Two New Studies Find Fewer Clouds Cause Warmer Temps

“The Science is Settled”

The Washington Post ran a story today, which calls into question whether global warming is man-made.

Two new studies offer a potential explanation: fewer clouds. And the decline in cloud cover, researchers say, could signal the start of a feedback loop that leads to more warming.

Researchers are still unsure exactly what accounts for this decrease. Some believe that it could be due to less air pollution: When particulates are in the air, it can make it easier for water droplets to stick to them and form clouds.

Another possibility, Goessling said, is a feedback loop from warming temperatures. Clouds require moisture to form, and moist stratocumulus clouds sit just underneath a dry layer of air about one mile high. If temperatures warm, hot air from below can disturb that dry layer, mixing with it and making it harder for wet clouds to form.

But those changes are difficult to predict — and not all climate models show the same changes. “It’s really tricky,” Goessling said.

The scientific papers cited in this article document that reduced aerosol particulates in the sky appear to be causing a decrease in low-cloud cover. This is because water surrounds such particulates and causes cloud formation. So the decreasing cloud cover, particularly in warmer regions, is causing temperatures worldwide to increase.

*Albedo is the fraction of light that a surface reflects.

Another preprint study conducted by NASA confirms these findings. That study reaches back 23 years to the present, to verify their results.

Less air pollution could be the reason for global warming…

So although the peer-reviewed paper doesn’t clearly articulate why this is happening. According to the Washington Post, many scientists believe the most reasonable explanation is that less air pollution worldwide is causing less cloud cover, causing the earth to warm faster than predicted. Others believe it is a feedback loop from disturbed cloud patterns, which is causing the decreased cloud cover.

The Washington Post story hypes these new studies that suggest a counter narrative to CO2 causing global warming as just accounting for the last two years of increased global temperatures (on average). But this is not actually what these new papers show. Clearly, when Pravda on the Potomac is willing to publicly question the climate change narrative, we have reached a turning point.

The Cost of Another Out of Control Public Health Response:

After going back and forth with various AIs on how much money the US government has spent on climate change initiatives, a very rough estimate can be placed, almost half a trillion dollars since the “problem” was identified.

Whoops!

This was a half trillion dollars of our money to fight a problem that mainstream scientists now admit most likely isn’t caused by all the “usual suspects.”

To think that the US government, in their panic to combat global warming, has spent almost a half trillion dollars to hamper the US economy, restrict consumer choices, force EV and environmental mandates, and to force the stoppage of domestic drilling for a product that may actually reduce global warming.

It turns out the science isn’t so settled after all.

Of course, geo engineering involving cloud seeding will conveniently increase cloud cover. So, one hypothesis is that this is all about justifying high altitude cloud seeing/geoengineering programs.

When NASA scientists are publishing papers with information counter to the propaganda being deployed, I think it is safe to say that the real data no longer fit the hypothetical model. And no, it doesn’t take an atmospheric scientist to figure that out. Regardless, it is clear that the promoted narrative involving increasing CO2 levels driven by human activity, fossil fuel use, and cattle is no longer “settled” science.

Who is Robert Malone is a reader-supported publication.

To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Subscribe to Robert Malone

Thanks for reading Who is Robert Malone! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Up Next

Are We Winning the Patient-to-Doctor Ratio War?

Don't Miss

Is Our Five-Year Nightmare Finally Over?

Todayville

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Trump HHS officially declares only two sexes: ‘Back to science and common sense’

Health / 2 hours ago

Trudeau government buys 500k bird flu vaccines to be ‘ready’ for potential ‘health threats’

Carbon Tax / 2 hours ago

Mark Carney has history of supporting CBDCs, endorsed Freedom Convoy crackdown

Media

Matt Walsh: CBS pushes dangerous free speech narrative, suggests it led to the Holocaust

Published on February 20, 2025

Todayville

MxM News

Quick Hit:

CBS News is facing backlash after host Margaret Brennan suggested on-air that free speech played a role in enabling the Holocaust. The comments came amid a broader discussion on censorship in Germany and Vice President JD Vance’s speech at the Munich Security Conference. Daily Wire commentator Matt Walsh dismantled the claim, calling it an example of the media’s ongoing push for authoritarian control under the guise of democracy.

Key Details:

Margaret Brennan’s Remark: CBS’s Brennan questioned whether “weaponized free speech” allowed the Nazis to carry out the Holocaust.
Historical Context: Walsh noted that pre-Nazi Germany had strict hate speech laws, contradicting Brennan’s assertion.
Media Hypocrisy: CBS recently praised Germany’s government for conducting pre-dawn raids on citizens over online speech.

Diving Deeper:

Daily Wire commentator Matt Walsh sharply criticized CBS News for pushing what he described as an “astonishingly ignorant” argument about free speech. In a segment on Face the Nation, host Margaret Brennan questioned whether the Holocaust was made possible by an unregulated public discourse, saying, “Didn’t the Nazis weaponize free speech to conduct a genocide?”

Walsh wasted no time dissecting the absurdity of Brennan’s claim. “It doesn’t actually mean anything to ‘weaponize free speech to conduct a genocide.’ The words don’t come together in a way that makes any sense,” he wrote. “It’s like saying the Nazis ‘weaponized air to conduct a genocide.’”

He then pointed out the historical reality that completely undermines Brennan’s argument. “Before the Nazis rose to power, Weimar Germany had laws against so-called ‘hate speech,’ including laws that prohibited hate speech against Jews,” Walsh noted. In fact, German authorities cracked down on dissenting voices long before Hitler’s rise, shutting down newspapers and banning public speeches. Yet, as history showed, these restrictions did nothing to stop the Nazis from gaining power.

The discussion around free speech restrictions comes at a critical time in Europe, as Germany prepares for a major election where the nationalist party, Alternative for Germany (AfD), is surging in popularity. The establishment media has repeatedly labeled AfD “far-right,” despite the party’s focus on issues like border control, energy independence, and rejecting radical gender ideology.

This broader push for censorship was highlighted by a separate CBS segment showcasing how German authorities now conduct pre-dawn raids on people over online speech deemed offensive. Walsh highlighted the disturbing reality of the situation: “Try to imagine how CBS would be covering raids like this if they came at the direction of Donald Trump.”

The media’s reaction to Vice President JD Vance’s speech at the Munich Security Conference further underscored their bias. The Ohio senator directly challenged European elites on their handling of migration and security, prompting outrage from diplomats and bureaucrats alike. Christoph Heusgen, the conference chair and a former German diplomat, went so far as to break down in tears in his farewell speech—a moment Walsh ridiculed as a “new low in global leadership.”

For Walsh, the media’s selective outrage over free speech and censorship is telling. “The corporate press isn’t actually concerned about the rise of an authoritarian government,” he concluded. “They just want to make sure they’re the ones running it.”

illegal immigration

Trump signs executive order cutting off taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal aliens

Published on February 20, 2025

Todayville

MxM News

Quick Hit:

President Donald Trump signed an executive order Wednesday night barring illegal immigrants from receiving federally funded benefits, a move he says will ensure taxpayer dollars are reserved for American citizens in need.

Key Details:

The order directs federal agencies to identify and cut off benefits to illegal immigrants.
Trump argues the Biden administration “undermined” federal law and improperly expanded benefits to non-citizens.
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, is tasked with reviewing all federal funding sources for illegal aliens.
The order mandates stricter eligibility verification systems and calls for improper payments to be referred to the DOJ and DHS.

Diving Deeper:

President Donald Trump took executive action Wednesday night to block illegal immigrants from receiving taxpayer-funded federal benefits, calling the move necessary to uphold the rule of law and protect resources for American citizens, including veterans and individuals with disabilities.

In signing the order, Trump pointed to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA), which was supposed to bar most illegal immigrants from accessing government benefits. However, he argued that multiple administrations—especially President Joe Biden’s—had worked to “undermine” these restrictions, effectively allowing taxpayer funds to support illegal immigration.

“The Biden administration repeatedly undercut the goals of that law, resulting in the improper expenditure of significant taxpayer resources,” Trump said. He further asserted that these benefits had acted as a “magnet” for illegal immigration, drawing more people across the border unlawfully.

The order directs the heads of all federal agencies to identify programs that currently allow illegal aliens to receive taxpayer-funded benefits and to take “all appropriate actions” to bring them in line with federal law. It also aims to prevent federal funds from subsidizing sanctuary policies, which shield illegal immigrants from deportation.

One of the most significant aspects of the order is the role of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a relatively new federal agency led by billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk. DOGE is tasked with reviewing all sources of federal funding for illegal immigrants and recommending additional measures to align spending with Trump’s directive. Trump has praised Musk and DOGE for cutting through bureaucratic resistance to implement his policies.

Additionally, the order calls for enhanced eligibility verification systems to prevent illegal immigrants from obtaining benefits in the first place. Federal agencies are also required to refer any improper payments to the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security for further action.

The move is the latest in Trump’s aggressive crackdown on illegal immigration, a central issue of his presidency and his 2024 re-election campaign. With a focus on border security, ending sanctuary policies, and tightening federal spending, Trump’s executive order represents yet another step in his administration’s effort to reverse the policies of his predecessor and enforce strict immigration laws.