Connect with us

Social Media

Elon Musk reinstates Alex Jones on X after five-year ban

Published

4 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Andreas Wailzer

70% of participants in an X poll voted in favor of bringing the eccentric political commentator back to the platform.

Alex Jones has been reinstated on X, formerly Twitter.Ā 

On Sunday, December 10, Jones’ X accountĀ was reinstated after Elon Musk ran a poll in which 70% voted in favor of bringing the eccentric political commentator back to the platform.Ā 

Musk’s decision came shortly after Tucker Carlson published an interview with Jones that garnered over 15 million views on X. In the conversation with Carlson, Jones warned about a globalist plan of ā€œdesigned global collapse.ā€ Musk has frequently watched and commented on Carlson’s showĀ Tucker on XĀ before.Ā Ā 

On Monday, X also reinstated the account of Jones’ showĀ InfoWars,Ā as well asĀ Jonathan Owen Shroyer, the host of the War Room show onĀ InfoWars.Ā 

Jones was banned from Twitter in September 2018, shortly after being de-platformed in aĀ coordinated effortĀ by several other big tech platforms, including his YouTube channel with around 2.5 million subscribers, due to ā€œhate speech.ā€Ā 

On Sunday, Mario Nawfal hosted a liveĀ discussionĀ (ā€œXTownHallā€) on X that featured Jones, Musk, and many other prominent figures, such as influencer Andrew Tate, GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, and political commentator Jack Posobiec.Ā 

The discussion, which lasted over two hours and was viewed by more than eight million users, covered a wide range of issues, including online censorship, globalism, de-population, and the World Economic Forum (WEF).Ā 

Musk and Jones agreed that there is a globalist plan to de-populate the world and that it is crucial to counter this agenda by having more children.Ā 

During the discussion, Jones praised Musk for standing up for free speech by acquiring Twitter and reinstating banned accounts. ā€œYou are literally changing the entire paradigm…you definitely got the system scared,ā€ Jones told the tech billionaire.Ā 

Later in the discussion, Posobiec asked Musk what he would do if intelligence agencies like the FBI or Department of Homeland Security (DHS) approached X with censorship requests as they did in the past before Musk acquired the platform.Ā Ā 

Musk affirmed his commitment to free speech, saying he plans to allow legal content to remain on the platform. He furthermore stated that he would be willing to go to jail if he thought a government agency was breaking the law with their censorship requests.Ā 

ā€œWe will be as transparent as possible…and frankly if I think that a government agency is breaking the law in their demands on the platform, I would be prepared to go to prison personally if I think they are the ones breaking the law.ā€Ā 

Addressing the globalist WEF meeting in Davos, MuskĀ saidĀ that some video clips he had seen from the events were ā€œconcerning,ā€ and referred to the WEF as an ā€œunelected world government.ā€Ā Ā 

ā€œI don’t think we should have an unelected, quasi-governmental organization deciding our future,ā€ he said.Ā 

ā€œI’m not okay with some organization that I didn’t vote for controlling my destiny or that of other people.ā€Ā Ā 

ā€œI think an unelected world government is not a good idea,ā€ the tech mogul concluded.Ā 

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

2025 Federal Election

Mark Carney Vows Internet Speech Crackdown if Elected

Published on

logo

By

Mark Carney dodges Epstein jabs in Hamilton while reviving failed Liberal plans for speech control via Bill C-36 and Bill C-63.

It was supposed to be a routine campaign pit stop, the kind of low-stakes political affair where candidates smile like used car salesmen and dish out platitudes thicker than Ontario maple syrup. Instead, Mark Carney found himself dodging verbal bricks in a Hamilton hall, facing hecklers who lobbed Jeffrey Epstein references like Molotovs. No rebuttal, no denial. Just a pivot worthy of an Olympic gymnast, straight to the perils of digital discourse.
ā€œThere are many serious issues that we’re dealing with,ā€ he said, ignoring the criticism that had just lobbed his way. ā€œOne of them is the sea of misogyny, antisemitism, hatred, and conspiracy theories — this sort of pollution online that washes over our virtual borders from the United States.ā€
Ah yes, the dreaded digital tide. Forget inflation or the fact that owning a home now requires a GoFundMe. According to Carney, the real catastrophe is memes from Buffalo.
The Ghost of Bills Past
Carney’s new plan to battle the internet; whatever it may be, because details are apparently for peasants, would revive a long-dead Liberal Party obsession: regulating online speech in a country that still pretends to value free expression.
It’s an effort so cursed, it’s been killed more times than Jason Voorhees. First, there wasĀ Bill C-36, which flopped in 2021. Then came its undead cousin,Ā Bill C-63, awkwardly titled the Online Harms Act, which proposed giving the Canadian Human Rights Commission the power to act as digital inquisitors, sniffing out content that ā€œfoments detestation or vilification.ā€
Naturally, it died too, not from public support, but because Parliament decided it had better things to do,Ā like not passing it in time.
But as every horror franchise teaches us, the villain never stays away for long. Carney’s speech didn’t include specifics, which is usually code for ā€œwe’ll make it up later,ā€ but the intent is clear: the Liberals are once again oiling up the guillotine of speech regulation, ready to let it fall on anything remotely edgy, impolite, or, God forbid, unpopular.
ā€œWon’t Someone Think of the Children?ā€
ā€œThe more serious thing is when it affects how people behave — when Canadians are threatened going to their community centers or their places of worship or their school or, God forbid, when it affects our children,ā€ Carney warned, pulling the emergency brake on the national sympathy train. It’s the same tired tactic every aspiring control freak uses, wrap the pitch in the soft fuzz of public safety and pray nobody notices the jackboot behind the curtain.
Nothing stirs the legislative loins like invoking the children. But vague terror about online contagion infecting impressionable minds has become the go-to excuse for internet crackdowns across the Western world. Canada’s Liberals are no different. They just dress it up and pretend it’s for your own good.
ā€œFree Speech Is Important, Butā€¦ā€
Former Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge, doing her best impression of a benevolent censor, also piped up earlier this year with a classic verbal pretzel: ā€œWe need to make sure [freedom of expression] exists and that it’s protected. Yet the same freedom of expression is currently being exploited and undermined.ā€
Protecting free speech by regulating it is the sort of logic that keeps satire writers out of work.
St-Onge’s lament about algorithms monetizing debate sounds suspiciously like a pitch from someone who can’t get a word in on X. It’s the familiar cry of technocrats and bureaucrats who can’t fathom a world where regular people might say things that aren’t government-approved. ā€œRespect is lacking in public discourse,ā€ she whined on February 20. She’s right. People are tired of pretending to respect politicians who think governing a country means babysitting the internet.
Powerful forces want to silence independent voices online
Governments and corporations are working hand in hand to control what you can say, what you can read; and soon, who you are allowed to be.
New laws promise to ā€œprotectā€ you; but instead criminalize dissent.
Platforms deplatform, demonetize, and disappear accounts that step out of line.
AI-driven surveillance tracks everything you do, feeding a system built to monitor, profile, and ultimately control.
Now, they’re pushing forĀ centralized digital IDs; a tool that could link your identity to everything you say and do online. No anonymity. No privacy. No escape.
This isn’t about safety, it’s aboutĀ power.
If you believe in a truly free and open internet; where ideas can be debated without fear, where privacy is a right, and where no government or corporation dictates what’s true; please become a supporter.
By becoming a supporter, you’ll help us:
  • Expose online censorship, surveillance, and the digital ID agenda
  • Challenge restrictive laws that threaten free expression
  • Provide independent analysis on the erosion of digital rights
  • Support voices who refuse to bow to pressure from governments or Big Tech
We don’t answer to advertisers or political elites.Ā 
If you can, pleaseĀ become a supporter. It takes less than a minute to set up, you’ll get a bunch of extra features, guides, analysis and solutions, and every donation strengthens the fight for online freedom.
Continue Reading

Internet

US government gave $22 million to nonprofit teaching teens about sex toys: report

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

The Center for Innovative Public Health Research’s website suggests teenage girls make their ‘own decisions’ about sex and not let their parents know if they don’t want to.

For almost a decade, the U.S. government funded a group that actively works to teach kids how to use sex toys and then keep them hidden from their parents to the tune of $22 million.

AccordingĀ toĀ investigative reporter Hannah Grossman at the Manhattan Institute, The Center for Innovative Public Health Research (CIPHR) has beenĀ educating minors about sex toys with public funds.

Records showĀ that the millions given to the group since 2016, according to its website, go toward ā€œhealth education programsā€ that ā€œpromote positive human development.ā€

However, the actual contents of the programs, as can be seen from comments from CIPHR CEO Michele Ybarra, seem to suggest that its idea of ā€œhumanā€ development is skewed toward radical sex education doctrine.

In 2017, CIPHR launchedĀ Girl2Girl, which is funded byĀ federal moneyĀ to promote ā€œsex-ed program just for teen girls who are into girls.ā€ Its website lets users, who are girls between ages 14 and 16, sign up for ā€œdaily text messages … about things like sex with girls and boys.ā€

The actual content of some of the messages is very concerning. Its website notes that some of the texts talk about ā€œlube and sex toysā€ as well as ā€œthe different types of sex and ways to increase pleasure.ā€

The website actively calls upon teenage girls to make their ā€œown decisionsā€ and not let their parents know if they don’t want to.

Grossman shared aĀ video clip on X of Ybarra explaining how they educate minors about the use of ā€œsex toysā€ and dealing with their parents if they are found out.

The clip, from a 2022Ā Brown University webinar, shows Ybarra telling researchers how to prepare ā€œyoung person(s)ā€ for her research.

In 2023, CIPHR launchedĀ Transcendent Health, which is a sex-education program for minors who are gender confused. ThisĀ initiativeĀ received $1.3 million of federal grant money that expired last month.

Grossman observed that the federal government ā€œshould not fund programs that send sexually explicit messages to minors and encourage them to conceal these communications from parents.ā€

She noted that in order to protect children and ā€œprevent further harm,ā€ U.S. President Donald Trump’s Department of Health and Human Services ā€œshould immediately cancel CIPHR’sĀ active contractĀ and deny its future grant applications.ā€

ā€œBy doing so, the Trump administration can send a clear message: Taxpayers will no longer foot the bill for perverted ā€˜research’ projects,ā€ she noted.

The Trump administration hasĀ thus far, through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE),Ā exposedĀ billions in government waste and fraud. Many such uses of taxpayer dollars are currently under review by the administration, includingĀ pro-abortionĀ andĀ pro-censorshipĀ activity through USAID, ā€œDiversity, Equity, and Inclusion and neo-Marxist class warfare propagandaā€Ā throughĀ the National Science Foundation, andĀ billionsĀ to left-wing ā€œgreen energyā€ nonprofits through the Environmental Protection Agency.

Continue Reading

Trending

X