COVID-19
71% of reported adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccine from just 4.2% of vaccine batches: Danish study
From Dr. John Campbell on YouTube
A report “Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine” by Danish researchers Max Schmeling, Vibeke Manniche, Peter Riis Hansen is shedding light on the number of adverse reactions to specific batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccines.
The researchers note in their report
“Vaccine vials with individual doses are supplied in batches with stringent quality control to ensure batch and dose uniformity.2 Clinical data on individual vaccine batch levels have not been reported and batch-dependent variation in the clinical efficacy and safety of authorized vaccines would appear to be highly unlikely. However, not least in view of the emergency use market authorization and rapid implementation of large-scale vaccination programs, the possibility of batch-dependent variation appears worthy of investigation. We therefore examined rates of SAEs between different BNT162b2 vaccine batches administered in Denmark (population 5.8 million) from 27 December 2020 to 11 January 2022.”
The results of the study are astounding. In certain vaccine batches reported adverse reactions occurred in one out of every twenty shots. Other batches have yet to be associated with any adverse reactions at all. As British health researcher Dr. John Campbell explains, this study could pose very serious questions Pfizer must address.
Viral Vaccine paper
Dr. Campbell’s presentation notes:
Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1…
71% of the suspected adverse reactions occurred in 4.2% of the vaccine batches
Numbers of suspected adverse events (SAEs), after BNT612b2 mRNA vaccination in Denmark.
27 December 2020–11 January 2022, (population 5.8 million)
(According to the number of doses per vaccine batch)
Each dot represents a single vaccine batch.
By 11 November 2022 (European area) 701 million doses of Pfizer given 971,021 reports of suspected adverse effects (SAEs)
Clinical data on individual vaccine batch levels have not been reported (batch-dependent variation in the clinical efficacy and safety of authorized vaccines would appear to be highly unlikely)
We therefore examined rates of SAEs between different BNT162b2 vaccine batches administered in Denmark
Data on all SAE cases, Danish Medical Agency (DKMA) SAE seriousness was classified as non-serious, serious (hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, life-threatening illness, permanent disability or congenital malformation) or SAE-related d****
Anonymized data SAEs were counted on a batch level by linking individual SAEs to the batch label(s) of BNT162b dose(s)
10,793,766 doses administered 4,026,575 persons 52 different BNT162b2 vaccine batches (2,340–814,320 doses per batch)
43,496 SAEs were registered in 13,635 persons 61,847 batch-identifiable SAEs, of which 14,509 (23.5%) were classified as severe, 579 (0.9%) were SAE-related d*****
Unexpectedly Rates of SAEs per 1000 doses varied considerably between vaccine batches
From 1 SAE per 20 doses given to I in many thousands to zero
Variabilities
Vaccine manufacturing
Storage
Transportation
Clinical handling and control
Administration technique
Viral vaccine paper, Dr Vibeke Manniche
2025 Federal Election
Conservatives promise to ban firing of Canadian federal workers based on COVID jab status
From LifeSiteNews
The Conservative platform also vows that the party will oppose mandatory digital ID systems and a central bank digital currency if elected.
Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party’s 2025 election platform includes a promise to “ban” the firing of any federal worker based “solely” on whether or not they chose to get the COVID shots.
On page 23 of the “Canada First – For A Change” plan, which was released on Tuesday, the promise to protect un-jabbed federal workers is mentioned under “Protect Personal Autonomy, Privacy, and Data Security.”
It promises that a Conservative government will “Ban the dismissal of federal workers based solely on COVID vaccine status.”
The Conservative Party also promises to “Oppose any move toward mandatory digital ID systems” as well as “Prohibit the Bank of Canada from developing or implementing a central bank digital currency.”
In October 2021, the Liberal government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced unprecedented COVID-19 jab mandates for all federal workers and those in the transportation sector. The government also announced that the unjabbed would no longer be able to travel by air, boat, or train, both domestically and internationally.
This policy resulted in thousands losing their jobs or being placed on leave for non-compliance. It also trapped “unvaccinated” Canadians in the country.
COVID jab mandates, which also came from provincial governments with the support of the federal government, split Canadian society. The shots have been linked to a multitude of negative and often severe side effects, such as death, including in children.
Many recent rulings have gone in favor of those who chose not to get the shots and were fired as a result, such as an arbitrator ruling that one of the nation’s leading hospitals in Ontario must compensate 82 healthcare workers terminated after refusing to get the jabs.
Beyond health concerns, many Canadians, especially Catholics, opposed the injections on moral grounds because of their link to fetal cell lines derived from the tissue of aborted babies.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
As millions of Americans anxiously await action from the new HHS leadership against the COVID-19 mRNA injections—injected into over 9 million children this year—Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has finally gone publicly on the offensive:
Let’s go over each key point made by RFK Jr.:
The recommendation for children was always dubious. It was dubious because kids had almost no risk for COVID-19. Certain kids that had very profound morbidities may have a slight risk. Most kids don’t.
In the largest review to date on myocarditis following SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. COVID-19 vaccination, Mead et al found that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not only significantly more common but also more severe—particularly in children and young males. Our findings make clear that the risks of the shots overwhelmingly outweigh any theoretical benefit:
 |
The OpenSAFELY study included more than 1 million adolescents and children and found that myocarditis was documented ONLY in COVID-19 vaccinated groups and NOT after COVID-19 infection. There were NO COVID-19-related deaths in any group. A&E attendance and unplanned hospitalization were higher after first vaccination compared to unvaccinated groups:
 |
So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk? We’ve seen huge associations of myocarditis and pericarditis with strokes, with other injuries, with neurological injuries.
The two largest COVID-19 vaccine safety studies ever conducted, involving 99 million (Faksova et al) and 85 million people (Raheleh et al), confirm RFK Jr.’s concerns, documenting significantly increased risks of serious adverse events following vaccination, including:
- Myocarditis (+510% after second dose)
- Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (+278% after first dose)
- Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (+223% after first dose)
- Guillain-Barré Syndrome (+149% after first dose)
- Heart Attack (+286% after second dose)
- Stroke (+240% after first dose)
- Coronary Artery Disease (+244% after second dose)
- Cardiac Arrhythmia (+199% after first dose)
 |
And this was clear even in the clinical data that came out of Pfizer. There were actually more deaths. There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group. We need to ask questions and we need to consult with parents.
Actually, according to the Pfizer’s clinical trial data, there were 43% more deaths in the vaccine group compared to the placebo group when post-unblinding deaths are included:
 |
We need to give people informed consent, and we shouldn’t be making recommendations that are not good for the population.
Public acknowledgment of the grave harms of COVID-19 vaccines signals that real action is right around the corner. However, we must hope that action is taken for ALL age groups, as no one is spared from their life-reducing effects:
Alessandria et al (n=290,727, age > 10 years): People vaccinated with 2 doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during follow-up.
 |
Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.
Police Associations Endorse Conservatives. Poilievre Will Shut Down Tent Cities
Red Deer Justice Centre Grand Opening: Building access to justice for Albertans
Ottawa Confirms China interfering with 2025 federal election: Beijing Seeks to Block Joe Tay’s Election
Pope Francis has died aged 88
Mark Carney Wants You to Forget He Clearly Opposes the Development and Export of Canada’s Natural Resources
Canada’s press tries to turn the gender debate into a non-issue, pretend it’s not happening
Conservatives promise to ban firing of Canadian federal workers based on COVID jab status
-
Alberta2 days agoGovernments in Alberta should spur homebuilding amid population explosion
-
International2 days agoHistory in the making? Trump, Zelensky hold meeting about Ukraine war in Vatican ahead of Francis’ funeral
-
Alberta2 days agoLow oil prices could have big consequences for Alberta’s finances
-
2025 Federal Election2 days agoCarney’s budget is worse than Trudeau’s
-
Business2 days agoIt Took Trump To Get Canada Serious About Free Trade With Itself
-
C2C Journal1 day ago“Freedom of Expression Should Win Every Time”: In Conversation with Freedom Convoy Trial Lawyer Lawrence Greenspon
-
Opinion1 day agoCanadians Must Turn Out in Historic Numbers—Following Taiwan’s Example to Defeat PRC Election Interference
-
2025 Federal Election16 hours agoColumnist warns Carney Liberals will consider a home equity tax on primary residences