Connect with us

Opinion

Is the City of Red Deer a Small Tent that is getting even smaller?

Published

5 minute read

Red Deer appears to be shrinking in more ways than in population. Our city is becoming a smaller and smaller tent. The most recent example is the city’s decision to withdraw from the Central Alberta Economic Partnership, (CAEP).
With a partnership of 40 municipalities representing 300,000 residents, and Red Deer representing 1/3 of the population. It is a commendable group seeking solidarity in voice with the larger governments. This was a big tent endeavour that could be a help or a hindrance, but as in any group it would be impossible to get unanimity on any issue. Of course politics can impede or derail even the best of intentions.
Perhaps Red Deer outgrew the CAEP, which is a possibility, but should we withdraw. Could we not listen and learn from the other partners. While Red Deer is shrinking in population, others are growing.
Councillor Lee recommended the withdrawal, citing the plan to focus on Red Deer’s interest like Sports Tourism and Downtown Redevelopment. I interpret this to mean 2019 Canada Games and a new aquatic centre and concert hall downtown and the Riverlands.
Sports Tourism, is a great sound byte, but is not given any serious consideration beyond the 2019 games and how it benefit’s the downtown, that is it. Just ask Councillor Lee about building the Aquatic Centre around Hazlett Lake, visible from Hwy2, incorporating the lake for a high-profile highly-visible tourist attraction and not downtown, replacing the Rec Centre. I did and he responded, about the needs of the Riverlands.
I remember talking about moving the public yard, the railroad and downtown redevelopment almost 30 years ago. The city admits it will be 20 more years before the Riverlands is fully developed and downtown redevelopment is a never ending process.
The CAEP may be a tool, we have failed to avail ourselves. I know we deal with other communities on many issues, but perhaps we could adjust the bigger picture. Less focus on single issues and more real-time focus on bigger issues.
I have been told on numerous occasions that the city focuses too much of it’s time, money and energy on the downtown. Nearly 1,000 people moved out of Red Deer last year, 777 of those who moved away lived north of the river. The city hasn’t ever built a high school north of the river, they are planning 6 south of the river. They haven’t built a school north of the river in 41 years. It has been over 40 years since they built an indoor pool or indoor ice rink north of the river.
Blackfalds, built the Abbey Centre away from their downtown and their population grew by over 700 residents, last year. Penhold built a multi-plex near Hwy2 and their town needs to expropriate more land for residential developments.
These communities live in the same province, at the same time but are achieving drastically different results.
Perhaps instead of withdrawing into a smaller and smaller tent, instead of focusing inward it should be focusing outward and seek a bigger tent.
So, (I have to add) how about building a Collicutt type complex, incorporating a 51m pool, and an indoor ice rink, around Hazlett Lake. It is visible from Hwy 2 and Hwy 11A. You could incorporate the lake for competitive swimming, canoeing, boat races, outdoor skating, hockey games, even ice fishing. It would boost tourism, kick-start development in the north, help the less fortunate who needs a staycation destination. What do you say? I know; it is not downtown, how dare I even dream of it. Could you at least build a high school for the thousand plus students living on the north side?
These suggestions don’t fit in a small tent.

Follow Author

Business

Will Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ Tariffs End In Disaster Or Prosperity?

Published on

 

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By J.D. Foster

“Liberation Day” has come. So what does it mean? Beats the hell out of me.

What we know is that President Trump’s avalanche of tariffs was to hit a peak on April 2; not end, mind you; not necessarily “the” peak, as more could be on the way; but a peak.

No Trump policy more completely breaks with America’s past than his “beautiful” tariffs on just about everything coming into the United States from just about anywhere.

Will this new policy liberate American manufacturing from foreign shackles? Will it usher in a new era of prosperity, keeping in mind the United States had for many years the consistently best-performing economy in the industrialized world, even overcoming the many inane obstacles erected by the Biden-Harris Administration?

Or will it leave the United States isolated, friendless, and weakened?

The correct answer at this point is no one knows, not even the bloviating talking heads on TV confidently predicting demise or Shangri-la.

Think of it this way. Suppose you’re a restaurant chef and a woman hands you a new recipe. Her father turns 75 soon and they want to have a party at the restaurant. The recipe is for the father’s favorite dish, one her mother made for years.

The recipe looks old, with odd ingredients and processes you’ve not seen before. Now judge it as a chef.

You can’t. Even as you start chopping and dicing, mixing ingredients as instructed, you’re not too sure how this is going to turn out. You have to wait until the dish is on the plate and taste it.

That’s the case with Trump’s tariffs. How will this all turn out? It’s too soon to tell.

The stock market sure doesn’t like it, but why should it? The investor class doesn’t understand this any better than you do. What they do understand is this new policy has upended assumptions and created enormous new uncertainties. We know that dish as those ingredients are always good for a big pullback.

Much of the confusion arises because we don’t know the underlying policy and likely this uncertainty is intentional. Trump likes keeping his counterparts, in this case our trading partners, guessing. If it means Americans are confused for a bit, Trump’s cool with that. Breaking eggs to make an omelette. It will pass and America will be great again afterward. Bon appetite.

If the core policy is to erect massive and mostly permanent tariff walls behind which American firms can hide, then we know how this will turn out: America, meet the dustbin of history.

If the core policy is to force our trading partners to deal with America fairly by reducing their trade barriers after which Trump will remove his tariffs, then this could turn out very well. Tariffs (and non-tariff barriers) in the U.S. and those of our trading partners would fall, reinvigorating the free trade that has energized prosperity for decades.

Which is it? Walls and doom or freedom and prosperity? Again, too early to tell.

Whatever else Trump does in his second term, these tariffs will define his presidency, akin in consequence to Ronald Reagan’s pro-growth tax cuts and Joe Biden’s inflation.

Trump in his second term clearly lives by the saying, “go bold or go home.” He’s got “bold” down pat. We will see over the next year or so whether he and the Republicans go home. Has he liberated Democrats from any fear of Republicans in the mid-terms or in 2028, or he’s liberated America from any fear of Democratic socialism and wokism returning in our lifetimes. The chips are all-in. Soon we will see the cards. Uncertainty, indeed.

JD Foster is the former chief economist at the Office of Management and Budget and former chief economist and senior vice president at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. He now resides in relative freedom in the hills of Idaho.

Continue Reading

International

FREE MARINE LE PEN!’: Trump defends French populist against ‘lawfare’ charges

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Emily Mangiaracina

‘The Witch Hunt against Marine Le Pen is another example of European Leftists using Lawfare to silence Free Speech, and censor their Political Opponent,’ Donald Trump on Truth Social.

U.S. President Donald Trump defended French populist Marine Le Pen as a fellow victim of “lawfare” after the popular opposition leader was barred from the 2027 French national election due to embezzlement charges.

“The Witch Hunt against Marine Le Pen is another example of European Leftists using Lawfare to silence Free Speech, and censor their Political Opponent, this time going so far as to put that Opponent in prison,” Trump wrote Thursday night on Truth Social.

As of Sunday, Le Pen, head of the National Rally (RN) party, was leading polls to win the presidential election, being 11 to 17 points ahead of the party of the globalist President Emmanuel Macron.

On Monday, Le Pen was hit with a five-year ban on running for elected office and sentenced to four years of prison on charges of “misuse of EU funds,” although two years were suspended and the remaining two would be served through house arrest.

Le Pen and her co-defendants were specifically accused of illegally using European Parliament funds for party employees who “seldom (or never) dealt with affairs in Brussels or Strasbourg,” of which the court held Le Pen personally responsible for €474,000.

Her prison sentence has been paused as her lawyer appeals the ruling, but the ban on her running for office nevertheless remains in force, despite the fact that legal penalties are typically delayed during the appeals process, according to Politico.

In his Truth Social post, Trump accused French leftists of using a “minor charge” against Le Pen as a pretext to block her from office.

“Just before what would be a Big Victory, they get her on a minor charge that she probably knew nothing about – Sounds like a ‘bookkeeping’ error to me,” wrote Trump.

“It is all so bad for France, and the Great French People, no matter what side they are on. FREE MARINE LE PEN!” he concluded.

“I am Marine!” wrote Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán on X Monday, in a cry of solidarity with his fellow anti-globalist.

“This is nuts,” remarked former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis on X. “Lawfare is wrong whomever it targets. And it is stupid to boot. France’s neofascists will only benefit from this, just as the MAGA lot did. A panicking illiberal establishment across the West is diving headlong into a totalitarian pit.”

“I am shocked by the incredible tough verdict against Marine Le Pen,” chimed in Geert Wilders, leader of a Dutch populist party that won a national election in 2023. “I support and believe in her for the full 100% and I trust she will win the appeal and become President of France.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has called the ruling a “violation of democratic norms,” and Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage denounced Le Pen’s “cancellation” as based on “a very trumped-up charge.”

“In this country we have nine county council elections on 1 May that won’t happen, and may not happen for years,” said Farage, according to the BBC. “And in France, they cancelled a candidate. A candidate that would, without doubt, have won the next French presidential election. And you know what, if looks to me like a very trumped-up charge.”

“They will not succeed in silencing the voice of the French people,” said Santiago Abascal, head of the pro-family, right-wing Vox party in Spain.

Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini urged Le Pen to keep fighting, calling her verdict a “bad film” akin to political shut-outs occuring in other countries like Romania.

“We will not be intimidated, we will not stop: full speed ahead my friend,” said Salvini.

Continue Reading

Trending

X