deaths are included:
 |
We need to give people informed consent, and we shouldn’t be making recommendations that are not good for the population.
Public acknowledgment of the grave harms of COVID-19 vaccines signals that real action is right around the corner. However, we must hope that action is taken for ALL age groups, as no one is spared from their life-reducing effects:
Alessandria et al (n=290,727, age > 10 years): People vaccinated with 2 doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during follow-up.
 |
Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.
BREAKING: THE FEDERAL BRIEF THAT SHOULD SINK CARNEY
How Canada’s Mainstream Media Lost the Public Trust
Ottawa Confirms China interfering with 2025 federal election: Beijing Seeks to Block Joe Tay’s Election
Indigenous-led Projects Hold Key To Canada’s Energy Future
-
Business2 days agoIs Government Inflation Reporting Accurate?
-
2025 Federal Election2 days agoCarney’s Hidden Climate Finance Agenda
-
2025 Federal Election2 days agoWhen it comes to pipelines, Carney’s words flow both ways
-
2025 Federal Election2 days agoStudy links B.C.’s drug policies to more overdoses, but researchers urge caution
-
2025 Federal Election2 days agoPolls say Canadians will give Trump what he wants, a Carney victory.
-
2025 Federal Election1 day agoCarney Liberals pledge to follow ‘gender-based goals analysis’ in all government policy
-
2025 Federal Election1 day agoPoilievre’s Conservatives promise to repeal policy allowing male criminals in female jails
-
Also Interesting2 days agoIf You Frequently Travel, A Second Phone Number Can Be A Cost Effective Solution