Connect with us

Censorship Industrial Complex

Tucker Carlson: Longtime source says porn sites controlled by intelligence agencies for blackmail

Published

6 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Emily Mangiaracina

Journalist Glenn Greenwald replied with a story about how U.S. Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson changed his tune on a dime about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows the government to spy on American communications without a warrant. The journalist made the caveat that he is not assuming blackmail was responsible for Johnsonā€™s behavior.

Tucker Carlson shared during an interview released Wednesday that aĀ ā€œlongtime intel officialā€ told him that intelligence agencies control the ā€œbig pornography sitesā€ for blackmail purposes.

Carlson added that he thinks dating websites are controlled as well, presumably referring at least to casual ā€œhook-upā€ sites like Tinder, where conversations are often explicitly sexual.

ā€œOnce you realize that, once you realize that the most embarrassing details of your personal life are known by people who want to control you, then youā€™re controlled,ā€ Carlson said.

He went on to suggest that this type of blackmail may explain some of the strange, inconsistent behavior of well-known figures, ā€œparticularlyā€ members of Congress.

ā€œWe all imagine that itā€™s just donorsā€ influencing their behavior, Carlson said. ā€œI think itā€™s more than donors. Iā€™ve seen politicians turn down donors before.ā€

Journalist Glenn Greenwald replied with a story about how U.S. Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson changed his tune on a dime about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows the government to spy on American communications without a warrant. The journalist made the caveat that he is not assuming blackmail was responsible for Johnsonā€™s behavior.

Greenwald told how he had seen Johnson grill FBI Director Christopher Wray about his agencyā€™s spying and ā€œcould just tell that he felt passionately about (this),ā€ prompting Greenwald to invite Johnson on his show, before anyone had any idea he might become Speaker of the House.

ā€œOne of the things we spent the most time on was (the need for) FISA reform,ā€ Greenwald told Carlson, noting that the expiration of the current iteration of the FISA law was soon approaching. He added that Johnson was ā€œdeterminedā€ to help reform FISA and that it was in fact ā€œhis big issue,ā€ the very reason he was on Greenwaldā€™s show to begin with.

Johnson became House Speaker about two months to three months later, and Greenwald was excited about the FISA reform he thought Johnson would surely help bring about.

ā€œNot only did Mike Johnson say, ā€˜Iā€™m going to allow the FISA renewal to come to the floor with no reforms.ā€™ He himself said, ā€˜It is urgent that we renew FISA without reforms. This is a crucial tool for our intelligence agencies,ā€™ā€ Greenwald reounted.

He noted that Johnson was already getting access to classified information while in Congress, wondering at Johnsonā€™s explanation for his behavior at the time, which was that he was made aware of highly classified information that illuminated the importance of renewing FISA and the spying capabilities it grants, as is.

Greenwald doesnā€™t believe one meeting is enough to change the mind of someone who is as invested in a position as Johnson was on FISA reform.

ā€œI can see someone really dumb being affected by that ā€¦ heā€™s a very smart guy. I donā€™t believe he changed his mind. So the question is, why did he?ā€ Greenwald asked.

ā€œI donā€™t know. I really donā€™t. But I know that the person that was on my show two months ago no longer exists.ā€

Theoretically, there are many ways an intelligence agency could coerce a politician or other person of influence into certain behaviors, including personal threats, threats to family, and committing outright acts of aggression against a person.

A former CIA agent hasĀ testifiedĀ during an interview with Candace Owens that his former employer used the latter tactic against him and his family, indirectly through chemicals that made them sick, when he blew the whistle on certain unethical actions the CIA had committed.

ā€œThis is why you never hear about CIA whistleblowers. They have a perfected system of career destruction if you talk about anything you see that is criminal or illegal,ā€ former CIA officer Kevin Shipp said.

As a form of coercion, sexual blackmail in particular is nothing new, although porn sites make the possibility much easier. In herĀ bookĀ ā€œOne Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime That Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein,ā€ investigative journalist Whitney Webb discusses not only how the intelligence community uses sexual blackmail through people like Jeffrey Epstein but how it was used by organized crime before U.S. intelligence even existed.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Censorship Industrial Complex

They knew it was a lab leak all along

Published on

MXM logo MxM News

Newly Revealed Documents Confirm Lab Leak Coverup

Quick Hit:

The global debate over COVID-19ā€™s origins has taken a dramatic turn after newly uncovered reports indicate that intelligence agencies in Germany had determined with near certainty that the virus originated in a Chinese lab as early as 2020. Despite this revelation, German Chancellor Angela Merkel reportedly chose to suppress the findings, aligning with a broader pattern of obfuscation by Western governments and media outlets.

Key Details:

  • German newspapers Zeit and SĆ¼ddeutsche Zeitung reported that Germanyā€™s intelligence agency, the BND, concluded in early 2020 with 80% to 95% certainty that COVID-19 leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China.

  • The intelligence was based on a combination of public-domain research and classified investigations under the code name “Saaremaa.”

  • Merkelā€™s administration allegedly buried the findings, with her successor Olaf Scholz continuing the suppression, ensuring the information remained hidden from the public until now.

Diving Deeper:

Journalist Alex Berenson detailed the shocking revelations in hisĀ Substack op-ed, underscoring how “the American media is doing its best to ignore the biggest news this week.” Berenson criticized legacy media outlets for fixating on the five-year anniversary of COVID-19 while sidestepping the implications of newly surfaced intelligence.

According to Berenson, German intelligence reached its high-confidence conclusion after analyzing public materials and conducting covert operations. “The materialā€¦ indicated that there had been some risky research methods used there [at the Wuhan Institute of Virology], compounded by breaches of laboratory safety rulesā€¦ [and] so-called gain-of-function experiments, in which viruses occurring in nature are manipulated [to become more dangerous or transmissible],” he wrote.

Rather than alert the world to the evidence, Merkel chose to suppress it. Berenson sarcastically noted, “Who immediately told the world of the findings and demanded a full investigation into what Chinaā€™s totalitarian government knew and when it knew it? Nah, Iā€™m funning you. Angela stuffed that report in a drawer and got back to doing what she did best, destroying Germanyā€™s industrial base to make Greta Thunberg happy.”

The refusal to disclose this intelligence aligns with a broader pattern of deception from both governmental and media institutions, which spent years dismissing the lab leak hypothesis as a conspiracy theory. Berenson noted that during early 2020, “Dr. Anthony S. Fauci and Peter Daszakā€¦ were gently steering their fellow scientists towards a conclusion that COVIDā€™s origins were 100 billion zillion percent natural.”

Even after Merkel left office in 2021, Scholzā€™s government continued to keep the intelligence under wraps. “The BND told her replacement, Olaf Scholz, ā€˜without the results finding their way to the publicā€™ ā€” as the British newspaper The Telegraph delicately put it,” Berenson wrote. Now that the findings have emerged, the German government has not denied the reports, leaving Berenson to conclude, “Thereā€™s about a 100 to 100 percent chance theyā€™re true.”

The final takeaway? “We all sorta knew this already, right? Both the lab leak and the coverup,” Berenson observed. “But thereā€™s knowing and thereā€™s knowing. And it looks like the same American news outlets that spent 2020 and 2021 lying (or, at best, being hopelessly credulous) about China and COVID still arenā€™t ready to come clean.”

As new evidence continues to surface, the question remains: Will legacy media and world leaders finally acknowledge the lab leak theory as fact, or will they continue to deflect responsibility and protect their preferred narratives?

Continue Reading

Censorship Industrial Complex

How America is interfering in Brazil and why that matters everywhere. An information drop about USAID

Published on

USAID Corruption & Brazil’s Elections w/ Nikolas Ferreira & Mike Benz | PBD Podcast

If you’re reading this you’re probably aware that there’s an information war going on.Ā  Not the battle between the corporate media vs the new independent journalists. That’s more of a technological and a new media story.Ā  The real battle isn’t only between the players, it’s between the information each side is sharing with their audiences.

The corporate world looks down on independent media.Ā  They use words like disinformation and misinformation and conspiracy.Ā  What they don’t do very often is examine the information being shared and present their own take. In fact, often they don’t share the information at all.

This leaves corporate media faithful in a disadvantaged position.Ā  They’re angry because they can’t understand why the world is changing (for the worse in their opinion).Ā  They won’t give up their corporate addiction because they’ve become intrenched in the belief the independent start ups are sharing misinformation, disinformation, and conspiracy theories.Ā  Because their corporate sources of information choose to ignore or criticize information without presenting a more informed and researched version themselves, their followers are completely missing out on many of the biggest stories that are shaping the century we’re struggling through.

This podcast is a perfect example.Ā  Chances are those who ignore independent media have no idea who Patrick Bet David is. That means they’re very unlikely to know anything about Mike Benz.Ā  Benz has been revealing secrets of the deep state for years.Ā  Recently he’s picked up massive audiences as he makes sense of what’s happening in America and around the world. (Especially with USAID)Ā  PBD also talks to Brazilian social media sensation Niklas Ferreira who has a perspective of politics in South America’s largest and most important nation unlike anything you’ll see in the corporate media.

This podcast is fascinating and it answers a lot of questions, not just about America and Brazil, but about the US deep state efforts to control political movements everywhere.

From the PBD Podcast

Patrick Bet-David sits down with Nikolas Ferreira and Mike Benz to dissect the deep connections between USAID, Brazilian corruption, and the political battle between Lula and Bolsonaro.

Ferreira, one of Brazilā€™s most outspoken conservative voices, exposes how foreign influence and NGOs may be shaping Brazilā€™s political landscape, while Benz, an expert in geopolitical strategy, unpacks the hidden power dynamics between Washington and Latin America.

Continue Reading

Trending

X