Crime
Trafficking victim advocate analyzes testimony of reported survivor of elite abuse network
From LifeSiteNews
In an exclusive interview with LifeSite’s John Henry-Westen, human trafficking victim advocate Liz Yore discussed the new allegations made by Anneke Lucas on an episode of the PBD Podcast about being ritually abused by elites.
In an exclusive interview with LifeSite’s John Henry-Westen, human trafficking victim advocate Liz Yore discussed the new allegations made by Anneke Lucas on an episode of the PBD Podcast about being ritually abused by the late Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau and banker David Rockefeller. Yore analyzed the credibility of Lucas’ claims, the massive pedophile network the latter was allegedly forced into, why sex trafficking victims are hesitant to come forward, pornography being used as manipulation against politicians, and more.
Westen asked Yore if she believed these stunning allegations were credible. Yore said she found her allegations to be “very credible.”
“Obviously, her allegations are startling, shocking because their names are known worldwide. But I also read her book, and I found that with great specificity, with great, you know, tenderness, she really did lay out [how] at the age of five, she was sold into sex slavery by her mentally ill mother,” she said.
The global pedophile network
Yore then dove into the high-level global pedophile network Lucas was allegedly forced into.
“It started in Belgium; she’s a Belgium woman. But when she in the Belgian network would meet at high level castles, mansions, property estates, where these prime ministers, ministers of defense, as she calls them,” Yore said.
“These are people that, as a child, she didn’t know who they were, but she knew that they were powerful people. And they had systematically sexually abused these children. They are, frankly, I mean, she calls them herself sadistic, Satanists, murderers. Many of them, you know, have been involved in Freemasonry… This network has been quietly impenetrable for many, many years,” she added.
Why victims don’t come forward for decades
Yore then suggested that since the Jeffrey Epstein case, people across the globe have become far less cynical of sex trafficking allegations made against powerful people.
“We now know that these networks are operating for the purposes of blackmail, for power, and at the highest levels of business in government,” Yore said.
A bit later, she added that she believes these allegations are only “the tip of the iceberg” and that it’s understandable why Lucas and other abuse victims are so hesitant to come forward against Trudeau Sr., Epstein, and other elites.
“[B]ecause these people are so powerful, it’s understandable why for 20, 30 years, she’s been afraid to name these names. And, of course, victims of traumatic sexual abuse have enormous obstacles to overcome. They have been demeaned, abused, undermined… They’ve been abused by powerful people who would believe a child next to a powerful prime minister,” Yore said.
“Many children who had been abused by priests, pastors, bishops would say, ‘It’s my word against a priest, my parents adore this priest, they’re not going to believe me.’ So, children have a high level of fear about coming forward,” she added.
Manipulation of powerful people
Later in the interview, Westen from Tucker Carlson’s recent podcast with Glenn Greenwald, in which the pair discussed porn sites being controlled by intel agencies to blackmail politicians and asked Yore if she believes this is true.
“Well, we know that that was the motivation, [as] said by many of the victims in the Epstein case… When you can blackmail them, you can control them, and you can force them into your own new world agenda, your elite agenda. And so that’s why, for example, she [Lucas] said that she would report back to David Rockefeller, as you said, the various preferences of these prominent people,” Yore said.
Watch the full interview for more analysis from Liz Yore.
Related
Alberta
Integrated Border Enforcement Team makes 189 kg cocaine bust at Coutts port of entry
News release from Alberta RCMP
Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) officers, working with the Integrated Border Enforcement Team (IBET) in Alberta, a joint force operation between the RCMP Federal Policing Northwest Region, CBSA and Calgary Police Service, seized 189 kg of cocaine following a secondary examination of a commercial truck seeking entry at the Coutts port of entry on Nov. 13, 2024. The drugs have an approximate wholesale value of $2 million.
“The safety and security of Canadians is the RCMP Federal Policing Northwest Region’s top priority. With the support of various law enforcement agencies, we’ve successfully prevented harmful drugs from entering Canada and harming our communities.
- Supt. Sean Boser, Officer in Charge of Federal Serious Organized Crime and Border Integrity – Alberta, RCMP Federal Policing Northwest Region
“I want to commend our CBSA officers who prevent illegal narcotics from breaching our borders and disrupt crime networks. In cooperation with our law enforcement partners, the RCMP and the Calgary Police Service, this significant seizure serves as another example of how Canada’s borders are being secured and drugs are kept off our streets.”
- Ben Tame, Director, Southern Alberta and Southern Saskatchewan District, Canada Border Services Agency
“Our efforts to combat drug trafficking rely heavily on working closely with our partner law enforcement agencies, including the CBSA and RCMP. This is a significant seizure that undoubtedly had the potential to cause serious damage to our community.”
- Supt. Jeff Bell, Criminal Operations & Intelligence Division, Calgary Police Service
IBET’s mandate is to enhance border integrity and security along the shared border, between designated ports of entry, by identifying, investigating and interdicting persons, organizations and goods that are involved in criminal activities.
All partners are engaged in the ongoing criminal investigation.
Crime
Biden’s ‘preemptive pardons’ would set ‘dangerous’ precedent, constitutional scholar warns
From LifeSiteNews
By Bob Unruh
Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley warned that preemptive pardons ‘would do precisely what Biden suggests that he is deterring: create a dangerous immunity for presidents and their allies in committing criminal abuses.’
An expert who not only has testified before Congress on the U.S. Constitution but has represented members in court cases is warning about Joe Biden’s speculated agenda to deliver to his friend and supporters preemptive pardons.
It is Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and author of The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage, who wrote, “After years of lying to the American people about the influence-peddling scandal and promising not to consider a pardon for his son, Biden would end his legacy with the ultimate dishonesty: converting pardons into virtual party favors.”
There has been much speculation about those preemptive pardons from Biden, who lied about allowing juries and courts to determine the outcomes of son Hunter’s criminal gun and tax cases, flip-flopped and pardoned him.
Hunter Biden could have been ordered to jail for years for his felony gun convictions and his guilty pleas to felony tax charges.
However, Joe Biden handed him a get-out-of-jail free card, then followed up with hundreds and hundreds more commutations and pardons to a long list of those with criminal convictions.
The activity triggered a rash of speculation about those preemptive pardons, and Turley explains what’s going on.
“Democrats are worried about the collapsing narrative that President-elect Donald Trump will destroy democracy, end future elections, and conduct sweeping arrests of everyone from journalists to homosexuals. That narrative, of course, ignores that we have a constitutional system of overlapping protections that has blocked such abuses for over two centuries.”
Thus, the talk of preemptive pardons, but Turley said it wouldn’t work out.
“Ironically, preemptive pardons would do precisely what Biden suggests that he is deterring: create a dangerous immunity for presidents and their allies in committing criminal abuses,” he said.
He noted if Biden delivers those pardons, “he would fundamentally change the use of presidential pardons by granting ‘prospective’ or ‘preemptive’ pardons to political allies. Despite repeated denials of President-elect Donald Trump that he is seeking retaliation against opponents and his statements that he wants ‘success [to be] my revenge,’ Democratic politicians and pundits have called for up to thousands of such pardons.”
He explained there’s politics all over the scheme.
“After many liberals predicted the imminent collapse of democracy and that opponents would be rounded up in mass by the Trump Administration, they are now contemplating the nightmare that democracy might survive and that there will be no mass arrests,” he wrote. “The next best thing to a convenient collapse of democracy is a claim that Biden’s series of preemptive pardons averted it. It is enough to preserve the narrative in the face of a stable constitutional system.”
But there will be a cost to such a “political stunt,” he said.
“Preemptive pardons could become the norm as presidents pardon whole categories of allies and even themselves to foreclose federal prosecutions. … It will give presidents cover to wipe away any threat of prosecution for friends, donors, and associates. This can include self-pardons issued as implied condemnations of their political opponents. It could easily become the final act of every president to pardon himself and all of the members of his Administration.
“We would then have an effective immunity rule for outgoing parties in American politics.”
He noted that in the past, Bill Clinton pardoned both family members and political donors.
“Yet, despite that history, no president has seen fit to go as far as where Biden appears to be heading,” he said. Promoters of the plan, he said, “would prefer to fundamentally change the use of the pardon power to maintain an apocalyptic narrative that was clearly rejected by the public in this election. If you cannot prove the existence of the widely touted Trump enemies list, a Biden pardon list is the next best thing.”
Reprinted with permission from the WND News Center.
-
Health24 hours ago
Trump doubles down on using RFK Jr. to study possible link between vaccines and autism
-
Crime23 hours ago
Biden’s ‘preemptive pardons’ would set ‘dangerous’ precedent, constitutional scholar warns
-
Business1 day ago
Out-Trumping Trump: A Mission Without a Win
-
Business1 day ago
Canada needs to get serious about securing its border
-
Business1 day ago
Canadians face massive uncertainly and turbulence in 2025
-
armed forces2 days ago
Canadian military deployed ‘gender advisors’ to Ukraine, Haiti at taxpayers’ expense
-
International2 days ago
Globalist elites are trying to ‘protect democracy’ by eliminating right leaning competition
-
Opinion1 day ago
How Christianity Remade the World