Connect with us

Opinion

PM Trudeau’s “Monetary Policy” gaffe could cost the Liberals the election. But will it?

Published

8 minute read

Back in 1993 things were not going well for Canada’s Progressive Conservative Government.  Brian Mulroney’s government had served 2 mandates and Canadians were clearly ready to move on.  The Conservatives decided Kim Campbell would be the best leader to bring a renewed excitement to their reelection hopes.  Campbell was a fresh face and that was important to the party which was losing support quickly.  She was also from Vancouver, which was a nice change for the party normally represented by leaders from Ontario or Quebec.  Even more importantly, when she won the leadership she would become the first female leader of a country in North America.  As Canadians would discover just a few months later though, no one cared about any of that.  That campaign did not go well.  The Conservatives not only lost.  They were decimated right out of official party standing.  The governing party won just 2 seats in the entire nation (Jean Charest in Quebec, and Elsie Wayne in New Brunswick). Kim Campbell did not even win her own seat.  Henceforth the Reform Party represented the Conservative voice for the next two elections.

For one reason or another, Canadians simply did not connect with Kim Campbell.  One of the biggest gaffes of that election campaign came when a reporter pressed Campbell for details on an issue and she replied “The election is not a time to discuss serious issues.”  That was the wrong answer.  Despite what she may have truly meant, all Canadians heard was “I don’t need to explain anything to you.”.  That was exactly the wrong thing to say at the worst possible time.

Why bring this up now, 28 years later? Well Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has made his first major gaffe of this election campaign.   And for those who care about monetary policy (which should be everyone who pays taxes and works or has savings, etc) it’s very likely as stunning a statement as Kim Campbell made three decades ago.

First some background.  In 2021, Canadians find themselves in an astounding situation.  When the covid pandemic hit last year governments all over the world shut down their economies for weeks, and then months.  Government stimulus was the order of the day and Canada’s was among the most generous in the world.  People were paid to stay at home.  Businesses were paid to continue to provide jobs to people working from home.  Landlords were paid to keep tenants afloat.  All in all, government money is being spent at unprecedented rates.

To pay for all this the Trudeau government attempted to pass a bill through Parliament which would allow it to raise taxes at will without a budget and without even coming back to ask Parliament to present a plan or ask for approval.  That didn’t go over so well.  But instead of turning back the taps, or introducing a budget with higher taxes the government worked out a plan with the Bank of Canada.  How this works basically is that every month the Bank of Canada prints out a few billion dollars, and the government uses that to pay for all the stimulus they want.  Over the first year of covid that totalled about 350 Billion dollars!

The Bank of Canada has left the core function expressed in its mandate in order to print all this extra money.  Despite it’s best efforts to decouple inflation from the printing of extra money, it’s not working.  Canada’s inflation rate has been blowing through the target of 2% month after month after month.

This is the the mandate as expressed by the Bank of Canada itself on its website.

The Bank of Canada is the nation’s central bank. Its mandate, as defined in the Bank of Canada Act, is “to promote the economic and financial welfare of Canada.” The Bank’s vision is to be a leading central bank—dynamic, engaged and trusted—committed to a better Canada.

The Bank has four core functions:

  • Monetary policy: The Bank’s monetary policy framework aims to keep inflation low, stable and predictable.
  • Financial system: The Bank promotes safe, sound and efficient financial systems within Canada and internationally.
  • Currency: The Bank designs, issues and distributes Canada’s bank notes.
  • Funds management: The Bank acts as fiscal agent for the Government of Canada, managing its public debt programs and foreign exchange reserves.

The Bank of Canada’s mandate is expiring at the end of this year and the new mandate could change.  Some are saying the Bank should continue to print money at an unprecedented rate and Canadians will learn to live with high inflation.  Considering this drives up the cost of everything from our homes and vehicles, to the food we eat there could hardly be a more important issue.  That’s why PM Trudeau’s response to this question in Vancouver this week is so stunning.  When asked if he would consider a higher tolerance for inflation going forward here’s what he said.

 

Reporter Question about the renewal of the Bank of Canada mandate due at the end of 2021:

-Do you have thoughts about that mandate?  Would you consider a slightly higher tolerance for inflation?

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau: “When I think about the biggest, most important economic policy this government, if re-elected, would move forward, you’ll forgive me if I don’t think about monetary policy.” 

Of course this spurred an immediate reaction from the opposition Conservatives.  That oppostion is perhaps best summed up in this address from Pierre Poilievre.

The question is, will Canadians punish Prime Minister Trudeau for either lacking basic economic knowledge, or not caring about it?  Kim Campbell failed to win her own seat, but she did not seem to connect well with Canadians at all even before that election campaign.  Justin Trudeau has so far been immune to gaffes.  Even though he’s had more than 5 years in government, millions of Canadians stand by him loyally.  Will this time be any different?

After 15 years as a TV reporter with Global and CBC and as news director of RDTV in Red Deer, Duane set out on his own 2008 as a visual storyteller. During this period, he became fascinated with a burgeoning online world and how it could better serve local communities. This fascination led to Todayville, launched in 2016.

Follow Author

Business

For the record—former finance minister did not keep Canada’s ‘fiscal powder dry’

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Ben Eisen

In case you haven’t heard, Chrystia Freeland resigned from cabinet on Monday. Reportedly, the straw that broke the camel’s back was Prime Minister Trudeau’s plan to send all Canadians earning up to $150,000 a onetime $250 tax “rebate.” In her resignation letter, Freeland seemingly took aim at this ill-advised waste of money by noting “costly political gimmicks.” She could not have been more right, as my colleagues and I have written herehere and elsewhere.

Indeed, Freeland was right to excoriate the government for a onetime rebate cheque that would do nothing to help Canada’s long-term economic growth prospects, but her reasoning was curious given her record in office. She wrote that such gimmicks were unwise because Canada must keep its “fiscal powder dry” given the possibility of trade disputes with the United States.

Again, to a large extent Freeland’s logic is sound. Emergencies come up from time to time, and governments should be particularly frugal with public dollars during non-emergency periods so money is available when hard times come.

For example, the federal government’s generally restrained approach to spending during the 1990s and 2000s was an important reason Canada went into the pandemic with its books in better shape than most other countries. This is an example of how keeping “fiscal powder dry” can help a government be ready when emergencies strike.

However, much of the sentiment in Freeland’s resignation letter does not match her record as finance minister.

Of course, during the pandemic and its immediate aftermath, it’s understandable that the federal government ran large deficits. However, several years have now past and the Trudeau government has run large continuous deficits. This year, the government forecasts a $48.3 billion deficit, which is larger than the $40 billion target the government had previously set.

A finance minister committed to keeping Canada’s fiscal powder dry would have pushed for balanced budgets so Ottawa could start shrinking the massive debt burden accumulated during COVID. Instead, deficits persisted and debt has continued to climb. As a result, federal debt may spike beyond levels reached during the pandemic if another emergency strikes.

Minister Freeland’s reported decision to oppose the planned $250 onetime tax rebates is commendable. But we should be cautious not to rewrite history. Despite Freeland’s stated desire to keep Canada’s “fiscal powder dry,” this was not the story of her tenure as finance minister. Instead, the story is one of continuous deficits and growing debt, which have hurt Canada’s capacity to withstand the next fiscal emergency whenever it does arrive.

Continue Reading

Daily Caller

Former FBI Asst Director Warns Terrorists Are ‘Well Embedded’ In US, Says Alert Should Be ‘Higher’

Published on

Chris Swecker on “Anderson Cooper 360” discussing terror threat

 

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By Hailey Gomez

Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker warned Friday on CNN that terrorists are “well embedded” within the United States, stating the threat level should be “higher” following an attack in Germany.

A 50-year-old Saudi doctor allegedly drove his car into a crowded Christmas market in Magdeburg, Germany on Friday leaving at least two people dead and nearly 70 injured so far. On “Anderson Cooper 360,” Swecker was asked if he believes there is a potential “threat” to the U.S. as concerns have risen since the “fall of Afghanistan.” 

“I think so,” Swecker said. “I mean, we’ve heard FBI Director Chris Wray talk about this in conjunction with the relative ease of getting across the southern border. And, you know, there’s no question that terrorists have come across that border, whether they’re lone terrorists or terrorist cells. And they’re well embedded inside this country.”

WATCH:

“I’ve worked terrorist cases. Hezbollah has always had a presence here. They raise funds here, and they can always be called into action as an active terrorist cell,” Swecker added. “So I think the alert here, especially around Christmas time, is elevated. It probably ought to be higher than what it is right now, because I mentioned that complacency earlier. And I fear that complacency as someone who has a background in this field.”

Concerns over the Biden-Harris administration’s handling of the U.S. southern border have raised questions over the vetting process of illegal immigrants entering the country.

On Tuesday United States Border Patrol (USPB) Chief Jason Owens announced in a social post that an unidentified South African national who was “suspected of terror”  was arrested in Brooklyn, N.Y. The illegal immigrant had originally been detained in Texas for criminal trespassing but was released due to the “information available at the time.”

In August an estimated 99 individuals on the U.S. terrorist watch list had been released into the country after crossing through the southern border, according to a congressional report. The report found that between fiscal years 2021 and 2023 USBP agents encountered more than 250 illegal migrants on the terrorist watchlist, with nearly 100 of those individuals being later released into the U.S. by the Department of Homeland Security.

Continue Reading

Trending

X