Censorship Industrial Complex
Julian Assange laments growing censorship, suppression of truth in the West upon release
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ef0c/3ef0c4d54b7e846107d61caebc76892ca3b0668a" alt=""
Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks, attends the European council on October 1, 2024, in Strasbourg, France
From LifeSiteNews
By Frank Wright
Speaking after 12 years of confinement, Julian Assange warned of the erosion of free speech in the West, linking his own prosecution to global censorship, political corruption, and attacks on honest journalism.
On October 1, Julian Assange made his first major speech since his release. In it, he delivered a verdict on how we are governed which is as damning as it is revealing.
āI am not free today because the system worked,ā Assange said, āI am free today because after years of incarceration I pled guilty to journalism.ā
Julian Assange was convicted under the U.S. Espionage Act and spent 12 years in confinement, first taking refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London in 2012, followed by five years in Britainās maximum-security prison in Belmarsh.
Had his plea not been accepted heĀ facedĀ a sentence of 175 years in prison. He was speaking in Strasbourg, France, at a hearingĀ convened by the Parliamentary Assembly of the European Council ā which recognized Assange as a āpolitical prisoner.ā
Saying how āincarceration has taken its toll,ā Assange noted how the world he had rejoined had changed ā for the worse:
I regret how much ground has been lost during that time period. How expressing the truth has been undermined, attacked, weakened, and diminished.
Assange gave a chilling account of the state of the Western world today, saying he now seesĀ āmore impunity, more secrecy, more retaliation for telling the truth, and more self-censorship.ā
He believes that his own treatment was a turning point for the suppression of freedom of speech in the West:
It is hard not to draw a line from the U.S. governmentās prosecution of me ā its crossing the Rubicon by internationally criminalizing journalism ā to the chill climate for freedom of expression that exists now.
During his speech, Assange alleged that former CIA director Mike Pompeo devised a plan to kill him, following Wikileaksā revelation in 2017 of CIA operations in Europe.
Citing the testimony of āmore than 30 former and current U.S. intelligence officials,ā Assange said that āit is a matter of public record that under Pompeoās explicit direction the CIA drew up plans to kidnap and to assassinate meā while he was in the Ecuadorian embassy in London.
TheĀ revelationsĀ published by Wikileaks which prompted the plot included evidence of CIA espionage on European governments and industries. In addition, WikileaksĀ reportsĀ ārevealed the CIAās vast production of malware [spy software] and viruses, its subversion of supply chains, its subversion of antivirus software, cars, smart TVs, and iPhones.ā
Assange was originally pursued for havingĀ publicizedĀ U.S. actions in Guantanamo Bay, and alleged war crimes in Iraq, which he explains intensified following Wikileaksā CIA revelations.
Cracks in our system
Assangeās case and his extraordinary testimony reveals one of many fault lines in the Western world.
āToday, the free world is no longer free.ā said Salvadorean President Nayib Bukele, describing also how the West is becoming āmore pessimistic,ā adding that, ā[t]ragically, we can see more evidence of this decline every day.ā Speaking at the United Nations on September 30, he said:
When the Free World became free it was due to freedom of expression, freedom before the law. But once a nation abandons the principles that make it free itās only a question of time before it completely loses its freedom.
The āFree Worldā is no longer free.
El āMundo Libreā ya no es libre. pic.twitter.com/IOrLv33KbW
— Nayib Bukele (@nayibbukele) September 30, 2024
His observations are echoed by statements from across the political divide in the U.S.
The former Democrat Tulsi Gabbard warned on October 5 that the party she left now seeks to undermine the First Amendment. She said onĀ X,Ā āPeople like Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris do not believe in the First Amendment because they see it as an obstacle to achieving their real goal: ātotal control.āā
Her remarks followed those made by Hillary Clinton in a recent video interview, in which Clinton said āwhether itās Facebook or Twitter/X or Instagram or TikTok ā¦ if they donāt moderate and monitor the content, we lose total control.ā
Hillary said it: when you allow free speech, āwe lose total control.ā People like Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris do not believe in the First Amendment because they see it as an obstacle to achieving their real goal: ātotal control.ā https://t.co/euQJgAVxV4
— Tulsi Gabbard šŗ (@TulsiGabbard) October 5, 2024
Clintonās remarks about losing ātotal controlā come after Sen. John KerryĀ spokeĀ at the World Economic Forum on September 25, sayingĀ āour First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to just hammer [disinformation] out of existence.ā
Kerry argued that opposition to the polices of the WEF was fueled by ādisinformationā when critics in fact simply dislike its policies. Populism generally is described as aĀ threatĀ to democracy in the West, when it is also simply theĀ preferenceĀ for popular policies, against the unpopular ones of the current ruling elite.
āDisinformation,ā and āmisinformationā are terms invented and used by the language and ideological police to hide their malicious intent.
It appears that unpopular policies such as those of permanent war, Net Zero, deindustrialization, and denationalization can only be pursued with ātotal controlā of the information seen by the public.
The meaningful political debate is not about left and right. It is about the meaning of what is right, and the outrage at what is obviously wrong. Assange says āit is uncertain what we can doā about the āimpunityā of our leadership, which as yet has faced no meaningful consequences for its pursuit of deeply unpopular policies at the expense of widespread corruption and defended by censorship.
Censorship Industrial Complex
Germanyās Shocking War on Online Speech: Armed Police Raids for Online āInsults,ā āHate Speech,ā and āMisinformationā
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/161f9/161f951f05f9b163f3fb3a32b64b494cc0466cef" alt=""
A shocking discussion on CBS News’ 60 Minutes has highlighted the stark limits of online speech in Germany, where oppressive scenes once thought to be relegated to history and dystopian fiction, show law enforcement has been conducting pre-dawn raids and confiscating electronics from individuals accused of posting content deemed as “hate speech.”
In typical Orwellian fashion, despite these speech raids, officials insist that free speech still exists.
Dr. MatthƤus Fink joined host Sharyn Alfonsi to explain how these laws operate and how those targeted by authorities typically react. According to Fink, most individuals are initially shocked when police confront them over online posts.
|
![]() |
60 Minutes followed armed police on early morning raids, confiscating devices of people accused of online “hate speech.”
|
āThey say ā in Germany we say, āDas wird man ja wohl noch sagen dĆ¼rfen,āā(You should still be allowed to say that) Fink remarked, illustrating the disbelief many express when they realize their statements can result in legal action. He noted that many Germans assume they are protected by free speech laws but learn too late that specific kinds of speech are punishable.
Alfonsi delved deeper, questioning the scope of these restrictions. Beyond banning swastika imagery and Holocaust denial, Fink pointed out that publicly insulting someone is also a criminal offense.
āAnd itās a crime to insult them online as well?ā Alfonsi asked.
Fink affirmed that online insults carry even steeper penalties than face-to-face insults. āThe fine could be even higher if you insult someone in the internet,ā he elaborated. āBecause in internet, it stays there. If we are talking face to face, you insult me, I insult you, OK. Finish. But if youāre in the internet, if I insult you or a politicianā¦ā
Watch the videoĀ here.
The segment aired shortly after Vice President JD VanceĀ spoke in Munich, warning about the dangers of European nations suppressing free speech. Vance emphasized that democracy cannot function without the fundamental right to express opinions.
āDemocracy rests on the sacred principle that the voice of the people matters. Thereās no room for firewalls,ā Vance argued. āYou either uphold the principle or you donāt.ā
In response to the 60 Minutes feature, Vance posted: “Insulting someone is not a crime, and criminalizing speech is going to put real strain on European-US relationships.” He added: “This is Orwellian, and everyone in Europe and the US must reject this lunacy.”
|
|
You subscribe to Reclaim The Net because you value free speech and privacy. Each issue we publish is a commitment to defend these critical rights, providing insights and actionable information to protect and promote liberty in the digital age.
Despite our wide readership, less than 0.2% of our readers contribute financially. With your support, we can do more than just continue; we can amplify voices that are often suppressed and spread the word about the urgent issues of censorship and surveillance. Consider making a modest donation ā just $5, or whatever amount you can afford. Your contribution will empower us to reach more people, educate them about these pressing issues, and engage them in our collective cause. Thank you for considering a contribution. Each donation not only supports our operations but also strengthens our efforts to challenge injustices and advocate for those who cannot speak out. Thank you.
|
Censorship Industrial Complex
Is Our Five-Year Nightmare Finally Over?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d2bf/2d2bfdcfd26cabf2e3cba74c72676cb360c4c310" alt=""
From the Brownstone Institute
ByĀ
ĀRobert F. Kennedy, Jr.ās confirmation as the Secretary of Health and Human Services in the US is the ultimate repudiation of the Covid policy response.
The scheme of lockdown-until-vaccination was the biggest effort of government and industry on a global scale on historical record. It was all designed to transfer wealth to winning industries (pharma, online retail, streaming services, online education), divide and conquer the population, and consolidate power in the administrative state.
By 2021, RFK, Jr., had emerged as the worldās most vocal, erudite, and knowledgeable critic of the scheme. In two brilliant books āĀ The Real Anthony FauciĀ andĀ The Wuhan Cover-UpĀ ā he documented the entire enterprise and dated the evolution of the pandemic industry from its postwar inception to the present. There was simply no way to read these books and think about the corporatist cabal in the same way.
The circumstances that led to his appointment at HHS are themselves implausible and remarkable. Perceiving President Biden to be a weak candidate ā one who had forced masks and shots on the population and brutally censored tech and media āĀ he decided to make a run for president, presuming that there would be an open primary. There wasnāt one, so he was forced into an independent run.
That effort was chewed up by the usual political dynamic that befalls every third-party effort ā too many ballot-access barriers plus the usual logic ofĀ Duvergerās law. That left the campaign in a difficult spot. At the same time, two huge political shifts had become clear. The Democratic Party had become a vessel and a front mainly for the administrative state with a veneer of woke ideology, while the Republican Party was being taken over by refugees from the Democrats, in effect creating a new Trump party out of the remnants of the other two.
The rest is legendary. Trump linked up with Elon Musk to do to the federal government what he did when he took over Twitter, taking the company private, gutting the place of embedded federal assets, and firing 4 out of 5 workers. In the midst of this, and faced with a terrifying flurry of legal attacks, Trump dodged an assassinās bullet. That triggered terrible memories of RFK, Jr.ās father and uncle, and thus sparked discussions about coming together.
Within a matter of weeks, we had a new coalition that brought together old antagonists, as many people and groups seemingly in the same instant realized their conjoined interests in cleaning up the corporatist cartel. With the newly freed platform of X to reach the public, MAGA/MAHA/DOGE was born.
Trump won and chose RFK, Jr., to lead the most powerful public health agency in the world. The barrier was Senate confirmation, but that was achieved through some incredible triangulation that made it extremely difficult to vote no.
In the big picture, you can measure the size of this titanic shift in American politics by the way the votes in the Senate lined up. All Republicans but one voted for the most prominent scion of the Democratic Party to head the health empire while all Democrats voted no. That alone is striking, and a testament to the power of the pharma lobby, which, during the hearings, was exposed as the hidden hand behind the most passionate opponents of the confirmation.
Is our nightmare over? Not yet. Writing not even a month into the second presidential term of Donald Trump, it is still unclear just how much authority he truly exercises over the sprawling executive branch. For that matter, no one can even agree on how large this branch is: between 2.2 million and 3 million employees and somewhere between 400 and 450 agencies. The financial bleed in this realm is unthinkable and far worse than even the biggest cynic can imagine.
Five former secretaries of the Treasury took to the pages of theĀ New York TimesĀ with a shockingĀ claim. āThe nationās payment system has historically been operated by a very small group of nonpartisan career civil servants.ā This has included a career employee called āfiscal assistant secretaryāa post that for the prior eight decades had been reserved exclusively for civil servants to ensure impartiality and public confidence in the handling and payment of federal funds.ā
There is no reason even to read between the lines. What this means is that no person voted into office by the people and no one appointed by such a person has access to the federal books since 1946. This is startling beyond belief. No owner of any company would ever tolerate being barred from the accounting offices and payment systems. And no company can offer any public stock without independent audits and open books.
And yet almost 80 years have gone by during which time neither has been true for this gigantic enterprise called the federal government. That means that $193 trillion has been spent by an institution that has never faced granulated oversight from the people and never met the normal demands that every enterprise faces every day.
The usual habit in Washington has been to treat every elected leader and their appointments as temporary and transitory marionettes, people who come and go and disturb little to nothing about the normal operations of government. This new administration seems to have every intention to change that but the job is inconceivably challenging. As much public support as MAGA/MAHA/DOGE enjoy for now, and as many people from those groups are getting embedded in the power structure, they are outnumbered and outmaneuvered by millions of agents of the old order.
This transition will not be easy if it happens at all.
The inertia of the old order is mighty. Even on the issue of health and pandemics, there is already confusion. CBS News hasĀ reportedĀ that Fauci-loyalist and mRNA pusher Gerald Parker will head the White House Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response or OPPR. The report cited only unnamed āhealth officialsā and the appointment has been celebrated by Scott Gottlieb, the Pfizer board member who nudged Trump into backing lockdowns in 2020.
All the while, this appointment has not been confirmed by the White House. We do not know if OPPR, created by Congressional charter, will even be funded. The reporter will not reveal his sources āĀ raising the question of why any appointment having to do with health should be surrounded by such cloak-and-dagger machinations.
If Dr. Parker becomes ensconced in this position and another health emergency is declared, this time for Bird flu, HHS and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., will not be in any kind of decision-making position at all.
The larger problems have to do with a broader question: is the president really in charge of the executive branch? Can he hire and fire? Can he spend money or decline to spend money? Can he set policy for the agencies?
One might suppose that the whole answer to these questions can be found in Article 2, Section 1: āThe executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.ā And yet that sentence was written almost 100 years before Congress created this thing called the ācivil serviceā that nowhere appears in the Constitution. This fourth branch has grown in size and power to swamp both the presidency and the legislature.
Courts are going to have to sort this out, and already an avalanche of lawsuits has hit the new administration for daring to presume control over agencies and their activities of which the president is and must necessarily be held accountable. Lower federal courts seem to be demanding that the president be that in name only, while the Supreme Court might have a different opinion.
The much-ballyhooed āconstitutional crisisā consists of nothing other than an attempt to reassert the original constitutional design of government.
This is the background template in which RFK, Jr., takes power at HHS, and oversees all the sub-agencies. These agencies played a huge role in covering for the attack on liberty and rights over five years. His confirmation is a symbolic repudiation of the most egregious public policies on record. And yet, the repudiation is entirely implicit: there has been no commission, no admission of error, no one truly held responsible, and no real accountability.
The trajectory on which we find ourselves affords many reasons for champagne celebrations, but sober up quickly. There is a very long way to go and enormous barriers in place to get us to the point that we are really safe again from the marauding corporatist/statist complex and their plots and schemes to rob the public of rights and liberties. In the meantime, to invoke a common phrase, keep these new appointees in your thoughts and prayers.
-
Alberta2 days ago
Snapshots of Alberta and Canadian trade with the US
-
Censorship Industrial Complex1 day ago
Germanyās Shocking War on Online Speech: Armed Police Raids for Online āInsults,ā āHate Speech,ā and āMisinformationā
-
Censorship Industrial Complex2 days ago
Is Our Five-Year Nightmare Finally Over?
-
Opinion2 days ago
Two New Studies Find Fewer Clouds Cause Warmer Temps
-
Bruce Dowbiggin1 day ago
With Carney On Horizon This Is No Time For Poilievre To Soften His Message
-
Health2 days ago
The FDA is trying to shut down his successful cancer treatments. Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski’s patients are outraged
-
National2 days ago
Did the Liberals Backdoor Ruby Dhalla to Hand Mark Carney the Crown?
-
Daily Caller2 days ago
Trumpās Energy Secretary Issues Dire Warning To Globalists About Green Energy Lunacy