Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

Crime

Mexico faces challenges getting cartels under control as Trump threatens tariffs

Published

4 minute read

From The Center Square

By 

Tony Payan, director of the Center for the United States and Mexico at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, previously told The Center Square that a significant reduction in opioid trafficking will remain a challenge for years to come. “I’ve never seen it get better at all, no matter what you try.”

President-elect Donald Trump’s plan to hit Mexico with a 25% tariff unless it stops trafficking and illegal migration puts international trade at risk over problems that past leaders on both sides of the border couldn’t fix.

U.S. officials have pledged to work with their counterparts in Mexico for decades without a significant reduction in cartel drug smuggling, which has proven intractable for authorities in both Mexico and the U.S. Two cooperative agreements between the U.S. and Mexico have guided most of the joint work. The Mérida Initiative, from 2008 to 2021, and then Bicentennial Framework, from late 2021 to the present.

Both countries agreed to the Bicentennial Framework, which created a comprehensive, long-term approach to stop criminal groups that smuggle the illicit drugs and weapons. The illicit drugs come into the U.S. Cash and weapons flow back to Mexico.

Tony Payan, director of the Center for the United States and Mexico at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, previously told The Center Square that a significant reduction in opioid trafficking will remain a challenge for years to come.

“I’ve never seen it get better at all, no matter what you try. The Mérida Initiative in 2008, previous efforts at collaborating that were more improvised, and then the Bicentennial framework, which replaced the Mérida Initiative in 2021, and no results,” Payan said. “So drugs seem to obey their own logic. It has nothing to do with government efforts.”

Former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s government largely focused on reducing violence rather than confronting cartels. President Claudia Sheinbaum, who took office last month, pointed the finger back at the U.S. on Tuesday.

In a letter to Trump, she said the incoming president must not be aware of efforts in Mexico. She said U.S. Customs and Border Patrol figures show a 75% reduction in encounters on the border between Mexico and the United States from December 2023 to November 2024.

“Half of those who arrive are through an appointment legally granted by the United States program called CBP One,” she said. “For these reasons, caravans of migrants no longer arrive at the border.”

Sheinbaum said the two counties need to work together to address the issues “that lead families to leave their places of origin out of necessity.”

“If a percentage of what the United States allocates to war is dedicated to building peace and development, the mobility of people will be fundamentally addressed,” she wrote.

Sheinbaum said lawmakers in Mexico are in the process of changing the constitution to declare the production, distribution and marketing of fentanyl and other synthetic drugs a serious crime without the right to bail.

She also said 70% of the illegal weapons seized from criminals in Mexico come from the U.S.

“We do not produce weapons, we do not consume synthetic drugs,” Sheinbaum said.

With the two countries on a collision course, consumers could pay the price. Tariffs could raise prices for U.S. consumers and slow economic growth. S&P Global, a credit-rating agency, reported that Trump’s proposed tariffs – a 10% across the board hike and up to 60% for China – could boost inflation by 1.8% and lower U.S. economic output by 1%, according to a post-election report.

Before Post

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Crime

Trafficking victim advocate analyzes testimony of reported survivor of elite abuse network

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Antonino Cambria

In an exclusive interview with LifeSite’s John Henry-Westen, human trafficking victim advocate Liz Yore discussed the new allegations made by Anneke Lucas on an episode of the PBD Podcast about being ritually abused by elites.

In an exclusive interview with LifeSite’s John Henry-Westen, human trafficking victim advocate Liz Yore discussed the new allegations made by Anneke Lucas on an episode of the PBD Podcast about being ritually abused by the late Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau and banker David Rockefeller. Yore analyzed the credibility of Lucas’ claims, the massive pedophile network the latter was allegedly forced into, why sex trafficking victims are hesitant to come forward, pornography being used as manipulation against politicians, and more.  

Westen asked Yore if she believed these stunning allegations were credible. Yore said she found her allegations to be “very credible.”  

“Obviously, her allegations are startling, shocking because their names are known worldwide. But I also read her book, and I found that with great specificity, with great, you know, tenderness, she really did lay out [how] at the age of five, she was sold into sex slavery by her mentally ill mother,” she said.  

The global pedophile network  

Yore then dove into the high-level global pedophile network Lucas was allegedly forced into.   

“It started in Belgium; she’s a Belgium woman. But when she in the Belgian network would meet at high level castles, mansions, property estates, where these prime ministers, ministers of defense, as she calls them,” Yore said.   

“These are people that, as a child, she didn’t know who they were, but she knew that they were powerful people. And they had systematically sexually abused these children. They are, frankly, I mean, she calls them herself sadistic, Satanists, murderers. Many of them, you know, have been involved in Freemasonry… This network has been quietly impenetrable for many, many years,” she added.    

Why victims don’t come forward for decades  

Yore then suggested that since the Jeffrey Epstein case, people across the globe have become far less cynical of sex trafficking allegations made against powerful people.  

“We now know that these networks are operating for the purposes of blackmail, for power, and at the highest levels of business in government,” Yore said.  

A bit later, she added that she believes these allegations are only “the tip of the iceberg” and that it’s understandable why Lucas and other abuse victims are so hesitant to come forward against Trudeau Sr., Epstein, and other elites.   

“Many children who had been abused by priests, pastors, bishops would say, ‘It’s my word against a priest, my parents adore this priest, they’re not going to believe me.’ So, children have a high level of fear about coming forward,” she added.    

Manipulation of powerful people   

Later in the interview, Westen from Tucker Carlson’s recent podcast with Glenn Greenwald, in which the pair discussed porn sites being controlled by intel agencies to blackmail politicians and asked Yore if she believes this is true.  

“Well, we know that that was the motivation, [as] said by many of the victims in the Epstein case… When you can blackmail them, you can control them, and you can force them into your own new world agenda, your elite agenda. And so that’s why, for example, she [Lucas] said that she would report back to David Rockefeller, as you said, the various preferences of these prominent people,” Yore said.    

Watch the full interview for more analysis from Liz Yore.  

Related 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/tucker-carlson-longtime-source-says-porn-sites-controlled-by-intelligence-agencies-for-blackmail/  

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/the-rise-of-jeffrey-epstein-how-us-intelligence-became-strangled-by-sexual-blackmail/  

Continue Reading

Crime

Canada’s violent crime rate 14.0% higher than U.S. in 2022, and rising; property crime rate 27.5% higher

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By: Livio Di Matteo

Rates of both violent crime and property crime (population adjusted) have been increasing in Canada in recent years, and now surpass comparable crime rates in the United States, finds a new study published today by the Fraser Institute, an
independent, non-partisan Canadian public policy think tank.

“This idea that Canada is much safer than the United States is not supported by the data as rates of property and violent crime in Canada are now higher than south of the border,” said Livio Di Matteo, a senior fellow at the Fraser Institute and author of an upcoming study Comparing Recent Crime Trends in Canada and the United States: An Introduction.

The chapter released today, the first of a larger upcoming study examining crime rates between the two countries, focuses on national comparisons. It finds that from 2014 (a year when crimes rates reached their lowest) to 2022 (the most recent comparable year of data), the violent crime rate in Canada increased by 43.8 per cent to 434.1 violent crimes per 100,000 people. That’s now 14 per cent higher than the violent crime rate in the U.S., which only increased 5.3 per cent over the same period to 380.7 violent crimes per 100,000 people.

Violent crime data in Canada differs from the United States, so adjustments were made to ensure as high a level of comparability as possible. The adjusted violent crime data includes murder, robbery, and assault with a weapon.

Additionally, the rate of population adjusted property crimes (e.g., burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft) is also now 27.5 per cent higher in Canada than in the U.S., with 2491.0 crimes occurring per 100,000 people in Canada in 2022—a 7.0 per cent
increase from 2014. By contrast, the property crime rate in the U.S. declined by 24.1 per cent over the same period to 1954.4 crimes per 100,000 people.

Crucially, homicides are also on the rise in Canada with the number of murders increasing from 1.5 per 100,000 in 2014 to 2.3 in 2022—a 53.4 per cent increase. The homicide rate in the U.S. remains markedly higher than in Canada at 5.8 per 100,000 people in 2022 and increased 49.4 per cent from 2014 to 2022.

“Crime rates in Canada, which are still historically low, are nevertheless rising and, in some cases are higher than in the U.S., which should concern Canadians,” Di Matteo said.

  • This is a pre-release of an upcoming study examining crime rates between Canada and the United States.
  • This first chapter focuses on national comparisons, and finds that from 2014 (a year when crimes rates reached their lowest) to 2022 (the most recent comparable year of data), rates of both violent crime and property crime (adjusted for population) have been increasing in Canada and now surpass comparable crime rates in the United States.
  • From 2014 to 2022, the violent crime rate in Canada increased by 43.8 per cent to 434.1 violent crimes per 100,000 people.
  • The violent crime rate in the U.S. increased 5.3 per cent over the same period to 380.7 violent crimes per 100,000 people.
  • Likewise, the rate of population-adjusted property crimes (e.g., burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft) is also now higher in Canada than in the U.S., with 2491.0 crimes occurring per 100,000 people in Canada in 2022—a 7.0 per cent increase from 2014.
  • By contrast, the property crime rate in the U.S. declined by 24.1 per cent over the same period to 1954.4 crimes per 100,000 people.
  • Homicides are also on the rise in Canada with the number of murders increasing from 1.5 per 100,000 in 2014 to 2.3 in 2022—a 53.4 per cent increase.
  • The homicide rate in the U.S. remains markedly higher than in Canada at 5.8 per 100,000 people in 2022 and increased 49.4 per cent from 2014 to 2022.

Read the full study

Livio Di Matteo

Professor of Economics, Lakehead University
Continue Reading

Trending

X