Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

COVID-19

Italy’s ex-health minister under investigation for murder after allegedly covering up COVID jab deaths

Published

5 minute read

Roberto Speranza, former health minister of Italy

From LifeSiteNews

By Andreas Wailzer

Multiple outlets in Italy are reporting that former health minister Roberto Speranza is one of two officials under investigation for ‘ideological forgery’ and murder for allegedly covering up COVID shot injuries and deaths.

Italy’s former health minister is under investigation for murder after allegedly covering up deaths related to the COVID-19 vaccines.

The Italian TV network Rete 4 published internal documents from the public prosecutor’s office showing that former Italian health minister Roberto Speranza and the former director of the Italian Medicines Agency (Aifa) are being investigated for “ideological forgery” and murder for their role in covering up COVID shot injuries and deaths.

The Italian newspaper La Verità confirmed the report by Rete 4 and quoted the public prosecutor Francesco Lo Voi, who said that he believes the conditions for opening the file against the two government officials were met.

Catholic outlet La Nuova Bussola reported that potential offenses by the former government officials include “bribery for the exercise of function,” “bribery for an act contrary to official duties,” ideological forgery committed by a public official, murder, personal injury, and administering medicines in a manner dangerous to public health.

The case was opened after a complaint was filed by lawyers representing a group of over 4,200 people who suffered injuries from the COVID jabs and is based on information uncovered by the so-called “Aifa leaks.”

According to La Nuova Bussola, the internal documents from “Aifa leaks” showed that Aifa executives issued orders to suppress and ignore reports of adverse events, including deaths, from the COVID shots, even though it was the agency’s responsibility to warn about them.

The host of Rete 4 show “Fuori dal coro,” Marianna Canè, said that for the Health Ministry and Aifa officials, “saving the vaccine was more important than saving people.”

La Nuova Bussola journalist Andrea Zambrano lamented the fact that most mainstream media outlets, apart from Rete 4 and La Verità, ignored the bombshell revelation of the former health minister being investigated for murder over his role in covering up vaccine injuries.

“The bond between the political power that has imposed an experimental vaccine on pain of loss of civil rights and the media power that has conveyed this imposition by passing it off as a civic duty is still as strong as ever and is in no danger of being undermined,” Zambrano wrote.

Multiple studies have found that COVID-19 shots increase the risk of heart inflammation, including a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-sponsored study which concedes that the jab increases the risk of myocarditis in children. Another FDA-funded study showed that the COVID shots increase the risk of strokes in the elderly.

Are governments around the world covering up COVID jab injuries?

Italy is not the only country where politicians are accused of suppressing data that points to the severe damage to people’s health caused by the COVID vaccines.

This month, a whistleblower who revealed government data that allegedly shows a connection between the excess deaths and the COVID jabs in New Zealand was arrested and is facing seven years in prison in what looks like a cover-up operation by the government of former Prime Minister and WEF “Young Global Leader“ Jacinda Ardern.

There has been a massive increase in excess deaths in many countries around the world since the COVID shot rollouts, especially in highly-jabbed regions and in young people who would typically not be expected to die in large numbers at their age. Many critics of the mainstream COVID narrative, like British MP Andrew Bridgen, have credibly argued that the COVID jabs have to be responsible for this sudden increase in excess deaths.

2025 Federal Election

Conservatives promise to ban firing of Canadian federal workers based on COVID jab status

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

The Conservative platform also vows that the party will oppose mandatory digital ID systems and a central bank digital currency if elected.

Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party’s 2025 election platform includes a promise to “ban” the firing of any federal worker based “solely” on whether or not they chose to get the COVID shots.

On page 23 of the “Canada First – For A Change” plan, which was released on Tuesday, the promise to protect un-jabbed federal workers is mentioned under “Protect Personal Autonomy, Privacy, and Data Security.”

It promises that a Conservative government will “Ban the dismissal of federal workers based solely on COVID vaccine status.”

The Conservative Party also promises to “Oppose any move toward mandatory digital ID systems” as well as “Prohibit the Bank of Canada from developing or implementing a central bank digital currency.”

In October 2021, the Liberal government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced unprecedented COVID-19 jab mandates for all federal workers and those in the transportation sector. The government also announced that the unjabbed would no longer be able to travel by air, boat, or train, both domestically and internationally.

This policy resulted in thousands losing their jobs or being placed on leave for non-compliance. It also trapped “unvaccinated” Canadians in the country.

COVID jab mandates, which also came from provincial governments with the support of the federal government, split Canadian society. The shots have been linked to a multitude of negative and often severe side effects, such as death, including in children.

Many recent rulings have gone in favor of those who chose not to get the shots and were fired as a result, such as an arbitrator ruling that one of the nation’s leading hospitals in Ontario must compensate 82 healthcare workers terminated after refusing to get the jabs.

Beyond health concerns, many Canadians, especially Catholics, opposed the injections on moral grounds because of their link to fetal cell lines derived from the tissue of aborted babies.

Continue Reading

COVID-19

RFK Jr. Launches Long-Awaited Offensive Against COVID-19 mRNA Shots

Published on

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH's avatar Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

As millions of Americans anxiously await action from the new HHS leadership against the COVID-19 mRNA injectionsinjected into over 9 million children this year—Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has finally gone publicly on the offensive:

Let’s go over each key point made by RFK Jr.:

The recommendation for children was always dubious. It was dubious because kids had almost no risk for COVID-19. Certain kids that had very profound morbidities may have a slight risk. Most kids don’t.

In the largest review to date on myocarditis following SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. COVID-19 vaccination, Mead et al found that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not only significantly more common but also more severe—particularly in children and young males. Our findings make clear that the risks of the shots overwhelmingly outweigh any theoretical benefit:

The OpenSAFELY study included more than 1 million adolescents and children and found that myocarditis was documented ONLY in COVID-19 vaccinated groups and NOT after COVID-19 infection. There were NO COVID-19-related deaths in any group. A&E attendance and unplanned hospitalization were higher after first vaccination compared to unvaccinated groups:

So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk? We’ve seen huge associations of myocarditis and pericarditis with strokes, with other injuries, with neurological injuries.

The two largest COVID-19 vaccine safety studies ever conducted, involving 99 million (Faksova et al) and 85 million people (Raheleh et al), confirm RFK Jr.’s concerns, documenting significantly increased risks of serious adverse events following vaccination, including:

  1. Myocarditis (+510% after second dose)
  2. Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (+278% after first dose)
  3. Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (+223% after first dose)
  4. Guillain-Barré Syndrome (+149% after first dose)
  5. Heart Attack (+286% after second dose)
  6. Stroke (+240% after first dose)
  7. Coronary Artery Disease (+244% after second dose)
  8. Cardiac Arrhythmia (+199% after first dose)

And this was clear even in the clinical data that came out of Pfizer. There were actually more deaths. There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group. We need to ask questions and we need to consult with parents.

Actually, according to the Pfizer’s clinical trial data, there were 43% more deaths in the vaccine group compared to the placebo group when post-unblinding deaths are included:

We need to give people informed consent, and we shouldn’t be making recommendations that are not good for the population.

Public acknowledgment of the grave harms of COVID-19 vaccines signals that real action is right around the corner. However, we must hope that action is taken for ALL age groups, as no one is spared from their life-reducing effects:

Alessandria et al (n=290,727, age > 10 years): People vaccinated with 2 doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during follow-up.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.

For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
Continue Reading

Trending

X