International
Media Suffers Complete MELTDOWN Over USAID

Reflect on this for a moment. Van Jones literally argued that the Chinese Communist Party is more reliable for humanitarian aid than the U.S. government—all because Trump dared to add oversight to a bloated, unaccountable agency.
President Trump has moved to dismantle USAID, merging it into the State Department under Marco Rubio to enforce oversight, stop taxpayer dollars from fueling corruption, and ensure U.S. aid serves American interests.
As expected, the media and Democrats are in full meltdown mode, framing Trump’s crackdown on wasteful spending as a “coup.”
This particular take came from MSNBC’s Joy Reid, who convinced herself that reining in USAID corruption was equivalent to overthrowing a government.
“If this were happening in any other country right now, I promise you, I’d be on the air calling it a coup,” she declared.
Join 100K+ Substack readers and 1.5 million 𝕏 users who follow the work of Vigilant Fox. Subscribe to Vigilant News for exclusive stories you won’t find anywhere else.
In an equally ridiculous media moment, former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki suggested that Elon Musk targeted USAID because he was “uncomfortable” with how the agency combatted “corruption.”
“[USAID] not only leads on humanitarian assistance around the world but also works to combat corruption and foreign aid programs. I kind of see how that could make Elon Musk a bit uncomfortable,” Psaki said.
Perhaps Psaki is just panicking because Musk and Trump just shut down one of the Deep State’s favorite laundering machines.
After all, a bombshell FOIA request by the White Coat Waste Project revealed that Fauci’s NIAID and USAID funneled over $40 million in U.S. taxpayer funds to a Wuhan scientist researching bat coronavirus emergence—who later became “patient zero” for COVID-19.
The funding, which ended in 2019, backed risky gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, raising major concerns that U.S. tax dollars may have helped create the infamous COVID-19 virus that triggered mass lockdowns, forced vaccinations, and an unprecedented global health crackdown.

The most hysterical take of the night came from CNN’s Van Jones, who claimed that Donald Trump is telling the rest of the world to “DIE” by adding oversight to USAID.
“Donald Trump says, ‘We don’t care. You go die.’ That’s the message from the United States government,” Jones declared, claiming that cutting off its massive foreign aid programs will lead to “people dying in very large numbers around the world.”
Jones warned that Trump’s actions against USAID open the door for China to say, “At least we’re a stable government who’s not going to leave you out here to die.”
Reflect on this for a moment. Van Jones literally argued that the Chinese Communist Party is more reliable for humanitarian aid than the U.S. government—all because Trump dared to add oversight to a bloated, unaccountable agency.
Now, that’s a very bold statement.
The only moment of clarity from the mainstream press came when Scott Jennings methodically schooled his fellow CNN panelists as they vainly tried to defend USAID.
“There is a difference between smart soft power and dumb spending by the leftwing ideologues who inhabit this bureaucracy,” Jennings quickly pointed out.
“There is a difference between soft power and soft stupidity. So whether you’re funding like DEI musicals in some country or transgender surgery somewhere or whatever, that is not what most Americans would say is an effective part of U.S. foreign policy,” he reminded everyone.
The media’s meltdown proves Elon Musk and Trump hit the Deep State right where it hurts.
When oversight is called a “coup,” and the people fixing corruption are painted as villains, you know the regime is in full panic mode.
Because if USAID was just another harmless aid agency, why are they melting down like their slush fund just got nuked?

Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more reports like this one.
Business
Ontario suspends electricity surcharge after Trump doubles tariffs

MxM News
Quick Hit:
Ontario Premier Doug Ford announced Tuesday that the province is suspending its 25% surcharge on electricity exports to the U.S. following President Trump’s decision to double tariffs on Canadian aluminum and steel.
Key Details:
-
Ford confirmed Ontario’s suspension of the electricity surcharge after Trump’s tariff escalation put Canadian industries under pressure.
-
The Ontario premier said he and Lutnick would meet with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on Thursday in Washington to discuss a “renewed USMCA.”
-
In a statement on X, Ford acknowledged the move, stating, “In response, Ontario agreed to suspend its 25 percent surcharge on exports of electricity to Michigan, New York and Minnesota.”
Diving Deeper:
Just hours after President Trump doubled tariffs on Canadian aluminum and steel, Ontario Premier Doug Ford announced Tuesday that the province will suspend its 25% electricity surcharge on power exports to three U.S. states. The policy reversal comes as Ontario seeks to avoid further economic retaliation from Washington.
Trump’s latest round of tariffs—upping duties on Canadian steel and aluminum to 50%—were issued in direct response to Ontario’s electricity tax on U.S. consumers in Michigan, New York, and Minnesota. The move threatened to escalate an already tense trade standoff, with Trump warning of additional penalties targeting Canada’s auto sector if broader trade disputes weren’t addressed.
Ford took to X to confirm Ontario’s decision to pull back on the surcharge, saying he had a “productive conversation” with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The two will meet in Washington on Thursday alongside U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer to discuss a possible “renewed USMCA,” signaling a potential shift in trade relations between the two nations.
“In response, Ontario agreed to suspend its 25 percent surcharge on exports of electricity to Michigan, New York and Minnesota,” Ford and Lutnick stated in a joint announcement.
The suspension of Ontario’s surcharge marks a significant concession in the ongoing trade dispute, which has sent shockwaves through financial markets and rattled Canadian industries. Trump had labeled Ontario’s surcharge an “abusive threat” and pledged to take decisive action to ensure American energy security.
Beyond the immediate tariff battle, Ford’s willingness to engage in talks about a “renewed USMCA” could indicate Canada’s growing concern over Trump’s broader trade agenda. The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, originally signed during Trump’s first term, remains a key economic framework, but Trump has long criticized Canada’s tariffs on American dairy and its limited contributions to North American security.
While Ontario’s suspension of the electricity surcharge could ease tensions in the short term, the broader U.S.-Canada trade relationship remains in flux as Trump continues pushing for more favorable terms for American industries.
Business
Elon Musk says X targeted by “massive cyberattack” originating in Ukraine

MxM News
Quick Hit:
Elon Musk revealed Monday that X was the target of a “massive cyberattack,” with IP addresses linked to the Ukraine region. Musk noted the attack was highly coordinated and suggested it could involve a large group or a nation-state.
Key Details:
-
Speaking to Fox Business’ Larry Kudlow, Musk said, “We’re not exactly sure what happened, but there was a massive cyberattack to try to bring down the ecosystem with IP addresses originating in the Ukraine area.”
-
Earlier Monday, Musk posted about the attack on X, stating, “There was (still is) a massive cyberattack against X,” adding that the platform faces daily attacks but this one was particularly well-resourced.
-
Musk, who acquired X (formerly Twitter) for $44 billion in October 2022, has faced increasing pressure as his companies, including Tesla and SpaceX, deal with coordinated protests that he alleges are backed by left-wing billionaires like George Soros and Reid Hoffman.
Diving Deeper:
X suffered a significant cyberattack Monday, according to its owner Elon Musk. During an interview with Fox Business’ Larry Kudlow, Musk said that while the full details were unclear, the attack sought to “bring down the ecosystem” and had origins tied to the Ukraine region. He suggested the attack was well-funded and likely involved either a large, coordinated group or a nation-state.
Musk had earlier addressed the incident on X, stating that while the platform regularly faces cyber threats, this particular attack was on a different scale. “We get attacked every day, but this was done with a lot of resources,” he wrote, adding that efforts were underway to trace those responsible.
The timing of the cyberattack raises questions, as it comes amid widespread protests against Musk’s other ventures, particularly Tesla. Musk has accused high-profile Democrat donors, including George Soros and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, of financing the demonstrations. He has not provided direct evidence to support the claim, but the protests have coincided with an intensifying political battle over Musk’s influence in both the private sector and government.
Musk’s role in the Trump administration as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency has drawn praise from the president. Trump has credited Musk with spearheading efforts to reduce government waste and save taxpayers billions. Meanwhile, Musk’s companies, including SpaceX, hold lucrative contracts with the Department of Defense, making them frequent targets of scrutiny and opposition from political adversaries.
As X continues to investigate the cyberattack, the broader implications remain unclear. Whether a nation-state or an organized cybercriminal group was behind the attack could have significant ramifications, particularly given the geopolitical tensions surrounding Ukraine.
-
Business1 day ago
Sec. of State Marco Rubio announces major overhaul at USAID, cancels 83% of programs
-
Fraser Institute2 days ago
New Prime Minister Carney’s Fiscal Math Doesn’t Add Up
-
Economy1 day ago
CANADA MUST REVIVE A “PIPELINE WEST” – Indigenous Ownership and Investment in Energy Projects are Critical to Canada’s Oil Customer Diversification
-
Alberta20 hours ago
Alberta to unlock new market potential
-
Business1 day ago
Mark Carney’s Misleading Actions and Non-Disclosure Should Disqualify Him as Canada’s Next Truly “Elected” Prime Minister – Jim Warren
-
Bruce Dowbiggin1 day ago
Time Is On His Side: Ovie Chase Defies Time
-
International2 days ago
Is Russia at War With Ukraine, or With the West?
-
Business1 day ago
Biden Admin Spent A Trillion Taxpayer Dollars To Embed DEI Across Government, Study Says