Excess Deaths in Canada and around the world remain astoundingly high in 2023

From the YouTube channel of British health researcher Dr. John Campbell

During World War II in the UK, Germany repeatedly bombed English cities night after night for months on end. Thousands were killed. In total, though World War II, about 70,000 English civilians were killed.

In the last two years, the UK has suffered over 101,000 “excess deaths”. These are deaths that data tells us should not be expected to happen at this time. In other words, people are dying earlier than should be expected.

This isn’t only happening in the UK. The numbers are astoundingly high in Canada, Australia, the US and in most western countries with modern medical systems.

In this short video presentation Dr. John Campbells shows the numbers and asks a critical question.

Excess deaths by week, 2023 https://data-explorer.oecd.org https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?que…

Australia, weeks 1 – 34, 2023 14,710 (16.8%) Covid deaths, 4,977

Australia, 2022, weeks 1 – 52 29,738 (18.7%) Australia, excess deaths 2022 + 2023 = 44,448

Austria, week 1 – 44, 2023 4,444 (6.5%)

Canada, weeks 1 – 33, 2023 28,400 (16.7%) Covid deaths, 4,613

Canada, 2022 61,468 (22.3%) Canada, excess deaths 2022 + 2023 = 89,868

Denmark, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 3,052 (6.9%) Covid deaths, 347

Denmark, 2022 5,871 (11%) Denmark, excess deaths 2022 + 2023 = 8,923

Finland, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 4,627 (10.5%)

France, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 22,268 (4.9%) Covid deaths, 5,565

France, 2022 71,751 (11.9%)

Germany, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 59,039 (7.7%)

Germany, 2022 134, 578 (14.9%)

Greece, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 5,132 (5.2%)

Iceland, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 209 (11.5%) Covid deaths, 0

Iceland, 2022 446 (20.2%)

Israel, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 4,303 (11.8%) Covid deaths, 640

Israel, 2022 7,050 (15.4%)

Italy, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 938 (0.28%)

Netherlands, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 14,209 (11.3%)

Netherlands, 2022 19,326 (13.2%)

New Zealand, weeks, 1 – 44, 2023 3,960 (14.5%)

New Zealand, 2022 5,787 (17.6%)

Norway, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 1,885 (5.7%)

Norway, 2022 4,980 (12.5%)

Portugal, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 5,184 (6.3%)

Spain, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 11,948 (3.7%)

Switzerland, 1 – 44, 2023 2,063 (3.9%)

UK, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 49,389 (9.44%) Covid deaths, 18,591

UK, 2022 52,514 (9.26%) UK excess deaths 2022 + 2023 = 101,903

Height of the Blitz, September 1940 to May 1941 UK civilian deaths, 40,000

Total civilian deaths for WW2, 70,000

US, weeks 1 – 37, 2023 155,763 (7.8%) Covid deaths, 76,187

US, 2022 495,749 (17.53) US excess deaths 2022 + 2023 = 651,512

Total US deaths in Vietnam war The U.S. National Archives shows that 58,220 U.S. soldiers perished. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/h…

Hungary, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 -3,785 (-3.2%)

Poland, weeks 1 – 43, 2023 104 (0.13%)

Slovak republic, weeks 1 – 43, 2023 -774 (-1.54%)

Sweden, weeks 1 – 44, 2023 -529 (0.6%)

COVID, the untold story. So much more makes sense after this book and my first illuminating discussion with Dr. Craig. Get your copy in the UK here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Expired-unto…

For friends in the US get your copy here, https://www.amazon.com/Expired-untold…

This dataset presents the latest data on All-cause death statistics Excess mortality and COVID-19 deaths, by week, for all OECD countries for which data are available. The expected number of deaths is based on the average number of deaths for the same week, (2015-19) This baseline could be considered a lower estimate of the expected number of deaths since both population growth and an ageing population would be expected to push up the number of deaths observed each year. For example, New Zealand saw its population grow by around 9% since 2015, with the number of people aged 65 and over increasing by 18%.

Related Topics:#ExcessDeaths2023 #ExcessDeathsCanada #JohnCampbell feature

Up Next

Court upholds Quebec’s unscientific and draconian Covid curfew law

Don't Miss

Ontario doctor has allegations of misconduct over his COVID-19 social media posts withdrawn by the CPSO

Todayville

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

As PM Poilievre would cancel summer holidays for MP’s so Ottawa can finally get back to work

Automotive / 3 hours ago

Canadians’ Interest in Buying an EV Falls for Third Year in a Row

2025 Federal Election / 3 hours ago

Poilievre Campaigning To Build A Canadian Economic Fortress

2025 Federal Election

Conservatives promise to ban firing of Canadian federal workers based on COVID jab status

Published on April 24, 2025

Todayville

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

The Conservative platform also vows that the party will oppose mandatory digital ID systems and a central bank digital currency if elected.

Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party’s 2025 election platform includes a promise to “ban” the firing of any federal worker based “solely” on whether or not they chose to get the COVID shots.

On page 23 of the “Canada First – For A Change” plan, which was released on Tuesday, the promise to protect un-jabbed federal workers is mentioned under “Protect Personal Autonomy, Privacy, and Data Security.”

It promises that a Conservative government will “Ban the dismissal of federal workers based solely on COVID vaccine status.”

The Conservative Party also promises to “Oppose any move toward mandatory digital ID systems” as well as “Prohibit the Bank of Canada from developing or implementing a central bank digital currency.”

In October 2021, the Liberal government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced unprecedented COVID-19 jab mandates for all federal workers and those in the transportation sector. The government also announced that the unjabbed would no longer be able to travel by air, boat, or train, both domestically and internationally.

This policy resulted in thousands losing their jobs or being placed on leave for non-compliance. It also trapped “unvaccinated” Canadians in the country.

COVID jab mandates, which also came from provincial governments with the support of the federal government, split Canadian society. The shots have been linked to a multitude of negative and often severe side effects, such as death, including in children.

Many recent rulings have gone in favor of those who chose not to get the shots and were fired as a result, such as an arbitrator ruling that one of the nation’s leading hospitals in Ontario must compensate 82 healthcare workers terminated after refusing to get the jabs.

Beyond health concerns, many Canadians, especially Catholics, opposed the injections on moral grounds because of their link to fetal cell lines derived from the tissue of aborted babies.

COVID-19

RFK Jr. Launches Long-Awaited Offensive Against COVID-19 mRNA Shots

Published on April 23, 2025

Todayville

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

As millions of Americans anxiously await action from the new HHS leadership against the COVID-19 mRNA injections—injected into over 9 million children this year—Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has finally gone publicly on the offensive:

Let’s go over each key point made by RFK Jr.:

The recommendation for children was always dubious. It was dubious because kids had almost no risk for COVID-19. Certain kids that had very profound morbidities may have a slight risk. Most kids don’t.

In the largest review to date on myocarditis following SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. COVID-19 vaccination, Mead et al found that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not only significantly more common but also more severe—particularly in children and young males. Our findings make clear that the risks of the shots overwhelmingly outweigh any theoretical benefit:

The OpenSAFELY study included more than 1 million adolescents and children and found that myocarditis was documented ONLY in COVID-19 vaccinated groups and NOT after COVID-19 infection. There were NO COVID-19-related deaths in any group. A&E attendance and unplanned hospitalization were higher after first vaccination compared to unvaccinated groups:

So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk? We’ve seen huge associations of myocarditis and pericarditis with strokes, with other injuries, with neurological injuries.

The two largest COVID-19 vaccine safety studies ever conducted, involving 99 million (Faksova et al) and 85 million people (Raheleh et al), confirm RFK Jr.’s concerns, documenting significantly increased risks of serious adverse events following vaccination, including:

Myocarditis (+510% after second dose)
Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (+278% after first dose)
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (+223% after first dose)
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (+149% after first dose)
Heart Attack (+286% after second dose)
Stroke (+240% after first dose)
Coronary Artery Disease (+244% after second dose)
Cardiac Arrhythmia (+199% after first dose)

And this was clear even in the clinical data that came out of Pfizer. There were actually more deaths. There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group. We need to ask questions and we need to consult with parents.

Actually, according to the Pfizer’s clinical trial data, there were 43% more deaths in the vaccine group compared to the placebo group when post-unblinding deaths are included:

We need to give people informed consent, and we shouldn’t be making recommendations that are not good for the population.

Public acknowledgment of the grave harms of COVID-19 vaccines signals that real action is right around the corner. However, we must hope that action is taken for ALL age groups, as no one is spared from their life-reducing effects:

Alessandria et al (n=290,727, age > 10 years): People vaccinated with 2 doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during follow-up.