Automotive
Europe’s EV Market Collapse Provides A Lesson For UAW Leadership
From the Daily Caller News Foundation
It is an ill-kept secret of American politics that most of the big labor unions in the country have long been client organizations of the Democratic Party. In presidential election years, endorsements from these unions for the party’s nominee have generally been foregone conclusions regardless of voting attitudes of rank-and-file union members.
Some are quicker to endorse than others. Vice President Kamala Harris barely had time to buy campaign letterhead before the United Auto Workers (UAW) weighed in on July 31 with its endorsement. The union’s bosses made the move despite the reality of the Biden-Harris electric vehicle mandates placing many of that union’s jobs at risk as the companies they work for lose billions each year on quixotic efforts to force the public to enjoy paying premiums for cars they cannot rely upon when the going gets tough.
Even with that early move, the UAW fell 9 days behind the AFL-CIO, which jumped on the Harris bandwagon so quickly it probably made union members’ heads spin. Hey, speed matters when your business model relies on constantly asking for favors and protections from the federal government, for which the Democratic Party has traditionally been the most fertile ground to plow.
Given that reality, the Teamsters Union made big news this week by endorsing — well, no one — despite overwhelming support among the rank-and-file for the Republican candidate, former President Donald Trump. It was the first time the Teamsters had failed to endorse the Democrat in a race since 1996, and only the second time in the union’s existence. Teamsters General President Sean O’Brien spoke at the Republican convention in July — and was snubbed by the Democrats at their convention in return. So, the refusal to endorse Harris was not a huge surprise. But O’Brien, fully aware of the vindictive nature of the Democrats towards their political enemies, apparently decided it would not be politically prudent to give a full-throated endorsement to the candidate his members so obviously prefer.
With the race shaping up to be another nail-biter, it remains to be seen whether any of these major unions’ decisions will prove to be wise. But for the UAW, the move to endorse Harris comes with increasing risk amid a softening market for the EVs being forced on U.S. consumers and the rising challenge by Chinese EV makers to the hegemony of domestic car companies in the U.S. market.
With legacy automakers like Ford and General Motors already bleeding billions of dollars in losses in their EV divisions despite heavy government subsidies in place, they can ill-afford an incursion into the U.S. market from Chinese carmakers who are able to make and sell quality EVs for far less than American car companies can. Right now, Europe is providing an object lesson about what happens in the EV space when governments allow that to happen.
EU countries were slow to move to protect their domestic car manufacturers when Chinese companies like BYD began to flood the European market with EVs. EV buyers in countries like Germany and France eagerly bought up the Chinese cars, saving thousands of Euros per unit in the process. When the EU belatedly moved to impose import tariffs on Chinese cars, the domestic car companies responded by raising prices for their own EVs in an effort to recover losses.
The result has been entirely predictable: EV sales in Germany collapsed by nearly 70% during the month of August. In France, they plunged by 33%. Clearly the appetite among EU car buyers for EVs is extremely price sensitive (no one could have possibly seen that coming), and consumers are more than happy to go back to buying gas-powered cars as cheaper alternatives.
Now, the climate alarmist central planners at the EU are proposing to respond to those uncooperative buyers by imposing massive fines on car makers for continuing to sell them the gas-powered cars they actually want to buy. Because, of course, that would be the response from power-mad apparatchiks.
Given that the Biden-Harris regime has basically followed the EU’s model on EV regulation, the EU’s struggles provide a preview of coming attractions for the U.S. auto market under a Harris presidency. It is hard to believe this is the future the UAW leadership really desires for its members.
David Blackmon is an energy writer and consultant based in Texas. He spent 40 years in the oil and gas business, where he specialized in public policy and communications.
Automotive
Electric-vehicle sales show modest spark
From Resource Works
Fuel-powered cars still outsell EVs in Canada by almost 7:1
While the federal government pushes electric vehicles (and other zero-emission vehicles), Canadians seem to be somewhat less enthusiastic about them.
Ottawa calls them all ZEVs and says: “Canada is committed to decarbonizing the country’s transportation sector and becoming a global leader in ZEVs. As such, the Government of Canada is aiming for 100% of new light-duty sales to be zero-emission by 2035.”
However, even with rebates offered by Ottawa and eight provinces and territories, Canadians are proving a little reluctant to make the switch—especially to pure battery-only electric vehicles (EVs).
For example, in the second quarter of this year, Statistics Canada reported sales of 511,173 new motor vehicles, the largest number since the third quarter of 2019, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Of those 511,173 vehicles, 445,231 (87.1%) were traditional carbon-fuel cars, vans, and light trucks. Meanwhile, 65,733 were EVs (12.9%). Thus, fuel-powered cars outsold EVs by a ratio of 6.8 to one.
Among the 65,733 EVs sold, 48,511 were pure battery-only vehicles, while 17,222 were hybrid models with both electric and carbon-fuel drives.
This is not quite what Ottawa had hoped for.
(Incidentally, 51.6% of all new EV registrations were in Quebec, followed by Ontario at 21.9%, and British Columbia at 18.5%. In the Statistics Canada survey, the numbers for BC also include the territories.)
When market research company J.D. Power surveyed new-vehicle shoppers in Canada, respondents who said they wouldn’t consider an EV cited high prices, concerns about travel range, and challenges with charging the battery as key reasons.
J.D. Ney of J.D. Power notes that mainstream vehicle buyers are less wealthy and more practical, making them harder to persuade to switch from gas-powered cars.
“If I make a mistake buying an EV or it doesn’t suit my lifestyle, that’s a $65,000 problem. It’s the second-biggest purchase that most Canadians will make. And so, I think they are rightfully cautious.”
As of March 1 (the latest figures available), Canada had 27,181 public charging ports located at 11,077 public charging stations across the country.
Of those 27,181 charging ports, 22,246 are “standard” Level 2 chargers, while 4,935 are fast chargers.
This means Canadians with battery-electric vehicles often face challenges finding an available public port, and, if they do find one, it could take hours to recharge their car from low to 100%. Most ZEV drivers opt instead to “top up” their batteries, but even that can take many minutes.
The availability of fast chargers in Canada is on the rise, with EV manufacturer Tesla adding more “superchargers” that can be used by non-Tesla owners if their vehicles are equipped with the right plug-in adapter or if the owners purchase a suitable adapter.
Electric vehicles are also improving their range, with some models now able to travel as much as 800 km before needing a major recharge. The average range is 435 km, although some older ZEVs still have ranges in the low hundreds.
Potential ranges drop, however, in Canadian cold weather. Some EVs can lose up to 30% of their range in freezing temperatures, and charging times can also increase in the cold.
The concerns and caution of customers have resonated with EV manufacturers.
As CBC News reported: “Just a few years ago, carmakers were investing billions of dollars into their electric lineups and pledging they would soon stop building gas-powered cars.
“But customers aren’t going fully electric as quickly as predicted, so many companies are making adjustments to better meet demand.
“General Motors has scaled back its electric vehicle production this year and will build an estimated 50,000 fewer EVs. Ford is shifting its strategy, stalling plans for an electric SUV and building a hybrid version instead.
“These companies are still losing money on EVs. Despite all that, the carmakers insist they’re still committed to the cause.”
In April, Honda announced plans to invest $11 billion in electric vehicle and battery plants in Ontario. The project aims to produce 240,000 EVs annually, with production expected to begin in 2028.
At the same time, construction of a $7-billion EV battery plant in Quebec could take up to 18 months longer than originally planned, according to the Quebec government.
Production at the Northvolt plant was slated to begin in 2026 to compete with Chinese-made batteries. However, while construction continues, a review by Northvolt could result in a reassessment of the timetable. This review followed Northvolt’s bankruptcy filing in the U.S.
Here in Canada, Ottawa began in August imposing a 100% tariff on Chinese-made EVs. The aim is to protect the domestic EV market from inexpensive Chinese imports. But President-elect Donald Trump proposes a 25% tariff on all imports from Canada, including Canadian-made EVs and parts. This is causing huge concern for firms planning to build EVs and/or EV parts in Canada for export to the U.S.
Returning to EVs: The federal government’s goals are for 20% of new cars sold to be ZEVs by 2026, 60% by 2030, and 100% by 2035.
Carmakers, however, have said those goals won’t be achievable unless Ottawa does more to boost charging infrastructure and address EV affordability.
“We have all of the ingredients for Canada to succeed in this sector,” says Brian Kingston, president of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers’ Association. “I’m convinced we’ll continue to see growth in EV adoption, but we do have to address some of those barriers to demand.”
Automotive
Northvolt bankruptcy ominous sign for politicians’ EV gamble
From the Canadian Taxpayers Federation
By Jay Goldberg
Northvolt’s bankruptcy and the heavy losses traditional auto manufacturers are seeing on EVs is evidence that betting billions on the industry was a terrible gamble for Trudeau, Legault, and Ontario Premier Doug Ford.
Politicians love to gamble with your cash, but, based on their record, you’d think they were rookies getting fleeced by a card shark at a shady bar.
The latest epic failure is the gamble on electric vehicle battery manufacturer Northvolt.
The Legault government bet buckets of cash. And now the company is broke.
“Northvolt’s liquidity picture has become dire,” reads the Swedish EV battery manufacturer’s bankruptcy protection filing.
It turns out Northvolt accumulated $5.8 billion of debt. It’s CEO just resigned. The company’s future is bleak. New leadership is hoping it can remain afloat with the help of a $100-million loan from one of its shareholders.
Both the government of Quebec and the province’s pension fund bet hundreds of millions of dollars on Northvolt. They bought stakes in the company worth a combined $470 million.
That’s money Quebec taxpayers and pensioners may never get back.
Quebec Economy Minister Christine Fréchette admitted the money is “at risk” and taxpayers will only know if that investment remains intact after the company goes through its bankruptcy process.
As bad as the loss is for Quebeckers, Canadian taxpayers might also soon be facing billions in losses. That’s because Northvolt has a Canadian subsidiary that also received buckets of taxpayer cash.
Northvolt’s Canadian subsidiary is currently building a $7-billion EV battery plant in Quebec. Quebec Premier Francois Legault and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau gave a combined $2.4 billion to Northvolt to build it.
Northvolt says its Canadian subsidiary is funded separately from the global company that was forced to file for bankruptcy and will “operate as usual outside the Chapter 11 process.”
But if the parent company’s finances have spiraled out of control, there’s every reason for taxpayers to worry its Canadian operation will too.
Northvolt repeatedly missed its in-house global production targets this year and curtailed some of its operations in Sweden.
If Northvolt is cutting back on global production, what reason does it have to ramp up production on a new facility in Canada?
With Northvolt’s global finances on the rocks, Canadian politicians might be tempted to throw even more cash at the company’s Canadian operation to keep the company afloat.
But throwing good money after bad isn’t a solution. Politicians in Ottawa and Quebec City need to stop gambling with taxpayers’ money.
Sadly, the implications for taxpayers are much wider than the future of one EV battery company.
Canadian politicians bet $57 billion of taxpayer cash on the EV industry.
But the entire industry is in jeopardy. Other than Tesla, every EV manufacturer is losing money making them.
General Motors lost $3.5 billion on EVs in 2023. The Ford Motor Company lost $7.7 billion. And both of those companies received billion-dollar handouts from the Trudeau and Ford governments to build EVs here in Canada.
The only reason GM and Ford aren’t in Northvolt’s position is because they have gasoline-powered cars to sell that turn a profit, allowing them to balance out their earnings (or lack thereof).
But there are signs of a pull-back.
Ford, for example, cancelled plans to produce two different models of electric SUVs, which were supposed to be built in Canada. This is costing the company billions. Meanwhile, the Canadian plant is pivoting back to building gasoline-powered cars.
Northvolt’s bankruptcy and the heavy losses traditional auto manufacturers are seeing on EVs is evidence that betting billions on the industry was a terrible gamble for Trudeau, Legault, and Ontario Premier Doug Ford.
This is a very expensive lesson: politicians should never gamble with taxpayer dollars by throwing billions at corporations. Businesses don’t need handouts to make investments that make sense.
In all these cases, the financial well-being of Canadian taxpayers should never have been at risk.
-
Alberta2 days ago
The Alberta energy transition you haven’t heard about
-
espionage2 days ago
Shock interview reveals big names connected to international paedophile network
-
Brownstone Institute2 days ago
Justice Is Served: Jay Bhattacharya Chosen to Be NIH Director
-
Business2 days ago
Green Energy or Green Grift? SDTC at the Center of a $38 Million Scandal
-
Alberta2 days ago
A Trump Effort To Revive Keystone XL Would Likely Be Purely Symbolic
-
Crime2 days ago
The Bureau Exclusive: The US Government Fentanyl Case Against China, Canada, Mexico
-
Daily Caller2 days ago
Celebrities Do Not Have The Political Star Power They Thought They Did
-
David Clinton23 hours ago
What Happens When Ministries Go Rogue?