Business
‘Serious Problem’: America’s Cutting Edge Weaponry Is Dependent On Chinese Tech, Experts Warn

From the Daily Caller News Foundation
By Jake Smith
American defense startups are far too reliant on Chinese parts — and that poses a serious risk of exploitation by Beijing, experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
Business is booming as hundreds of defense startups have joined the growing U.S. military-industrial complex since 2021, according to The Wall Street Journal. But defense contractors are heavily dependent on China for parts for weapons systems, including motors, chips and rare earth minerals, which poses potential avenues for Beijing to exploit or hamper American technologies, experts told the DCNF.
“This is a serious problem for two reasons,” John Lee, senior defense expert at the Hudson Institute, told the DCNF. “First, as we saw during the pandemic, over-reliance on Chinese supply chains for components and inputs leaves countries and economies vulnerable to politically or policy-motivated restrictions being imposed by Beijing.”
“Second, components can have elements inserted into them without the knowledge of the end user. This could be spying equipment, channels for China to disable or damage the component from a distance, or even materials that can weaponize the component,” Lee said.
New defense contractors particularly rely on these parts because they don’t enjoy the same cash reserve that the industry giants do, and China makes and sells the parts for a cheaper price.
But these startups don’t want to be so reliant on China, given that the country is actively trying to undermine the U.S. and would likely be an adversary in a global war scenario, industry executives told the WSJ.
Decoupling from China-based entities proves difficult and expensive, defense startups told the WSJ, though it’s the only option in the long term.
“There’s a lot of lip-flapping about national security resilience manufacturing. But there’s no money for us to do this,” Scott Cololismo, CEO of defense startup LAND Energy, told the WSJ. LAND has some funding grants from the Pentagon, but needs more support to thrive, Colosimo explained.
The rare-earth minerals that China provides U.S. defense contractors — including neodymium, yttrium and samarium — are of particular value, given that they are essential for most high-tech military equipment, including laser and missile systems, jet engines, communications devices and even nuclear propulsion systems.
“Critical minerals are the building blocks for many of the most sensitive products in our defense industry,” Adam Savit, director of the China Policy Initiative at the America First Policy Initiative, told the DCNF. “China can abuse its dominant position in other critical mineral supply chains at any time.”
“The only long-term solution to this is to enact comprehensive permitting reform to approve domestic mining projects, and work with allied nations to develop new production when the U.S. lacks the relevant natural resources,” Savit said.
Savit’s warning that China can upset the supply chain of rare earth minerals also invokes a broader problem — China can cut the supply line for any of the parts needed by U.S. defense contractors, for any time or reason it chooses.
“If your supply chain runs dry, you have nothing to sell,” Ryan Beall, founder of drone manufacturer TILT Autonomy, told the WSJ.
‘It’s Alarming’: US-Funded Research Led To Over 1,000 Patents For China-Based Entitieshttps://t.co/tpr0NSD79X
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) August 30, 2024
Lee warned that the problem exposes the U.S. and West’s gaps in domestic supply chain capabilities for their respective defense industrial bases, which creates a vacuum that other actors like China find ways to exploit.
China supplies over 90% of the magnets used in motors for ships, missiles, satellites and drones, according to the WSJ. Republican Reps. Elise Stefanik and Rob Wittman sent a letter to an Air Force official last week and called the reliance on China “a serious national security threat,” pointing to an example in a report last year that found the Air Force increased its dependence on China for parts by 69%.
The idea to stop relying on China for resources became more popular after the COVID-19 pandemic, which created massive supply chain shortages in various sectors, including healthcare products. But in the defense capacity, it will take years to produce parts domestically, according to the WSJ.
“There has been a hollowing out of manufacturing and industrial capabilities in the West which provides China with an enormous advantage,” Lee told the DCNF. “In the event of a crisis against a country such as China, this will become very dangerous for the U.S. and its allies.”
Unable to wait for domestic capabilities to improve and increasingly wary of buying from China, new defense contractors are turning to other alternatives for parts, according to the WSJ. Sourcing components from Mexico and Southeast Asia, utilizing 3-D printing and buying parts in bulk have been some of the creative ways contractors are solving the problem.
Industry experts also expect that the U.S. government is likely to restrict some Chinese parts used by contractors in a bid to move toward domestic capabilities, according to the WSJ. Some restrictions on items used to produce cameras and radios already exist.
“If the government wants a U.S. supply chain, that’s fine, but they need to be clear about their requirements, and they need to pay for it,” Beall told the WSJ.
Featured Image: U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Aaron Lau
Business
Poll shows eight-in-10 Canadians oppose MP pay raise

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation released Leger polling showing 79 per cent of Canadians are against the upcoming member of Parliament pay raise on April 1.
“The poll results are crystal clear: the vast majority of Canadians don’t think MPs deserve a raise,” said Franco Terrazzano, CTF Federal Director. “It seems like the only Canadians who strongly support an MP pay raise are the politicians themselves.”
The Leger poll asked Canadians if they support or oppose the upcoming MP pay raise. Results of the poll show:
- 59 per cent strongly oppose
- 20 per cent somewhat oppose
- 10 per cent somewhat support
- 3 per cent strongly support
- 9 per cent unsure
Among those decided on the issue, 86 per cent of Canadians oppose the MP pay raise.
MPs give themselves pay raises each year on April 1, based on the average annual increase in union contracts with corporations that have 500 or more employees.
A backbench MP’s salary is currently $203,100. A minister collects $299,900, while the prime minister takes home a $406,200 annual salary.
The CTF estimates this year’s pay raise will amount to an extra $6,700 for backbench MPs, $9,800 for ministers and $13,400 for the prime minister, based on contract data published by the federal government.
After this year’s pay raise, backbench MPs will receive a $209,800 annual salary, according to CTF estimates. A minister will collect $309,700 and the prime minister will take home $419,600.
“Do MPs really want to pad their pockets with higher pay as they head into an election?” Terrazzano said. “After a pandemic, tax hikes, a cost-of-living crisis and now a painful tariff war, there’s no way MPs should be taking more money from their constituents.
“If politicians want to be true champions for taxpayers, they must push to stop this MP pay raise.”
The federal government stopped automatic MP pay raises from 2010 to 2013.
Business
Elon Musk says X targeted by “massive cyberattack” originating in Ukraine

MxM News
Quick Hit:
Elon Musk revealed Monday that X was the target of a “massive cyberattack,” with IP addresses linked to the Ukraine region. Musk noted the attack was highly coordinated and suggested it could involve a large group or a nation-state.
Key Details:
-
Speaking to Fox Business’ Larry Kudlow, Musk said, “We’re not exactly sure what happened, but there was a massive cyberattack to try to bring down the ecosystem with IP addresses originating in the Ukraine area.”
-
Earlier Monday, Musk posted about the attack on X, stating, “There was (still is) a massive cyberattack against X,” adding that the platform faces daily attacks but this one was particularly well-resourced.
-
Musk, who acquired X (formerly Twitter) for $44 billion in October 2022, has faced increasing pressure as his companies, including Tesla and SpaceX, deal with coordinated protests that he alleges are backed by left-wing billionaires like George Soros and Reid Hoffman.
Diving Deeper:
X suffered a significant cyberattack Monday, according to its owner Elon Musk. During an interview with Fox Business’ Larry Kudlow, Musk said that while the full details were unclear, the attack sought to “bring down the ecosystem” and had origins tied to the Ukraine region. He suggested the attack was well-funded and likely involved either a large, coordinated group or a nation-state.
Musk had earlier addressed the incident on X, stating that while the platform regularly faces cyber threats, this particular attack was on a different scale. “We get attacked every day, but this was done with a lot of resources,” he wrote, adding that efforts were underway to trace those responsible.
The timing of the cyberattack raises questions, as it comes amid widespread protests against Musk’s other ventures, particularly Tesla. Musk has accused high-profile Democrat donors, including George Soros and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, of financing the demonstrations. He has not provided direct evidence to support the claim, but the protests have coincided with an intensifying political battle over Musk’s influence in both the private sector and government.
Musk’s role in the Trump administration as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency has drawn praise from the president. Trump has credited Musk with spearheading efforts to reduce government waste and save taxpayers billions. Meanwhile, Musk’s companies, including SpaceX, hold lucrative contracts with the Department of Defense, making them frequent targets of scrutiny and opposition from political adversaries.
As X continues to investigate the cyberattack, the broader implications remain unclear. Whether a nation-state or an organized cybercriminal group was behind the attack could have significant ramifications, particularly given the geopolitical tensions surrounding Ukraine.
-
National2 days ago
Trudeau fills Canadian courts with Liberal-appointed judges before resigning as prime minister
-
Red Deer2 days ago
Historic Gift to Transform Cardiac Care in Central Alberta
-
Censorship Industrial Complex2 days ago
Misinformed: Hyped heat deaths and ignored cold deaths
-
Frontier Centre for Public Policy2 days ago
Canadians No Longer Trust Their Government. And For Good Reason
-
Banks2 days ago
“Trade-Based Money Laundering IS THE FENTANYL CRISIS”: Sources expose Chinese-Mexican-Canadian Crime Convergence
-
Crime2 days ago
Reporter Exposes The Left’s $20 Billion Climate Slush Fund
-
Addictions2 days ago
Fuelling addiction – The “safe supply” disaster
-
Business2 days ago
Next federal government has to unravel mess created by 10 years of Trudeau policies