illegal immigration
Reports: Islamic terrorist incidents increased under Biden
Havre Sector Border Patrol agent patrolling northern border on an ATV. The Havre Sector covers the U.S.-Canada border along most of Montana’s northern border, and includes part of Idaho and all of Wyoming, Colorado and Utah.
From The Center Square
By
Islamic terrorist incidents increased under President Joe Biden, according to several reports, as a majority of Americans polled say terrorism dangers increased under his watch.
“The number of Islamist terrorist incidents targeting the United States increased in 2024 after several years of reduced activity, with federal and state authorities arresting individuals in seven different incidents on charges related to five unsuccessful plots and two actual attacks,” an analysis published by the Anti-Defamation League states.
The analysis is not all inclusive. It excludes several incidents, including authorities stopping a 9/11-style terrorist attack plotted by a Lebanese man in Houston, and terrorist threats related to ISIS and Hamas posed by those in Canada, The Center Square first reported.
The ADL’s Center on Extremism claims to track Islamic-related terror incidents, reporting six in the U.S. between 2021 and 2023. It cites examples of authorities arresting those with links to Islamic terrorist organizations, for providing material support to terrorist groups, traveling overseas to join them, or plotting an attack against Americans.
In 2024, ADL identified seven Islamic-related terrorist incidents. Three of the most recent occurred in October – in Illinois, Arizona and Oklahoma.
On Oct. 26, authorities in Chicago arrested 22-year-old Sidi Mohammed Abdullahi after he shot a Jewish man on his way to synagogue, stayed at the scene and proceeded to shoot at responding officers and emergency personnel. Before he shot at police, he was reportedly recorded on video shouting “Allahu Akbar.” At a detention hearing last month, prosecutors said he’d identified several synagogues and Jewish schools to target.
Abdullahi illegally entered the country in March 2023 from Mauritania, West Africa. He was processed by Border Patrol agents in the U.S. Customs and Border Protection San Diego Sector and released into the country under the Biden administration’s “catch and release” policy. President-elect Donald Trump has vowed to end the policy on his first day in office. The policy, as well as multiple Biden administration-created parole programs, have been linked to illegal foreign nationals who committed violent crimes against Americans.
Had he not been released into the country, the shooting would not have occurred, critics argue.
On Oct. 18, in Peoria, Arizona, authorities arrested a 17-year-old male for allegedly plotting an ISIS-inspired attack against Phoenix Pride parade attendees. He allegedly planned to use an explosive remote-controlled drone. He was charged as an adult with the class 2 felonies of terrorism and conspiracy to commit terrorism.
On Oct. 7, the one-year anniversary of the Hamas terrorist attacks against Israel, federal authorities in Oklahoma City arrested an Afghan national released into the U.S. by the Biden administration for plotting a 9/11-style Election Day terrorist attack on American soil, The Center Square reported.
He was allegedly affiliated with ISIS’s subsidiary in Afghanistan and Pakistan, ISIS-K; two of his brothers were arrested on similar charges by French authorities.
In September, a Pakistani national was arrested by Canadian authorities for attempting to illegally enter the U.S. He reportedly planned a mass shooting targeting Jews in New York in support of ISIS, claiming it would be the “largest attack on U.S. soil since 9/11.” He was indicted in New York and charged with one count of attempting to provide material support and resources to a designated foreign terrorist organization.
Also in New York, in August, a Pakistani national with close ties to Iran was arrested for attempting to “commit an act of terrorism transcending national boundaries and murder-for-hire as part of a scheme to assassinate a politician or U.S. government official on U.S. soil.” He was indicted in September for his alleged murder-for-hire plot “straight out of the Iranian regime’s playbook,” FBI Director Christopher Wray said.
In July, federal authorities arrested a Jordanian national in Orlando. In August, he was indicted on four counts of threatening to use explosives and one count of destruction of an energy facility. According to court documents, he targeted and attacked Orlando area businesses for their perceived support of Israel.
The report comes as a recent Rasmussen Reports survey found that many Americans believe that danger related to terrorism increased under Biden. The majority, 59%, said the U.S. is likely to be the target of a major terrorist attack under Trump’s term; 24% said it’s very likely.
It also comes as the greatest number of individuals on the U.S. terrorist watch list have been apprehended by U.S. authorities at the northern border, more than 1,200, the greatest number in U.S. history of any administration, The Center Square first reported.
While the Biden administration has never acknowledged the record number of illegal border crossers or terrorist threats coming from Canada, Trump has already made demands that Canada increase its border security.
illegal immigration
How to Lower the Risk of New Terror Strikes by Border-Crossing Islamist Extremists
U.S.-bound Mauritanian migrants in Costa Rica near the Nicaraguan border. 2022 Photo by Todd Bensman.
From the Center for Immigration Studies
By Todd Bensman
So a border-crossing illegal immigrant has finally conducted a terror attack just as the FBI Director and the U.S. intelligence community has warned with increasing frequency would happen because of a 2021-2024 mass migration border crisis the New York Times recently concluded was the “largest in U.S. history”, fomented by policies of the Joe Biden administration.
Mauritanian national Sidi Mohammad Abdallahi, who illegally crossed the southern border during it in March 2023, entered the U.S. history books October 26 as the first to validate the long-hypothesized border terror infiltration threat with an attempt to massacre Jews and police in Chicago – as detailed in Part 1 and Part 2 of this “First Blood” series.
Now what? How might the incoming second administration of President Donald Trump reduce the threat of more such attacks with millions of foreign strangers already inside the United States and more constantly trying the southern land border?
Following are some remedies, starting with a highly viable one that comes from a most unexpected quarter, the Democratic administration of President Barack Obama and perhaps best frames where many solutions must aim: a category of illegal aliens the government has long termed “special interest aliens (SIAs)” or variations thereof, for hailing from countries where Islamist terrorist groups operate.
In June 2016, Obama’s DHS Secretary, Jeh Johnson, issued a three-page unclassified memorandum titled “Cross-Border Movement of Special Interest Aliens“. It ordered DHS border security and immigration agency directors to develop a concerted, whole-of-government initiative that would more robustly apply security vetting to SIA border-crossers and much more.
Since 2004 in the aftermath of 9/11, the U.S. Border Patrol and the US intelligence community came up with the SIA category tag to slap on apprehended illegal aliens who hailed from 35 mostly Muslim majority “countries of interest” where Islamist extremism and terrorist groups operated. Mauritania has long been on the intelligence community-created list, and Abdallahi therefore was an SIA.
The SIA tag didn’t mean the aliens were actual terrorists, of course, just that FBI or qualified intelligence officers would take a good, hard look at each to make sure they weren’t. To do that, agents endeavored to conduct intensive in-person interviews with them in detention centers, go through pocket trash and phones, and maybe check with amenable foreign intelligence agencies, looking for terrorism indicators that might weed out for deportation any who turned up as problematic.
Something related to “the increased global movement of SIAs” Johnson mentioned in the memo had clearly spooked him in 2016, perhaps the Muslim immigrants then pouring over European Union border in a mass migration surge, among them some who conducted attacks across the continent. (See: What Terrorist Migration Over European Borders Can Teach About American Border Security.) Perhaps he worried that the SIA security vetting program had fallen into dangerous disrepair a dozen years into it.
“As we all appreciate, SIAs may consist of those who are potential national security threats to our homeland”, the secretary wrote in the 2016 memo. “Thus the need for continued vigilance in this particular area.”
Whatever it was, the Johnson memo demanded the “immediate attention” of underlings to form a “multi-DHS Component ‘SIA Joint Action Group.’” The memo outlined plan objectives. Intelligence collection and analysis, Johnson wrote, would drive efforts to “counter the threats posed by the smuggling of SIAs.” Coordinated investigations would “bring down organizations involved in the smuggling of SIAs into and within the United States”, he wrote.
Border and port of entry operations capacities would “help us identify and interdict SIAs of national security concern who attempt to enter the United States” and “evaluate our border and port of entry security posture to ensure our resources are appropriately aligned to address trends in the migration of SIAs.”
The Obama administration’s SIA initiative never fully developed before Donald Trump took office in January 2017 and was soon lost in the shuffle, even though the old unreformed SIA vetting program remained in place, its FBI interviewers supplemented by specially trained agents of a U.S. Customs and Border Patrol unit called Tactical Terrorism Response Teams (TTRTs) working ICE facilities.
But the Trump administration should resurrect the Johnson idea because an SIA action task force has never been needed more than now, both at the border and in the interior, with so many SIAs like Abdallahi now living inside the country with virtually no vetting beyond largely ineffective database biometrics checks before release.
A Counterterrorism Program Swamped to Oblivion
Johnson was considering the idea at a time when perhaps 3,000-4,000 SIAs per year were apprehended at the border on average. (See: Terrorist Infiltration Threat at the Southwest Border.)
But today, the SIA vetting program is all but nonexistent, swamped to oblivion by the epic Biden-era mass migration crisis that brought in tens of thousands of SIAs per year, including at least 400 \who were on the FBI’s terrorism watch list by the end of 2024. A majority are thought to have traveled from South American landing countries through the Colombia-Panama “Darien Gap” migration passage where enabling governments have facilitated northward passages by bus through to Nicaragua.
Under no circumstance could responsible agencies possibly interview and investigate more than a miniscule fraction of them. It is almost certain that Abdallahi did not undergo a face-to-face interview with a trained federal agent before he was released to go to Chicago.
Indeed, data leaked to the media shows that nearly 75,000 SIAs reached the southern border between October 2022 and August 2023. Another 30,000 SIAs entered in the following 15 months through February 2024, the Daily Caller reported. The Biden DHS responded by reducing the number of SIA countries from 35 to about 13 (still including Mauritania), another House Judiciary Subcommittee report said.
A Biden-era cell phone app-based parole scheme (CBP One) gave thousands more SIAs from two dozen of the countries permission to cross the border on legally questioned mass humanitarian parole with ineffective security vetting. (See: Thousands of ‘Special Interest Aliens’ Posing Potential National Security Risks Entering via CBP One App.) Among them were some Tajikistanis arrested in a multi-state FBI counterterrorism wiretap sting in three cities. (See: After Suspected Tajik Terrorist Arrests, Little-Known Biden Border Entry Program Demands Hard Focus.)
Far from able to interview these overwhelming thousands, every federal agent assigned to the border was so swamped that at least 99 illegal aliens who were on the terrorism watch list were accidentally released, an August 2024 House Judiciary Committee report said.
Key Recommendations
These facts present an argument for the incoming Trump administration’s DHS to follow through on Johnson’s idea to establish an aggressive SIA action task force that can quickly assess and oversee the resurrection of a more thorough, well-resourced vetting program at the land borders as other policies reduce overall migration flow to pre-Biden numbers. But that’s only a start to onboard other remedies that will reduce the current heightened risk from unvetted SIAs. Other high-priority solutions are as follows:
At the land borders
- Restore the list of SIA countries to prior lengths; prioritize and resource federal personnel to conduct enhanced in-person vetting inside detention centers with a goal of 100 percent while more emphatically exploiting and enhancing the capabilities of the National Vetting Center (NVC) to assist in detecting derogatory information. (President Trump originally established the NVC, which the Biden administration maintained.) Consider the use of state and local fusion center officers and analysts as trusted partners to conduct vetting in detention centers under section 103 (a)(10) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which allows the federal use of state and local police resources. Encourage a congressional oversight responsibility with annual reporting requirements to ensure the SIA counterterrorism enterprise at the borders remains impactful, updated, and appropriately resourced.
- Institute extended detention time and misdemeanor federal prosecution for illegal entry by SIAs and discourage any availability of bond-outs for SIAs; ensure that bed space availability is always commensurate with average SIA apprehension rates so that room is consistently available for detention times necessary for security screening, investigative efforts, court proceedings, or final removals.
In the U.S. interior
- Convene regional ICE task forces that will compile databases of SIAs released into the United States since January 2021 under Biden-era policies and parole programs and require them to undergo belated enhanced security screenings, to include interviews, that were not previously conducted when they were released. Officers would act on derogatory information from abroad but also any uncovered during U.S. residency.
- Prioritize and resource asylum fraud investigations of SIAs by empowering officers of the Fraud, Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to conduct forensic analyses of random samples of asylum claims by SIAs. Grant FDNS agents arrest and investigative referral authorities independent of any other agency, including ICE. Substantially increase FDNS investigative staff and train USCIS’s asylum officer corps to conduct national security vetting during the “credible fear” interview process in synchronicity with routine duties.
- Have the Attorney General direct U.S. Attorneys to accept and prioritize asylum fraud case prosecutions and referrals from the newly empowered FDNS officer corps, resolving Government Accountability Office reporting in recent years that shows U.S. Attorneys reject most asylum fraud referrals.
- Direct appropriate law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute U.S.-based individuals who encourage, induce, or directly fund the illegal cross-border smuggling of SIAs, for deterrent effect, under Section 274 (A)(1)(IV) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Abroad
- Fully collaborate with the new Panamanian government in its plan to close the Darien Gap, through which many SIAs travel, by funding highly deterring, large-scale foreign repatriation flights to home countries and local detention facilities as needed. Provide aircraft as necessary. Furthermore, require large-scale repatriation flight programs in Colombia and Costa Rica. Consider funding repatriation flights from Mexico. Apply diplomatic pressure as appropriate on recalcitrant home nations to accept the flights.
- Create a contingency plan to implement “offshore” asylum processing centers in countries of transit and origin, in conjunction with US-funded foreign air repatriation programs.
- Increase the number of American law enforcement screeners able to interview SIAs in detention facilities of Mexico, Honduras, Panama, Brazil, and other Latin American countries known for the staging and transit of SIAs.
- Direct and prioritize a surge of SIA smuggling investigations in Latin America by ICE Homeland Security Investigations (HSI); ensure more HSI units target SIA smuggling as a larger percentage of total crime categories in South America, Central America, and in Mexico.
- Use all tools of government power to ensure that the governments of Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, Ecuador, and (eventually) Cuba more robustly monitor, vet, audit, investigate, and prosecute corrupt practices within their consulates and embassies in countries of national security interest as a means to reduce wrongful issuances of visas.
Managing down the risks associated with SIA flows and detection of terrorism-minded immigrants within them, of course, gets easier when other deterrence policies reduce the overall numbers. Finding needles is easier when the haystacks are small.
Crime
Mystery Terrorist: The Unknown Life and Violent Times of Illegal Border-Crosser Sidi Mohammed Abdallahi
The most recent burial in a cost-free Muslim cemetery on the outskirts of Chicago in late December, possibly the burial site of Abdallahi, although the marker is the only one numbered rather than identified by name. Photo by Todd Bensman.
From the Center for Immigration Studies
First Blood, Part 2
By Todd Bensman
(Part 2 of 3; Read Part 1, Part 3.)
CHICAGO, Illinois – If ever there was a magic moment for Americans to learn why Mauritanian national Sidi Mohammad Abdallahi rampaged through an Orthodox Jewish neighborhood firing a semi-automatic handgun at Jews and police, trying to rack up a body count, it was after he’d been dead a week on December 6, 2024.
“Prayers will be held over the body of the deceased” at 8:45 pm, read a post on the Chicago Mauritanian Community’s Facebook page. “Notice: Everyone is requested to come and pray for our bereaved. It is our right. Let us not forget also the virtue of a funeral, its follow-up and rewards.”
The funeral post drew several responses from the account’s 537 followers and drew one re-share.
“May God have mercy on him,” wrote Vadel Wel Belli, an active group member.
The 22-year-old Abdallahi, critically wounded then arrested by police, had hanged himself the week before while in the Cook County Jail while awaiting his eventual trial on state terrorism and other charges for conducting an October 26 shooting melee described at length in Part 1 of this series. (See First Blood: Anatomy of a Border-Crosser’s Chicago Terror Attack).
The pre-trial jailhouse suicide had made perfunctory news headlines, but any reporter who would have attended the Chicago Mauritanian Community’s publicly advertised “prayers…over the body of the deceased” and presumed burial of Abdallahi on Friday, December 6, could have potentially interviewed the people who knew him most intimately. A Facebook page that matches Abdallahi’s full name, devoid of entries other than a photo of a car, show five followers, among them some who follow the Chicago Mauritanian Community. But no reporters bothered to show up, missing what turned out to be a consequential opportunity to learn about Abdallahi’s violent path from the Mexican border to the West Rogers Park neighborhood, which he shot up during his 20-minute attack.
A Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) trip to Chicago two weeks after the funeral service, to learn what the cancelled trial might have revealed about the ground-breaking first charged terrorist attack by a border-crossing illegal immigrant, discovered a window onto Abdallahi’s world in Chicago.
A Pakistani man who parks several black hearses at what turned out to be a large Albanian mosque at the provided Facebook address, one of which displays a “Muslim Funeral Service” sign in a window, told CIS that Abdallahi had “relatives” in the area, the first known reference to that. They were the ones who accepted the body from the county Medical Examiner’s office and paid for the funeral service, he said.
The Pakistani funeral director refused to say anything more without the family’s permission, which he offered to secure for CIS. They never responded.
The Chicago Mauritanian community’s self-described leaders, many of them recent immigrants like Abdallahi, declined CIS interview requests to talk about Abdallahi, through an interlocutor who works closely with them.
And so, even the most basic information of homeland security value about Abdallahi and his path to violence, essential in helping authorities uncover violent plans by other illegal border-crossers from countries of terrorism concern like Mauritania, remains out of reach. It has already been reported that his phone and computer searches showed he was steeped in jihadist and pro-Hamas propaganda – and wore to his attack a green workman’s safety vest currently popular among pro-Hamas demonstrators. But that’s a small morsel.
One of the first of many rounds Abdallahi fired during the 20-minute spree went through a Jewish man’s back as he walked to synagogue and more toward police until officers critically wounded him. That white-knuckled morning of terror left Chicago’s Orthodox Jewish community deeply shaken and, with no trial coming, feeling an unrequited ache to know how this young foreign gunman was ever able to cross the U.S. southern border and attack their people with a semi-automatic pistol while screaming “Allahu Akbar.”
They still didn’t know two months later – and won’t ever, at least not from any trial.
“When they said ‘terrorism,’ it was just kind of shocking. It made us wonder if there’s much more to the story, that this guy wasn’t just some guy,” Abdallahi’s Jewish victim, who has fully recovered, told CIS in late December. “Like, what are we missing from this story? No one has given us any details or answers or anything.” (The victim spoke to CIS, in his first and only interview, on condition that his identity not be disclosed for fear of future targeting.)
“The safety piece is what’s scary,” he continued. “Like was he alone in this or was there somebody who coerced him to this? And if that’s the case, then okay, where are the rest of them and are they going to start infiltrating our neighborhood in some way? We still don’t have that answer, and that’s the scary thing.”
Many other questions hover over the incident unanswered but needed to enhance national security.
For instance, did U.S. Border Patrol and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) miss opportunities to detect his extremist ideology at the border or later on?
When Abdallahi crossed and passed a database check, was he ever detained and referred to the Border Patrol’s Tactical Terrorism Response Team or to ICE intelligence officers for extended terrorism-related interviews? That is supposed to happen with “special interest aliens,” who get assigned that tag if they hail from designated countries of terrorism concern like Mauritania.
According to material obtained by CIS through a Freedom of Information Act request, Border Patrol apprehended 18,260 Mauritanians (and hundreds of thousands of other special-interest aliens) who have illegally crossed the U.S. southern border from 2021 through December 2023, probably far too many for tedious direct interviews that can turn up signs of extremist beliefs.
If mistakes with Abdallahi remain unexplored, how then would the border agencies learn to interdict other potentially dangerous border-crossers already in the United States for a year or two?
Are co-conspirators who helped him or failed to report his plan still free or ruled out?
How exactly did Abdallahi, an illegal immigrant barred from obtaining a firearm in gun-restricted Chicago, get his hands on one and who might be held responsible?
What Is Known
ICE officials have confirmed that Abdallahi crossed the U.S. southern Border from Tijuana to San Diego on March 29, 2023. After a criminal and national security database check returned nothing derogatory, U.S. Border Patrol freed him on his own recognizance just as they have millions of other illegal entrants under orders from the Biden-Harris Department of Homeland Security.
Most often, those millions released were given dates to voluntarily report to ICE offices in their chosen destination city to file asylum claims or seek other forms of relief from deportation.
It’s unknown whether Abdallahi reported to ICE in Chicago or what the office knew of him. CIS has filed a Freedom of Information Act request to find out what ICE knew of him and when, if anything, but he may have obtained work authorization because Cook County prosecutors said at his detention hearing that he worked at a Chicago Amazon warehouse, and he had possession of a car where police found his phone after the shootout.
The Gun Mystery
The phone contained more than 100 “antisemitic and pro-Hamas” images and videos, the prosecutor said. He’d used the phone to map local synagogues, including one just a couple of blocks from where he attacked the Jewish man. And his Google search history included a gun store in the suburb of Lyons.
The Jewish victim he shot said he dearly wants to know how his assailant got the gun.
So CIS visited the Lyons gun store and shooting range that came up in one of Abdallahi’s searches, Midwest Sporting Goods, and pretty much ruled out that he obtained the firearm there. The store’s manager said detectives came around too and found that there was no record that Abdallahi held a state-required FOID card permit required to legally buy, sell, or fire any handgun in Illinois – a rule the gun store rigorously enforces to stay out of trouble. There also was no evidence that Abdallahi might have come in with a friend who had the permit, she said.
It could have been stolen and sold on the black market. Whatever the handgun’s history, the manager noted, police probably know a lot about it since they recovered it after the attack.
Home Life and Times
At least for a time, Abdallahi lived in a crowded but somewhat renovated South Chicago flop house above a taco shop shared by five other young Mauritanian immigrants who also crossed the southern border.
The apartment in a dilapidated older neighborhood pockmarked by abandoned condemned buildings consisted of three disheveled bedrooms with two men in each, a kitchen and toilet facilities. A prayer rug was visible on the floor in one room. No one seemed interested in replacing the expired batteries on two chirping smoke detectors.
Two of Abdallahi’s former roommates confirmed that Abdallahi had lived there for a time and had relatives in the area, including a “cousin” who spoke good English but that they hardly knew Abdallahi well enough to meaningfully comment. CIS could not locate the relative.
“Yeah, he lived here. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah,” one young Mauritanian named Abdullah, who crossed the southern border in 2023, said in broken English. Police interviewed him a couple of times. “But I’m not talking to this guy. I not see this guy. I don’t know about this.”
But Abdullah was definitive in saying that Abdallahi had never served in the Mauritanian military and also was angry about Israel’s war on Gaza as many in the community are.
“Too much Palestine! America give you everything to help you. Why do you have to go catch somebody outside of Palestine?” the young man opined.
A second Facebook page registered to Abdallahi’s unique name, recently taken down, showed that he had about 30 followers, most of them in Mauritania. Interestingly, Abdallahi followed the California Highway Patrol page in El Cajon, which is near the Mexican border.
Meanwhile, no one and no government agency seem interested in anything but moving on.
The FBI Closes Its Case; Other Agencies Fall Silent
Basic information to enhance public safety may remain unknown even to the most relevant federal law enforcement agency that investigates all suspected U.S. terrorism offenses, the FBI.
In this one rare instance, the FBI appears to have substantially ceded its role as primary investigator to the Chicago Police Department and Cook County Attorney’s office, which are arguably far less equipped for complex international and national terrorism cases even though they eventually lodged a state terrorism charge.
Two days after his attack, the only peep from the FBI came in a written statement that it would work “diligently with local, state, and federal partners to provide critical resources and assistance as we learn more.” The bureau disappeared after that, steering clear of the few press conferences that local authorities staged.
In response to a more recent inquiry by CIS, the FBI now says it has closed whatever support case it had opened, since the suspect is dead, and declined CIS interview requests to rule out or in co-conspirators or foreign direction or anything else that is important to know.
“It is common for investigations to be closed in conjunction with the US Attorney’s Office if a subject dies prior to the conclusion of an investigation,” the FBI’s Chicago Public Affairs Team wrote to CIS in a January 3 email.
CIS has filed a federal Freedom of Information request to the FBI for more information and is prepared to litigate it if necessary.
The FBI’s tack here is highly unusual in the annals of obvious U.S. terror attacks, regardless of body count.
Contrast this lack of curiosity with the recent New Years Day vehicle ramming attack in New Orleans, which killed 14 plus the driver, and the so-called “cybertruck” bombing in Las Vegas, during which nobody died but the driver. Even before a full news cycle passed, news media brimmed with exhaustive reports about the life and times of a U.S.-born terrorist who carried out the ISIS-inspired New Orleans attack. One reporter even took social media followers on a video tour inside the dead terrorist’s FBI-searched Houston residence, before his victim’s bodies were even cleared from the bloody scene.
Even with Abdallahi dead and the trial cancelled, both the Chicago Police Department and the Cook County prosecutor declined CIS interview requests for interviews about the case. CIS has filed numerous FOIA requests.
Short of congressional or Trump White House intervention on behalf of transparency, the FOIAs may hold the last hope that authorities can improve processes and interdict other illegal aliens raised in countries where extremist ideologies are common and who might be predisposed to also plan mass casualty violence.
Part 3: Solutions
-
Business2 days ago
2025 Energy Outlook: Steering Through Recovery and Policy Shifts
-
Economy2 days ago
The European Union is shifting back towards fossil fuels
-
Business2 days ago
Liberal Leadership Candidates should scrap the carbon tax
-
Energy2 days ago
Coal: one million tons an hour
-
Bruce Dowbiggin1 day ago
Trump Goes Fishing, Catches A Prime Minister On The First Cast
-
National2 days ago
Court challenge to Trudeau’s suspension of Parliament could result in early election
-
espionage1 day ago
Non-citizens could choose Canada’s next prime minister thanks to Liberal Party rules
-
Health1 day ago
Mel Gibson Drops Two Medical Bombshells on the Joe Rogan Podcast