Bruce Dowbiggin
Québec: Still Speaking In Tongues, Cashing Your Cheques
Lather. Rinse. Repeat. The cycle of Québec’s byzantine language politics continues. Nothing seems to change. The culture authoritarians propose. The anglos protest. More people make the decision to leave the province. The Québec-based prime minister takes off for Tofino.
The latest bagarre concerns a policy that has leaders of Québec’s English community worried they might not be entitled to health treatment in English. The purpose of this latest culture cleansing was, as always, to re-assert the primacy of French is the delivery of services. Because nothing works better than unworkable impositions to insoluble problems.
The language of the directive was, at best, inelegant. For instance, immigrants to the province are only eligible to receive health care in a language other than French for the first six months after their arrival. Also, says the document, a language other than French can only be used in healthcare settings when “health, public safety or the principles of natural justice require it,”— including in emergencies.
The directive also stipulates that members of “Quebec’s historic anglophone community” must provide a certificate proving their eligibility to attend English school in the province if they want to receive all medical services exclusively in English. (Wouldn’t wearing stars on their clothes suffice?)
Predictably the remaining Québec anglos, whose gullibility on language diktats knows no bounds, reacted in fear. For decades they’ve tried to be good little citoyens, sending their kids to French immersion, learning to order their smoked meat in the approved tongue, assuming settler guilt for winning at the Plains of Abraham. Voting Liberal. And what has it gotten them?
Trudeau Liberal stooge Anna Gainey tried to salve their feelings. “It is clear that the confusion and uncertainty created by the directive is likely to have adverse consequences that cannot be ignored,” she wrote. “Clarity is urgently needed. The choice of language should continue to belong to the patient.”
As you might expect, the tongue troopers denied any malign intent in their ongoing push to keep Québec a French enclave— even if that’s what the policy says. Three Québec ministers reached out to say the new directive does not restrict healthcare access for English speakers. “The government of Québec imposes absolutely no linguistic conditions in health care settings before providing health care in English to anyone who requests it,” they wrote in The Gazette.
In other words, take two pilules and call me in the morning. Plus cà change.
What’s most remarkable is that no one seems to acknowledge that this ongoing cleansing of the anglo fact in Quebec, a process launched by the election of René Levesque’s PQ in 1976, is a lingering 20th-century artifact, irrelevant in a current world where regional language and culture laws are subordinate to globalist commissars. In that world a unilingual Québec is a minnow that won’t last a minute.
As an example, this week’s X chat between its founder Elon Musk and Americans GOP candidate Donald Trump was seen as so threatening to world order that pencil-necked EU digital chief Thierry Breton warned Musk that, under EU laws, “X is obliged to ensure ‘all proportionate and effective mitigation measures are put in place regarding the amplification of harmful content’.”
In other words we are criminalizing speech we don’t like, and you might be charged. Breton’s concern was that “around 100 million X users in the EU” might be polluted by something other than his propaganda. (In fact, the chat had nearly a billion engagements worldwide.) Musk responded to Breton with a Tom Cruise line from Tropic Thunder that said, “Literally, fuck your own face!”
Meanwhile in Québec’s dreamland, the bunkered solitudes of traditional culture perpetuate their waltz over preserving a French culture abandoned centuries ago by the mother country. Hundreds of thousands of native Quebeckers have tired of this folly, leaving for other provinces and nations where the position of an apostrophe doesn’t bring down the weight of a government on you. An anglo rump conveniently remains to serve as punching bags for the autocrats in the National Assembly.
Equally preposterous is that Canada itself remains mired in this morass, incapable of entering the 21st century, because its eastern elites are petrified of admitting that Québec’s game is up. Principal among them is Justin Trudeau whose sovereign duty is preserving the status quo handed him by his father. That means the protection of Québec’s sweetheart deal under the equalization plan, wasting billions on a bilingual mandate in places where the most French thing is the fries and keeping police away from Québec’s sacred corporate sector.
Canada still has an explicitly separatist party in the federal parliament, sucking up federal funds while dreaming out loud about destroying the union. But they know that they’ll never have to go rogue in the current milieu. They’re protected by a double standard that allows them to take money from the rest of Canada (suck) while undermining the federation (blow).
While no one is anxious to see Canada rupture, patience has warn thin, says the Fraser Institute. “From 2007 and 2022, Albertans’ contributed $244.6 billion to the federal government in taxes and other payments in excess of the money Ottawa spent or transferred to Alberta — more than five times as much as was contributed (on net) by either British Columbians or Ontarians.
The other seven provinces, and most notably Québec, were net recipients of federalism, meaning the amount of revenue collected by the federal government in those provinces was exceeded by the amount of money spent or transferred by Ottawa back to the provinces.” All the while with Quebec attacking the energy sector that fuels their lucrative equalization hustle.
The persistent presence of the province among the takers is a feature, not a bug in the Trudeau master plan. In whatever language you say it, pandering to Québec and its linguistic fetish is unsustainable. But who will bell that cat when the current stalemate serves everyone in Ottawa?
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, he’s a regular contributor to Sirius XM Canada Talks Ch. 167. His new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.
From the Brownstone Institute
No data is 100% secure, and this is mental health data. Data that might be extremely embarrassing, career-damaging, or has the potential to disrupt family relationships. Remember, no one knows what new laws, regulations, or more might come to pass years from now.
True Story: The Health app built into iPhones is now collecting as much personal information on the mental health of each and every one of us as they can get a hold of.
Yet, a search on Google and Brave yielded no results on the dangers of sharing such information over the phone or the internet. Seriously, no single MSM has done an article on why such data sharing might be a bad idea?
To start, in sharing such data, you aren’t just sharing your information; iPhone knows exactly who your family members are. In many cases, those phones are connected via family plans.
iPhone mental health assessments not only ask questions about your mental health but can also infer the mental health status of family members, as demonstrated by the image publicly shared by phone on the benefits of a phone mental health assessment.
What could possibly go wrong?
Although the iPhone has historically been known to keep user data “safe,” this is not a given, and there have been hacks and data breaches over the years.
CrowdStrike happened – from just a simple coding error. In 2015, all of my confidential data given to the DoD and the FBI in order to get a security clearance was harvested by the Chinese government, when they hacked into the government’s “super-secret,” and “super-secure” government data storage site. In response, the government offered me a credit report and monitoring of my credit score for a year. Yeah – thanks.
The bottom line – no data is 100% secure, and this is mental health data. Data that might be extremely embarrassing, career-damaging, or has the potential to disrupt family relationships. Remember, no one knows what new laws, regulations, or more might come to pass years from now. This type of information should not be harvested and stored.
Stay Informed with Brownstone Institute. Sign up for updates.
Furthermore, trusting that Apple will never sell that data or pass it off to research groups is very naive. In fact, mental health data is already being mined.
Apple has partnered with various health organizations and academic institutions to conduct health-related studies, such as Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and the University of Michigan on various health studies. Apple also collaborates with the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) on a Digital Mental Health Study. This study likely utilizes data collected through Apple devices to investigate mental health patterns and outcomes. Trusting that the user identifiers have been completely stripped before that data is passed on is a risk that one takes when entering such information into an iPhone.
“Connect with resources.”
So how does Apple benefit? At this time, it appears that Apple is selling advertising of various mental health services by “connecting” services to people’s phones. Apple writes that “These assessments can help users determine their risk level, connect to resources available in their region, and create a PDF to share with their doctor.”
That might mean that if one presses the depressed button in the mental health assessment, Apple will place ads on the search engine for anti-depressants or physicians that prescribe them.
Why would that example be relevant, and which pharmaceutical companies might benefit?
iPhone has developed their mental health assessment with an “educational grant” from Pfizer!
Pfizer manufactures and sells Zoloft, Effexor, Pristiq, and Sinequan formulations. Together the sales revenue for these drugs is in the billions each year:
From 2015 to 2018, 13.2% of American adults reported taking antidepressant medication within the past 30 days, with sertraline (Zoloft) being one of the most common. Even off-patent, there were 39.2 million prescriptions filled with an annual sales revenue of 470 million.
Effexor XR is an antidepressant medication that was originally developed by Wyeth (now part of Pfizer). In 2010, when the first generic version of Effexor XR was introduced in the United States, the brand name product had annual sales of approximately $2.75 billion. By 2013, due to generic competition, Pfizer’s sales of Effexor XR dropped to $440 million.
According to IMS Health data, in 2016, Pristiq (desvenlafaxine) had annual sales of approximately $883 million in the United States, although sales appear to have fluctuated over the years.
The bottom line is that Pfizer is not supplying educational grants to develop mental health assessment software for Apple out of the “goodness of their heart.” Mental health inventions via medication are a big business, and these companies are looking to profit.
This is just one way that Apple is using surveillance capitalism by data mining mental health status and then selling access to that data to Big Pharma, Big Tech, physician and insurance companies, etc.
How this information, which once released or leaked, can never be returned with privacies intact, will be used in the future is unknown.
If the setting for sharing research on health conditions has not been deactivated, this information will go into a database somewhere. It is only Apple’s assurance that your identification has been stripped from the data. Further, your mental health information will be uploaded to the cloud and will be used as a behavioral future. To be shared, packaged, sold, used to influence your decision-making, etc.
I am wary of the highly profitable industry that has been built up around “mental disorders.” Over the years, the American Psychiatric Association and the fields of psychology and psychiatry have hurt individuals and families by both classifying diseases and disorders incorrectly and by developing treatments and therapies that were and are dangerous. Many are still in use. Here are a few examples:
- There are estimates that 50,000 lobotomies were performed in the United States, with most occurring between 1949 and 1952. In 1949, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to António Egas Moniz for his development of the lobotomy procedure.
- Homosexuality was classified as a mental disorder in 1952 with the publication of the first Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I) by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). It was listed under “sociopathic personality disturbance.” This classification remained in place until 1973.
- Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) are a widely prescribed class of antidepressant medications. There is a link between SSRIs and increased risk of violent crime convictions, and other research has shown an increase in self-harm and aggression in children and adolescents taking SSRIs.
- The APA supports access to affirming and supportive treatment for “transgendered” children, including mental health services, puberty suppression and medical transition support.
- The APA believes that gender identity develops in early childhood, and some children may not identify with their assigned sex at birth.
- Asperger’s syndrome was merged into the broader category of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the DSM-5 in 2013. Since then, a large number of people have faced discrimination and barriers to entry into higher-paying positions. Children handed such a diagnosis also can suffer a lack of confidence in their ability to manage relationships effectively, which can easily carry on to adulthood.
These are just a few of the many, many ways the American Psychiatric Association and the fields of psychology and psychiatry have gotten things very wrong.
- A survey of more than 500 social and personality psychologists published in 2012 found that only 6 percent identified as conservative overall, implying that 94% were liberal or moderate.
- At a 2011 Society for Personality and Social Psychology annual meeting, when attendees were asked to identify their political views, only three hands out of about a thousand went up for “conservative” or on the right.
The liberal bias in psychology influences findings on conservative behaviors.
To bring this back to the use of software applications and the iPhone mental health app in particular, be aware that these software programs are being developed by people with a liberal bias and who will view the beliefs of conservatives negatively. What this means for future use of this data is unknown, but it can’t be good.
If you do choose to use the mental health applications, which mainstream media has nothing but praise for, be aware – there are alligators in those waters.
But sure that the data sharing mode, particularly giving data access to researchers is turned off. But even then, don’t be surprised if your phone begins planting messages about the benefits, SSRIs, or other anti-depressant drugs into your everyday searches. Or maybe your alcohol use or tobacco use data will be used to supply you with advertisements on the latest ways to reduce intake or how to find a good mental health facility. These messages may very well include neuro-linguistic programming methods and nudging, to push you into treatment modalities. But honestly, it is all for your “own good and for the benefit of your family.”
Now, the iPhone and the watch can be valuable tools. The EKG, blood oxygen, and heart rate monitoring are fantastic tools for those who suffer from cardiac disorders. I have found them to be extremely helpful.
My wife, Jill is often motivated by getting more walking steps each week via her iWatch tracker.
Just be aware that these programs can be invasive. Data is never 100% secure and it is being used. We just don’t know all the details.
Republished from the author’s Substack
Author
Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth.- Mike Tyson
Okay, maybe it’s not exactly funereal, but the sad music is playing for the Toronto Blue Jays 2018 Master Plan. The design that was supposed to make Jays fans forget departing GM Alex Anthopoulos and worship new Jays president Mark Shapiro and his GM Ross Atkins. That was the legacy plan predicated on three hot prospects with famous baseball names— Vladimir Guerrero, Bo Bichette and Cavan Biggio—and a pitching staff of gaudy free-agent signings—José Berrios, Kevin Gausman, Hyun-Jin Ryu and Chris Bassett— returning the Jays to their 1990s glory
What did Iron Mike say about plans? The peak of the 2024 season probably occurred last winter where, for a few short days, some Toronto media convinced the fans that Shohei Ohtani was taking Toronto’s money over Dodgers’ green. He didn’t, and with no Plan B, Shapiro started talking about the re-design of the Rogers Centre. Anything but the fact they were in big trouble on the field.
As the 2024 season winds down the Blue Jays now resemble their Baseball America Top 20 prospects roster more than a Shohei powerhouse on par with the Yankees, Dodgers and Astros. Yes, there have been some encouraging glimmers from the farm in this phoney war since the season collapsed months ago. In Spencer Horowitz, Addison Barger, Will Wagner, Joey Loperfido and Leo Jimenez there are hints at a more promising future. The no-hit bids by Bowden Francis have been a pleasant surprise.
Just not the Golden Boys + rented-pitching formula advertised for years by president Shapiro and GM Atkins. This formula, much-touted by Jays media, hasn’t worked out for a number of reasons. Briefly, the injury plague that laid low the bullpen this season occurring concurrently with Guerrero and Bichette slumping early was more than manager John Schneider could handle.
Happy town
An offence that promised fireworks at the plate reminiscent of the 2015-2017 Gun Show has been more like a pop gun. While the starting pitching has stayed relatively healthy it has not dominated in a way that justifies the huge salaries doled out to its component parts. The abject failure of a series of Jays pitching prospects— typified by dumping uber-prospect Nate Pearson recently— has also scuttled the promise of catching the Yankees and Orioles. Will Francis break the schneid?.
Nor does the prospect of heading into 2025 with these components augur well. Before they get to next year there remains the vexing question of signing Guerrero and Bichette to longterm deals before 2026. Vladdy will get the moon and stars after rehabilitating this career midseason, becoming one of the top five hitters in baseball. (He also appears more grounded.) The question remains will he take that money in Toronto or go catch steam with a title contender. Because Toronto is not that team in 2025.
Bichette is the sticking point. In 2023 it looked as though he was the rock to build on. But his production suddenly cratered and injuries robbed him of about 250 at bats this year. There was talk he wanted out, that he was available at the trade deadline, that he’s in funk over family issues. Whatever, he’s not getting Vladdy money now as a free agent. He says he wants to stay, but will someone else pony up the full meal deal for him?
Yes, there’ll be primo free agents available to overpay. Juan Soto, Alex Bregman and Pete Alonso would all answer some need in the Blue Jays lineup— at astronomical costs (if they were even interested in playing in Canada). But as a second-tier location Toronto may have to bring back old pal Edwin Encarnacion or Arizona’s Christian Walker to distract from the decline of the team.
Which leaves the real question: will the phone salesmen at Rogers re-up with the Shapiro/ Atkins/ Schneider troika for one more try at pushing the rope the hill? It’s clear that Rogers loves Shapiro’s handling of the reconstruction of the playing surface, even if the work seeks to have turned Rogers Centre from a launching pad to a power neutral/ power negative one for the home team’s offence.
For the Rogers shareholders Shapiro’s Loonie Hot Dogs, Bobblehead nights and Oktoberfest specials are swell. The stands remain populated despite the dreck on the field. But the team they watch has been a painful failed strategy. Perhaps there will be enough feedback from disgruntled season ticket holders to force the hand of the Rogers paymasters.
But even if there isn’t, how can you let this front office handle the contract decisions on Guerrero and Bichette when another bad season will seem them gone? Perhaps this hinge point is a good time to reload the C suite with new eyes and something better than doing Western Night or the Westjet Flight Deck. The fans of MLB’s largest home market may seem content with bells and whistles.
But it’s half past tomorrow, and the alarm is ringing.
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, he’s a regular contributor to Sirius XM Canada Talks Ch. 167. His new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.
Premier: Stop sending asylum claimants to Alberta!
Police seize more than 66 kg of illicit drugs in interprovincial trafficking investigation
Big Pharma’s Rap Sheet
Kamala Harris Is Full On Hiding Her Climate Agenda From Voters
$40 million weekly cash shipments from US are stabilizing Afghanistan’s Taliban government
Singh must push Trudeau to scrap the carbon tax
Biden Admin Touts Reduction In Border Crossings While Flying In Hundreds Of Thousands Of Migrants
-
Daily Caller2 days ago
Biden Admin Touts Reduction In Border Crossings While Flying In Hundreds Of Thousands Of Migrants
-
Economy2 days agoScrap the second carbon tax: Taxpayers Federation
-
Censorship Industrial Complex2 days agoElon Musk slams woke Los Angeles Times for questioning ‘morality’ of having children
-
Addictions1 day agoWATCH: “Government Heroin” documentary exposes safer supply scandal in London, Ontario
-
espionage1 day agoChronic Counter-terrorism Lapses at the Border
-
Red Deer2 days agoRed Deer Advocate will print just twice a week starting next month
-
International2 days agoLawmakers call for changes at Secret Service after second assassination attempt
-
Censorship Industrial Complex1 day agoAustralian woman fired, dragged before tribunal for saying only women can breastfeed