Connect with us

News

Should Alberta Reconsider Its Plans For a Carbon Tax?

Published

3 minute read

By Todayville.com Staff

As of January 1st, 2017, a new Carbon Tax will go into effect in Alberta and increase the costs of heating our homes and businesses and the price of gas at the pumps.

This has sparked rallies across the province including one in Red Deer on November 5th, where hundreds showed up at City Hall Park to voice their opposition to a tax they feel won’t make much of a difference to the environment and only hurt the people of this province when it’s already struggling through tough economic times. Many would like to see the government hold a plebiscite on the issue but Premier Rachel Notley says Alberta needs to be a leader in the fight against climate change and reinvest in newer and greener technologies like wind, solar and hydro power, instead of carbon-based non-renewable energy initiatives.

With the election of Donald Trump as President-Elect in the U.S., it’s unlikely he would implement a similar kind of levy in the States, leaving Alberta as one of the few jurisdictions in the world striving to make a difference in that respect.

This is a concern according to the Red Deer Chamber of Commerce. Policy and Advocacy Manager Reg Warkentin wonders what kind of difference Alberta can make in the fight against climate change, when larger emitters such as the U.S., China and India are currently not on board.

Warkentin says there are significant costs involved to both implement the Carbon Levy and to continue to maintain it. He says with Alberta’s economy very much carbon-based including agriculture, many farmers and ranchers for example will see the cost of heating their greenhouses and barns go up, with the transportation industry to also be affected through the rising price of fuel.

Warkentin would like to see more corresponding tax cuts for people and businesses to help off-set the increased costs many will face in an already tough economic climate, such as what B.C. has done in that respect.

Warkentin is also concerned about the impact the Carbon Tax will have on municipalities like Red Deer, adding the City will either have to raise taxes, cut services or a mixture of both.

Although the new Carbon Levy may have a positive impact on the environment and everyone’s health eventually, Warkentin also wonders what the government will do with the revenue from this tax. “Will they use it to invest in greener technology? and if so, “Where does that leave everyone else?”

Take this week’s poll question

(Picture courtesy of the Red Deer Chamber of Commerce)

Follow Author

National

Liberals, NDP admit closed-door meetings took place in attempt to delay Canada’s next election

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

Pushing back the date would preserve the pensions of some of the MPs who could be voted out of office in October 2025.

Aides to the cabinet of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau confirmed that MPs from the Liberal and New Democratic Party (NDP) did indeed hold closed-door “briefings” to rewrite Canada’s elections laws so that they could push back the date of the next election.

The closed-door talks between the NDP and Liberals confirmed the aides included a revision that would guarantee some of its 28 MPs, including three of Trudeau’s cabinet members, would get a pension.

Allen Sutherland, who serves as the assistant cabinet secretary, testified before the House of Commons affairs committee that the changes to the Elections Act were discussed in the meetings.

“We attended a meeting where the substance of that proposal was discussed,” he said, adding that his “understanding is the briefing was primarily oral.”

According to Sutherland, as reported by Blacklock’s Reporter, it was only NDP and Liberal MPs who attended the secret meetings regarding changes to Canada’s Elections Act via Bill C-65, An Act to Amend the Canada Elections Act before the bill was introduced in March.

As reported by LifeSiteNews before, the Liberals were hoping to delay the 2025 federal election by a few days in what many see as a stunt to secure pensions for MPs who are projected to lose their seats. Approximately 80 MPs would qualify for pensions should they sit as MPs until at least October 27, 2025, which is the newly proposed election date. The election date is currently set for October 20, 2025.

Sutherland noted when asked by Conservative MP Luc Berthold that he recalled little from the meetings, but he did confirm he attended “two meetings of that kind.”

“Didn’t you find it unusual that a discussion about amending the Elections Act included only two political parties and excluded the others?” Berthold asked.

Sutherland responded, “It’s important to understand what my role was in those meetings which was simply to provide background information.”

“My role was to provide information,” replied Sutherland, who added he could not provide the exact dates of the meetings.

MPs must serve at least six years to qualify for a pension that pays $77,900 a year. Should an election be called today, many MPs would fall short of reaching the six years, hence Bill C-65 was introduced by the Liberals and NDP.

The Liberals have claimed that pushing back the next election date is not over pensions but due to “trying to observe religious holidays,” as noted by Liberal MP Mark Gerretsen.

“Conservatives voted against this bill,” Berthold said, as they are “confident of winning re-election. We don’t need this change.”

Trudeau’s popularity is at a all-time low, but he has refused to step down as PM, call an early election, or even step aside as Liberal Party leader.

As for the amendments to elections laws, they come after months of polling in favour of the Conservative Party under the leadership of Pierre Poilievre.

A recent poll found that 70 percent of Canadians believe the country is “broken” as Trudeau focuses on less critical issues. Similarly, in January, most Canadians reported that they are worse off financially since Trudeau took office.

Additionally, a January poll showed that 46 percent of Canadians expressed a desire for the federal election to take place sooner rather than the latest mandated date in the fall of 2025.

Continue Reading

International

Trump takes Arizona, completes swing state sweep

Published on

From The Center Square

By 

According to the Secretary of State’s office, Trump leads Harris by 184,935 in a 53%-46% split.

Former President Donald Trump was declared the winner Saturday night in Arizona, marking the final swing state for the Republican to collect in his landslide victory.

Arizona was the seventh and final swing state to be decided, securing Trump 312 Electoral College votes.

All but Coconino, Apache, Santa Cruz, and Pima counties favored Trump over Vice President Kamala Harris. Maricopa County, the source of dozens of electoral challenges including a partisan ballot review of the 2020 election, is currently favoring Trump by more than 78,000 votes. Trump lost the state to President Joe Biden in 2020 by little more than 10,000 votes.

According to the Secretary of State’s office, Trump leads Harris by 184,935 in a 53%-46% split.

Complete election results aren’t expected for at least another week, which is no different from previous cycles. Two-page ballots with dozens of judicial retention races and ballot propositions led to slower results in the days after polls closed. A new election integrity law enacted this year requiring polling stations to count envelopes before they can send off ballots added to the lag in results.

Both the Trump and Harris campaigns made Arizona a priority throughout the election cycle, either hosting rallies themselves or sending big-name surrogates.

Campaign volunteers descended on Maricopa County to join local activists who knocked on thousands of doors in the days before the election. Many residents complained about the barrage of phone calls, texts, emails, and flyers from numerous organizations.

Continue Reading

Trending

X