Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

COVID-19

Italy’s ex-health minister under investigation for murder after allegedly covering up COVID jab deaths

Published

5 minute read

Roberto Speranza, former health minister of Italy

From LifeSiteNews

By Andreas Wailzer

Multiple outlets in Italy are reporting that former health minister Roberto Speranza is one of two officials under investigation for ‘ideological forgery’ and murder for allegedly covering up COVID shot injuries and deaths.

Italy’s former health minister is under investigation for murder after allegedly covering up deaths related to the COVID-19 vaccines.

The Italian TV network Rete 4 published internal documents from the public prosecutor’s office showing that former Italian health minister Roberto Speranza and the former director of the Italian Medicines Agency (Aifa) are being investigated for “ideological forgery” and murder for their role in covering up COVID shot injuries and deaths.

The Italian newspaper La Verità confirmed the report by Rete 4 and quoted the public prosecutor Francesco Lo Voi, who said that he believes the conditions for opening the file against the two government officials were met.

Catholic outlet La Nuova Bussola reported that potential offenses by the former government officials include “bribery for the exercise of function,” “bribery for an act contrary to official duties,” ideological forgery committed by a public official, murder, personal injury, and administering medicines in a manner dangerous to public health.

The case was opened after a complaint was filed by lawyers representing a group of over 4,200 people who suffered injuries from the COVID jabs and is based on information uncovered by the so-called “Aifa leaks.”

According to La Nuova Bussola, the internal documents from “Aifa leaks” showed that Aifa executives issued orders to suppress and ignore reports of adverse events, including deaths, from the COVID shots, even though it was the agency’s responsibility to warn about them.

The host of Rete 4 show “Fuori dal coro,” Marianna Canè, said that for the Health Ministry and Aifa officials, “saving the vaccine was more important than saving people.”

La Nuova Bussola journalist Andrea Zambrano lamented the fact that most mainstream media outlets, apart from Rete 4 and La Verità, ignored the bombshell revelation of the former health minister being investigated for murder over his role in covering up vaccine injuries.

“The bond between the political power that has imposed an experimental vaccine on pain of loss of civil rights and the media power that has conveyed this imposition by passing it off as a civic duty is still as strong as ever and is in no danger of being undermined,” Zambrano wrote.

Multiple studies have found that COVID-19 shots increase the risk of heart inflammation, including a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-sponsored study which concedes that the jab increases the risk of myocarditis in children. Another FDA-funded study showed that the COVID shots increase the risk of strokes in the elderly.

Are governments around the world covering up COVID jab injuries?

Italy is not the only country where politicians are accused of suppressing data that points to the severe damage to people’s health caused by the COVID vaccines.

This month, a whistleblower who revealed government data that allegedly shows a connection between the excess deaths and the COVID jabs in New Zealand was arrested and is facing seven years in prison in what looks like a cover-up operation by the government of former Prime Minister and WEF “Young Global Leader“ Jacinda Ardern.

There has been a massive increase in excess deaths in many countries around the world since the COVID shot rollouts, especially in highly-jabbed regions and in young people who would typically not be expected to die in large numbers at their age. Many critics of the mainstream COVID narrative, like British MP Andrew Bridgen, have credibly argued that the COVID jabs have to be responsible for this sudden increase in excess deaths.

2025 Federal Election

Mark Carney refuses to clarify 2022 remarks accusing the Freedom Convoy of ‘sedition’

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

Mark Carney described the Freedom Convoy as an act of ‘sedition’ and advocated for the government to use its power to crush the non-violent protest movement.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney refused to elaborate on comments he made in 2022 referring to the anti-mandate Freedom Convoy protest as an act of “sedition” and advocating for the government to put an end to the movement.

“Well, look, I haven’t been a politician,” Carney said when a reporter in Windsor, Ontario, where a Freedom Convoy-linked border blockade took place in 2022, asked, “What do you say to Canadians who lost trust in the Liberal government back then and do not have trust in you now?”

“I became a politician a little more than two months ago, two and a half months ago,” he said. “I came in because I thought this country needed big change. We needed big change in the economy.”

Carney’s lack of an answer seems to be in stark contrast to the strong opinion he voiced in a February 7, 2022, column published in the Globe & Mail at the time of the convoy titled, “It’s Time To End The Sedition In Ottawa.”

In that piece, Carney wrote that the Freedom Convoy was a movement of “sedition,” adding, “That’s a word I never thought I’d use in Canada. It means incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.”

Carney went on to claim in the piece that if “left unchecked” by government authorities, the Freedom Convoy would “achieve” its “goal of undermining our democracy.”

Carney even targeted “[a]nyone sending money to the Convoy,” accusing them of “funding sedition.”

Internal emails from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) eventually showed that his definition of sedition were not in conformity with the definition under Canada’s Criminal Code, which explicitly lists the “use of force” as a necessary aspect of sedition.

“The key bit is ‘use of force,’” one RCMP officer noted in the emails. “I’m all about a resolution to this and a forceful one with us victorious but, from the facts on the ground, I don’t know we’re there except in a small number of cases.”

The reality is that the Freedom Convoy was a peaceful event of public protest against COVID mandates, and not one protestor was charged with sedition. However, the Liberal government, then under Justin Trudeau, did take an approach similar to the one advocated for by Carney, invoking the Emergencies Act to clear-out protesters. Since then, a federal judge has ruled that such action was “not justified.”

Despite this, the two most prominent leaders of the Freedom Convoy, Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, still face a possible 10-year prison sentence for their role in the non-violent assembly. LifeSiteNews has reported extensively on their trial.

Continue Reading

COVID-19

17-year-old died after taking COVID shot, but Ontario judge denies his family’s liability claim

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Clare Marie Merkowsky

An Ontario judge dismissed a liability claim from a family of a high schooler who died weeks after taking the COVID shot.

According to a published report on March 26 by Blacklock’s Reporter, Ontario Superior Court Justice Sandra Antoniani ruled that the Department of Health had no “duty of care” to a Canadian teenager who died after receiving a COVID vaccine.

“The plaintiff’s tragedy is real, but there is no private law duty of care made out,” Antoniani said.

“There is no private law duty of care to individual members of the public injured by government core policy decisions in the handling of health emergencies which impact the general population,” she continued.

In September 2021, 17-year-old Sean Hartman of Beeton, Ontario, passed away just three weeks after receiving a Pfizer-BioNtech COVID shot.

After his death, his family questioned if health officials had warned Canadians “that a possible side effect of receiving a Covid-19 vaccine was death.” The family took this petition to court but has been denied a hearing.

Antoniani alleged that “the defendants’ actions were aimed at mitigating the health impact of a global pandemic on the Canadian public. The defendants deemed that urgent action was necessary.”

“Imposition of a private duty of care would have a negative impact on the ability of the defendants to prioritize the interests of the entire public, with the distraction of fear over the possibility of harm to individual members of the public, and the risk of litigation and unlimited liability,” she ruled.

As LifeSiteNews previously reported, Dan Hartman, Sean’s father, filed a $35.6 million lawsuit against Pfizer after his son’s death.

However, only 103 claims of 1,859 have been approved to date, “where it has been determined by the Medical Review Board that there is a probable link between the injury and the vaccine, and that the injury is serious and permanent.”

Thus far, VISP has paid over $6 million to those injured by COVID injections, with some 2,000 claims remaining to be settled.

According to studies, post-vaccination heart conditions such as myocarditis are well documented in those, especially young males who have received the Pfizer jab.

Additionally, a recent study done by researchers with Canada-based Correlation Research in the Public Interest showed that 17 countries have found a “definite causal link” between peaks in all-cause mortality and the fast rollouts of the COVID shots as well as boosters.

Continue Reading

Trending

X