Connect with us

National

Taxpayers Federation joins constitutional court fight regarding equalization expansion

Published

2 minute read

From the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

Author: Carson Binda 

“Provincial governments want the courts to force Ottawa to give them even more money through the equalization program”

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation is joining the fight against Newfoundland and Labradors’ legal bid to increase federal equalization payments.

“Provincial governments want the courts to force Ottawa to give them even more money through the equalization program and taxpayers simply can’t afford to pay those bills,” said Carson Binda, B.C. Director for the CTF. “Taxpayers in so-called have provinces lose billions through the equalization program, but the payments don’t provide any long-term solutions in recipient provinces.

“The Canadian Taxpayers Federation is getting into this court fight to stop provinces from wasting even more taxpayers’ money on the equalization program.”

The Newfoundland and Labrador government is suing the federal government for more equalization money. Premier Andrew Furey is arguing a province should receive more tax dollars when it can’t afford to pay for new programs that other provinces implement.

“Taxpayers in the rest of Canada shouldn’t be on the hook for whatever new spending provincial politicians want to roll out,” Binda said. “Equalization already costs $25 billion a year – how much would the bill go up if Furey gets his way?”

The CTF filed an application to intervene in the Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court on Oct. 3, 2024. The CTF will argue that the Constitution does not give provinces standing to sue Ottawa for bigger equalization payments.

“Canada’s Constitution was never designed to grant provincial governments the authority to forcibly extract more tax dollars from taxpayers in other provinces,” said Devin Drover, CTF General Counsel and Atlantic Director. “We look forward to representing taxpayers in the court in this groundbreaking case.”

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Artificial Intelligence

AI is another reason why Canada needs to boost the energy supply

Published on

From Resource Works

Massive energy levels are required to keep up with AI innovations, and Canada risks being unable to do that

Artificial Intelligence is already one of the most important technologies of our time, and its development has been pushing innovation at a breakneck pace across huge swathes of the economy. Smart assistants now operate, albeit in a limited fashion, as secretaries for those who need help in the office, while autonomous vehicle capabilities keep improving.

It is a remarkable and world-changing time.

Just as one plays a video game, turns on a light, or starts up their car, AI requires energy. To say that AI’s appetite for energy is ravenous is an understatement, and Canadian governments must understand the challenge that comes with that.

Energy shortages are a growing threat to Canada’s economic security and, yes, our standard of living. Failure to keep up with demand means importing more energy at a cost, or facing energy blackouts, in which case Canada will fall behind in far more than just AI.

New AI models are seemingly rolling out every month, especially in machine learning and generative AI. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Bard require huge levels of computing power to work. To train ChatGPT-4, an advanced language model, consumes thousands of megawatt hours of electricity, not incomparable to the energy usage of urban centres.

A single query made to ChatGPT requires ten times the energy of making a search on Google, revealing the massive needs of AI technology. AI is not just another internet search extension or downloadable app, it is an entirely new industry.

AI models are trained and run in data centers, which are central to this energy dilemma. The sheer power consumption in data centers is ballooning, and some estimates warn that the world’s data center energy demand will surge by 160 percent by 2030.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) has reported that AI and data centers already consume 1 to 2 percent of global electricity, a figure expected only to climb as more companies embrace AI-driven technology. As much as AI is driving digital innovation, it is also consuming electricity at a rate we will have to match.

Canada’s energy security is being seriously challenged by rising demand, with or without AI. Historically, Canadians have enjoyed the fruits of abundant, cheap energy generated by hydroelectricity in BC and Quebec, or nuclear power in Ontario. Times, and weather, have unfortunately changed.

A large and growing population, electrifying economies, and the weakening of Canada’s legacy energy sources are pushing the country to its limits regarding power supply.

The current federal government wants Canada to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, which means that electricity is going to have to double in the next 25 years. Canada is already dealing with electricity shortages, such as in British Columbia, where demand for hydroelectricity is expected to rise 15 percent over the next six years. Manitoba is projecting a shortfall by 2029, while Ontario races to put up new nuclear power plants to avert an energy crisis by 2029 as well.

AI can help Canadians craft solutions to its incoming energy problems as a valuable research aid that can help with modeling and processing data. However, that will mean more energy consumption as part of the rogue wave of energy consumption that AI innovation has created.

As evidenced by the constant developments in AI, it is obvious that the technology is going nowhere, and neither are Canada’s energy shortfalls.

If AI is going to contribute to the surge in energy demand, then it only makes sense that it becomes a vital tool in the search for solutions, and we need those solutions now.

Continue Reading

Crime

Conservative MP appeals to Canadians to support bill protecting churches from arson

Published on

St. Gabriel Catholic Mission in northern Alberta was burned to the ground

Jamil Jivani called church burnings an attack on religious freedom and said Bill C 4-11 would increase the penalty for crimes of arson by adding the targeting of churches as an aggravating factor in sentencing for these acts of destruction.

A Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) MP urged support from his political opponents for a bill that would give stiffer penalties to arsonists caught burning churches down.

“This is a very serious issue. It is not just an attack on churches as buildings, it’s an attack on communities, on families and an attack on religious freedom in Canada,” CPC MP Jamil Jivani said in an X video post on October 2.

“We need to see action, we need the other political parties to realize that this is a serious problem. We need support behind Bill C -411, and we need to do more to protect churches in Canada.”

In the span of less than one week, as reported by LifeSiteNews, two more Christian churches were reduced to ash piles, one Catholic and the other Anglican.

Jivani called out the fires as attacks on freedom, saying the “pattern of destruction that we have observed of church after church after church being burned to the ground in Canada” must stop.

“Why isn’t the government doing anything about this problem?” he asked. “Well, let me tell you, conservatives have put forward legislation on this issue. Bill C 4-11 would increase the penalty for crimes of arson against churches by adding the targeting of churches as an aggravating factor in sentencing for arson crimes.”

Jivani observed that Conservatives have not seen “other political parties support this Bill C-411.”

“The Liberals, the NDP, the Bloc, all of them continue to be silent on this problem. This pattern of destruction we have not seen the other political party support our legislation, Bill C-411, and they’re not even offering their own legislation,” he said.

“We need support behind Bill C-411, and we need to do more to protect churches in Canada.”

The law, if passed, would create specific criminal offenses for setting fires to churches and for starting wildfires.

Under the new legislation, arson that directly target churches or other places of worship would be punishable by “imprisonment for a term of not more than 14 years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of five years” for the first offense.

“For each subsequent offence, imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment for a term of seven years,” the legislation stated.

The legislation also outlines consequences for starting wildfires of fines up to $250,000 and life imprisonment.

Since the spring of 2021, 112 churches, most of them Catholic, have been burned to the ground, vandalized or defiled in Canada.

The church burnings started after the mainstream media and the federal government ran with inflammatory and dubious claims that hundreds of children were buried and disregarded by Catholic priests and nuns who ran some of the now-closed residential schools in Canada.

LifeSiteNews reported last week that Leah Gazan, backbencher MP from the socialist New Democratic Party (NDP), brought forth a bill that seeks to criminalize the denial of the unproven claim that the residential school system once operating in Canada was a “genocide.”

As reported by LifeSiteNews in August, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s cabinet said it will expand a multimillion-dollar fund geared toward documenting thus far unfounded claims that hundreds of young children died and were clandestinely buried at the residential schools.

Canada’s Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations confirmed it spent millions searching for “unmarked graves” at a residential school but turned up no human remains.

Canadian indigenous residential schools were run by the Catholic Church and other Christian churches but were mandated and set up by the federal government. They were open from the late 19th century until the last school closed in 1996.

While there were indeed some Catholics who committed serious abuses against native children, the unproved “mass graves” narrative has led to widespread anti-Catholic sentiment since 2021.

Continue Reading

Trending

X