Crime
RCMP response not a factor in cell death
April 09, 2019
On May 13, 2017 ASIRT was directed to investigate the circumstances surrounding the death of a 32-year-old man, who went into medical distress and later died following a period of custody at the Wood Buffalo South Policing Facility in Fort McMurray, Alberta.
On May 11, 2017, RCMP officers entered and searched a residence in Fort McMurray as part of a drug trafficking investigation. Once inside the residence, police located the 32-year-old man behind a locked door to one of the residence’s suites. Police negotiated with the man through the locked door, and ultimately, the man voluntarily emerged from the suite. Inside that residence, they located numerous items consistent with drug trafficking and the man was placed under arrest. The man was only wearing underwear upon arrest, and officers located clothing for him and assisted him in dressing, as he was handcuffed. RCMP transported the man to the Wood Buffalo South Policing Facility, and although the officers who dealt with him upon arrest and during transport observed some signs consistent with intoxication, there were no medical concerns based upon the man’s presentation and behaviour. Upon arrival at the facility, the man was searched, provided access to a phone, and placed inside a holding cell.
Once the man was booked into the holding facility, his movements were captured on CCTV video, providing a detailed record of the man’s time in custody. The majority of this time was unremarkable, however on two occasions, the man’s condition or behaviour raised concern with the civilian guards at the facility, and on those occasions, RCMP officers immediately responded to the man’s cell to check on his well-being. On one occasion, when the man appeared to be having some respiratory issues, EMS attended with the RCMP member but the man refused treatment, repeatedly indicating that he only had a cold. Based on subsequent observations made by an officer, a strip search was conducted but did not reveal any illicit substances on his person.
In the early hours of May 13, 2017, the man asked to call his lawyer again, and was taken to the phone room to make a call. While in the phone room, the man went into medical distress. RCMP officers immediately responded to the phone room, contacted EMS, and provided first aid to the man. EMS arrived minutes later, assumed care of the man, and transported him to hospital, where the man was later pronounced deceased.
An autopsy determined the cause of death was cocaine and fentanyl toxicity. Post-mortem toxicology reports revealed a potentially lethal level of cocaine in the man’s bloodstream, as well as metabolites of both cocaine and fentanyl. A small, torn “baggie” consistent with drug packaging was located inside the man’s stomach at autopsy.
While it is impossible to determine with absolute certainty, based on the evidence, it is a reasonable inference the man used the brief period of advance awareness of his forthcoming arrest to conceal drugs within his body that later led to him going into medical distress and ultimately resulted in his death. This tragic conclusion is only available through the compilation of the observations of numerous individual witnesses, the analysis of dozens of hours of CCTV footage, an autopsy and post-mortem toxicology analysis that provide a complete picture of what was a medical death. It is this hindsight that allows for an understanding of why the man died.
In all of the circumstances, while the man’s death is unquestionably tragic, the actions of the officers who dealt with him demonstrated concern for his well-being and responsiveness to his medical needs. The care and supervision provided to the man was reasonable and demonstrates genuine concern for his safety. There are no reasonable grounds to believe the conduct of any officer would constitute a criminal offence. As such, no charges will be laid in this case.
Crime
Biden’s ‘preemptive pardons’ would set ‘dangerous’ precedent, constitutional scholar warns
From LifeSiteNews
By Bob Unruh
Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley warned that preemptive pardons ‘would do precisely what Biden suggests that he is deterring: create a dangerous immunity for presidents and their allies in committing criminal abuses.’
An expert who not only has testified before Congress on the U.S. Constitution but has represented members in court cases is warning about Joe Biden’s speculated agenda to deliver to his friend and supporters preemptive pardons.
It is Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and author of The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage, who wrote, “After years of lying to the American people about the influence-peddling scandal and promising not to consider a pardon for his son, Biden would end his legacy with the ultimate dishonesty: converting pardons into virtual party favors.”
There has been much speculation about those preemptive pardons from Biden, who lied about allowing juries and courts to determine the outcomes of son Hunter’s criminal gun and tax cases, flip-flopped and pardoned him.
Hunter Biden could have been ordered to jail for years for his felony gun convictions and his guilty pleas to felony tax charges.
However, Joe Biden handed him a get-out-of-jail free card, then followed up with hundreds and hundreds more commutations and pardons to a long list of those with criminal convictions.
The activity triggered a rash of speculation about those preemptive pardons, and Turley explains what’s going on.
“Democrats are worried about the collapsing narrative that President-elect Donald Trump will destroy democracy, end future elections, and conduct sweeping arrests of everyone from journalists to homosexuals. That narrative, of course, ignores that we have a constitutional system of overlapping protections that has blocked such abuses for over two centuries.”
Thus, the talk of preemptive pardons, but Turley said it wouldn’t work out.
“Ironically, preemptive pardons would do precisely what Biden suggests that he is deterring: create a dangerous immunity for presidents and their allies in committing criminal abuses,” he said.
He noted if Biden delivers those pardons, “he would fundamentally change the use of presidential pardons by granting ‘prospective’ or ‘preemptive’ pardons to political allies. Despite repeated denials of President-elect Donald Trump that he is seeking retaliation against opponents and his statements that he wants ‘success [to be] my revenge,’ Democratic politicians and pundits have called for up to thousands of such pardons.”
He explained there’s politics all over the scheme.
“After many liberals predicted the imminent collapse of democracy and that opponents would be rounded up in mass by the Trump Administration, they are now contemplating the nightmare that democracy might survive and that there will be no mass arrests,” he wrote. “The next best thing to a convenient collapse of democracy is a claim that Biden’s series of preemptive pardons averted it. It is enough to preserve the narrative in the face of a stable constitutional system.”
But there will be a cost to such a “political stunt,” he said.
“Preemptive pardons could become the norm as presidents pardon whole categories of allies and even themselves to foreclose federal prosecutions. … It will give presidents cover to wipe away any threat of prosecution for friends, donors, and associates. This can include self-pardons issued as implied condemnations of their political opponents. It could easily become the final act of every president to pardon himself and all of the members of his Administration.
“We would then have an effective immunity rule for outgoing parties in American politics.”
He noted that in the past, Bill Clinton pardoned both family members and political donors.
“Yet, despite that history, no president has seen fit to go as far as where Biden appears to be heading,” he said. Promoters of the plan, he said, “would prefer to fundamentally change the use of the pardon power to maintain an apocalyptic narrative that was clearly rejected by the public in this election. If you cannot prove the existence of the widely touted Trump enemies list, a Biden pardon list is the next best thing.”
Reprinted with permission from the WND News Center.
Alberta
B.C. traveller arrested for drug exportation during Calgary layover
From the Alberta RCMP
B.C. traveller arrested for drug exportation during Calgary layover
Calgary – On Nov. 17, 2024, Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) officers at the Calgary International Airport were conducting outbound exams when they intercepted luggage from a commercial flight destined for the United Kingdom. During the exam, officers found and seized 12 kg of pressed cocaine and a tracking device. The owner of the bag was subsequently arrested by CBSA prior to boarding a flight to Heathrow Airport.
The Integrated Border Enforcement Team in Alberta, a joint force operation between the RCMP Federal Policing Northwest Region, CBSA and Calgary Police Service, was notified and a criminal investigation was initiated into the traveller and the seized drugs.
Justin Harry Carl Beck, 29, a resident of Port Coquitlam, B.C., was arrested and charged with:
- Exportation of a controlled substance contrary to section 6(1) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act;
- Possession of a controlled substance for the purpose of trafficking contrary to section 5(2) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
Beck is scheduled to appear at the Alberta Court of Justice in Calgary on May 6, 2025.
“This seizure is a testament to the exemplary work and investigative expertise shown by CBSA Border Services Officers at Calgary International Airport. Through our key partnerships with the RCMP and the Calgary Police Service, the CBSA works to disrupt those attempting to smuggle illegal drugs across our borders and hold them accountable.”
- Janalee Bell-Boychuk, Regional Director General, Prairie Region, Canada Border Services Agency
“The RCMP Federal Policing Northwest Region’s top priority has always been, and will continue to be, public safety. This investigation serves as an important reminder that this extends beyond any border. By working together, we prevented this individual from importing an illicit substance into a foreign country where it had the potential to cause significant harm to others, all for the sake of turning a profit.”
- Supt. Sean Boser, Officer in Charge of Federal Serious Organized Crime and Border Integrity – Alberta, RCMP Federal Policing Northwest Region
“This investigation underscores the importance of collaboration in drug trafficking investigations. Our partnerships with law enforcement agencies across the country, and internationally, are vital to addressing crimes that cross multiple borders. By intercepting these drugs before they could reach their destination, we have ensured a safer community, both locally and abroad.”
- Supt. Jeff Bell, Criminal Operations & Intelligence Division, Calgary Police Service
IBET’s mandate is to enhance border integrity and security along the shared border, between designated ports of entry, by identifying, investigating and interdicting persons, organizations and goods that are involved in criminal activities.
-
Business2 days ago
Senator Introduces Bill To Send One-Third Of Federal Workforce Packing Out Of DC
-
National1 day ago
When is the election!? Singh finally commits and Poilievre asks Governor General to step in
-
COVID-192 days ago
Freedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich calls out Trudeau in EU Parliament address for shunning protesters
-
COVID-191 day ago
Former Trudeau minister faces censure for ‘deliberately lying’ about Emergencies Act invocation
-
Alberta2 days ago
Ford and Trudeau are playing checkers. Trump and Smith are playing chess
-
MAiD2 days ago
Nearly half of non-terminally ill Canadians who choose euthanasia say they are lonely
-
Business1 day ago
DOGE already on the job: How Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy caused the looming government shutdown
-
Alberta1 day ago
Free Alberta Strategy trying to force Trudeau to release the pension calculation