Connect with us

National

Red Deer – Mountain View MP Earl Dreeshen retiring

Published

less than 1 minute read

After 5 elections and sixteen years in Parliament, Red Deer – Mountain View MP Earl Dreeshen has decided he will not seek a sixth term when the current Liberal Government finally falls sometime this year.

Dreeshen who is 71 and in good health will step away to spend more time with family.Ā  He has released this resignation letter to inform constituents.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Fraser Institute

Premier Eby seeks to suspend democracy in B.C.

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Niels Veldhuis and Tegan Hill

Last week, B.C. Premier David Eby proposed new legislation to give himself and his cabinet sweeping powers to unilaterally change almost any provincial law and regulation without legislative approval or review. While the legislationā€”dubbed theĀ Economic Stabilization (Tariff Response) Actā€”has yet to be enacted into law, the fact that the government proposed such unprecedented powers is deeply concerning and a genuine threat to our democracy.

Only five months ago, British Columbians went to the polls and delivered a sobering victory to Ebyā€™s incumbent NDP government, which lost 8 of its 55 seats and ended up withĀ 47 of 93 seats, the narrowest ā€œmajorityā€ possible. The popular vote was nearly dead-even between the NDP (44.86 per cent) and the upstart Conservative Party (43.28 per cent).

Even Premier Eby acknowledged the voters sent his government aĀ messageĀ andĀ promisedĀ to work together with other parties. ā€œAfter a close and hard-fought campaign, it’s now time to come together to deliver for people,ā€ he said. ā€œBritish Columbians have asked us to work together and make life better for them.”

“Work together” in a democracy means embracing a deliberative and, at times, messy process. Thoughtful policymaking takes time. Itā€™s a core feature of democracy. No leader has all the knowledge to act unilaterally to do whatā€™s right. We need the legislature to weigh competing viewpoints through rigorous and transparent debateā€”thatā€™s how our system works.

Yet according to the EbyĀ government, theĀ Economic Stabilization (Tariff Response) ActĀ will lead to the opposite andĀ provide ā€œtemporary authority to cabinetā€¦ to modify the application or effect of B.C. laws and regulations.ā€ In other words, if approved, it will allow Premier Eby and his cabinet to override provincial laws, regulations, bylaws, rules, resolutions, practices, policies, standards, procedures and other measures without approval or review by the elected legislature. Thatā€™s not how our system is supposed to work.

To put it more starkly, the Eby government is telling British Columbians that 23 cabinet ministers and four ministers of state can sufficiently decide almost any matter pertaining to the government without democratic approval or input from opposition parties. It is by all measures an extraordinary circumvention of the provinceā€™s democratic institutions.

Premier Eby, of course, knows the extraordinary nature of this type of undemocratic authority. ā€œIn extraordinary times,ā€ he told reportersĀ last week, ā€œwe need extraordinary powers.ā€ And he wants these extraordinary powers for the next two years.

While President Trump’s tariffs are terrible economic policy and very damaging to Canada and other countries, many governments throughout history have tried these policies. Like in the past, our politicians and policymakers must deal with tariffs and other economic challenges purposefully and deliberately within democratic constraints, which include transparent debates, reviews, re-assessments, and genuine deliberations that include opposition parties.

Instead, Premier Eby wants absolute power and control.

As British Columbians will no doubt conclude, thereā€™s something fundamentally wrong with suspending democracy because weā€™re in challenging times. We often deal with significant challenges. Should our governments have suspended democracy in the wake of 9/11, the limited outbreak of SARS, the financial crisis of 2008-09 or COVID?

Finally, this dim view of democratic constraints is not new to the Eby government. Just last year, Premier Eby tried to pass one of the most significant and fundamental legislative changes in B.C. history, giving more than 200 First Nations veto power over land-use decisions in the province. Eby hoped to rush his legalisation through the legislature without full transparency or meaningful public input, and without disclosing any analysis of its economic impact. When British Columbians caught wind of his plan, there was an uproar, and before Octoberā€™s election, Eby shelved the legislation (for now, at least).

Here we are again, mere months later, with Premier Eby wanting to make unprecedented changes to our democracy in response to an economic policy from another democratically elected government that, while damaging, is hardly an existential threat.

To call theĀ Economic Stabilization (Tariff Response)Ā ActĀ a significant overreach would be a gross understatement. Itā€™s an affront to our democracy.

Niels Veldhuis

President, Fraser Institute

Tegan Hill

Director, Alberta Policy, Fraser Institute
Continue Reading

2025 Federal Election

Soaked, Angry, and Awake: What We Saw at Pierre Poilievreā€™s Surrey Rally

Published on

The Opposition with Dan Knight Dan Knight

Thousands stood in the rainā€”not for politics, but for hope. And this time, they just might bring it home.

We were there. We saw it with our own eyes. We were out in the rain too.

This was our first rally. No press passes. No backstage passes. Just boots on the ground in Surrey, British Columbia, shoulder to shoulder with five thousand other Canadians standing in line, drenched, coldā€”and awake. We werenā€™t there to fanboy. We came to observe. To listen.

And what we saw was more than a political event. It was a moment.

We saw Alex Zoltan from True North (@AmazingZoltan), Mike Le Couteur from CTV (@mikelecouteur), and legendary broadcaster Anita Krishna (@AnitaKrishna1) in the crowd. But more importantlyā€”we saw the people. Working people. Retired people. Young people. People who’ve been ignored for years by the political class, who finally feel like someone is saying out loud what theyā€™ve been screaming into the void.

What we heard from them? It wasnā€™t rehearsed. It wasnā€™t ideological. It was heartbreak.

A lot of people are angry. Not the rage you see on Twitter. Real anger. The kind that comes from watching your country stop workingā€”for you. One man told us heā€™s on a pension and canā€™t afford groceries. Another woman said she skips meals so her kids can eat. We met a young couple in their late twenties whoā€™ve given up on the idea of owning a home. They’re not lazy. They’re not reckless. They’re just priced out of the country they were born in.

And hereā€™s what cut the deepestā€”many of them told us,Ā ā€œWe want to support this party. But we canā€™t.ā€Ā Why? Because theyā€™ve been burned too many times. Promised too much. Betrayed too often. But they came anyway. They stood in the rain for hours anyway. Because thereā€™s a flicker of something they havenā€™t felt in a long time:

Hope.

I kept asking:Ā ā€œDo you like this guy?ā€Ā The answer was a resounding yes. And not because theyā€™re buying the hypeā€”but because heā€™s giving voice to something real. Pierre Poilievre is reaching disillusioned Canadiansā€”not through political poetry or staged empathyā€”but through hard truths, said plainly, with no filter.

These arenā€™t people looking for a savior. Theyā€™re looking for someone who remembers them. And on that night in Surrey, they believed they found one. They came for a message. For a fight. For a reason to believe that someoneā€”finallyā€”was on their side.

Before Pierre ever took the mic, the crowd in Surrey was already fired upā€”and a big reason for that was Anaida Poilievre.

Letā€™s be honest: sheā€™s a bombshell. And not just because sheā€™s beautiful but because sheā€™s the real deal. Industrious, sharp, fluent in two languages, and built from the same immigrant grit that defines so many Canadians who feel left behind by this system.

She opened the rally not like a politicianā€™s wife reading off a cue card, but like a woman who actually believes in what her husbandā€™s fighting for. She talked about Pierreā€™s adoption, his humble roots, and the hard lessons that shaped him. No privilege. No elite pedigree. Just two schoolteachers raising a kid to believe thatĀ if you want something in life, you earn it.

She looked out at a rain-soaked crowd and didnā€™t flinch. She thanked them. She told them their presence was a sign of hope. She didnā€™t pander. She didnā€™t posture. She spoke like someone whoā€™s been watching this country changeā€”and not for the betterā€”and is finally standing beside someone willing to do something about it.

And you know what? People listened.

And when Pierre Poilievre walked onto that stage hugged his wife and said,Ā ā€œWhoā€™s ready to axe some taxes?ā€ā€”the crowd roared. Not clapped. Not nodded politely. Roared.

Because after a decade of being kicked in the teeth by a government that lectures more than it listens, Canadians are tired. Tired of being broke. Tired of being lied to. Tired of being told their pain is imaginary while the Laurentian elite pockets billions and jets off to climate conferences.

Poilievre knows that. And in this rally, he laid it out in plain language.Ā ā€œThe Canadian promise is broken,ā€Ā he said. And heā€™s right. Food inflation is higher than it is in the United States. Vancouver is the most expensive housing market in North America. People canā€™t afford groceries, never mind rent. And Mark Carneyā€”Trudeauā€™s successor and another unelected globalistā€”wants you to believe this is fine.

Itā€™s not fine. Itā€™s engineered decline. And the crowd in Surrey knew it.

Poilievre tore into the carbon tax scam.Ā ā€œThey told us without the carbon tax, the planet would catch fire,ā€Ā he said.Ā ā€œI thought you put out fires with waterā€”not taxes.ā€Ā The room went wild. Because finally, someone said out loud what every working-class Canadian already knows: this isnā€™t about climate. Itā€™s about control.

And hereā€™s the kickerā€”while Canadians are being taxed into oblivion, whatā€™s Carney doing? Poilievre didnā€™t mince words:Ā ā€œHeā€™s moved his headquarters out of Canada, shifted billions to offshore tax havens, and wants to tax our industries into extinction.ā€Ā And itā€™s true. Brookfield took $276 million from the Bank of China. Thatā€™s the man now lecturing you about sovereignty and security.

And just when you think it couldnā€™t get more absurd, Poilievre nailed the punchline:Ā ā€œImagine the one thing Trump and Carney agree onā€”taxing Canadian industry.ā€Ā One with tariffs. One with carbon taxes. The same result: you lose. They win.

And then Pierre Poilievre started talking about the one thing the political class wonā€™t touchā€”housing. Real housing. Not photo ops with construction helmets. Not climate-smart TikTok renderings. Actual places where real people live. You know, the thing you used to be able to afford before Justin Trudeau and his handpicked successor, Mark Carney, burned the Canadian economy to the ground.

And when Poilievre said it costs $250,000 a year to buy a home in this country? The crowd didnā€™t gasp. They nodded. Because they already know. Theyā€™re living it. Theyā€™re paying $2,600 a month in rent in Vancouverā€”more than most mortgages in the U.S. They’re watching housing slip into fantasy while their wages stagnate and taxes climb.

Poilievre didnā€™t just diagnose the problem. He named the villains: gatekeepers. Bureaucrats. Urban planners with six-figure pensions who spend five years approving a duplex. Politicians more concerned about aesthetics than affordability. And of course, the federal Liberals who reward this dysfunction with your tax dollars.

He looked them in the eye and said: We will cut them off. No homes, no money.

You want to build homes? Greatā€”weā€™ll help. You want to stall, delay, regulate and strangle supply while pretending to care? Goodbye federal funding. And when he said heā€™d pay cities a bonusā€”$10,000 per unitā€”for every home completed, the crowd erupted.

Because for the first time in a long time, someone isnā€™t just ā€œraising awareness.ā€ Heā€™s ready to bulldoze the roadblocks.

Then he got to the scam of the century: the carbon tax. He said,Ā ā€œThey told us the planet would catch fire without it. I thought you put out fires with waterā€”not taxes.ā€Ā Thatā€™s not a joke. Thatā€™s clarity. And clarity is dangerous to the people who make billions off confusion.

Now Carneyā€”Canadaā€™s favorite unelected international bankerā€”is floating his latest con:Ā “Don’t worry, weā€™ll scrap the carbon tax and give you a rebate instead.”Ā Right. The government takes your dollar, runs it through three ministries, skims 30 cents, then hands you back 70 and tells you itā€™s a gift. Thatā€™s their model.

Poilievre? He cuts through the lie: ā€œJust let people keep their damn money.ā€

And hereā€™s what made this rally different. This wasnā€™t a campaign stop in a suit-and-tie showroom. This was a declaration of war against the elite cartel thatā€™s run this country into the ground for the last decade.

He talked about immigration, not from a place of fear, but ofĀ reality. Canadians arenā€™t against immigration. Theyā€™re against chaos. They’re against bringing in more people when we can’t even house the people already here. Itā€™s not anti-immigrant. Itā€™s pro-sanity.

And most of all, he spoke about something you rarely hear from a politician in this country: pride. Not in institutions, not in photo-opsā€”but in the tradesman, the small business owner, the truck driver, the welder. The people who actually build Canada. He said weā€™re going to make things again. That weā€™re going to stop outsourcing our sovereignty and start bringing it all home.

And the crowd? They didnā€™t just applaudā€”they believed him.

This was not a speech for journalists or corporate donors. It was a speech for people who still love this country, who want their kids to own homes, who want to work and not be punished for it.

It was for the family thatā€™s cut out takeout to pay the heating bill. For the welder who canā€™t get approved for a mortgage in his own city. For the young couple living in their parentsā€™ basement, not because theyā€™re lazyā€”but because everything is rigged against them. And for the first time in a long time, they heard someone say out loud what theyā€™ve been thinking in silence: This isnā€™t your fault. Itā€™s theirs.

We donā€™t need more government programs.

We donā€™t need more subsidies or slogans.

We need leaders with a spineā€”who will stop apologizing for this country and start rebuilding it.

Pierre Poilievre stood in front of thousands in Surrey and said: ā€œWeā€™re going to bring it home.ā€

And maybe, just maybe, this time… we will.

Invite your friends and earn rewards

If you enjoy The Opposition with Dan Knight , share it with your friends and earn rewards when they subscribe.

Invite Friends

Continue Reading

Trending

X