Opinion
Two thirds of our city has declined in City Council’s last mandate. Is the at-large system really working?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1e6f/e1e6f09987b6a366a6dafad54263df7a4107dcdd" alt=""
No it is not just the north side of the river which is seeing a decline in population, but there are also about 18 declining neighbourhoods south of the river, too. During their 4 year mandate this council did see growth in a few select neighbourhoods.
Garden Heights……………………….2016=381.……..2013=36
Timberlands/College Heights…….…2016=2215.……..2013=864
Clearview Ridge………………………2016=1706.……..2013=1177
Vanier………………………………….2016=3630.……..2013=2019
Sunnybrook…………………………2016=1119.……….2013=856
Lancaster…………………………….2016=6356.………2013=5738
Mountview……………………………2016=1550.………2013=1538
Michener Hill…………………………2016=1511.………2013=1454
Eastview Terrace……………………..2016=1664.………2013=1654
Eastview Estates………………………2016=2455.….….2013=2455
Deerpark Village………………………2016=3720.……..2013=3715
Riverside Meadows……………..……2016=3686..……2013=3665
Johnstone Park………………………2016=3865.………2013=3760
Total…………………2016=33,858.….3013=28,931…increase of 4,927
The city’s total population only increased by2,723.
So besides north of the river, where did we lose residents? Let us continue to look at the census material on reddeer.ca.
So while 13 neighbourhoods’ population showed no decline or showed increases 25 neighbourhoods decreased.
Waskasoo—————————2016=474—-2013=486
Woodlea—————————–2016=553—-2013=606
Downtown————————–2016=3,197–2013=3283
Parkvale—————————–2016=795—-2013=813
Westpark—————————-2016=5430—2013=5514
South Hill West——————–2016=1582—2013=1712
South Hill East———————2016=1302—2013=1410
Bower——————————–2016=1953—2013=1991
Sunnybrook————————-2016=1411—2013=1430
Grandview————————–2016=950—-2013=1023
Clearview—————————2016=2547—2013=2754
Rosedale—————————–2016=3386—2013=3482
Morrisroe—————————2016=1274—-2013=1279
Morrisroe Ext.———————2016=1643—2013=1782
Anders Park————————2016=2967—2013=3101
Anders South, Aspen Ridge—–2016=3884—2013=3911
Deerpark—————————-2016=3986—-2013=4072
Inglewood—————————2016=4334—2013=4481
So basically the city grew in only 34% of the neighbourhoods, some by a bare margins others with whole new subdivisions.
Will your neighbourhood be the next one to be forgotten? Will it be abandoned for next new neighbourhood? It might.
Business
DOJ drops Biden-era discrimination lawsuit against Elon Musk’s SpaceX
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29f1a/29f1a61b4fc7d7e37da362fb64a72f5265a1178b" alt=""
MxM News
Quick Hit:
The Justice Department has withdrawn a discrimination lawsuit against Elon Musk’s SpaceX that was filed during the Biden administration. The lawsuit accused SpaceX of discriminatory hiring practices against asylum seekers and refugees. The move follows ongoing cost-cutting measures led by Musk as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency under the 47th President Donald Trump’s administration.
Key Details:
-
The DOJ filed an unopposed motion in Texas federal court to lift a stay on the case, signaling its intent to formally dismiss the lawsuit.
-
The lawsuit, filed in 2023, alleged SpaceX required job applicants to be U.S. citizens or permanent residents, a restriction prosecutors argued was unlawful for many positions.
-
Elon Musk criticized the lawsuit as politically motivated, asserting that SpaceX was advised hiring non-permanent residents would violate international arms trafficking laws.
Diving Deeper:
The Justice Department, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, has moved to drop the discrimination lawsuit against SpaceX, marking another reversal of Biden-era legal actions. The case, initiated in 2023, accused SpaceX of discriminating against asylum seekers and refugees by requiring job applicants to be U.S. citizens or permanent residents. Prosecutors claimed the hiring policy unlawfully discouraged qualified candidates from applying.
The DOJ’s decision to withdraw the case follows a judge’s earlier skepticism about the department’s authority to pursue the claims. No official reason for the withdrawal was provided, and neither Musk, SpaceX, nor the DOJ have issued public statements on the development.
Elon Musk was outspoken in his criticism of the lawsuit, labeling it as a politically motivated attack. Musk argued that SpaceX was repeatedly informed that hiring non-permanent residents would violate international arms trafficking laws, exposing the company to potential criminal penalties. He accused the Biden-era DOJ of weaponizing the case for political purposes.
The decision to drop the lawsuit coincides with Musk’s growing influence within the Trump administration, where he leads the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Under his leadership, DOGE has implemented aggressive cost-cutting measures across federal agencies, including agencies that previously investigated SpaceX. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which proposed fining SpaceX $633,000 for license violations in 2023, is currently under review by DOGE officials embedded within the agency.
Meanwhile, SpaceX’s regulatory challenges appear to be easing. A Texas-based environmental group recently dropped a separate lawsuit accusing the company of water pollution at its launch site near Brownsville. The withdrawal of the DOJ lawsuit signals a significant victory for Musk as he continues to navigate regulatory scrutiny while advancing his business ventures under the Trump administration.
Business
PepsiCo joins growing list of companies tweaking DEI policies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aec8e/aec8e7025e4bf50487e71cbbdda985b7f72db0f6" alt=""
MxM News
Quick Hit:
PepsiCo is the latest major U.S. company to adjust its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies as 47th President Donald Trump continues his campaign to end DEI practices across the federal government and private sector. The company is shifting away from workforce representation goals and repurposing its DEI leadership, signaling a broader trend among American corporations.
Key Details:
-
PepsiCo will end DEI workforce representation goals and transition its chief DEI officer to focus on associate engagement and leadership development.
-
The company is introducing a new “Inclusion for Growth” strategy as its five-year DEI plan concludes.
-
PepsiCo joins other corporations, including Target and Alphabet-owned Google, in reconsidering DEI policies following Trump’s call to end “illegal DEI discrimination and preferences.”
Diving Deeper:
PepsiCo has announced significant changes to its DEI initiatives, aligning with a growing movement among U.S. companies to revisit diversity policies amid political pressure. According to an internal memo, the snacks and beverages giant will no longer pursue DEI workforce representation goals. Instead, its chief DEI officer will transition to a broader role that focuses on associate engagement and leadership development. This shift is part of PepsiCo’s new “Inclusion for Growth” strategy, set to replace its expiring five-year DEI plan.
The company’s decision to reevaluate its DEI policies comes as President Donald Trump continues his push against DEI practices, urging private companies to eliminate what he calls “illegal DEI discrimination and preferences.” Trump has also directed federal agencies to terminate DEI programs and has warned that academic institutions could face federal funding cuts if they continue with such policies.
PepsiCo is not alone in its reassessment. Other major corporations, including Target and Google, have also modified or are considering changes to their DEI programs. This trend reflects a broader corporate response to the evolving political landscape surrounding DEI initiatives.
Additionally, PepsiCo is expanding its supplier base by broadening opportunities for all small businesses to participate, regardless of demographic categories. The company will also discontinue participation in single demographic category surveys, further signaling its shift in approach to DEI.
As companies like PepsiCo navigate these changes, the debate over the future of DEI in corporate America continues. With Trump leading a campaign against these practices, more companies may follow suit in reevaluating their DEI strategies.
-
Bruce Dowbiggin2 days ago
With Carney On Horizon This Is No Time For Poilievre To Soften His Message
-
Media2 days ago
Matt Walsh: CBS pushes dangerous free speech narrative, suggests it led to the Holocaust
-
illegal immigration2 days ago
Trump signs executive order cutting off taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal aliens
-
COVID-192 days ago
Red Deer Freedom Convoy protestor Pat King given 3 months of house arrest
-
Health2 days ago
Trudeau government buys 500k bird flu vaccines to be ‘ready’ for potential ‘health threats’
-
Health1 day ago
Trump HHS officially declares only two sexes: ‘Back to science and common sense’
-
Business1 day ago
Government debt burden increasing across Canada
-
Business1 day ago
New climate plan simply hides the costs to Canadians