Connect with us

Opinion

Red Deer, for many is “A nice place to work but they don’t want to live here”

Published

8 minute read

October 16 2017 is the final exam for the current city council, mayor and the school boards. That is the day the citizens of Red Deer will elect a mayor, a city council and 2 school boards.
Some incumbents, will retire and not put their name forward, others may fail. Some will pass the exam solely on their personalities, good looks or connections, while others will work hard to pass and continue on for 4 more years.
What will they have on their resume?
The city has declined, dramatically while others have grown and prospered. The city shrank by 1%, (Blackfalds grew by 8%), unemployment is increasing, crime is increasing, vacancies are increasing, new home builds are down, businesses are leaving, and taxes are increasing. The north side of the river population 30,000, is still being discriminated against. No new schools in 30 years, still no high school, no new swimming pool in 30 years, no new indoor ice rink in 30 years. Blackfalds is fundraising for a second indoor ice rink, now with a population of only 9510.
I like to ask myself, why do these intelligent members of councils, school boards and mayors discriminate against sectors of Red Deer? I know that the north side of the river has been discriminated against both in operations and in planning, so when will my area be discriminated against, next year, next decade, or next election?
What will happen in the next nine months?
First of all this will be their final budget. The fiscal hawks, will have to show that they had what it took, to be fiscally responsible, these past 4 years. Can they square the circle of continuing tax increases, continued growth at city hall, continued increased spending, while the citizens are earning less, losing jobs, and ultimately leaving, with almost a 1,000 people moving out of Red Deer last year, 777 from north of the river.
Some will say that any decisions they make, you will not see any effect for 2 years. Fine, so what decisions did you make 3 years ago, that saw almost a thousand people leave the city last year, that saw our city become the second highest in crime rate across Canada. What decisions did you make 2 years ago that saw our unemployment rate increase last month, and businesses move from downtown to gasoline alley? What decisions did you make last year that would make you think that the city will not grow next year, negating the need for the annual census? Do not make those same decisions.
Apparently, for 700 former residents, it is better to fight rush hour traffic and drive back and forth to Blackfalds, than to live in Red Deer. What happened to make Red Deer; “A nice place to work, but I wouldn’t want to live there.”
Will the city increase taxes? Will they continue putting 1% in savings and blame that for increases? It shouldn’t because if they stayed with last year’s budget it would still be there. Will they expand staff levels, increase personnel, security, operations without reducing and redundancies? The city shrank by 1% and cost of living barely rose over 1%, 100 x 99% x101%= 99.99%. The fiscal hawks better have a good explanation for any tax increases.
The downtown protectionists, will have to explain why downtown businesses are leaving for areas like gasoline alley, after we spent so much, time, money and energy downtown. Roads, services, patios, entertainment, advertising, and businesses are leaving. What was our return on investment? Will we continue to pour millions into downtown projects at the expense of other areas and taxpayers?
Why is there no plans for a high school, north of the river? The area north of 11a will provide homes for 20,000+ more residents, meaning there will be 50,000+ residents north of the river, yet there is no plan for a high school. The incumbents will blame others, the city, the province, past-members, but they had 4 years to implement a plan. Why has fund raising become so necessary?
Nine months will see new initiatives brought forward, only to be forgotten on October 17. Incumbents will finally have an opinion, find a voice, and express their beliefs, before becoming mute again on October 17. New medias will offer more insight into the incumbents. The election of Notley in Alberta, Trudeau in Ottawa, and Trump in the USA will give a voice and optimism to the need for change, and give some awareness to re-election campaigns.
Perhaps in the next nine months leading up to the election on October 16, 2017, someone might say it is time. Instead of building the 7th or 8th indoor ice rink south of the river we could build a 2nd one north of the river. Instead of building the 5th and 6th high school south of the river we could build a 1st one north of the river. Instead of tearing down the recreation centre downtown so we can make the indoor pool bigger and the outdoor pool smaller we could build a 2nd pool north of the river.
Perhaps in the next nine months, an incumbent will say, the Collicutt Centre was a huge success, and kick started development in the south-east we should replicate that success in the north-west. We could build it by Hazlett Lake, fulfilling some of the needs of the residents, kick start development and give boost to our tourism and diversification desires.
The incumbents cannot say yes to every demand, and we do not expect them too. We would be outraged if for example, they only said yes to men and only said no to women. Would we be equally outraged if they only said yes to the south and only no to the north? Apparently not given the evidence of no high school ever, no new schools, indoor pools and indoor ice rinks in 30 plus years, north of the river.
The next nine months leading up to the municipal election on Monday October 16, 2017 will see some changes, will see stands taken, ideas proposed and many explanations. Will it be enough or is there enough impetus for change? We will have to see.
Thank you.

Follow Author

Opinion

British Columbians protest Trump while Eby brings their province to its knees

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Bruce Pardy

Recently, millions participated in “No Kings” protests across the United States and elsewhere, including the Vancouver Art Gallery where people gathered to resist authoritarianism and protect democracy. But inexplicably, they were there to protest Donald Trump. The politician dismantling their rights is British Columbia Premier David Eby.

It’s quintessentially Canadian. Vancouver’s best are outraged about the state of democracy in America, but oblivious to the autocracy of their own governments.

Quietly, Eby is transforming B.C. In early 2024, his government proposed to amend the province’s Land Act, which governs the use of Crown land in the province. It planned to give B.C.’s hundreds of First Nations a veto over mining, hydro projects, farming, forestry, docks and communication towers. The government tried to consult quietly, but the backlash was immediate and vociferous. It withdrew the proposals, promising to be more transparent. But it did not shelve its objectives or plans. And did not deliver on its promise. Instead, it sought to make agreements over specific territories with specific Aboriginal groups, often negotiated covertly and announced after the fact.

In April 2024, the Eby government recognized Aboriginal title to Haida Gwaii, the archipelago on Canada’s west coast. Around 5,000 people live on Haida Gwaii, about half Haida, who voted overwhelmingly in favour of the deal. But non-Haida residents had no say. Two classes of citizens now live on Haida Gwaii; one with political status and the other without. The Haida agreement says private property will be honoured, but private property is incompatible with Aboriginal title, which is communal. If Haida Gwaii really is subject to Aboriginal title, then no one can own parts of it privately.

Eby has said that the Haida agreement is to serve as a “template.” In January 2025, his government revealed that it had made an agreement for Indigenous management of land and resources with the shíshálh (Sechelt) Nation on B.C.’s Sunshine Coast. Aboriginal title is in the works. The agreement was made in August 2024 on the eve of the provincial election but kept hidden for five months. Residents were in the dark until the government revealed the finished deal.

Even before that agreement was negotiated, shíshálh Nation and the government had developed a “Dock Management Plan” to impose various new and onerous rules on private property owners in Pender Harbour, including red “no go” zones and rules that made many existing docks and boat houses non-compliant. Residents with long-standing docks in full legal compliance had no right to negotiate, to be consulted or to be grandfathered.

In June 2025, the government gave the Tŝilhqot’in Nation a veto over mining projects in the Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) area. In an agreement with the Squamish Nation, it established 33 cultural sites off limits to development. The government has also allowed First Nations to close provincial parks to the non-Aboriginal public.

Much of this can be traced to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), and to the B.C. statute that incorporates UNDRIP into B.C. law. That statute, known as DRIPA, was passed unanimously by the B.C. legislature in 2019. It calls upon the B.C. government to “take all measures necessary to ensure the laws of British Columbia are consistent with the Declaration.” UNDRIP says, literally, that the land belongs to Indigenous peoples. To be charitable, not all members of the legislature may have understood what they were doing. Next up for DRIPA transformation appears to be the B.C. Heritage Conservation Act.

Courts have been doing their part. Recently, the City of Richmond sent out a letter to property owners. “For those whose property is in the area outlined in black,” the letter reads, “the Court has declared aboriginal title to your property which may compromise the status and validity of your ownership… The entire area outlined in green has been claimed on appeal by the Cowichan First Nations.”

The Richmond letter is a consequence of a recent decision of the B.C. Supreme Court, which awarded the Cowichan First Nation Aboriginal title over 800 acres of land in Richmond. Wherever Aboriginal title is found to exist, said the court, it is a “prior and senior right” to other property interests, whether the land is public or private.

Governments and the courts work together on this project, too. In September, the Eby government, along with the federal government and the Haida Council, applied for a consent order declaring Aboriginal title to Haida Gwaii. The B.C. Supreme Court obliged. The effect of that declaration is to incorporate the Haida agreement’s recognition of Aboriginal title into a constitutional right under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. No future government can reverse it.

B.C. is home to the most famous ostrich farm in the world, but it’s the people who have their heads in the sand. “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty,” said abolitionist Wendell Phillips in 1852, “power is ever stealing from the many to the few.” Assume good faith on the part of governments at your peril. Especially in British Columbia, where the premier is mounting an existential threat to the future of his own province.

Bruce Pardy

Professor of Law, Queen’s University
Continue Reading

International

Biden’s Autopen Orders declared “null and void”

Published on

MXM logo MxM News

In a 91-page report released Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee accused Joe Biden’s inner circle of executing and concealing presidential actions without his knowledge, declaring that any orders signed through the autopen were “null and void.” The Republican-led panel, chaired by Rep. James Comer (R-KY), said it uncovered evidence that senior aides used the mechanical signature device to authorize pardons, commutations, and executive directives while Biden’s mental and physical decline worsened — all to preserve “the illusion of presidential authority.”

“The Biden Autopen Presidency will go down as one of the biggest political scandals in U.S. history,” the report stated. “As Americans saw President Biden’s decline with their own eyes, his inner circle sought to deceive the public, cover up his condition, and took unauthorized executive actions that are now invalid.” The committee urged the Justice Department to launch a full criminal investigation into what it called a “cover-up of historic proportions,” naming several aides who invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about their roles. It also demanded the D.C. Board of Medicine investigate Biden’s physician for allegedly hiding his true medical state.

According to the report, internal emails and documentation revealed a “haphazard process” surrounding clemency and other executive actions, with no reliable record confirming Biden’s personal approval. Comer said the findings raise profound constitutional concerns. “If unelected aides were using the autopen to execute presidential powers without Joe Biden’s knowledge or consent, that is an assault on the Constitution itself,” he said.

The White House has not yet responded.

Continue Reading

Trending

X