Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

International

Trudeau Vs. Modi in the Punjabi Gang Wars (I hope you’re sitting down)

Published

25 minute read

Fr0m The Real Story 

By Terry Glavin

Also, it’s official: Samidoun is a terrorist organization and Khaled Barakat is officially a terrorist (thank you, America). This has been a hell of a week.

Spies in the House!

I’ve just come from the Montreal International Security Summit on China and the Indo-Pacific where I joined the Globe and Mail’s Bob Fife and Yaqiu Wang from Freedom House on a panel titled Decoding Transnational Repression and Foreign Influence Operations. CPAC recorded the summit. When the video clips are available I’ll post them here.

At the moment I’m in Ottawa, where all everybody seems to be talking about whether Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has finally and fatally beclowned himself by his melodramatic performance at Madame Justice Hogue’s Foreign Influence Inquiry hearings this past week.

If you’re interested in that sort of thing here’s some reading for when you’re done here: Trudeau’s interference allegations a dramatic act of self-preservation; Trudeau the Magnificent offers foreign-interference inquiry a master class in redirecting attentionTrudeau came to the foreign interference inquiry to hurl a grenade at his opponent.

On the allegation that Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre doesn’t want to know who’s among the compromised politicians identified in that secret report of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians, come back when you’re done reading this newsletter and give a listen to former New Democratic Party leader Tom Mulcair, here.

As for Trudeau’s headline-grabbing assertion that the Conservatives have a serious foreign-influence problem that party leader Pierre Poilievre doesn’t want to talk about (Poilievre minced no words, calling Trudeau a liar and demanding that he name names), it will not come as news to Real Story subscribers or to readers acquainted with my contributions to the National Post that yes, the Conservatives have a problem.

It’s nothing like the Liberals’ circumstances of course, the main difference being that Trudeau’s Liberals don’t see Beijing’s lavish dotings to their electoral advantage in the federal polls of 2019 and 2021 as particularly unwelcome. Trudeau has never given any indication that he finds anything unseemly about the affections of Beijing’s Mandarin bloc donors and deal-makers in Canada.

Teenagers who aren’t even Canadian citizens or permanent residents, mobilized en masse to vote in Liberal Party candidacy and leadership races? Sure, let them in, Trudeau told the Hogue Commission: “Expanding the pool is also a way to try to engage future voters – those too young to vote or who are not yet Canadian citizens.”

The Conservatives have had their own entanglements. See: Conservatives, the Media and CCP Psy-Ops for a link-rich deep background piece on the whole thing. This was pretty important too: The Comprador in the Conservative leadership race keeps digging. Here’s the bedrock Jean Charest is about to hit.

Now that Canada’s diplomatic relations with India are broken …

There’s been so much going on in my “beat” this week that I need to try hard not to bog everyone down here. Below I’ll have some news for you that you’re unlikely to have come across anywhere else, related to my front page piece in the National Post, here.

Certain incendiary facts related to the Canada-India rumpus will have to wait for subsequent Real Story editions, but I do have some riveting details below about the sinister Indian intelligence-agency spymaster who Canada is determined to shold accountable for Hardeep Singh Nijjar’s murder in Surrey in June last year. Let’s just say he doesn’t fit the profile.

For now, riddle me this.

The crime gang that the RCMP says Delhi has contracted to carry out its dirty counter-terrorism operations against Khalistani extremists here in Canada is the Lawrence Bishnoi crime syndicate. “We believe that that group is connected to agents of the Government of India,” Assistant RCMP Commissioner Brigitte Gauvin said Monday.

But in India, law enforcement agencies are engaged in a long and drawn-out war with the Bishnoi gang, and Narendra Modi’s people say they’re furious that Canada isn’t helping. Ottawa won’t even respond to extradition requests. India’s National Investigation Agency says Bishnoi’s mobsters have been directly collaborating with the Khalistanis in various criminal enterprises, and they’ve been running extortion, kidnapping and gun-running operations in India from their safe havens in Canada.

The NIA prepared a charge sheet against several Bishnoi gangsters last year setting out their various ties to Babbar Khalsa International, a listed Khalistani terrorist organization in Canada. Talwinder Singh Parmar’s Babbar Khalsa organization was behind the murder of 329 passengers in the 1985 Air India atrocity, which was plotted and carried out in Canada under the noses of the RCMP.

Bishnoi has been in prison for a decade, but Indian police agencies say his operations across the Indian subcontinent are run from Canada by his chief lieutenant, the gangster Goldy Brar. It’s not that Bishnoi or Brar are devoted Khalistanis; they’re devoted to guns, money and power.

For as much background as you could possibly want on the suffering of the Sikhs and the harms done by Khalistani extremists over four decades in Canada and India, there’s quite a bit in the Real Story archives.

Of immediate relevance: Politics and The Punjabi Gangland Wars

Introductory dispatches: Why I know where the bodies are buried.

Part 1: Is India interfering in Canada’s affairs or is it the other way round?

Part 2: Did Ottawa Sabotage Modi’s Peace Talks?

Part 3: Conspiracy Theories, From Inside The House.

More recently: The worst of all possible worldsDefiling the memory of dead Canadians; The worst mass murder in Canadian history.

As you may have picked up from my tone. I’m not fond of the Khalistanis. They killed a friend of mine, among several thousand others. Follow those links above and you’ll understand.

Speaking of lurid Khalistani conspiracy theories and defiling the memory of the Air India dead, Liberal MP Sukh Dhaliwal is sponsoring a petition for an inquiry to entertain allegations that the Government of India itself blew up Air India Flight 182 to make Khalistani separatists look bad.

India Strikes Back: ‘You want names? Here are some names.’

Furious with Trudeau’s refusal to cooperate with its own counter-terrorism and organized crime investigations, this week India released the names of several Khalistanis and gangsters from a list of extradition requests that Ottawa has allegedly ignored.

The Bishnoi boss Goldy Brar is just one of them. Another, who I knew only by his alias “Sunny Toronto” until a couple of day ago, is reportedly a Canadian Border Services Agency official who lives in Abbotsford, B.C.; In the cause of discretion I’ll leave his name and address out of it for the time being.

Ottawa’s got the list now.

Ujjal Dosanjh, the former NDP B.C. premier and Liberal MP makes an astute observation: India-Canada relations are likely to remain broken until both Trudeau and Modi are gone. Ujjal and I go way back. The Khalistanis beat him within an inch of his life back in the 1980s.

Dosanjh is not impressed with the way Trudeau and his ministers are grandstanding about what Indian spies may or may not be doing in Canada: “Why do they have to say anything? Why, in particular, when they say nothing about Khalistani extremism in the first place?”

Speaking of the Trudeau government’s astonishing inattentiveness to fanatical extremists engaging in incitements and intimidations and coming and going from Canada as they please. . .

An excruciatingly embarassing Canadian moment.

I was airborne on the first leg of the long haul to the Montreal Summit when the news broke. CBC version: Canada lists pro-Palestinian group Samidoun as terrorist entity.

(I’m not going to bang on again about how describing Samidoun as “pro-Palestinian” in a headline is an unfortunate case of the news media once again conceding the specious claim Samidoun makes for itself against the case that it should have been outlawed years ago, so let’s just move on).

During a brief stopover in Vancouver I checked my phone, and holy cow. The emails, text messages, phone messages. . .then my phone started ringing. I’d turned down a half dozen interviews before the day was over.

It all began here, in April, 2022, with this investigation: The Curious Case of Khaled Barakat. It carried on until just a few days ago: Liberal failure to outlaw pro-terrorist group Samidoun is mind boggling

In between,there was a lot of this sort of thing: Why was man linked to terrorist group allowed to speak at city-owned Ottawa venue? Group banned in Germany gets carte blanche in Canada to glorify Hamas massacreFinally, a terrorist sympathiser is arrested.

Necessary reading for anyone who wants the deep backstory: Samidoun: The Network.

I’m not due any great part of the credit for Samidoun’s ill luck, although I’d like think that all that research and all those interviews and investigations and fact-checking shifts for the National Post and the Ottawa Citizen and The Real Story going back two and a half years have amounted to something worthwhile.

Credit for Samidoun’s comeuppance this week genuinely belongs elsewhere. It belongs to the terrific research staff and the leadership of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, NGO Monitor, B’nai Brith, Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre, the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights . . . and in the House of Commons, Michael Chong, Shuv Majumdar, Kevin Vuong, Jamil Jivani, Anthony Housefather, and lately Pierre Poilievre.

I better stop there or it’ll be a long list and I’ll leave someone off and feel bad. Mostly I’d like to thank the paying subscribers to The Real Story, where I’ve done most of my work on this file. I wouldn’t have been able to do it without you, so take a bow.

The Real Story is made possible by paying subscribers who get all sorts of news backstories otherwise unavailable anywhere.

Why can’t we call this a proud Canadian moment?

Let me put it this way.

In effect as of last Friday, the U.S. Treasury Department has designated a federally-registered Canadian non-profit corporation a “sham charity” that has been covertly and openly serving a Foreign Terrorist Organization listed by the U.S. State Department, for years, specifically the Specially Designated Global Terrorist organization known as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.

Let that sink in. The Americans were forced to list one of Canada’s federally-registered non-profits as a terrorist entity. The PFLP has been on Canada’s own terrorist list all this time, too, and for several years, to no avail, Jewish advocacy organizations and Israeli diplomats had been hammering away to bring Samidoun to Ottawa’s attention.

Washington agreed to present this turn of events as a collaboration with Ottawa, and that’s fine. Diplomacy and all that. Canadian and American officials have been chatting for a year about how to get this mess sorted, but by last week the Americans were done waiting. Canada had to act swiftly.

Here’s something odd about Ottawa’s account: Samidoun meets the definition of a ‘terrorist group’ under Canada’s Criminal Code,” following Germany’s decision to do just that. Israel isn’t mentioned. Maybe that’s because Samidoun was registered with Corporations Canada as a non-profit corporation a mere three days after Israel listed Samidoun as a terrorist group and about two years after Ottawa was first warned that the PFLP was using Canada as a base of operations through Samidoun.

It was just as the financial, insurance and fundraising walls were closing in on the organization, globally, that Ottawa threw Samidoun a lifeline, on March 3, 2021.

Samidoun appears to remain a federally-registered non-profit, although its Corporations Canada page includes a note: “Government of Canada lists Samidoun as a terrorist entity.” At least as of Wednesday, Samidoun shows up on Public Safety Canada’s list of proscribed terrorist groups.

There’s an important distinction between the Americans’ listing announcement and Canada’s move. Here’s the U.S. Treasury Department: “Also designated today is Khaled Barakat, a member of the PFLP’s leadership. Together, Samidoun and Barakat play critical roles in external fundraising for the PFLP.” The Government of Canada is silent about Barakat.

A Palestinian from the West Bank town of Dahiyat al-Barid, Barakat is a Canadian citizen now. He first showed up in Canada at the University of British Columbia about 20 years ago. At some point along the way Barakat married the insufferable American immigrant Charlotte Kates, the Samidoun rally-organizer, international coordinator and slogan shouter arrested on hate-speech charges in April. Unaccountably, the B.C. Prosecution Service is still fussing and mulling and dragging its feet: no prosecution, six months on.

Barakat was last noticed in Beirut where he was livestreaming a conversation with Laith Marouf, the grossly antisemitic apologist for Syria’s Bashar Assad who famously siphoned hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal “anti-racism” and broadcasting consultation contracts before anyone in Ottawa even noticed.

Back to the India-Canada dyspepsia.

What does Justin Trudeau mean by proof?

I’m reluctant to include Monday’s extraordinary RCMP press conference among the several exercises in diversionary stage-management that Team Trudeau undertook this past week. But I do wonder.

The big headlines from that presser involved the RCMP’s conclusion that there are “links” between Indian diplomats and certain of the outrages that have occurred in a crime wave of extortion, arson, and strongarming in the South Asian community over the past year or so. The upshot is that Delhi is using the crime wave as cover to go after Khalistanis in Canada who are wanted India, and there are even “links tying agents of the Government of India to homicides.”

It’s certainly plausible. As Real Story subscribers will know, for quite some time now Narendra Modi’s government has been furious about the Trudeau government’s reluctance to tread on the toes of powerful Khalistani elements that have embedded themselves in Canada’s Sikh temples. It’s all “vote bank politics,” the Indians say.

The RCMP has concluded that Delhi’s overseas counter-terrorism efforts have come to include going after the gangs on their own turf according to gang rules. Delhi’s frustration involves at least two dozen high-profile criminals and Khalistanis in Canada who are wanted in India in several serious criminal and terrorism cases. India says they continue to run their gangland empires across the Indian subcontinent from their safe havens here in Canada.

Despite the impression Foreign Affairs Minister Melanie Joly set out to give in her account of the expulsion of India’s High Commissioner and five diplomats this week, RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme and Assistant RCMP Commissioner Brigitte Gauvin said the bad behaviour they were on about in their press briefing had nothing to do with the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar.

And despite Joly’s version, India says its embassy and consular officials were withdrawn for their own safety because Trudeau himself, by his florid language and grandstanding, had put them at risk.

Canada’s foot-stamping, tantrum-having approach has been avoided by the Americans, who report that Indian officials are being perfectly cooperative in the case that caused Trudeau to stand up in the House of Commons last September to accuse Modi of killing a Canadian on Canadian soil. That wasn’t a stunt quite on the scale of lowering the flags on all government buildings quY

Unlike the case of Hardeep Singh Nijjar’s murder, the possibly-related plot to kill Nijjar’s Sikhs for Justice associate Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, foiled by the Federal Bureau of Investigations and the Drug Enforcement Agency, is coming along swimmingly.

The only fleeting evidence of an Indian government agent’s involvement in Nijjar’s murder comes from the transcipts the U.S. Department of Justice put together from wiretaps in the comically compromised murder-for-hire plot to kill Pannun – of the five people who were in on it, one was an FBI agent and another was a DEA informant.

Trudeau himself conceded to the Hogue Commission Tuesday that he had no proof of the Indian government’s involvement in the Nijjar murder, that he had only “intelligence” suggesting an Indian government connection. As you might imagine, the news media in India jumped on Trudeau’s deposition with glee.

The Department of Justice transcipt contains an exchange between the gangster Nikhil Gupta (now in U.S. custody) and his prospective hit man (who was in reality an FBI agent) in which Gupta describes Nijjar as one of several targets in an anti-Khalistani assassination scheme with big payouts.

The money man in the arrangement has turned out to be something rather less than a movie-script spy chief. Vikash Yadav, a disreputable former RAW officer, was himself arrested by Delhi police on extortion, attempted murder and kidnapping charges last December.

In an amateurish shakedown, Yadav and an accomplice beat a Lodhi Road businessman, relieved him of his cash, a gold chain and his rings, and left him at the side of the road. Yadav was arrested soon after by the Delhi police, but he was allowed out on bail four months later, in April, and hasn’t been seen since. The FBI has issued a warrant for his arrest, and the U.S. is expected to ask for his extradition if he turns up.

It’s astonishing that something so tawdry could lead to Canada’s worst fracture in diplomatic relations with a fellow democracy in living memory. But this is Justin Trudeau’s Canada, and this is how we roll.

By the time you read this I should be airborne again. I’m tired.

Not a paywall to be found in this whole newsletter. I can only blame myself, but if you’ve come this far, you really should take out a paid subscription, right?

Business

Trump’s Initial DOGE Executive Order Doesn’t Quite ‘Dismantle Government Bureaucracy’

Published on

 

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By Thomas English

President Donald Trump’s Monday executive order establishing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) presents a more modest scope for the initiative, focusing primarily on “modernizing federal technology and software.”

The executive order refashions the Obama-era United States Digital Service (USDS) into the United States DOGE Service. Then-President Barack Obama created USDS in 2014 to enhance the reliability and usability of online federal services after the disastrous rollout of HealthCare.gov, an insurance exchange website created through the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Trump’s USDS will now prioritize “modernizing federal technology and software to maximize efficiency and productivity” under the order, which makes no mention of slashing the federal budget, workforce or regulations — DOGE’s originally advertised purpose.

“I am pleased to announce that the Great Elon Musk, working in conjunction with American Patriot Vivek Ramaswamy, will lead the Department of Government Efficiency (‘DOGE’),” Trump said in his official announcement of the initiative in November. “Together, these two wonderful Americans will pave the way for my Administration to dismantle Government Bureaucracy, slash excess government regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies.”

The order’s focus on streamlining federal technology and software stands in contrast to some of DOGE’s previously more expansive aims, including Elon Musk’s claim that “we can [cut the federal budget] by at least $2 trillion” at Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally in November. Musk now leads DOGE alone after Vivek Ramaswamy stepped down from the initiative Monday, apparently eying a 2026 gubernatorial run in Ohio.

The order says it serves to “advance the President’s 18-month DOGE agenda,” but omits many of the budget-cutting and workforce-slashing proposals during Trump’s campaign. Rather, the order positions DOGE as a technology modernization entity rather than an organization with direct authority to enact sweeping fiscal reforms. There is no mention, for instance, of trillions in budget cuts or a significant reduction in the federal workforce, though the president did separately enact a hiring freeze throughout the executive branch Monday.

“I can’t help but think that there’s more coming, that maybe more responsibilities will be added to it,” Susan Dudley, a public policy professor at George Washington University, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. Dudley, who was also the top regulatory official in former President George W. Bush’s administration, said the structure of the new USDS could impact the recent lawsuits against the DOGE effort.

“I think it maybe moots the lawsuit that’s been brought for it not being FACA,” Dudley said. “So if this is how it’s organized — that it’s people in the government who bring in these special government employees on a temporary basis, that might mean that the lawsuit doesn’t really have any ground.”

Three organizations — the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), National Security Counselors (NSC) and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) — separately filed lawsuits against DOGE within minutes of Trump signing the executive order. The suits primarily challenge DOGE’s compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), alleging the department operates without the required transparency, balanced representation and public accountability.

The order also emphasizes not “be construed to impair or otherwise affect … the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.”

“And the only mention of OMB [Office of Management and Budget] is some kind of boilerplate at the end — that it doesn’t affect that. But that’s kind of general stuff you often see in executive orders,” Dudley continued, adding she doesn’t “have an inside track” on whether further DOGE-related executive orders will follow.

“It’s certainly, certainly more modest than I think Musk was anticipating,” Dudley said.

Trump’s order also establishes “DOGE Teams” consisting of at least four employees: a team lead, a human resources specialist, an engineer and an attorney. Each team will be assigned an executive agency with which it will implement the president’s “DOGE agenda.”

It remains unclear whether Monday’s executive order comprehensively defines DOGE, or if additional orders will be forthcoming to broaden its mandate.

Continue Reading

International

California’s soaring electricity rates strain consumers, impact climate goals

Published on

From The Center Square

By 

While the greenhouse gas reduction programs that raise electricity rates are part of California’s climate goals, the increased prices actually discourage individuals from switching away from using fossil fuels impacting California’s ambitious climate goals.

California has completed yet another year with some of the highest electricity rates in the country – almost double the national average. The state’s electricity rates have been increasing rapidly, outpacing inflation in recent years by approximately 47% from 2019 to 2023. This is due largely to the high rates charged by the state’s three large investor-owned utilities (IOUs).

According to a report published by the California Legislative Analyst Office, the factors driving rate increases are wildfire-related costs, greenhouse gas reduction mandates, and policies and differences in utility operational structures and services territories. Ratepayers bear the brunt of these costs with those who earn lower incomes and live in hotter areas of the state the most severely affected.

The report points out that while the greenhouse gas reduction programs that raise electricity rates are part of California’s climate goals, the increased prices actually discourage individuals from switching away from using fossil fuels impacting California’s ambitious climate goals.

These programs include the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), which requires utilities to provide a percentage of retail electricity sales from renewable sources, raising costs for ratepayers. Additionally, SB 350 directs the CPUC to authorize ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs to meet California’s goal of doubling energy efficiency savings by 2030.

“While many other states operate ratepayer-supported energy efficiency programs, on average, we estimate that Californians contribute a notably greater share of their rates to such programs than is typical across the country,” the report notes.

Electricity rates pay for numerous costs related to the construction, maintenance and operation of electricity systems including the generation, transmission and distribution components. However, these rates also pay for costs unrelated to servicing electricity.

“Most notably, the state and IOUs use revenue generated from electricity rates to support various state-mandated public purpose programs,” the report says. “These programs have goals such as increasing energy efficiency, expediting adoption of renewable energy sources, supporting the transition to zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs), and providing lower-income customers with financial assistance.”

The largest public purpose program is the California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE), which provides discounts for lower-income customers. However, the report notes that while CARE benefits certain customers, it shifts the costs onto other slightly higher-income customers and that the majority of Californians spend a larger portion of their income on electricity compared to other states.

 “According to data from the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, California households in the lowest quintile of the income distribution typically spend about 6 percent of their before-tax incomes on electricity, compared to less than 1 percent for the highest-income quintile of households,” reads the report. “Notably, high electricity rates also can impose burdens on moderate-income earners, since they also pay a larger share of their household incomes toward electricity than their higher-income counterparts but typically are not able to qualify for bill assistance programs.”

Electricity bills also reflect other state and local tax charges including utility taxes that are used to support programs such as fire response and parks in addition to the state-assessed charge on electricity use that is put into the Energy Resources Programs Account (ERPA). This account is used to pay for energy programs and planning activities.

While many of the funds recovered through electricity rates are fixed costs for programs, these costs increased in 2022 following the repeal of a state law that limited fixed charges at $10, requiring the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to authorize fixed charges that vary by income. These come out to be around $24 per month for non-CARE customers and $6 per month for CARE customers.

Wildfire related costs have also been increasing. Before 2019, wildfire costs included in electricity rates charged by IOUs were negligible, but now it has grown between 7% and 13% of typical non-CARE customers. Reasons for this increase include California’s high wildfire risk and the state’s liability standard holding IOUs responsible for all costs associated with utility-caused wildfires.

“The magnitude of the damages and risks from utility-sparked wildfires have increased substantially in recent years,” reads the report. “Correspondingly, IOUs have spent unprecedented amounts in recent years on wildfire mitigation-related activities to try to reduce the likelihood of future utility-caused wildfires, with the associated costs often passed along to ratepayers. Furthermore, California IOUs and their ratepayers pay for insurance against future wildfires, including contributing to the California Wildfire Fund.”

According to the report, electricity use and rates for Claifornians are only expected to increase and the legislature will have to determine how to tackle the statewide climate goals while reducing the burden on ratepayers.

Continue Reading

Trending

X