Connect with us

International

UK Supreme Court rules ‘woman’ means biological female

Published

7 minute read

Susan Smith (L) and Marion Calder, directors of ‘For Women Scotland’ cheer as they leave the Supreme Court on April 16, 2025, in London, England after winning their appeal in defense of biological reality

From LifeSiteNews

By Michael Haynes, Snr. Vatican Correspondent

The U.K. Supreme Court has issued a ruling stating that “woman” in law refers to a biological female, and that transgender “women” are not female in the eyes of the law.

In a unanimous verdict, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled today that legally transgender “women” are not women, since a woman is legally defined by “biological sex.”

Published April 16, the Supreme Court’s 88-page verdict was handed down on the case of Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v. The Scottish Ministers (Respondent). The ruling marks the end of a battle of many years between the Scottish government and women’s right campaigners who sought to oppose the government’s promotion of transgender ideology.

In 2018, the Scottish government issued a decision to allow the definition of “woman” to include men who assume their gender to be female, opening the door to allowing so-called “transgender” individuals to identify as women.

This guidance was challenged by women’s rights campaigners, arguing that a woman should be defined in line with biological sex, and in 2022 the Scottish government was forced to change its definition after the court found that such a move was outside the government’s “legislative competence.”

Given this, the government issued new guidance which sought to cover both aspects: saying that biological women are women, but also that men with a “gender recognition certificate” (GRC) are also considered women. A GRC is given to people who identify as the opposite sex and who have had medical or surgical interventions in an attempt to “reassign” their gender.

Women Scotland Ltd appealed this new guidance. At first it was rejected by inner courts, but upon their taking the matter to the Supreme Court in March last year, the nation’s highest judicial body took up the case.

Today, with the ruling issued against transgender ideology, women’s campaigners are welcoming the news as a win for women’s safety.

“A thing of beauty,” praised Lois McLatchie Miller from the Alliance Defending Freedom legal group.

“Victory,” commented Charlie Bently-Astor, a prominent campaigner for biological reality against the transgender movement, after she nearly underwent surgical transition herself at a younger age.

“After 15 years of insanity, the U.K. Supreme Court has ruled that men who say they are ‘trans women’ are not women,” wrote leader of the Christian political movement David Kurten.

Leader of the Conservative Party – the opposition to the current Labour government – Kemi Badenoch welcomed the court’s ruling, writing that “saying ‘trans women are women’ was never true in fact and now isn’t true in law, either.”

 

Others lamented the fact that the debate even was taking place, let alone having gone to the Supreme Court.

“What a parody we live in,” commented Reform Party candidate Joseph Robertson.

Rupert Lowe MP – who has risen to new prominence in recent weeks for his outspoken condemnation of the immigration and rape gang crisis – wrote, “Absolute madness that we’re even debating what a woman is – it’s a biological fact. No amount of woke howling will ever change that.”

However, the Supreme Court did not wish to get pulled into siding with certain arguments, with Lord Hodge of the tribunal stating that “we counsel against reading this judgment as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another. It is not.”

The debate has taken center stage in the U.K. in recent years, not least for the role played by the current Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Starmer himself has become notorious throughout the nation for his contradictions and inability to answer the question of what a woman is, having flip-flopped on saying that a woman can have a penis, due to his support for the transgender movement.

At the time of going to press, neither Starmer nor his deputy Angela Rayner issued a statement about the Supreme Court ruling. There has been no statement issued from the Scottish government either, nor from the office of the first minister.

Transgender activists have expectedly condemned the ruling as “a disgusting attack on trans rights.” One leading transgender campaigner individual told Sky News, “I am gutted to see the judgement from the Supreme Court which ends 20 years of understanding that transgender people with a GRC are able to be, for all intents and purposes, legally recognized as our true genders.”

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

conflict

Trump call with Putin: ‘Not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace’

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Conservative Treehouse

Trump said his call with the Russian president was ‘good’ but cautioned against expecting an immediate ceasefire, as Russia ‘will have to respond’ to airfield strikes.

Cut through all the chaff and countermeasures deployed by the professional D.C. system intended to convolute and keep Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin at arm’s length, and you can see the outline of what we have discussed on these pages for several months.

There are geopolitical benefits to President Trump and President Putin having a strategic alignment. However, the elements against them are massive, entrenched, and highly Machiavellian.

President Trump shares the following message after a phone call with Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin:

 

… It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.…

As Ukraine officials huddle together with their co-dependent enablers in the U.S. Senate, the implied message from the second half of Trump’s statement is for the senators to stop messing with U.S. foreign policy because Putin can help solve the Iran problem.

Reprinted with permission from Conservative Treehouse.

Continue Reading

Crime

Exclusive Analysis: Chinese Couple Smuggled ‘Agroterrorism Weapon’ Fungus into U.S., Echoing Winnipeg Lab Ebola Espionage Case

Published on

Sam Cooper's avatar Sam Cooper

Potential Bioweapon Smuggling Across Borders: FBI Case Parallels Chinese Military Ties and Bio Espionage at Canada’s Top Lab

In a chilling insider threat case bearing striking similarities to China’s covert use of a married couple to develop an Ebola bioweapon and bat coronavirus research using Canada’s highest-security lab in Winnipeg, a Chinese researcher in Michigan and her boyfriend have been charged with smuggling a biological pathogen described as a potential “agroterrorism weapon” into the United States, according to federal charging documents unsealed Tuesday.

The FBI alleges that Yunqing Jian, a “loyal” Chinese Communist Party member and a 33-year-old postdoctoral researcher at the University of Michigan, and her boyfriend Zunyong Liu, 34, conspired to smuggle dangerous biological material, committed visa fraud, and made false statements to federal agents after U.S. border officials discovered samples of Fusarium graminearum hidden inside Liu’s backpack at Detroit Metropolitan Airport. The reddish plant material—identified as multiple strains of a fungus known to devastate cereal crops—was concealed in four plastic baggies, wrapped in tissues.

It was not the couple’s first illicit border crossing with biological materials. The case underscores a broader pattern: repeated clandestine transfers of biohazards across North American borders; visa fraud by Chinese students accessing elite laboratories; loyalty pledges to the Chinese Communist Party by researchers; and the strategic use of Chinese military-linked research grants—all elements shared with the notorious Winnipeg case.

At Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory, researchers Dr. Xiangguo Qiu and her husband, Keding Cheng, secretly collaborated for years with China’s top biowarfare institutions—including the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Academy of Military Medical Sciences. In 2019, Qiu and Cheng coordinated the unauthorized export of live Ebola and Henipah virus samples from Winnipeg to Wuhan. Canadian intelligence documents indicate that Keding Cheng pledged loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party, while Dr. Qiu was recruited as a key collaborator on the Wuhan lab’s bat filovirus project, which multiple Western intelligence agencies now assess resulted in an accidental lab leak that caused the COVID-19 pandemic.

The FBI’s newly unsealed agroterrorism case also details coordinated lab penetration involving facilities in Texas, Michigan, and Zhejiang University in China, dating back to at least 2022. In July 2024, Liu arrived in Detroit on a tourist visa while carrying several undeclared samples of the fungus, in violation of U.S. import restrictions, according to a sworn affidavit.

Since August 2022, Jian—evidently operating under Chinese Communist Party direction—had also worked at a university in Texas, where her research focused specifically on Fusarium graminearum. According to the FBI affidavit, her work at both the Texas institution and the University of Michigan was funded by the Chinese government. Files recovered from Jian’s phone included a signed “annual self-assessment form” dated January 2024 from Zhejiang University, in which she outlined her research accomplishments and affirmed her loyalty to the principles of the Chinese Communist Party.

“Electronic evidence also shows that Jian has been involved in smuggling packages of biological material into the United States on prior occasions,” the indictment alleges.

The allegation of Chinese funding and bonds of loyalty are critical to the case. Radio Free Asia has previously reported that many thousands of Chinese students studying abroad on government-backed scholarships are required to sign such forms as part of their continued funding.

The new U.S. indictment suggests a growing pattern of covert Chinese state-directed espionage activity targeting elite research facilities in North America, with espionage agents working under cover of academics and science—specifically involving romantic pairs who exploit Western institutions and scientific openness to traffic pathogens with dual-use potential.

U.S. Attorney Jerome Gorgan said in a statement: “The alleged actions of these Chinese nationals—including a loyal member of the Chinese Communist Party—are of the gravest national security concerns.”

“These two aliens have been charged with smuggling a fungus that has been described as a ‘potential agroterrorism weapon’ into the heartland of America, where they apparently intended to use a University of Michigan laboratory to further their scheme,” Gorgan added.

According to case filings, “Fusarium graminearum is responsible for billions of dollars in economic losses worldwide each year,” and “toxins produced by Fusarium graminearum cause vomiting, liver damage, and reproductive defects in livestock and humans.”

Agroterrorism is a form of hybrid warfare targeting a population’s food supply and economy. It involves the malicious use of plant or animal pathogens to cause devastating diseases and is closely related to biological and chemical warfare.

Liu and Jian had previously studied the pathogen as university students in China, according to the FBI. Since 2023, Jian had been working at the University of Michigan’s Molecular Plant-Microbe Interaction Laboratory, a facility focused on understanding the molecular biology of crop disease and plant immune responses.

Liu initially told U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers that he didn’t know what the materials were and suggested someone else must have planted them in his bag. But he quickly changed his story under FBI questioning.

“Liu stated that he intentionally hid the samples in his backpack because he knew there were restrictions on the importation of the materials,” the complaint says. “Liu confirmed that he had intentionally put the samples in a wad of tissues so CBP Officers would be less likely to find and confiscate them, and he could continue his research in the United States.”

Court filings show that Liu intended to deliver the samples to Jian’s lab and assist in cloning and culturing the fungus, should earlier experiments fail. Investigators say the couple coordinated in advance and had previously communicated about biological sample transfers.

When investigators spoke to Jian, she denied knowing anything about Liu’s smuggling or plans to research the pathogen.

But an examination of Liu’s and Jian’s electronic devices uncovered WeChat messages from 2022 in which they discussed smuggling seeds into the United States.

“I put them in my Martin boots,” Liu wrote, according to the complaint. “In a small bag. The ziplock bag. Very small.”

“That’s good,” Jian replied, the complaint says. “Just put it in your shoes.”

Liu’s attempt to bring fungal samples into the United States on a tourist visa, without the necessary permits, mirrors the unauthorized transfer of sensitive materials by Dr. Xiangguo Qiu and her husband Keding Cheng, who orchestrated the shipment of live Ebola and Henipah virus samples from Canada’s high-security lab to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2019. Documents from Canadian investigations indicated the couple and their students also smuggled biological materials from China into Canada for use in the Winnipeg lab.

Both incidents highlight a reckless disregard for biosecurity protocols and the coordinated use of Chinese students to infiltrate North American labs through visa fraud—bringing materials from China into research institutions and illegally conducting work on the samples using taxpayer-funded facilities to advance China’s scientific and strategic interests. As a Cold War-style scenario between Washington and Beijing heats up, and American military officials warn of China’s “imminent” threat to invade U.S. ally Taiwan, these actions also raise chilling questions about Beijing’s military-aligned objectives for this research.

In the case of the PLA penetration of Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, investigations showed that in 2019, Qiu and Cheng coordinated the unauthorized shipment of live Ebola and Henipah virus samples from the Winnipeg lab to Wuhan, while conducting joint studies with an elite network of bioweapon researchers directly tied to PLA Major-General Chen Wei. CSIS investigations later confirmed Qiu was recruited into the Thousand Talents Plan.

As The Bureau has reported, in August 2018, CSIS warned senior federal health officials of insider threat risks related to Qiu and Cheng. Despite the warning, the couple maintained access to Canada’s most sensitive virology materials for months. Qiu’s collaboration with PLA military scientists on Ebola engineering and bat coronavirus projects was documented in co-authored papers and grant applications and award nominations.

As early as 2013, Keding Cheng filled out an application for the PRC’s “Science and Technology Innovation Talent Program,” requiring applicants to “passionately love the socialist motherland” and maintain Chinese citizenship.

By 2016, Dr. Qiu was nominated for an award by a senior military official from the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences, recognizing her collaborations with Major-General Chen Wei, a leading figure in China’s biological weapons research. CSIS investigations revealed that Dr. Qiu and Major-General Chen collaborated on multiple research projects dating back to 2012.

Dr. Qiu’s use of Canada’s facilities to benefit China was well recognized in Beijing. An award nomination for Dr. Qiu noted that she “used Canada’s Level 4 Biosecurity Laboratory as a base to assist China to improve its capability to fight highly pathogenic pathogens … and achieved brilliant results.”

But in the Canadian case, for unknown reasons, the Chinese couple was allowed to return to China while under RCMP national security investigation.

The Michigan case charges come as the Trump administration is moving to tighten restrictions on Chinese access to U.S. research institutions. “We are looking to revoke visas for Chinese students, especially those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said last week. The Biden-era pause on such restrictions was formally reversed under President Trump’s new executive order in May.

The Bureau is a reader-supported publication.

To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Invite your friends and earn rewards

If you enjoy The Bureau, share it with your friends and earn rewards when they subscribe.

Invite Friends

Continue Reading

Trending

X