Opinion
If the Molly Bannister Ext. wasn’t needed it would have easily disappeared years ago.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15291/15291c27559d0ddff067f7f5d531dcd30d5b6d85" alt=""
The city will be making a decision September 14 I do believe. Please contact the city by August 31 to let them know.
If the Molly Bannister Extension wasn’t needed, it would have been an easy decision to remove the right of way. But it is deemed necessary for proper planning. So, that brings me to my question, which is.
“How much suffering are so many Red Deer residents supposed to bear and how much are Red Deer taxpayers supposed to spend to benefit so few?”
The City Council in a split decision decided to postpone a decision about the Molly Bannister extension for 12 weeks.
Intuition tells me, that the Molly Bannister Extension will be built, but probably in about thirty years. This issue has been around for at least 25 or more years.
If the need for it, in city hall’s long term planning for a livable city, when the population will be substantially higher, wasn’t there, this issue would have disappeared years ago.
But the need is there. Some at city council would have us keep throwing money at it until a magic solution reveals itself.
32 Street is about 6 lanes wide now at 40 Ave. but the street is only metres from housing and apartments. Will a 12 million dollar traffic circle at 19 St. solve that?
We all know someone who thinks our issues are nothing compared to the old days or real cities, but I am not living in the old days, and if I wanted to live in Calgary, Edmonton, Toronto or Vancouver, I would.
Why not look after the residents along 32 St.? We don’t have a giant berm between us and with 32 St. only metres away. We know, Deerfoot Trail in Calgary is worse but we live in Red Deer.
The city mandated denser housing of approximately 17 residential units per hectare and with 60 hectares out of 73 hectares in most quarter sections, that would mean a 1,020 new homes and with 2.3 residents per unit that means 2346 residents.
The only entry and/or exit will be on 40 Ave, Westbound exiting traffic would then use 32St. or 19 ST. like all the traffic leaving all the other current and planned neighbourhoods along 22 St.
12 weeks will go by, and the city council will finally realize that the city planners were right and keep the Molly Bannister Extension right of way secure. The old information might have been collected 10 years ago, but information collected this year will be just as redundant in 30 years if we proceed.
In 30 years we may not need it, you never know. At least if we do, we can build it.
Like the developer said at the Bower Public Hearing: “If we remove the right-of-way now the city won’t be able to build the bridge in the future when they need it,” “ It would be very difficult.”
I am glad the majority on City Council decided against spending $200,000 on new soon to be redundant information and I hope they don’t think that a possible $12 million traffic circle on 19 Street will be their panacea.
All this so a developer can build 50 more houses backing onto Piper Creek.
How much will it cost the many, so the few can make more money? Just asking.
Business
DOJ drops Biden-era discrimination lawsuit against Elon Musk’s SpaceX
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07af6/07af61567d8c9487b8e693f7faa9b9245bc1c71a" alt=""
MxM News
Quick Hit:
The Justice Department has withdrawn a discrimination lawsuit against Elon Musk’s SpaceX that was filed during the Biden administration. The lawsuit accused SpaceX of discriminatory hiring practices against asylum seekers and refugees. The move follows ongoing cost-cutting measures led by Musk as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency under the 47th President Donald Trump’s administration.
Key Details:
-
The DOJ filed an unopposed motion in Texas federal court to lift a stay on the case, signaling its intent to formally dismiss the lawsuit.
-
The lawsuit, filed in 2023, alleged SpaceX required job applicants to be U.S. citizens or permanent residents, a restriction prosecutors argued was unlawful for many positions.
-
Elon Musk criticized the lawsuit as politically motivated, asserting that SpaceX was advised hiring non-permanent residents would violate international arms trafficking laws.
Diving Deeper:
The Justice Department, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, has moved to drop the discrimination lawsuit against SpaceX, marking another reversal of Biden-era legal actions. The case, initiated in 2023, accused SpaceX of discriminating against asylum seekers and refugees by requiring job applicants to be U.S. citizens or permanent residents. Prosecutors claimed the hiring policy unlawfully discouraged qualified candidates from applying.
The DOJ’s decision to withdraw the case follows a judge’s earlier skepticism about the department’s authority to pursue the claims. No official reason for the withdrawal was provided, and neither Musk, SpaceX, nor the DOJ have issued public statements on the development.
Elon Musk was outspoken in his criticism of the lawsuit, labeling it as a politically motivated attack. Musk argued that SpaceX was repeatedly informed that hiring non-permanent residents would violate international arms trafficking laws, exposing the company to potential criminal penalties. He accused the Biden-era DOJ of weaponizing the case for political purposes.
The decision to drop the lawsuit coincides with Musk’s growing influence within the Trump administration, where he leads the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Under his leadership, DOGE has implemented aggressive cost-cutting measures across federal agencies, including agencies that previously investigated SpaceX. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which proposed fining SpaceX $633,000 for license violations in 2023, is currently under review by DOGE officials embedded within the agency.
Meanwhile, SpaceX’s regulatory challenges appear to be easing. A Texas-based environmental group recently dropped a separate lawsuit accusing the company of water pollution at its launch site near Brownsville. The withdrawal of the DOJ lawsuit signals a significant victory for Musk as he continues to navigate regulatory scrutiny while advancing his business ventures under the Trump administration.
Business
PepsiCo joins growing list of companies tweaking DEI policies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/295ae/295ae51c7ff61963d0c2e829bb2e7236a91ec155" alt=""
MxM News
Quick Hit:
PepsiCo is the latest major U.S. company to adjust its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies as 47th President Donald Trump continues his campaign to end DEI practices across the federal government and private sector. The company is shifting away from workforce representation goals and repurposing its DEI leadership, signaling a broader trend among American corporations.
Key Details:
-
PepsiCo will end DEI workforce representation goals and transition its chief DEI officer to focus on associate engagement and leadership development.
-
The company is introducing a new “Inclusion for Growth” strategy as its five-year DEI plan concludes.
-
PepsiCo joins other corporations, including Target and Alphabet-owned Google, in reconsidering DEI policies following Trump’s call to end “illegal DEI discrimination and preferences.”
Diving Deeper:
PepsiCo has announced significant changes to its DEI initiatives, aligning with a growing movement among U.S. companies to revisit diversity policies amid political pressure. According to an internal memo, the snacks and beverages giant will no longer pursue DEI workforce representation goals. Instead, its chief DEI officer will transition to a broader role that focuses on associate engagement and leadership development. This shift is part of PepsiCo’s new “Inclusion for Growth” strategy, set to replace its expiring five-year DEI plan.
The company’s decision to reevaluate its DEI policies comes as President Donald Trump continues his push against DEI practices, urging private companies to eliminate what he calls “illegal DEI discrimination and preferences.” Trump has also directed federal agencies to terminate DEI programs and has warned that academic institutions could face federal funding cuts if they continue with such policies.
PepsiCo is not alone in its reassessment. Other major corporations, including Target and Google, have also modified or are considering changes to their DEI programs. This trend reflects a broader corporate response to the evolving political landscape surrounding DEI initiatives.
Additionally, PepsiCo is expanding its supplier base by broadening opportunities for all small businesses to participate, regardless of demographic categories. The company will also discontinue participation in single demographic category surveys, further signaling its shift in approach to DEI.
As companies like PepsiCo navigate these changes, the debate over the future of DEI in corporate America continues. With Trump leading a campaign against these practices, more companies may follow suit in reevaluating their DEI strategies.
-
Bruce Dowbiggin2 days ago
With Carney On Horizon This Is No Time For Poilievre To Soften His Message
-
COVID-192 days ago
Red Deer Freedom Convoy protestor Pat King given 3 months of house arrest
-
Media2 days ago
Matt Walsh: CBS pushes dangerous free speech narrative, suggests it led to the Holocaust
-
illegal immigration2 days ago
Trump signs executive order cutting off taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal aliens
-
Carbon Tax1 day ago
Mark Carney has history of supporting CBDCs, endorsed Freedom Convoy crackdown
-
Censorship Industrial Complex1 day ago
Bipartisan US Coalition Finally Tells Europe, and the FBI, to Shove It
-
Health1 day ago
Trump HHS officially declares only two sexes: ‘Back to science and common sense’
-
Business18 hours ago
Argentina’s Javier Milei gives Elon Musk chainsaw