Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

National

Daughter of Canadian PM Mark Carney uses ‘they/them’ pronouns

Published

7 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Jonathon Van Maren

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has a daughter who identifies as “non-binary” and uses “they/them” pronouns. 

The Daily Mail first reported these details on March 10: 

Carney’s other daughter Sasha, 24, who graduated cum laude from Yale University with a degree in English and Gender Studies, uses they/them pronouns, according to their social media profiles. They previously went by the name Sophia. Sasha Carney, who currently works as a freelance writer and reviewer in Brooklyn, New York, has previously posted about their mental health struggles online.   

Sasha’s Facebook profile, which was publicly accessible at time of publication, shows that she self-identified as “non-binary” in 2018:

Many of Carney’s publicly stated views are avowedly leftist; one of her profile pictures identifies her as a supporter of socialist Bernie Sanders. In 2019, she made a Facebook post stating that “Yale is an institution which has promoted and legitimized eugenics, global warfare, genocidal policies, the racialized carceral state, and the hyper-privileging of white voices in academia. In the face of this, it is crucial that we invest time, energy, thought, resources, and love into ethnicity, race, and migration studies, which looks at the world, and Yale itself, through a critical anti-racist and anticolonial lens.” 

Juno News, formerly known as True North, broke additional details earlier today, publishing excerpts of an essay written by Sasha Carney in an alternative magazine called Authenticity in April 2020 titled Mumsnet, and Transmasculine Childhood. As reporters Cosmin Dzurdzsa and Alex Zoltan noted, the essay reveals that “Mark Carney sent [his] daughter to [the] discredited U.K. Tavistock Transgender Clinic.” The published excerpt reads: 

In 2013, shortly after I chopped off all my hair into a deeply regrettable floppy Justin Bieber cut, I moved to London, the land of Enid Blyton murder mysteries. A block from my new house was the Tavistock & Portman NHS Foundation Trust, an imposing grey building which contained the country’s only child and adolescent ‘gender identity clinic.’

I watched as my friend, after a year of weekly appointments trying desperately to get an official diagnosis of gender dysphoria, was denied the diagnosis, and with it any hope of top surgery because they sometimes wore skirts. I watched organisations with names like ‘Transgender Trend’ refer to trans Tavistock patients as ‘experimental subjects’ who didn’t know what was best for them. I watched as my school’s former principal told a national news outlet that trans students like me and many of my close friends were cis women who were only coming out to ’cause turbulence’ and ‘adhere to anything a bit radical.’ I watched all this happen, and I quietly stopped wearing underwire bras, and wore baggier clothes, and I felt a fierce surge of jealousy every time I walked into the Tavistock for therapy and saw patients turn left, towards the medical spaces I didn’t feel ‘trans enough’ to enter. 

The essay has since been scrubbed from the internet. 

In 2022, it was announced that Tavistock was being shut down, with over 1,000 families expected to join a massive lawsuit over the damage done to their children due to the “treatment” they received at the gender clinic. Last year, the U.K. National Health Service announced that it would stop prescribing puberty blockers to minors entirely. Juno News also reported that Sasha has expressed her support, in writing, for “puberty blockers” for children. 

It is difficult to overstate the potential political impact of this story. Last year, Danielle Smith’s government in Alberta banned sex change surgeries and puberty blockers for minors; in a press conference in February 2024, Smith specifically cited the Tavistock clinic as a motivation behind her legislation.

The fact that the prime minister’s daughter went to Tavistock clinic is certainly an indication of his views on such legislation, and an indication that his commitment to the transgender agenda will likely be every bit as fervent as his predecessor’s.  

Featured Image

Jonathon Van Maren

Jonathon’s writings have been translated into more than six languages and in addition to LifeSiteNews, has been published in the National PostNational ReviewFirst Things, The Federalist, The American Conservative, The Stream, the Jewish Independent, the Hamilton SpectatorReformed Perspective Magazine, and LifeNews, among others. He is a contributing editor to The European Conservative.

His insights have been featured on CTV, Global News, and the CBC, as well as over twenty radio stations. He regularly speaks on a variety of social issues at universities, high schools, churches, and other functions in Canada, the United States, and Europe.

He is the author of The Culture WarSeeing is Believing: Why Our Culture Must Face the Victims of AbortionPatriots: The Untold Story of Ireland’s Pro-Life MovementPrairie Lion: The Life and Times of Ted Byfield, and co-author of A Guide to Discussing Assisted Suicide with Blaise Alleyne.

Jonathon serves as the communications director for the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform.

Before Post

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

More from this author

Business

Trudeau collecting two pensions worth $8.4 million

Published on

By Franco Terrazzano 

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation is calling on all party leaders to commit to ending the second pension for prime ministers.

“Taxpayers can’t afford to pay for all of the perks in Ottawa and the government should start saving money by ending the prime minister’s second taxpayer-funded pension,” said Franco Terrazzano, CTF Federal Director. “Prime ministers already take a salary nearly six times more than the average Canadian and they already get a lucrative MP pension, so taxpayers shouldn’t be on the hook for a second pension for prime ministers.”

Trudeau will collect two taxpayer-funded pensions in retirement. Combined, those pensions total $8.4 million, according to CTF estimates.

First, there’s the MP pension.

The payouts for Trudeau’s MP pension will begin at $141,000 per year when he turns 55 years old. It will total an estimated $6.5 million should he live to the age of 90.

Then there’s the prime minister’s pension.

“A prime minister who holds the Office of the Prime Minister for at least four years is entitled to receive a special retirement allowance in addition to their members of Parliament pension benefit,” according to the government of Canada.

The payouts for Trudeau’s prime minister pension will begin at $73,000 per year when he turns 67 years old. It will total an estimated $1.9 million should he live to the age of 90.

Add the $6.5-million MP pension to the $1.9-million prime minister’s pension and Trudeau will collect a total of about $8.4 million.

The prime minister’s current annual salary is $406,200.

Trudeau’s pension payouts would be even higher if not for reforms implemented in 2012, which increased the retirement age, cut benefits and saw MPs increase their own contributions. Prior to the reforms, MPs contributed just $1 for every $24 of taxpayer and federal monies invested in their pensions.

Former prime minister Stephen Harper forfeited an estimated $1 million to $2 million in additional payouts by implementing the reforms. Nevertheless, the CTF estimates Harper’s lifetime pensions will total about $7 million.

“A prime minister already takes millions through their first pension, they shouldn’t be billing taxpayers more for their second pension,” Terrazzano said. “Taxpayers need to see leadership at the top and all party leaders should commit to ending the second pension for future prime ministers.”

Continue Reading

Business

Next federal government should reduce size of Ottawa’s bureaucracy

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Jake Fuss

With an election looming, and despite uncertainty over when the next federal budget will be tabled, the federal government recently launched its pre-budget consultations to get input from Canadians about their policy priorities.

And a change in course is long overdue. For example, from 2018 to 2023, the Trudeau government recorded the six highest levels of per-person spending (adjusted for inflation) in Canadian history. Put differently, before, during and after COVID the government spent more money annually than it did during the Great Depression, both world wars, and the peak of the Global Financial Crisis in 2008/09.

Meanwhile, the revenue generated through a bevy of tax hikes (on top income earners and 86 per cent of middle-income families) has been insufficient to pay for all this spending. So the government chose to borrow and burden future generations of Canadians who will pay for today’s debt through higher taxes tomorrow. Consequently, the Trudeau government ran nine consecutive deficits and total federal debt per person (adjusted for inflation) is now at the highest point in Canadian history.

And according to projections, the state of federal finances will likely get worse. At its current trajectory of spending, the government will run six more deficits between 2024/25 and 2029/30 and accumulate substantially more debt. Of course, like households, government must pay interest on debt, and rising interest costs leave less money available for programs and services. By 2029/30, the government will spend a projected $69.4 billion on debt interest payments, which is significantly more than projected GST revenue that year.

To prevent this scenario, the next federal government—whoever that may be—should review in detail all areas of federal spending, find potential savings based on the Chrétien government’s successful approach in the 1990s, balance the budget and end the red ink.

A good first step would be to reduce the size of the federal bureaucracy. Federal government employment (as measured in full-time equivalents) in Ottawa and across the country increased by 26.1 per cent between 2015/16 and 2022/23—growing nearly three times as fast as the Canadian population. Had the size of the federal bureaucracy simply grown in line with population growth, federal spending would be $7.5 billion lower than it is today.

Despite this sizeable increase in government, many Canadians remain frustrated with service quality. According to a 2023 poll, nearly half (44 per cent) of Canadians feel they receive “poor” or “very poor” value from government services. More administrators and managers in government has also failed to help produce higher living standards for Canadians. As of September 2024, per-person GDP, an indicator of incomes and living standards, was down 2.2 per cent compared to five years earlier (after adjusting for inflation). Reducing the number of federal bureaucrats would provide billions in savings for Ottawa to reduce the deficit and help pave a path back to budget balance, without sacrificing service quality.

The government could find additional savings by eliminating corporate welfare and subsidies to legacy media outlets, and abolishing the Canada Infrastructure Bank, which since 2017 has approved “investments” totalling $13.2 billion (as of the fourth quarter of 2023-24) and completed only two projects—the purchase of 20 electric buses in Edmonton and the construction of two solar facilities in Calgary.

Ottawa’s addiction to spending and debt cannot continue. Returning to balanced budgets must be a top priority in the next federal budget and for the next government.

Jake Fuss

Director, Fiscal Studies, Fraser Institute
Continue Reading

Trending

X