Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

Opinion

Overnight sensation known as Oliver Anthony says “I’m not a good musician, I’m not a very good person” as he turns down multi million dollar offer

Published

11 minute read

His real name is Christopher Lunsford.  Friends and family just call him Chris. But over the last week or so, millions of people around the world have been introduced to him as Oliver Anthony.  That’s because Chris records music under the name of his grandfather, Oliver Anthony, for a youtube channel called RadioWv (Radio West Virginia).  Back on August 8, Chris was creating music as a hobby he practiced after work and on days off.  But on August 9, a video he recorded for his original song “Rich Men North of Richmond” was loaded on the RadioWv channel.  Within hours, Lunsford’s life was turned upside-down.

Chris Lunsford and “Draven” from RadioWv were sure this was a special song and they were hoping maybe something this good could get a few hundred thousands views.  Well… 21 million views later, Lunsford has reportedly had to contend with about 50,000 online comments, and consider an 8 million dollar recording contract.  Something about this song has touched a nerve.

In case you haven’t heard it yet, here it is on the youtube channel RadioWv.  And this is the description put up by RadioWv.

“When I first came across Oliver Anthony and his music, I was blown away to say the least. He had a whole collection of songs that I could listen to for hours. Oliver resides in Farmville, VA with his 3 dogs and a plot of land he plans on turning into a small farm to raise livestock. We have a whole mess of songs set to release of Oliver for your viewing and listening pleasure, he is truly special and notes his biggest influence as Hank Williams Jr. Oliver wants to give hope to the working class and your average hard working young man who may have lost hope in the grind of trying to get by.” 

The song is written about the struggles of regular folk in Appalachia, but millions of Americans have adopted it as an anthem for their own lives.  The secret sauce behind the success of “Rich Men North of Richmond” certainly has to do with a brilliant title and the haunting melody.  But it’s the heartfelt lyrics that strongly challenge political and corporate power structures which seem to be taking the world by storm.  It’s kicking up a little storm of controversy too.  While many media outlets are calling the song a ‘conservative anthem’, the BBC goes as far as to say the song is the latest in a series of cultural flashpoints that reflect a deeply divided America.

As a songwriter, Lunsford has called on a bitter period in his life to come up with lines like these:

“Livin’ in the new world/ With an old soul/

These rich men north of Richmond/ Lord knows they all just wanna have total control/

Wanna know what you think, wanna know what you do/ And they don’t think you know, but I know that you do/

‘Cause your dollar ain’t s**t and it’s taxed to no end/ ‘Cause of rich men north of Richmond.”

Like it or hate it, the song has rocketed to the top of Country Music charts.  For his part Christopher Lunsford has made two public statements which are no where near as political as his lyrics.  Lunsford recorded the first statement as an update to his sudden success.

Then with the pressure building to address his new audience again, Thursday, Chris Lunsford wrote this thoughtful update on his Oliver Anthony facebook page.

From the Facebook page of Oliver Anthony Music

It’s been difficult as I browse through the 50,000+ messages and emails I’ve received in the last week. The stories that have been shared paint a brutally honest picture. Suicide, addiction, unemployment, anxiety and depression, hopelessness and the list goes on.
I’m sitting in such a weird place in my life right now. I never wanted to be a full time musician, much less sit at the top of the iTunes charts. Draven from RadioWv and I filmed these tunes on my land with the hope that it may hit 300k views. I still don’t quite believe what has went on since we uploaded that. It’s just strange to me.
People in the music industry give me blank stares when I brush off 8 million dollar offers. I don’t want 6 tour buses, 15 tractor trailers and a jet. I don’t want to play stadium shows, I don’t want to be in the spotlight. I wrote the music I wrote because I was suffering with mental health and depression. These songs have connected with millions of people on such a deep level because they’re being sung by someone feeling the words in the very moment they were being sung. No editing, no agent, no bullshit. Just some idiot and his guitar. The style of music that we should have never gotten away from in the first place.
So that being said, I have never taken the time to tell you who I actually am. Here’s a formal introduction:
My legal name is Christopher Anthony Lunsford. My grandfather was Oliver Anthony, and “Oliver Anthony Music” is a dedication not only to him, but 1930’s Appalachia where he was born and raised. Dirt floors, seven kids, hard times. At this point, I’ll gladly go by Oliver because everyone knows me as such. But my friends and family still call me Chris. You can decide for yourself, either is fine.
In 2010, I dropped out of high school at age 17. I have a GED from Spruce Pine, NC. I worked multiple plant jobs in Western NC, my last being at the paper mill in McDowell county. I worked 3rd shift, 6 days a week for $14.50 an hour in a living hell. In 2013, I had a bad fall at work and fractured my skull. It forced me to move back home to Virginia. Due to complications from the injury, it took me 6 months or so before I could work again.
From 2014 until just a few days ago, I’ve worked outside sales in the industrial manufacturing world. My job has taken me all over Virginia and into the Carolinas, getting to know tens of thousands of other blue collar workers on job sites and in factories. Ive spent all day, everyday, for the last 10 years hearing the same story. People are SO damn tired of being neglected, divided and manipulated.
In 2019, I paid $97,500 for the property and still owe about $60,000 on it. I am living in a 27′ camper with a tarp on the roof that I got off of craigslist for $750.
There’s nothing special about me. I’m not a good musician, I’m not a very good person. I’ve spent the last 5 years struggling with mental health and using alcohol to drown it. I am sad to see the world in the state it’s in, with everyone fighting with each other. I have spent many nights feeling hopeless, that the greatest country on Earth is quickly fading away.
That being said, I HATE the way the Internet has divided all of us. The Internet is a parasite, that infects the minds of humans and has their way with them. Hours wasted, goals forgotten, loved ones sitting in houses with each other distracted all day by technology made by the hands of other poor souls in sweat shops in a foreign land.
When is enough, enough? When are we going to fight for what is right again? MILLIONS have died protecting the liberties we have. Freedom of speech is such a precious gift. Never in world history has the world had the freedom it currently does. Don’t let them take it away from you.
Just like those once wandering in the desert, we have lost our way from God and have let false idols distract us and divide us. It’s a damn shame.

It will be interesting to see what happens to Chris Lunsford.  Certainly at some point soon he’ll accept a contract to make enough money to live a comfortable life far removed from the struggling Appalachian behind “Rich Men North of Richmond”.  Millions of new fans affected by his song will hope he never moves too far away.

 

Before Post

After 15 years as a TV reporter with Global and CBC and as news director of RDTV in Red Deer, Duane set out on his own 2008 as a visual storyteller. During this period, he became fascinated with a burgeoning online world and how it could better serve local communities. This fascination led to Todayville, launched in 2016.

Follow Author

Energy

The U.S. Just Removed a Dictator and Canada is Collateral Damage

Published on

Early this morning, the United States says it carried out a ground raid supported by air strikes inside Venezuela, reportedly involving elite U.S. forces, including Delta Force, and removed Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores from the country.

President Donald Trump confirmed the operation publicly and stated that the United States intends to “run Venezuela” during a transition period, explicitly including control over the country’s oil sector. That single statement should alarm Canada far more than any diplomatic condemnation ever could.

Kelsi Sheren is a reader-supported publication.

To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

While this move may be justified on moral or strategic grounds for the U.S., it is unequivocally bad news for Canada, really really bad. Canada’s energy position just weakened significantly and now Canada’s leverage with the United States has always rested on one simple fact: the U.S. needed Canadian oil.

Not liked it. Needed it.

Canada became Washington’s largest and most reliable foreign energy supplier not because it was cheap, fast, or efficient but because alternatives were unstable, sanctioned, or politically toxic. Venezuela was one of those alternatives.

It isn’t anymore.

If the U.S. succeeds in stabilizing Venezuelan oil production under its influence, Canada loses something it cannot easily replace and wish it did sooner, strategic indispensability. When your biggest customer gains options, your negotiating power not only shrinks, it completely disappears.

Venezuelan crude is largely heavy oil, the same category as much of Canada’s oil sands production. Many U.S. refineries, especially along the Gulf Coast, are designed to process heavy crude. For years, sanctions and mismanagement kept Venezuelan barrels off the market. Canadian heavy helped fill that gap. That advantage just cracked open. If Venezuelan supply re-enters global markets under U.S. oversight, Canadian oil faces more competition, downward pressure on prices, wider discounts for heavy crude and reduced urgency for new Canadian infrastructure. Urgency that Mark Carney refused to see was needed.

Canada’s oil is already expensive to extract and transport. It is already burdened by regulatory delays, pipeline bottlenecks, and political hostility at home. Now it faces a rival with larger reserves, lower production costs, shorter shipping routes and U.S. strategic backing

That is not a fair fight, but the liberals put us in this position and only have themselves to blame. Ottawa officially has no cards left to play. Canada’s response options are beyond limited and that’s the real problem.

Ottawa cannot meaningfully condemn the U.S. without risking trade and defence relations. It cannot influence Venezuelan reconstruction. It cannot outcompete Venezuelan oil on cost and it has spent years undermining its own energy sector in the name of climate virtue signalling. This is just the snake eating it’s tail and now realizing its proper fucked.

Canada is watching a major shift in global energy power from the sidelines, with no leverage and no contingency plan. This is the cost of mistaking morality for strategy. This is the cost of an ego gone unchecked.

Canada likes to tell itself that being stable, ethical, and predictable guarantees relevance. It doesn’t, Canada isn’t even in the game anymore it just hasn’t realized it. It only works when your partner has no better options.

The U.S. did not remove a communist dictator in Venezuela to protect Canadian interests. It did it to secure American interests energy, influence, and control. Thats what a real leader does, puts it’s country and it’s citizens first.

Canada’s reliability is now a nice bonus, not a necessity. That shift will show up quietly in trade negotiations, in infrastructure decisions and how quickly Canadian concerns get brushed aside. No dramatic break. Just less attention. Less urgency. Less patience and soon enough Canada won’t be invited to the table to even begin the conversation. Canada has just been down graded to the kids table.

This moment didn’t begin today. It began when Canada failed to build pipelines, ego drove away energy investment, allowed its regulatory system to become a chokehold and treated its largest export sector as an embarrassment.

While Ottawa debated optics, the U.S. planned for contingencies. Today was one of them.

The removal of a communist dictator in Venezuela may be a massive victory for it’s citizen and a strategic win for the United States but for Canada, it is a warning shot. Canada just became more optional in a world that punishes irrelevance quickly and quietly.

Being polite won’t save us. Being virtuous won’t save us.

Only being necessary ever did and today, Canada no longer became necessary.

KELSI SHEREN

– – – – – – – – – – – –

One Time Donation! – Paypal – https://paypal.me/brassandunity

Buy me a coffee! – https://buymeacoffee.com/kelsisheren

Let’s connect!

Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/@thekelsisherenperspective

Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/thekelsisherenperspective?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet&igsh=ZDNlZDc0MzIxNw%3D%3D

X: https://x.com/KelsiBurns

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kelsie_sheren/

Substack: https://substack.com/@kelsisheren

TikTok – https://x.com/KelsiBurns

Continue Reading

International

US Justice Department Accusing Maduro’s Inner Circle of a Narco-State Conspiracy

Published on

Sam Cooper's avatar Sam Cooper

Newly unsealed U.S. charges name two former Venezuelan justice ministers alongside Maduro’s wife and son in a sprawling narco-terror conspiracy case.

Hours after President Trump said the United States had carried out a “large-scale strike” in Venezuela and extracted President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, from the country, federal prosecutors in Manhattan unsealed a sweeping indictment that portrays Venezuela’s top leadership, including several former justice ministers, as the hub of a long-running cocaine enterprise aimed intentionally at the United States.

The geopolitical edge of the operation was sharpened further by reports that Maduro had met at the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas with Qiu Xiaoqi, China’s special representative for Latin American affairs, only hours before the American action began.

The charging document — filed in the Southern District of New York in United States of America v. Nicolás Maduro Moros, et al. — opens with an assertion that “for over 25 years” Venezuela’s leaders “abused their positions of public trust” and “corrupted once-legitimate institutions” to import cocaine into the United States. It places Maduro “at the forefront,” accusing him of using “illegally obtained authority” and “the institutions he corroded” to move “thousands of tons of cocaine” north.

In prosecutors’ telling, the alleged scheme was not simply tolerated by the state; it was fused with it.

The indictment says Maduro “now sits atop a corrupt, illegitimate government” that, for decades, “leveraged government power to protect and promote illegal activity, including drug trafficking,” enriching and entrenching the political and military elite around him — including Diosdado Cabello Rondón, described as Venezuela’s Minister of the Interior, Justice and Peace, and Ramón Rodríguez Chacín, identified as a former interior and justice minister.

It also alleges that “massive-scale drug trafficking” concentrated power and wealth in Maduro’s family, including Flores — described in the document as Venezuela’s de facto First Lady — and Maduro’s son, Nicolás Ernesto Maduro Guerra, a National Assembly member known as “Nicolasito” and “The Prince.”

From the start, prosecutors tie the alleged state-protected pipeline to major trafficking and insurgent networks across the hemisphere. The indictment says Venezuelan officials “partnered with narco-terrorists” from the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, the National Liberation Army, the Sinaloa Cartel, the Zetas, and Tren de Aragua, naming Héctor Rusthenford Guerrero Flores — “Niño Guerrero” — as the Venezuelan gang’s leader.

In a notable update that situates the case inside the present-day U.S. counterterrorism framework, the indictment states that in February 2025 the State Department designated the Sinaloa Cartel as a foreign terrorist organization, and that it remains so designated. It likewise says the State Department in the same month designated the Cartel del Noreste — “formerly known as the Zetas” — as a foreign terrorist organization, and designated Tren de Aragua as a foreign terrorist organization, with both groups remaining designated as of the filing.

In one of the document’s most consequential framing passages, prosecutors describe Venezuela’s geography and ports — and the collapse of meaningful constraints on officials — as structural enabling conditions.

“Starting in or about 1999,” the indictment says, Venezuela “became a safe haven for drug traffickers willing to pay for protection,” and it describes a flourishing trade routed through Caribbean and Central American transshipment points.

By about 2020, it adds, the State Department estimated “between 200 and 250 tons of cocaine were trafficked through Venezuela annually,” moved by maritime routes using go-fast vessels, fishing boats, and container ships, and by air from clandestine airstrips.

The indictment’s narrative then proceeds office by office, laying out how prosecutors say power was converted into logistics.

As a National Assembly member, it alleges, Maduro “moved loads of cocaine under the protection of Venezuelan law enforcement.” As foreign minister, it alleges, he provided “Venezuelan diplomatic passports to drug traffickers” and facilitated “diplomatic cover” for flights used to repatriate drug proceeds from Mexico to Venezuela. And as president — “now-de facto ruler,” prosecutors write — he “allows cocaine-fueled corruption to flourish” for his benefit, for the benefit of the ruling regime, and for the benefit of his family.

Much of the indictment’s detail is concentrated in a long “overt acts” section that reads like a catalogue of how prosecutors say trafficking networks use the state when the state belongs to them. Between roughly 2006 and 2008, it alleges, Maduro “sold Venezuelan diplomatic passports” to individuals he “knew were drug traffickers,” then facilitated private flights “under diplomatic cover” by alerting the Venezuelan embassy in Mexico, enabling traffickers to load planes with drug proceeds and return to Venezuela shielded from scrutiny.

Flores is accused of playing a direct role as well.

The indictment alleges that in about 2007 she attended a meeting in which she “accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes” to broker access to the head of Venezuela’s National Anti-Drug Office, and that a portion of subsequent bribery payments was paid to her.

For Cabello, prosecutors describe the alleged use of military and port infrastructure to move bulk shipments at industrial scale. Between 2003 and 2011, the indictment alleges, the Zetas worked with Colombian traffickers to dispatch container ships carrying “five to six tons of cocaine” per container — “sometimes as much as 20 tons each” — protected in Venezuela by military officials referred to as “the generals.”

The indictment also portrays violence as an enforcement tool and a signature of impunity. It alleges that between 2004 and 2015, Maduro and Flores trafficked cocaine with armed military escorts and “maintained their own groups of state-sponsored gangs known as colectivos” to facilitate and protect the operation; it further alleges kidnappings, beatings, and murders against those who owed drug money or threatened the scheme, including “ordering the murder of a local drug boss in Caracas.”

Several episodes in the document appear designed to show not just trafficking, but how the alleged network adapted after shocks. In 2006, prosecutors allege, Venezuelan officials dispatched “more than 5.5 tons of cocaine” to Mexico on a DC-9 jet, moving the load through a hangar reserved for the Venezuelan president at the main international airport outside Caracas. After Mexican authorities seized the shipment, the indictment says traffickers were told they needed to pay Cabello a bribe to ensure that those who assisted at the airport would not be arrested.

Another episode, described as occurring only months after Maduro succeeded to the presidency, involves an international seizure. In September 2013, prosecutors allege, Venezuelan officials dispatched “approximately 1.3 tons of cocaine” on a commercial flight to Paris Charles de Gaulle; after French authorities seized the cocaine, the indictment says Maduro convened a meeting with Cabello and other officials and urged them to avoid using that airport route again, and it alleges that arrests were authorized to divert scrutiny from participants in the shipment and coverup.

The indictment places Maduro’s son, “Nicolasito,” inside the alleged machinery as well. It describes frequent visits to Margarita Island in 2014 and 2015, including travel on a plane owned by Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A., and alleges the aircraft would be loaded with large taped packages that a National Guard captain “understood were drugs.” On one occasion, the indictment says, Maduro Guerra stated “the plane could go wherever it wanted, including the United States.”

If the case has a recurring connective tissue, it is the claim that Colombia’s insurgent-drug groups and Mexico’s cartel networks were not outside forces pressing on Venezuela, but partners operating in a jointly protected corridor.

The indictment describes the Sinaloa Cartel’s then-leader Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán Loera as financing cocaine laboratories in Colombia in 2011, with cocaine then transported “under the protection” of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia into Venezuela and protected en route to an airstrip by a close ally of Maduro and Cabello.

It describes Rodríguez Chacín as maintaining a large estate in Barinas State that contained a “large” Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia encampment and training school, “with approximately 200 armed” members present “at any given time,” and it alleges that he accepted bribes and used corrupt influence to shield traffickers from arrest and extradition while discussing multi-ton quantities with other officials.

The indictment also folds in a strand of courtroom history that prosecutors appear to treat as corroboration: recorded meetings involving two relatives of Maduro and Flores in which, the indictment says, they discussed dispatching cocaine shipments from Maduro’s “presidential hangar,” described being “at ‘war’ with the United States,” referenced the “Cartel de Los Soles,” and discussed a connection to a commander in the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia. Those relatives were later convicted at trial in the Southern District of New York, the document says.

In parallel, the indictment’s portrayal of Tren de Aragua extends beyond a street-gang label into a claimed logistics capability. It says Guerrero Flores, speaking from the group’s base inside Tocorón Prison, described storage compartments called “cradles” on a beach in Aragua State and “confirmed” the gang’s ability to protect “over one ton of cocaine,” offering escort services and control over coastal routes.

The overt-acts section extends into recent years, alleging that Cabello “regularly traveled to clandestine airstrips controlled by the ELN near the Colombia-Venezuela border” between 2022 and 2024 “to ensure the cocaine’s continued safe passage in Venezuelan territory.” It also references narcotics proceeds “in or about the end of 2024,” with discussions about continued trafficking “in or about 2025.”

The charges themselves track that architecture. Count One alleges a narco-terrorism conspiracy running from 1999 through 2025, naming Maduro, Cabello, and Rodríguez Chacín; Count Two alleges a cocaine importation conspiracy naming all defendants; and Counts Three and Four allege firearms conduct involving machine guns and destructive devices during and in relation to the charged trafficking crimes.

For the Justice Department, the indictment reads as an effort to collapse the distinction between political leadership and organized crime leadership — to argue that, in Venezuela’s case, they became the same thing. In paragraph after paragraph, it portrays decisions that look, in ordinary states, like diplomacy, aviation, and policing as instruments in a narcotics corridor.

More to come.

The Bureau is a reader-supported publication.

To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Continue Reading

Trending

X