Connect with us

Business

Red Deer’s Poor Air Quality Reputation Going Up In Smoke?

Published

3 minute read

Warren Kindzierski

(Dr. Warren Kindzierski PhD, MSc, BSc – Associate Professor – School of Public Health – University of Alberta)

By Sheldon Spackman

An Associate Professor in the U of A’s School of Public Health is trying to clear the air when it comes to Red Deer’s reputation for poor air quality. Dr. Warren Kindzierski first caught wind of the issue in 2015 when news stories claimed Red Deer had the worst air quality in the province. Kindzierski says that didn’t make any sense to him and his colleague, Aynul Bari. The two spent a considerable amount of time in the summer of 2016 looking into the claims and found something much different. He says as far as he can see “Red Deer doesn’t have an air quality problem, it’s mostly good.”

Kindzierski and Bari set out to answer the questions that most interested them such as: Where are Red Deer’s emissions coming from? Are there issues that need to be addressed? and How does Red Deer’s emission levels compare to other communities in Alberta?

In a special report he penned for The Financial Post, Kindzierski says he and Bari “Studied data from an air-monitoring station in Red Deer using state-of-the-art scientific methods and had the results peer reviewed and published in the February edition of the international journal Environmental Pollution. They “Looked at methods for identifying sources within and outside of Red Deer. These included using the U.S. Environment Protection Agency Positive Matrix Factorization model, and a U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration meteorological model for air parcel backward trajectory analysis.”

According to their study almost two-thirds of the fine-particulate-matter air pollution in the Red Deer area comes from vehicle, industrial and agricultural emissions. Kindzierski says air quality is often poorest in the winter months when it’s colder, as pre-cursors or conditions that lead to the creation of fine-particulate-matter air pollution tend to stick around longer.

Looking at air quality trends in Alberta, Kindzierski says fine-particulate-matter air pollution in Edmonton, Calgary, Fort McMurray and Fort McKay, hasn’t changed in the last 17 years.” His results also show “Red Deer has better air quality than Calgary.” He notes however that their study excluded days where PM2.5 levels were high due to smoke from forest fires, so as not to skew the results.

The following chart created by the University of Alberta researchers shows the three-year average fine-particulate-matter levels from 2010 to 2015 in Calgary, Edmonton and at Red Deer’s Riverside air monitoring station.

Air Quality Comparison

Dr. Kindzierski’s study is welcome news to the Red Deer Chamber of Commerce. Policy Manager Reg Warkentin says this validates what he has believed all along.

Follow Author

Business

CBC’s business model is trapped in a very dark place

Published on

The Audit

 

 David Clinton

I Testified Before a Senate Committee About the CBC

I recently testified before the Senate Committee for Transport and Communications. You can view that session here. Even though the official topic was CBC’s local programming in Ontario, everyone quickly shifted the discussion to CBC’s big-picture problems and how their existential struggles were urgent and immediate. The idea that deep and fundamental changes within the corporation were unavoidable seemed to enjoy complete agreement.

I’ll use this post as background to some of the points I raised during the hearing.

You might recall how my recent post on CBC funding described a corporation shedding audience share like dandruff while spending hundreds of millions of dollars producing drama and comedy programming few Canadians consume. There are so few viewers left that I suspect they’re now identified by first name rather than as a percentage of the population.

Since then I’ve learned a lot more about CBC performance and about the broadcast industry in general.

For instance, it’ll surprise exactly no one to learn that fewer Canadians get their audio from traditional radio broadcasters. But how steep is the decline? According to the CRTC’s Annual Highlights of the Broadcasting Sector 2022-2023, since 2015, “hours spent listening to traditional broadcasting has decreased at a CAGR of 4.8 percent”. CAGR, by the way, stands for compound annual growth rate.

Dropping 4.8 percent each year means audience numbers aren’t just “falling”; they’re not even “falling off the edge of a cliff”; they’re already close enough to the bottom of the cliff to smell the trees. Looking for context? Between English and French-language radio, the CBC spends around $240 million each year.

Those listeners aren’t just disappearing without a trace. the CRTC also tells us that Canadians are increasingly migrating to Digital Media Broadcasting Units (DMBUs) – with numbers growing by more than nine percent annually since 2015.

The CBC’s problem here is that they’re not a serious player in the DMBU world, so they’re simply losing digital listeners. For example, of the top 200 Spotify podcasts ranked by popularity in Canada, only four are from the CBC.

Another interesting data point I ran into related to that billion dollar plus annual parliamentary allocation CBC enjoys. It turns out that that’s not the whole story. You may recall how the government added another $42 million in their most recent budget.

But wait! That’s not all! Between CBC and SRC, the Canada Media Fund (CMF) ponied up another $97 million for fiscal 2023-2024 to cover specific programming production budgets.

Technically, Canada Media Fund grants target individual projects planned by independent production companies. But those projects are usually associated with the “envelope” of one of the big broadcasters – of which CBC is by far the largest. 2023-2024 CMF funding totaled $786 million, and CBC’s take was nearly double that of their nearest competitor (Bell).

But there’s more! Back in 2016, the federal budget included an extra $150 million each year as a “new investment in Canadian arts and culture”. It’s entirely possible that no one turned off the tap and that extra government cheque is still showing up each year in the CBC’s mailbox. There was also a $93 million item for infrastructure and technological upgrades back in the 2017-2018 fiscal year. Who knows whether that one wasn’t also carried over.

So CBC’s share of government funding keeps growing while its share of Canadian media consumers shrinks. How do you suppose that’ll end?

We make content free for you but we require support to create journalism. Please consider a free subscription to our newsletter, or donate an amount of your choice.

Subscribe to The Audit

Continue Reading

Business

PBO report shows cost of bureaucracy up 73 per cent under Trudeau

Published on

From the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

By Franco Terrazzano

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation is calling on the federal government to rein in the bureaucracy following today’s Parliamentary Budget Officer report showing the bureaucracy costs taxpayers $69.5 billion.

“The cost of the federal bureaucracy increased by 73 per cent since 2016, but it’s a good bet most Canadians aren’t seeing anywhere close to 73 per cent better services from the government,” said Franco Terrazzano, CTF Federal Director. “Taxpayers are getting soaked because the size and cost of the federal bureaucracy is out of control.”

Today’s PBO report estimates the federal bureaucracy cost taxpayers $69.5 billion in 2023-24. In 2016-17, the cost of the bureaucracy was $40.2 billion. That’s an increase of 72.9 per cent.

The most recent data shows the cost continues to rise quickly.

“Spending on personnel in the first five months of 2024-25 is up 8.0 per cent over the same period last year,” according to the PBO.

“I have noticed a marked increase in the number of public servants since 2016 and a proportional increase in spending,” said Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux. “But we haven’t seen similar improvements when it comes to service.”

The Trudeau government added 108,793 bureaucrats since 2016 – a 42 per cent increase. Canada’s population grew by 14 per cent during the same period. Had the bureaucracy only increased with population growth, there would be 72,491 fewer federal employees today.

The government awarded more than one million pay raises to bureaucrats in the last four years, according to access-to-information records obtained by the CTF. The government also rubberstamped $406 million in bonuses last year.

“The government added tens of thousands of extra bureaucrats, rubberstamped hundreds of millions in bonuses and awarded more than one million pay raises and all taxpayers seem to get out of it is higher taxes and more debt,” Terrazzano said. “For the government to balance the budget and provide tax relief, it will need to cut the size and cost of Ottawa’s bloated bureaucracy.”

Continue Reading

Trending

X