Opinion
The federal government wants Canadians to eat bugs.
A few (very few) media outlets have picked up on this recent news release from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation regarding the human consumption of.. Bugs!
Yuck right? Well don’t panic. They’re not quite ready to swap your bowl of Count Chocula for cocoa-flavoured crickets just yet. However it does appear the Liberal government is hoping to put bugs on your menu. The article from the CTF is included below so I urge you to read on because it’s really interesting (and for those with a queasy stomach, just a tad disturbing).
But before you do that, a couple of observations.
First. This is NOT another win for the annoying conspiracy theory people. Sure they may have been spouting off about forcing us to eat bugs, but that doesn’t make this a classic conspiracy theory.
When it comes to conspiracy theories, most of us have always concluded there are just two types of people. There are the KOOKS. And then there are the people who do their best to avoid the kooks. Let’s call the first group the Flat Earthers, and the second group, Everyone Else (or the Rest of Us if you please).
Flat Earthers use evidence no one can verify to draw ridiculous conclusions and make strange accusations. Governments insisting we eat bugs may sound like a ridiculous conclusion formed by evidence no one can verify, but it turns out this is not the case at all.
Why is it that “The Liberal Government Wants Us To Eat Bugs” is not a ‘classic’ conspiracy theory?
Well it’s because of the words ‘conspiracy’ and ‘theory’. They just don’t apply.
The Oxford Dictionary defines conspiracy as “a secret plan by a group of people to do something harmful or illegal.” For one thing there’s nothing illegal about adding bugs to our diet. We’ve never had to make a law about it. Politicians like getting elected, and so it never occurred to them to force bugs onto our plates. Sure you’ll see them flipping pancakes and picking hot dogs off a bbq, but that’s about as ‘harmful’ as they’re willing to get. So there’s nothing illegal and nothing harmful going on. That leaves the part about being a secret.
To prove this isn’t a secret I’m afraid I’m going to have to put 2 and 2 together because we have to talk about the World Economic Forum. They might not be shouting it from the mountaintops, but the World Economic Forum isn’t hiding the fact they’d like us to replace meat protein with bugs. It’s only a secret if you’ve never taken the time to read “Why we need to give insects the role they deserve in our food systems“, or “5 reasons why eating insects could reduce climate change“.
You might think our trusted sources of information would look into this because food is something their readers tend to eat almost every day. Sometimes more than once. They might not even have to go to Davos to check it out. News reporters bump into Deputy PM Chrystia Freeland in the hallways on Parliament Hill all the time. Chrystia Freeland is on the World Economic Forum Board of Trustees If you click the link you can see her there, third person down on the right. If Deputy PM Freeland doesn’t know where to find these articles on the WEF website, as a Board of Trustee member she’ll know who to ask. So this certainly isn’t illegal or particularly harmful, and it’s only a secret to those who don’t read these things or have these things read to them by the information sources we’ve always trusted. The Liberal government might not talk about sharing goals with the WEF every day, but when Canada’s Deputy PM is on the WEF’s Board of Trustees let’s just say it would be odd to think they’re at odds.
The other word in play here is “theory”. When it comes to “conspiracy theory”, the word theory means “theoretical”, as in a theory, but not really happening. Again with the Oxford, second meaning applies here, “that could possibly exist, happen or be true, although this is unlikely”.
One could make a weak argument that Canada’s Deputy PM only goes to Davos to exchange stories with the rich and famous about how ridiculously hard it is to drive the speed limit in Alberta. One ‘theory’ is that she had to make it all the way back to Ottawa in an EV before it got cold. Regardless. Canada’s Deputy PM is a member of the WEF Board of Trustees. So although it could be a coincidence, it is not a theory that the federal government is funding bug – food research. As you’ll see below, the liberals are paying companies to ” promote the consumption of “roasted crickets” or “cricket powder” mixed-in with your morning bowl of cereal. ”
The fact the WEF has been talking about this for years now, the fact our Deputy Prime Minister is on the WEF Board of Trustees, and the fact the federal government is now funding research meant to change Canadians from people who stomp on bugs into people who chomp on bugs.. Well that pretty much takes the theoretical part right out of it.
Now that you’re hungry for more, here is the news release from a new trusted information source, the CTF.
By Ryan Thorpe of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation
Taste the crunch: cricket corporate welfare cost $420K

Bon apétit.
The federal government spent $420,023 since 2018 subsidizing companies that turn crickets into human food.
“Canadians are struggling as inflation pushes up grocery bills, but subsidizing snacks made out of bugs doesn’t sound like the right solution for taxpayers,” said Franco Terrazzano, CTF Federal Director. “If Prime Minister Justin Trudeau wants to take a bite out of crunchy crickets, he can do it without taking a bite out of taxpayers’ wallets.”
The Canadian Taxpayers Federation gathered the list of cricket corporate welfare deals by reviewing the federal government’s proactive disclosure of grants and contributions.
On two separate occasions, the feds cut cheques to a Montreal-based company called NAAK Inc., for a combined cost to taxpayers of $171,695.
The co-founders of NAAK were “introduced … to the benefits of adding insects to (their) diet” by a friend and describe their mission as “democratizing insect consumption.”
NAAK specializes in “cricket energy bars,” but a portion of its corporate welfare money was earmarked for developing other cricket products, including “steaks, sausages and falafels.”
NAAK is one of five companies producing crickets for human consumption that have received corporate welfare deals from the feds in recent years.
Table: Corporate welfare deals, 2018-2022
|
Company |
Number of subsidies |
Total cost of subsidies |
|
NAAK Inc. |
2 |
$171,695 |
|
Entologik Inc. |
2 |
$88,979 |
|
Prairie Cricket Farms |
2 |
$78,349 |
|
Gaia Protein |
1 |
$42,000 |
|
Casa Bonita Foods |
1 |
$39,000 |
Casa Bonita Foods wants to “manufacture high protein snacks made with cricket flour,” while Prairie Cricket Farms promotes the consumption of “roasted crickets” or “cricket powder” mixed-in with your morning bowl of cereal.
The founder of Entologik claims insects are the “protein of the future” and wants to grow the company into “the largest producers and processor of edible insects in Canada.”
“The feds are having their ‘let them eat crickets’ moment,” Terrazzano said. “If someone can sell crickets as food, we wish them the best of luck, but taxpayers shouldn’t be paying for it.”
An additional $8.7 million in subsidies went to Aspire Food Group, which operates a cricket processing plant in London, Ont. In total, the company received four separate handouts.
While the company is primarily geared toward pet food production, its owner said about 10 per cent of its business uses crickets for human food.
Opinion
British Columbians protest Trump while Eby brings their province to its knees
From the Fraser Institute
By Bruce Pardy
Recently, millions participated in “No Kings” protests across the United States and elsewhere, including the Vancouver Art Gallery where people gathered to resist authoritarianism and protect democracy. But inexplicably, they were there to protest Donald Trump. The politician dismantling their rights is British Columbia Premier David Eby.
It’s quintessentially Canadian. Vancouver’s best are outraged about the state of democracy in America, but oblivious to the autocracy of their own governments.
Quietly, Eby is transforming B.C. In early 2024, his government proposed to amend the province’s Land Act, which governs the use of Crown land in the province. It planned to give B.C.’s hundreds of First Nations a veto over mining, hydro projects, farming, forestry, docks and communication towers. The government tried to consult quietly, but the backlash was immediate and vociferous. It withdrew the proposals, promising to be more transparent. But it did not shelve its objectives or plans. And did not deliver on its promise. Instead, it sought to make agreements over specific territories with specific Aboriginal groups, often negotiated covertly and announced after the fact.
In April 2024, the Eby government recognized Aboriginal title to Haida Gwaii, the archipelago on Canada’s west coast. Around 5,000 people live on Haida Gwaii, about half Haida, who voted overwhelmingly in favour of the deal. But non-Haida residents had no say. Two classes of citizens now live on Haida Gwaii; one with political status and the other without. The Haida agreement says private property will be honoured, but private property is incompatible with Aboriginal title, which is communal. If Haida Gwaii really is subject to Aboriginal title, then no one can own parts of it privately.
Eby has said that the Haida agreement is to serve as a “template.” In January 2025, his government revealed that it had made an agreement for Indigenous management of land and resources with the shíshálh (Sechelt) Nation on B.C.’s Sunshine Coast. Aboriginal title is in the works. The agreement was made in August 2024 on the eve of the provincial election but kept hidden for five months. Residents were in the dark until the government revealed the finished deal.
Even before that agreement was negotiated, shíshálh Nation and the government had developed a “Dock Management Plan” to impose various new and onerous rules on private property owners in Pender Harbour, including red “no go” zones and rules that made many existing docks and boat houses non-compliant. Residents with long-standing docks in full legal compliance had no right to negotiate, to be consulted or to be grandfathered.
In June 2025, the government gave the Tŝilhqot’in Nation a veto over mining projects in the Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) area. In an agreement with the Squamish Nation, it established 33 cultural sites off limits to development. The government has also allowed First Nations to close provincial parks to the non-Aboriginal public.
Much of this can be traced to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), and to the B.C. statute that incorporates UNDRIP into B.C. law. That statute, known as DRIPA, was passed unanimously by the B.C. legislature in 2019. It calls upon the B.C. government to “take all measures necessary to ensure the laws of British Columbia are consistent with the Declaration.” UNDRIP says, literally, that the land belongs to Indigenous peoples. To be charitable, not all members of the legislature may have understood what they were doing. Next up for DRIPA transformation appears to be the B.C. Heritage Conservation Act.
Courts have been doing their part. Recently, the City of Richmond sent out a letter to property owners. “For those whose property is in the area outlined in black,” the letter reads, “the Court has declared aboriginal title to your property which may compromise the status and validity of your ownership… The entire area outlined in green has been claimed on appeal by the Cowichan First Nations.”
The Richmond letter is a consequence of a recent decision of the B.C. Supreme Court, which awarded the Cowichan First Nation Aboriginal title over 800 acres of land in Richmond. Wherever Aboriginal title is found to exist, said the court, it is a “prior and senior right” to other property interests, whether the land is public or private.
Governments and the courts work together on this project, too. In September, the Eby government, along with the federal government and the Haida Council, applied for a consent order declaring Aboriginal title to Haida Gwaii. The B.C. Supreme Court obliged. The effect of that declaration is to incorporate the Haida agreement’s recognition of Aboriginal title into a constitutional right under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. No future government can reverse it.
B.C. is home to the most famous ostrich farm in the world, but it’s the people who have their heads in the sand. “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty,” said abolitionist Wendell Phillips in 1852, “power is ever stealing from the many to the few.” Assume good faith on the part of governments at your peril. Especially in British Columbia, where the premier is mounting an existential threat to the future of his own province.
International
Biden’s Autopen Orders declared “null and void”
In a 91-page report released Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee accused Joe Biden’s inner circle of executing and concealing presidential actions without his knowledge, declaring that any orders signed through the autopen were “null and void.” The Republican-led panel, chaired by Rep. James Comer (R-KY), said it uncovered evidence that senior aides used the mechanical signature device to authorize pardons, commutations, and executive directives while Biden’s mental and physical decline worsened — all to preserve “the illusion of presidential authority.”
Joe Biden WAS NOT running the show.
Our new report EXPOSES how Biden's decline was real and his aides covered it up.
Aides didn't even know WHO was operating the autopen to sign official documents and pardons.
Watch the truth they tried to bury 👇🏻 pic.twitter.com/WkQsy5k6uC
— Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) October 28, 2025
“The Biden Autopen Presidency will go down as one of the biggest political scandals in U.S. history,” the report stated. “As Americans saw President Biden’s decline with their own eyes, his inner circle sought to deceive the public, cover up his condition, and took unauthorized executive actions that are now invalid.” The committee urged the Justice Department to launch a full criminal investigation into what it called a “cover-up of historic proportions,” naming several aides who invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about their roles. It also demanded the D.C. Board of Medicine investigate Biden’s physician for allegedly hiding his true medical state.
According to the report, internal emails and documentation revealed a “haphazard process” surrounding clemency and other executive actions, with no reliable record confirming Biden’s personal approval. Comer said the findings raise profound constitutional concerns. “If unelected aides were using the autopen to execute presidential powers without Joe Biden’s knowledge or consent, that is an assault on the Constitution itself,” he said.
The White House has not yet responded.
-
Business16 hours agoTrans Mountain executive says it’s time to fix the system, expand access, and think like a nation builder
-
Alberta2 days agoCoutts border officers seize 77 KG of cocaine in commercial truck entering Canada – Street value of $7 Million
-
Business2 days agoThe painful return of food inflation exposes Canada’s trade failures
-
Alberta1 day agoPremier Smith sending teachers back to school and setting up classroom complexity task force
-
Alberta1 day agoThousands of Albertans march to demand independence from Canada
-
Addictions17 hours agoThe Shaky Science Behind Harm Reduction and Pediatric Gender Medicine
-
Business2 days agoOttawa Bought Jobs That Disappeared: Paying for Trudeau’s EV Gamble
-
Crime1 day agoSuspect caught trying to flee France after $100 million Louvre jewel robbery



