Opinion
Colton Boushie’s death was tragic and affected many families including Gerald Stanley’s family.
Colton Boushie’s life was taken from him on August 9, 2016 and at the same time Gerald Stanley’s world was turned upside down.
I was not there and I do not know all the details. I do know that a group outing turned tragic and a family’s life has been negatively affected permanently.
Colton Boushie’s death may have been the result of poor policing, over protection of property, overreaction, fear, hysteria or frustration from increasing rural crime.
Gerald Stanley may have been fearful, over-protective and overwhelmed by the unexpected events, I do not know. I do know that he was found not guilty by a jury of his peers. I still want to believe that one is innocent until proven guilty.
The system may be flawed, but Gerald Stanley did not create the system. We did. Colton Boushie’s death was unnecessary and the system may of let him down. It may have been in the courtroom, but I sense it let him down before August 9, 2016.
It may have been simply bravado, alcohol, stress, fear, a clash of cultures, events escalating out of control, to a tragic end but at least 2 families are suffering because of it.
Can we fix the system? No we can’t. We will try and we will push the pendulum too far in the other direction and we will celebrate until reality kicks in.
Remember Women’s Lib? I was around in the sixties and lived through women’s rights issues very similar to what is happening in today’s news. The racism issues flare up on regular basis and the populace takes note, complains gets promises, compromises and missteps. Then after a period of time, with another group in a different place it happens again.
We can’t fix the system but we can adapt to the times of today but it will be broken again tomorrow.
Colton Boushie’s death was unnecessary and he will be mourned and I hope we can find solutions to prevent it from happening to someone else.
Gerald Stanley, whether guilty or innocent of a crime, will continue to be punished in the court of public opinion and that too needs fixing. Can we fix it? No we can’t.
The most rational of people can be irrational, caught up in the moment, go with the flow, be one with the crowd, then they feel remorse. We need to be rational now if we can find any way to fix this without going too far.
Can we be rational? I hope so.
National
Canadian town appeals ruling that forces them to pay LGBT group over ‘pride’ flag dispute
From LifeSiteNews
The irony of the ruling is that Emo’s town hall doesn’t even have a flagpole
A Canadian town has announced it will seek a “judicial review” regarding a decision that saw it being mandated by a tribunal to pay an LGBT group thousands of dollars because it refused to cave to activists’ demands by declaring June “Pride Month” and flying the related rainbow flag.
In a media statement Thursday, the town of Emo, Ontario, said it has “decided to seek judicial review of the decision of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. As the matter is proceeding to the Divisional Court, we will not be commenting further at this time.”
The town noted that it wished “to state that it made a Declaration of Equality in 2022, which remains in effect today.”
“The Township recognizes the dignity and worth of all people, as well as the barriers of discrimination and disadvantage faced by human rights protected groups, including members of the LGBTQ2+ community,” said the town in its 2022 declaration.
As reported by LifeSiteNews, last month Mayor Harold McQuaker of Emo, Ontario, was ordered by an Ontario Human Rights Tribunal to pay local LGBT activist group Borderland Pride $5,000 for refusing to celebrate the LGBT agenda during the month of June. The town was also ordered to pay $10,000.
Specifically, the mayor and town had refused to cave to demands to fly the LGBT “Pride flag” and declare the month of June to be “Pride Month.”
After the mayor refused to pay, his bank account appears to have been garnished to pay for damages ordered against him by the tribunal.
McQuaker had publicly protested the tribunal’s orders, calling them a form of “extortion.” In a vulgar Facebook post, Borderland Pride claimed they were successful in forcing money from the mayor via the garnishing of his bank funds.
“Sure, sex is great, but have you ever garnished your mayor’s bank account after he publicly refused to comply with a Tribunal’s order to pay damages?” wrote the group on Facebook.
McQuaker previously had told the Toronto Sun, “I utterly refuse to pay the $5,000 because that’s extortion” and said he would not undergo the Ontario Human Rights Commission re-education course.
Ontario adjudicator Karen Dawson wrote in her decision against McQuaker that “$15,000 is an appropriate level of compensation for Borderland Pride’s injury to dignity, feelings and self-respect.”
The irony of the ruling is that Emo’s town hall doesn’t even have a flagpole.
Emo is not the only town in Canada that has recently banned the flying of “Pride” flags from municipal buildings.
As reported by LifeSiteNews, residents of the Canadian town of Barrhead, Alberta, recently voted in a solid majority to pass a bylaw that will in effect ban pro-LGBT “Pride” themed designs from being displayed on public infrastructure, including such flags on government buildings and rainbow painted crosswalks.
Residents in the Alberta town of Westlock likewise passed a bylaw that bans all non-governmental flags from municipal buildings and mandates that crosswalks only be painted in the standard white-striped pattern.
The LGBT indoctrination in Canadian cities and towns via “Pride month,” which often includes flags and painted crosswalks, has been described by LifeSiteNews columnist Jonathon Van Maren as “not a ‘celebration of Pride,’” but as “an assertion of ownership, a declaration of dominance” over “public spaces.”
Van Maren recently observed celebrated the Emo mayor, writing, “Harold McQuaker isn’t having any of it (LGBT activists demands). And we need more like him.”
Daily Caller
‘Brought This On Ourselves’: Dem Predicts Massive Backlash After Party Leaders Exposed For ‘Lying’ About Biden Health
From the Daily Caller News Foundation
By Harold Hutchison
Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky said Thursday night that the Democratic Party could face a “tea party” movement after the Biden administration concealed the truth about President Joe Biden’s health.
A Wall Street Journal article published Thursday revealed White House aides “insulated” Biden, even from Cabinet members, from the first year of his presidency. Roginsky said that the “lying” about Biden’s health would have consequences for Democrats.
“There is a bigger problem here, and that is that I think Democrats are at the point where Republicans might have been right after the Bush election or after the Bush term was up, which is that I think Democrats are starting to mistrust their institutions,” Roginsky said. “And this goes back to a bipartisan effort to lie us into the Iraq war, not just by George Bush, but also by a lot of Democrats.
WATCH:
“It has to do with the fact that Barack Obama did not hold anybody accountable after the 2008 crisis, which also happened on George Bush’s watch, but he became president, he never threw a hostage on the tarmac from Wall Street,” Roginsky continued. “You saw the rise of Bernie Sanders as a result of that, and you saw a lot of institutional Democrats, me included, saying, no, no, no, this is not the time. We have to stick with the institution.”
Similar articles published by the Wall Street Journal earlier in the year to their Thursday article generated pushback from some media outlets, with many pundits claiming Biden’s health was not in decline.
“I think you have a lot of Democrats now, me included, who are pretty sick of the institution and trusting people in the institution and this is just one example, the most recent example, I think of people institutionally lying to the American people and what you’re ultimately going to see,” Roginsky continued. “And I don’t have a problem saying this as a Democrat, is that you’re going to see a tea party version rise up in the Democratic Party based on the fact that this is yet another marker of people just not trusting our leaders anymore. And I’m sorry to say that, but I think we brought this on ourselves.”
Democratic Rep. Adam Smith of Washington told the Wall Street Journal about having difficulty reaching Biden during the disastrous August 2021 pullout from Afghanistan. The only time Smith spoke with Biden directly during Biden’s term in office was after a heated exchange with Secretary of State Antony Blinken.
On multiple occasions during his presidency, Biden has said he spoke with people who had died, including claiming to have spoken with former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, who died in 2017, and former French President Francois Mitterrand, who passed away in 1996. In September 2022, Biden asked for Republican Rep. Jackie Walorski of Indiana at a conference on hunger that took place several weeks after Walorski and two staffers were killed in a car crash.
Biden also has suffered multiple falls during his term in office, including one at the Air Force Academy in June 2023, falling down while on his bike in June 2022 and stumbling on the steps of Air Force One on multiple occasions. Biden now takes a different set of stairs onto the VC-25 used as Air Force One, among other concessions to his age.
-
Business23 hours ago
Senator Introduces Bill To Send One-Third Of Federal Workforce Packing Out Of DC
-
Business2 days ago
Canada needs to get serious about securing its border
-
National13 hours ago
When is the election!? Singh finally commits and Poilievre asks Governor General to step in
-
Alberta2 days ago
Federal taxes increasing for Albertans in 2025: Report
-
International1 day ago
GOP-led House bill allows for future vaccine and mask mandates, international emergency powers
-
COVID-192 days ago
Children who got COVID shots more likely to catch the virus than those who didn’t, study finds
-
Bruce Dowbiggin1 day ago
Hero Or Villain: How Chrystia Freeland Wears Both Masks
-
Business1 day ago
Report Reveals Push to Weaponize AI for Censorship