Connect with us

Media

Trudeau claims Canada must subsidize CBC to ‘protect our democracy’

Published

6 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Clare Marie Merkowsky

Trudeau failed to explain how the CBC could be an unbiased news source for Canadians when it is being funded by the Liberal party.

 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau claims that Canada must continue to subsidize mainstream media outlet CBC to “protect our democracy.”

During the January 31 question period in the House of Commons, Trudeau promised continued funding for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), Canada’s public radio and television broadcaster, arguing that the state-funded outlet is necessary for Canada’s democracy.  

“At a time of misinformation and disinformation, and the transformation of our media and digital era, we need CBC/Radio Canada to be strong to protect our culture, to protect our democracy, and to tell our stories from one end of the country to another,” Trudeau said.  

“We’ll always be here to defend CBC/Radio Canada, and we are going to seek to make necessary investments … to fulfill their mandate to inform and to strengthen democracy here in Canada,” he continued.  

Trudeau’s statement was in response to a request from Quebec Member of Parliament Martin Champoux (BQ-Drummond) for increased government funding for the Quebec division of CBC, Radio Canada. 

Trudeau pointed out that the Liberal government is already massively subsidizing the mainstream media. 

Ironically, Trudeau celebrated Bill C-18, the Online News Act, a law which mandates that Big Tech companies pay to publish Canadian content on their platforms.    

“This is why we put forth [Bill] C-18 which will help our journalists at all levels to continue operating,” Trudeau stated. “We’ll be here to support a free and independent press. That is professional. We know there’s a lot of work to be done still.” 

However, thanks to his law, Canadians can no longer view or share news on Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, which blocked all access to news content in Canada rather than pay the fees outlined in the new legislation. Google, on the other hand,  agreed to pay Canadian legacy media $100 million. 

Additionally, Trudeau failed to explain how CBC could be an unbiased news source for Canadians when it is being funded by the Liberal party.  

Indeed, many Canadians have pointed out that the massive subsidies have made the CBC into a wing of the Liberal party.  

In April, Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre labeled the CBC a “biased propaganda arm of the Liberal Party and frankly negatively affects all media.” 

“For example, Canadian Press is negatively affected by the fact that you have to report favourably on the CBC if you want to keep your number one, taxpayer-funded client happy,” he said. 

“We need a neutral and free media, not a propaganda arm for the Liberal Party… When I am prime minister, we are going to have a free press where every day Canadians decide what they think rather than having Liberal propaganda jammed down their throats.” 

Poilievre added that if he becomes prime minister he will cut “corporate welfare,” including money to the CBC.

Despite being nominally unaffiliated with either political party in Canada, CBC takes in about $1.24 billion in public funding every year. This is roughly 70 percent of its operating budget.  

That subsidies are the CBC’s largest single source of income has become a point of contention among taxpayers who see the propping up of the outlet as unnecessary.  

Furthermore, the CBC was set to receive increased funding thanks to the deal with Google that followed the passing of Trudeau’s Online News Act. 

The deal was finalized in early December. Under the new agreement, Google will pay legacy media outlets $100 million to publish links to their content on both the Google search engine and YouTube.  

As a result of the government handouts and the Google agreement, roughly half the salary of a CBC journalist earning $85,000 is estimated to be paid by the combined contributions of the Trudeau government and Google.  

Additionally, Trudeau recently announced increased payouts for legacy media outlets ahead of the 2025 election. The subsidies are expected to cost taxpayers $129 million over the next five years.  

However, even these massive payouts may be insufficient to keep the CBC relevant amid growing public distrust in mainstream media.  

According to a recent study by Canada’s Public Health Agency, less than a third of Canadians displayed “high trust” in the federal government, with “large media organizations” as well as celebrities getting even lower scores.  

Large mainstream media outlets and “journalists” working for them scored a “high trust” rating of only 18 percent. This was followed by only 12 percent of people saying they trusted “ordinary people,” with celebrities receiving only an eight percent “trust” rating.  

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Business

Taxpayers launching court fight against CBC transparency

Published on

By Devin Drover

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation is taking the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation to court to force the broadcaster to provide transparency regarding the money it spends on advertising.

“Canadians have a right to know how their tax dollars are being spent, but the CBC wants to keep taxpayers in the dark,” said Devin Drover, CTF General Counsel. “That’s why we are going to court to compel the CBC to be transparent and release financial information that taxpayers have the right to see.”

The legal challenge stems from an access-to-information request filed by Ryan Thorpe, the CTF’s investigative journalist, who has submitted dozens of requests to provide transparency about spending at the CBC. His work includes breaking the story about CBC executives receiving millions in bonuses.

Thorpe requested records detailing how much the CBC has spent on advertising over the past five years. The broadcaster has refused to release the information despite receiving $1.4 billion from taxpayers last year.

The CTF has now filed a legal challenge in Federal Court to force the disclosure of these records. A copy of the notice of application is available here.

Meanwhile, the Trudeau government has announced recommendations to nearly double taxpayer funding for the CBC and shield budget reporting from public scrutiny.

“It’s bad enough that the CBC takes more than a billion dollars from taxpayers and the government wants to raise that number, but it’s even worse that the CBC won’t respect taxpayers’ right to know how the money’s being spent,” said Kris Sims, CTF Alberta Director. “Now Canadians can add ‘refusing to be accountable’ to the list of reasons to defund the CBC.”

Continue Reading

Business

Trump to Counter Foreign Social Media Censorship Demands and Defend Free Speech Online

Published on

logo
President Donald Trump has signed a new directive aimed at protecting American businesses from what his administration describes as “overseas extortion.” The directive renews efforts to challenge digital services taxes (DSTs) imposed by foreign governments, which the administration argues unfairly target American companies operating internationally and promote online censorship.
“President Trump will not allow foreign governments to appropriate America’s tax base for their own benefit,” the White House stated, underscoring its commitment to defending US economic interests.
The memorandum directs the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to reopen investigations into DSTs under Section 301, revisiting cases first launched during President Trump’s first term.
Additionally, it calls for scrutiny of other nations implementing DSTs that allegedly discriminate against American companies.
The administration also plans to evaluate European Union and United Kingdom policies that could push US businesses toward practices that, according to the memorandum, undermine free speech or contribute to censorship.
Key regulations under review include the European Union’s Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act, which dictate how American firms interact with consumers in the region. The White House has signaled potential countermeasures, including tariffs if these regulations are deemed harmful to US business interests.
The memorandum asserts that foreign governments have imposed DSTs as a way to extract revenue from successful American firms rather than fostering economic growth within their own countries. “America’s economy will not be a source of revenue for countries that have failed to cultivate economic success of their own,” the administration declared.
The White House estimates that billions of dollars could be siphoned from US companies annually through these taxes, further arguing that such financial burdens stifle American innovation and reduce global economic competitiveness.
The directive highlights the United States’ digital economy, which has outpaced the total GDP of several developed nations, including Australia and Canada.
The administration attributes this dominance to American technology companies and the entrepreneurial spirit that fuels them.
Continue Reading

Trending

X