Business
The NSA’s Secret Sex Chats
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c75c5/c75c541c73c8500fa6899c46590117007dee3913" alt=""
|
|
Intelligence officials maintained a chatroom to discuss polyamory and transgender surgeries, internal documents reveal.
The “intelligence community” is one of the most powerful parts of the American national security apparatus. In theory, it works tirelessly to keep the nation safe. But according to internal documents that we obtained, some intelligence agency employees have another on-the-job priority: sex chats.
We have cultivated sources within the National Security Agency—one current employee and one former employee—who have provided chat logs from the NSA’s Intelink messaging program. According to an NSA press official, “All NSA employees sign agreements stating that publishing non-mission related material on Intelink is a usage violation and will result in disciplinary action.” Nonetheless, these logs, dating back two years, are lurid, featuring wide-ranging discussions of sex, kink, polyamory, and castration.
One popular chat topic was male-to-female transgender surgery, which involves surgically removing the penis and turning it into an artificial vagina. “[M]ine is everything,” said one male who claimed to have had gender reconstruction surgery. “[I]’ve found that i like being penetrated (never liked it before GRS), but all the rest is just as important as well.” Another intelligence official boasted that genital surgery allowed him “to wear leggings or bikinis without having to wear a gaff under it.”
These employees discussed hair removal, estrogen injections, and the experience of sexual pleasure post-castration. “[G]etting my butthole zapped by a laser was . . . shocking,” said one transgender-identifying intel employee who spent thousands on hair removal. “Look, I just enjoy helping other people experience boobs,” said another about estrogen treatments. “[O]ne of the weirdest things that gives me euphoria is when i pee, i don’t have to push anything down to make sure it aims right,” a Defense Intelligence Agency employee added.
These revelations come at a moment of heightened scrutiny for the intelligence community. President Donald Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard have each made the case that the intelligence agencies have gone “woke,” prioritizing left-wing activism over national security. These chat logs confirm their suspicions and raise fundamental questions about competence and professionalism.
According to our sources, the sex chats were legitimized as part of the NSA’s commitment to “diversity, equity and inclusion.” Activists within the agency used LGBTQ+ “employee resource groups” to turn their kinks and pathologies into official work duties. According to the current NSA employee, these groups “spent all day” recruiting activists and holding meetings with titles such as “Privilege,” “Ally Awareness,” “Pride,” and “Transgender Community Inclusion.” And they did so with the full support of NSA leadership, which declared that DEI was “not only mission critical, but mission imperative.”
In this case, “diversity” was not a byword for racialism, but rather a euphemism for sex talk. Last January, chatroom members discussed their practice of polyamory, or “ethical non-monogamy.” “[A] polycule is a polyamorous group,” one employee explained. “A is my [girlfriend], and B-G are her partners. . . . then B&C are dating but not C&D, nor E, F, or G with any of the others, though there are several MWB (metas-with-benefits) connections.” Another employee claimed to be part of a nine-member “polycule,” adding that “some of our friends are practically poly-mers, with all the connected compounds.”
At other times, the conversations became explicit. The active source at the NSA claimed to have witnessed hundreds of sexually provocative discussions, which, he added, occurred mostly on taxpayer time. The former NSA source who was familiar with the chats recalled being “disgusted” by a particularly shocking thread discussing weekend “gangbangs.”
The NSA sources also raised the question of some staffers’ mental fitness for the job. In one chat, an NSA employee insists on using “it” pronouns in lieu of the human “he” or “she” pronouns. “[I]t/its user here. While I understand we can make some people uncomfortable, keep in mind that the dehumanizing aspect either a) doesn’t apply or b) is a positive effect when we’re requesting it.” A commenter who disagreed was quickly dismissed by employees of the NSA and CIA, who claimed that refusing to use “it/its” pronouns amounted to “erasing” a transgender identity.
“These are folks with top secret clearances believing they are an IT!” said the NSA source.
With the Trump administration taking over, we may see changes. The NSA source said that staffers involved in employee resource groups fear the end of DEI. “[T]here are legal restrictions in place, but this admin has shown they don’t give a f**k about legality,” a staffer in space intelligence remarked about DEI staffers being placed on leave. Others have expressed opposition to Trump’s cabinet nominees.
A conflict is coming. These NSA chat logs suggest the presence of at least hundreds of gender activists within the intelligence services who cannot distinguish between male and female, and who believe that discussing castration, polyamory, and “gangbangs” is an appropriate use of public resources. For psychological and ideological reasons, these kinds of people will not be easily sidelined. The Trump administration should not only dismantle the structure of DEI but also terminate the employees who use it to advance gender activism at the expense of national security.
![]() |
A guest post by
|
Subscribe to Christopher F. Rufo.
For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
Business
Here are four ways the next federal government can cut spending
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0464/d0464ec6c97c85bc15cd0d289563bf9ce57a53b6" alt=""
From the Fraser Institute
By Jake Fuss and Grady Munro
With a federal election on the horizon, it’s worth reflecting on the Trudeau government’s extraordinary fiscal legacy, which includes record-high levels of spending (even after excluding emergency COVID spending), an uninterrupted string of budget deficits, a near doubling of the federal debt from $1.1 trillion to $2.1 trillion, and sky-high federal debt interest payments, which will reach a projected $51.9 billion (more than all GST revenue) this fiscal year.
Clearly, the next federal government, whoever that may be, must get smarter about government spending. Fortunately, as noted in our new study published by the Fraser Institute, there are many areas within the federal government to find savings.
For example, this fiscal year (2024/25) the government will spend a projected $3.5 billion through the Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB). Established by the Trudeau government in 2017, the CIB is a federal Crown corporation tasked with investing and attracting investment in infrastructure projects across Canada. Despite approving “investments” totalling $13.2 billion (as of the fourth quarter of 2023-24), the CIB has demonstrated an alarming lack of progress. As of July 2024, only two (out of 76) CIB-funded projects had been completed—the purchase of 20 electric buses in Edmonton and the construction of two solar facilities in Calgary. Small wonder that a 2022 multi-partisan House of Commons committee report recommended the government abolish the CIB.
To find more savings, the government should look at its seven Regional Development Agencies (RDAs), which provide financial assistance (a.k.a. corporate welfare) to businesses in specific regions across the country. Total spending will reach a projected $1.5 billion this fiscal year. But research shows that corporate welfare does little to nothing to promote widespread economic growth but simply allows the government to pick winners and losers in the free market. And rather than using concrete objectives and results to justify their existence, the RDAs rely on vague platitudes such as “businesses are growing” and “communities are developing economically.”
The government should also eliminate its so-called “Strategic Innovation Fund,” which spends tax dollars (a projected $2.4 billion this fiscal year) to simply shift jobs and investment away from some firms and industries to firms and industries favoured by the government, with no net benefit for the overall economy. And “Global Innovation Clusters,” which incentivize firms to spend time and resources modifying their businesses to secure government grants (worth a projected $202.3 million this fiscal year) rather than developing new and improved goods and services.
Finally, there’s the Green Municipal Fund (GMF), which uses federal tax dollars (including a projected $530 million this fiscal year) to bankroll municipal projects that purportedly accelerate the transition to “net-zero” greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. But several current projects (e.g. “climate-friendly” home tours, funding for climate advocacy groups in Ottawa) will not reduce GHG emissions in any measurable way. In other words, the GMF is spending taxpayer dollars on projects that make no progress towards the GMF’s stated goal.
In total, our study highlights eight areas where the federal government should cut spending, with potential savings totalling $10.7 billion this fiscal year alone. By cancelling these wasteful programs, the government could eliminate roughly one-quarter of the current budget deficit.
Until policymakers in Ottawa get serious about cutting wasteful spending, budget deficits will likely continue. Smaller and smarter government in Ottawa is both possible and necessary.
Business
Trump to Counter Foreign Social Media Censorship Demands and Defend Free Speech Online
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b545/2b5458c942de0950c5cb281ec322c3c52dfdf921" alt=""
-
International21 hours ago
Vatican reports ‘slight improvement’ in Pope Francis’ condition
-
Daily Caller1 day ago
Trump Taps Dan Bongino For FBI Deputy Director
-
Business2 days ago
Bad Research Still Costs Good Money
-
Addictions24 hours ago
Does America’s ‘drug czar’ hold lessons for Canada?
-
Agriculture18 hours ago
How USAID Assisted the Corporate Takeover of Ukrainian Agriculture
-
conflict21 hours ago
Trump meets Macron at White House, says Ukraine war ending soon
-
Artificial Intelligence20 hours ago
Apple bets big on Trump economy with historic $500 billion U.S. investment
-
Business19 hours ago
Trump backs Musk’s ultimatum as ‘great’ idea, but some aren’t responding