Crime
Edmonton Police release suspect images connected to Tuesday homicide

The Edmonton Police Service is releasing images of a male suspect alleged to be responsible for the death of a 42-year-old male in northeast Edmonton early Tuesday morning.
Homicide Section investigators are seeking the publicās assistance in locatingĀ Matthew Leonard Dawson Campeau, 24.
CampeauĀ isĀ wanted in connection to the murder of a 42-year-old male, which occurred at approximately 12:40 a.m. Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2019, at a residence near Belmont Park in northeast Edmonton.
Autopsy results released by the Edmonton Medical Examiner this morning confirm the 42-year-old male died from a gun-shot wound, and the manner of death is homicide.
Homicide investigators believeĀ CampeauĀ may still be in the Edmonton area. He is considered to be armed and dangerous and should not be approached.
CampeauĀ is described as being a Caucasian male,Ā 6ā2ā, brown eyes, short black hair and weighs approximately 186 pounds. He also has a tattoo of an arrow on his left hand.

Matthew Leonard Dawson Campeau, 24
Investigators are urging anyone with information regarding the whereabouts ofĀ CampeauĀ to contact the EPS at 780-423-4567 or #377 from a mobile phone. Anonymous information can also be submitted to Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-8477 or online atĀ www.tipsubmit.com/start.htm.
Background:
Northeast Division patrol officers responded to a 911 call in connection to shots being fired at a residence near 135 Avenue and 38 Street, at approximately 12:40 a.m., Feb. 26, 2019.
Upon arrival, EPS officers found a deceased male inside the residence. The male is known to police.
Crime
Could the UKās āGrooming Gangsā operate in Canada?

From the Macdonald Laurier Institute
By Raheel Raza
Fear of being labelled a racist prevented UK officials from stopping the mass abuse of women by āgrooming gangs.ā Could the same happen in Canada?
If you asked Canadians what they know about the United Kingdomās āgrooming gangsā the majority would be clueless. So far, the issue has been an exclusively UK based scandal, with limited media coverage.
These so-called āgroomingĀ gangsā sexually exploited hundreds of vulnerable young women and girls across theĀ UKĀ for many years before their activities came to public attention in the early 2010s.Ā In essence, because the perpetrators are largely groups ofĀ British-Pakistani men, the media, law enforcement, and officials failed in their duty to address or publicize the scandal for fear of being accused of racism. This is a truly tragic result of identity politics on a massive scale.
The victims were mostly female and white (although some Asian girls were also targeted). Many victims were underage, some were homeless or living in state childrenās homes. Local social services officials knew many of the girls but stood by as the gangs exploited them ā sometimes for years.
Media reports suggested that local law enforcement also knew some of the perpetrators but waited unreasonably long before making arrests and laying charges. Scores of men in different towns have since been arrested, tried and imprisoned for their actions. But hundreds roam free, even today.
Among the worst cases wereĀ gangsĀ operating in the northern towns of Rotherham and Rochdale, but many others have been exposed around the country over the last decade-and-a-half: Oldham, Oxford, Telford, Peterborough, and others. Ministers and members of the opposition have acknowledged that similarĀ gangsĀ may still be operating.
The story came to international attention recently, due to intervention by Elon Musk, whoĀ tweetedĀ in clear terms about the UKās problems with racial integration. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is now grappling with the re-emergence of this long-running scandal.
GB NewsĀ UKĀ produced one of the most comprehensive and detailed exposes through an investigative documentary featuring exclusive interviews with survivors, whistleblowers, and activists. The documentary explains why the police and authorities have allowed such a significant cover up to persist for so long. There is evidence of a massive cover up by people who had infiltrated into social services, councils and law enforcement.
UKĀ Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips refused a request from Oldham City Council to launch a national inquiry into the issue and instead told the council it should mount a local one itself.Ā But thankfully, UK Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has announced plans for aĀ nationwide reviewĀ and five government-backed local inquiries.
British academic Alexis Jay, a professor of social work and a child protection expert,Ā concluded a multi-yearĀ public inquiryĀ detailingĀ how an organizedĀ gangĀ abused girls as young as 11, trafficking them across the country and even picking them up from childrenās care homes in taxis without any effort to hide what they were doing.
Jay found thatĀ ā1,400 children had been sexually exploited, raped by multiple perpetrators, trafficked across other towns, abducted, beaten, and threatened with guns. Children had even been doused in petrol. Girls as young as 11 had been raped. Those reports a decade ago identified a failure to confront Pakistani heritageĀ gangsĀ and a āwidespread perceptionā that they should ādownplay the ethnic dimensionsā for fear of being seen to be racist.ā
SomeĀ UKĀ Labour politicians previously said that fear of being labelled racist has created a taboo around saying there is a specific ethnicity of men, of Pakistani heritage, participating in sexual exploitation.
Among them is Sarah Champion,Ā who represents of the areas whereĀ groomingĀ gangsĀ operated. She Ā has campaigned consistently on the issue, and recently called for another national inquiry intoĀ groomingĀ gangs, putting more pressure onĀ Prime MinisterĀ Starmer.
Champion wrote an op-ed for aĀ tabloid newspaperĀ in which she stated: āBritain has a problem withĀ BritishĀ Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls. There. I said it. Does that make me a racist? Or am I just prepared to call out this horrifying problem for what it is?ā
Championās statement caused such an outrage ā the Labour Party responded byĀ shunning herĀ ā that she had to retract it from her article.
In 2023, then-Home Secretary Suella Braverman made several comments about the ethnicity of abusers in high-profileĀ gangs. SheĀ said, āthe perpetrators are groups of men, almost allĀ BritishĀ Pakistani.ā She toldĀ the BBCĀ theĀ gangs āoverwhelminglyā consisted of BritishĀ Pakistani males.
Reports first surfaced about the groomer gangs more than a decade earlier. In September 2012,Ā journalist Andrew Norfolk,Ā chief investigative reporter forĀ The Times, publishedĀ an articleĀ based on a police report aboutĀ the extent of the issue. It revealed that networks of mainly British Pakistani men were abusing children in Rotherham āon an unprecedented scale.ā
Law authorities failed to prosecute suspects despiteĀ police and child protection agenciesĀ in Rotherham having had knowledge of these crimes for decades, the newspaper said.
To show that they were engaged, governments and agencies commissioned various reports, but no action was taken. In these reports, the criminals were referred to as āmen of Asian heritageā!
Meanwhile Naz Shah, a Labour MP, retweeted, āThose abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of diversity.ā She later deleted her retweet and unliked the post.
In 2018, I was invited toĀ the UKĀ to give testimony in theĀ House of LordsĀ about the Sharia debate in Ontario. At the time, there was a rising number of Sharia Councils operating inĀ the UKĀ that were depriving many Muslim women of their rights.
During that visit I met a white woman named Toni Bugle. Bugle is founder of MARIAS ā Mothers Against Radical Islam and Sharia. Bugle had been a victim ofĀ gangĀ rape and abuse as a child (not byĀ groomingĀ gangs) so she paid close attention to the stories of victims ofĀ groomingĀ gangs.
Bugle asked me if I would attend a conference that she set up at theĀ UKĀ Parliament where some of theĀ groomingĀ gangĀ victims would tell their stories. She told me she needed a Muslim womanās voice because when she tried to expose the stories, she was called a racist, bigot, and Islamophobe.
At Bugleās conference (which had no media presence) I met some of the rape victims, including Caitlin, Samantha, and Torron. They were scared and insecure and spoke in soft voices, looking around constantly. Some of them showed visible signs of trauma and had bruises on their arms and faces. But they were brave enough to share their stories, which were absolutely horrendous. The shock gave me sleepless nights.
Bugle had also organized a rally outside theĀ BritishĀ Parliament with the victims and I was happy to join her to amplify the victimsā concerns about the authoritiesā failure to stop the abuse.
Bugle told me āI realized that there was a massive issue with Muslim men of predominantly Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnicity targeting predominantly young white working-class girls.āĀ Bugle decided to reach out to the victims to help them and started to hear their stories. She continues to do that to this day:
āI always have my phone near me,ā Bugle says, āThese young girls can and do call me at anytimeā¦ I make myself available. If I had to give a number for how many girls Iāve helped, I would take a guess that via just the phone maybe fifty or sixty and more direct involvement approximately ten or fifteen young women. I have also helped many Muslim women who were facing the trauma of forced marriage and sharia councils ā two of which I introduced at the conference.ā
Hearing this, I was shocked as to why Muslim organizations inĀ UKĀ (especially womenās groups) did not condemn what was happening to their non-Muslim sisters or take any action? Imagine if this was the reverse and happened to Muslim women? All hell would have broken loose!
Bugle said that she had also been contacted by young girls for support. The first girl who reached out, Caitlin Spencer, eventually wrote a book titled,Ā Please, let me go: the horrific true story of a girlās life in the hands of sex traffickers.
From the age of 14, traffickers controlled Caitlin, raped her, and repeatedly sold and passed her on to newĀ gangsĀ across theĀ UK. Her abusers were blatant in their attacks, often collecting her from school or home, to be taken to flats they owned, family homes, or hotels booked for the day.
Please, Let Me GoĀ is Caitlinās shocking story of abuse and survival. She writes, āI was trapped. Iād been raped so many times, abused by hundreds, if not thousands. They could have left every door open, and it would have made no difference. And I always came back ā they always brought me back.ā
Bugle says, āgiven that Caitlin still sees her abusers driving their taxis with impunity and that other victims similarly see perpetrators living freely and intimidating them, what will our government do to bring those perpetrators to justice?ā
Bugle continues, āI have met girls who have been raped, defecated on, urinated on, had children from their abusers and often those children were taken away from these girls by social services. You can imagine the damage that did was devastating for the whole family.ā
Another girl Bugle helped is Sarah, a 15 year old white girl.Ā A journalist for theĀ Daily MailĀ did a story on Sarah:Ā a grooming gang coerced her to marry a gang member who effectively forced her into sex slavery after abducting her in aĀ TescoĀ parking lot in an English suburb. Sarahās captivity lasted for 12 years.
I asked Bugle why they didnāt go to court or the police. She says āsadly they went to the police, who pretty much promised they would deal with what happened ā but also made it very clear it would be ātheir word against the menāā¦ The girls were made to feel they were not believed and it led to the girls just giving upā¦ every time they went to the police and nothing was done the girls would often find themselves beaten by the very men they reported.ā
Bugle says she saw this same trend, of girls and their families not believed by local authorities, occur over and over. The total failure of social services, law enforcement, teachers, and council officers exacerbated the trauma faced by these victims.
In the past eight years, Iāve observed the changing face of Canada, and the picture is eerily similar to the changes Iāve observed in UK. Every time I returned from a trip to the UK, I worried that with a rise in wokeism, political correctness, and DEI policies, a similar situation of abuse could arise in Canada, and that Canadian leaders would likewise remain silent.
The rise in radical Islamist extremism across Europe and the UK is also happening in Canada, while our politicians and institutions refuse to acknowledge this reality. Radical Islamist extremism is directly connected to the behaviour and attitudes of Islamists. They justify their weaponizing ofĀ sexual slavery, disrespect, and dishonouring of non-Muslim women as being in sync with their warped interpretation of the faith. The sexual abuseĀ unleashed by HamasĀ terrorists against innocent Israeli women is a further indication of the ideological mindset of Islamist radicals. For example, ISIS raped and abused Yazidi women ā the irony being that some of the Yazidi women given asylum in the West haveĀ seen their captorsĀ on the streets.
We now see protestors in Canada rallying in favour of a radical Islamist terror organizations with impunity, a weak judicial system where criminals roam the streets on bail days after committing a crime, an influx of mass immigration with a lack of integration, assimilation, and respect for Canadian values, and a hyper focus on identity politics across our political institutions. A worrying thought: All the ingredients that allowed the āgroomingĀ gangsā to operate in the UK are now present in Canada. Canada should learn from the UKās experience before it is too late.
Raheel RazaĀ is President of The Council for Muslims Against Antisemitism and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.
Addictions
āUnscientific and bizarreā: Yet another Toronto addiction physician criticizes Canadaās āsafer supplyā experiment

By Liam Hunt
āIt seems to be motivated by a very small, vocal, and well-connected group of advocatesā says Dr. Michael Lester
Dr. Michael Lester, a Toronto-based addiction physician with 30 years of experience, says Canadaās āsafer supplyā programs are āinherently dangerousā and causing ādystopianā community harms due to widespread fraud.
These programs claim to reduce overdoses and deaths by distributing free addictive drugsātypically 8-milligram tablets of hydromorphone, an opioid as potent as heroināto dissuade addicts from consuming riskier street substances. Yet experts across Canada say recipients regularly divert (sell or trade) their safer supply on the black market to acquire stronger illicit drugs, which then fuels addiction and organized crime.
āI have a couple dozen patients in my practice who were drug-free prior to the advent of safe supply, and theyāve gone back to using opioids in a destructive way because of the availability of diverted hydromorphone,ā said Lester. āEvery single day that I go to work, people tell me theyāre struggling with the temptation not to take diverted safe supply. They donāt want to take it, but they take it anyway just because itās cheap and available.ā
AfterĀ safer supplyĀ programs became widely accessible across Canada in 2020, Lesterās patients reported an influx of 8-milligram hydromorphone tablets on the black market, coinciding with a crash in the drugās street price from $15ā$20 per pill to just $2. He now estimates that 80 percent of his patients struggling with opioid addiction have relapsed due to diverted safer supply, leading some to abandon treatment entirely.
āEven if itās sold at the rock-bottom price of $2 or $3 a pill, a person would make tens of thousands of dollars a year, which would have a tremendous impact on their ability to buy other drugs,ā he explained. āSelling hydromorphone is too tempting not to do it, which keeps them entrenched in the whole world of dealing with opioid users and having opioids in their premises.ā
Subscribe for free to get BTNās latest news and analysis ā or donate to our investigative journalism fund.
Lester said safer supply is evidently āfueling organized crimeā because drug seizures in Ontario now commonly include hydromorphone, āwhich wasnāt happening before.ā He added that some individuals who try these diverted drugs later transition to stronger opioids, such as fentanyl.
In July, for example, the London Police Service announced that seizures of hydromorphone had increased by more than 3,000 percent in the city since 2020. According to London Police Chief Thai Truong, āDiverted safer supply is being resold into our community. Thereās organized drug trafficking at the highest levels of organized crime, and thereās drug trafficking at the street level. Weāre seeing all of it.ā
While Lester acknowledges that safer supply can be useful as a ātreatment of last resort, after traditional treatments have been tried and failed,ā he said it is now being offered immediately to a wide variety of patients, which has ādecimatedā uptake of traditional addiction therapies, such as methadone and Suboxone.
As a result, conventional addiction clinics are now at risk of shutting down, meaning some communities could lose access to gold-standard treatments (i.e., methadone and Suboxone) while highly profitable, but unscientific, safer supply programs take over instead.
Lester said the evidence supporting safer supply is biased and āmisleadingā because, generally speaking, these studies simply interview enrolled patients and ask them to self-report whether they benefit from the programs. He noted that many safer supply researchers are public health academics, not doctors, meaning they lack clinical experience with the communities they study.
āIt seems to be motivated by a very small, vocal, and well-connected group of advocates that has completely changed the landscape in addiction medicine treatment in a very short time,ā he said.
Lester argues that some safer supply researchers seem to purposefully design their study methodologies to favor the programs and disregard systemic harms. He said this flawed science is then propagated by credulous journalists who fail to adequately scrutinize agenda-driven research.
While he personally knows āa couple dozenā colleagues in addiction medicine who regularly express skepticism about safer supply, many have been reluctant to speak out, fearing backlash from activist groups that āterrorizeā critics.
āThe stories are common of people being harassed and insulted on social media. Weāve heard of doctors being threatened [and] dropped from committees because they spoke out.ā
For example, after Lester and his colleagues published two open letters criticizing safer supply in late 2023, they were targeted by a series of articles byĀ Drug Data Decoded, a popular Canadian harm reduction Substack, which compared the doctors to Nazis and eugenicists. The articles were then widely shared on social media by safer supply activists.
Lester recalled an incident in which harm reduction activists targeted a doctorās daughter at her high school in retaliation for her parentās public criticism of safer supply.
āItās just something that seems so unscientific and so bizarre in medicine,ā he said. āPhysicians just arenāt used to a powerful political lobby changing a treatment protocol.ā
After Lester and more than a dozen of his colleagues wrote several public letters calling for reform and requested a meeting with Yaāara Saks, the federal Minister of Mental Health and Addictions, they found themselves āsidelined and ignored.ā
After months of delays, they were able to present their clinical observations to Saks, only to have her disregard them and incorrectly claim, weeks later, that criticism of safer supply is rooted in āfear and stigma.ā
āThe insults arenāt a big enough consequence to keep me from speaking my mind,ā he declared.
After a short reflection, he then added, āIf anyone doesnāt have a stigma against this population, itās me. Iāve dedicated my life to helping them.ā
Liam HuntĀ is a Canadian writer and journalist with an interest in humanism, international affairs, and crime and justice. This story is produced by the Centre For Responsible Drug Policy’s “Experts Speak Up” series in partnership with the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.
Ā Our content is always free ā but if you want to help us commission more high-quality journalism,
consider getting a voluntary paid subscription.
-
National2 days ago
War against the US? Chrystia Freeland says Canada, allies need to build āNew World Orderā to combat Trump
-
Opinion1 day ago
Liberal leadership race guarantees Canadian voters will be guided by a clown show for a while yet
-
Business2 days ago
Taxpayers launching court fight against CBC transparency
-
Business2 days ago
Elon Musk: āIām getting a lot of death threatsā due to DOGE
-
Crime1 day ago
Could the UKās āGrooming Gangsā operate in Canada?
-
Courageous Discourse22 hours ago
Zelensky Met with Dems Before He Met President Trump
-
Alberta2 days ago
Can Trump Revive The Keystone Pipeline?
-
Alberta2 days ago
Alberta Coordinating law enforcement to fight fentanyl