Great Reset
Don’t celebrate yet: The WHO could still sneak the pandemic treaty through a back door
Dr Tedros Ghebreyesus of the World Health Organization
From LifeSiteNews
Several nations, including the United States, have proposed a Resolution, the effect of which would be that the WHO will continue to negotiate the proposed Amendments to the IHR throughout this week, to be voted upon by the end of the week.
Negotiations to finalize both the proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations and the new Pandemic Treaty stalled on Friday May 24, leading many to claim that the treaty was “dead.” However, the Director General of the World Health Organization, Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus, immediately stated that the negotiations would continue.
Several nations, including the United States, have proposed a Resolution, the effect of which would be that the WHO will continue to negotiate the proposed Amendments to the IHR throughout this week, to be voted upon by the end of the week.
RELATED: Canadian MP warns new WHO pandemic treaty may enshrine COVID-era freedom restrictions
A press release from the WHO makes clear that it wants to finalize the Amendments to the International Health Regulations by June 1.
Reggie Littlejohn, Co-Founder of the Sovereignty Coalition and President of Anti-Globalist International, traveled to Geneva for the World Health Assembly. She stated:
Negotiating Amendments to the International Health Regulations during the meeting of the World Health Assembly, to be disclosed the day of the vote on those amendments, is a flagrant violation of IHR Article 55, which requires that all proposed amendments be circulated in their final form four months in advance of a vote. The intent of Article 55 is to give national governments and civil society time to review the proposed changes and analyze their impact. The fact that the World Health Organization is willing to violate its own laws and regulations so flagrantly indicates their disdain for the rule of law. If they are willing to toss even their own procedural safeguards out the window, why should we expect them to honor the laws of our nation?
Littlejohn continued: “Beyond this, we have no idea what they are planning to add to the IHRs, as they are negotiating them this week in a black box. Will they try to inject problematic provisions of the Pandemic Treaty – provisions that could damage our national sovereignty and personal medical freedom – into the IHRs, so that they can get them passed by consent rather than putting them to the rigorous 2/3 majority vote required by a treaty? We must do everything we can to stop this vote on Friday!”
By Ken Macon
Digital ID systems risk becoming massive vulnerabilities in the face of modern cyber threats.
Ukraine’s reliance on its new digital identity systems has become a warning about the dangers of digital ID, as a recent cyberattack exposed critical vulnerabilities in the country’s digital infrastructure.
Last month, several key government databases were taken offline, disrupting essential services like legal filings and marriage registrations. Officials assured citizens that the controversial Diia, the government’s widely used e-governance app, would soon be restored, but the incident laid bare significant risks within the app’s centralized backend platform, Trembita.
This breach, the most serious since Trembita’s launch in 2020, raises urgent questions about the security of Ukraine’s growing dependence on digital IDs and is a clear warning to other countries that are rushing to embrace the controversial tech.
Trembita, the platform enabling Diia’s operations, functions as a digital network connecting government databases. While officials insisted it operated as designed during the breach, cybersecurity experts are sounding alarms.
Mykyta Knysh, a former Ukrainian security official, described the platform’s centralized architecture as a dangerous “single point of failure.” Warnings about these risks had surfaced before — security analysts cautioned in 2021 that consolidating sensitive personal and administrative data under Diia would leave Ukraine exposed to large-scale attacks.
The Russian hacking group XakNet has claimed responsibility for the attack.
This highlights a broader danger inherent in Ukraine’s ambitious digitalization efforts, spearheaded by the Ministry of Digital Transformation under the Zelensky administration.
While consolidating government services into the smartphone-based Diia app has streamlined access for millions of citizens, the breakneck pace of implementation has left little time to address critical security gaps.
The compromised registries contained highly sensitive data, including personal addresses, family connections, and financial assets.
Beyond military implications, the breach exposes the inherent risks of digital ID systems. Security analysts have pointed out that a central repository of personal data, as seen in Ukraine’s system, creates lucrative targets for hackers. If exploited, such data could fuel identity theft, phishing campaigns, or even more devastating cyberattacks, undermining public trust in digital governance.
If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.
PayPal’s internal documents reveal a politically charged decision-making process behind Covid-era account closures.
|
It seemed pretty obvious as it was happening – but now there appears to be proof that PayPal was punishing users for their Covid-era speech that didn’t align with official narratives.
One of the critics of pandemic mandates that got “debanked” is UsForThem founder Molly Kingsley, who has been told by PayPal that her account got frozen because it was used to receive donations, and that was found to be outside the payment giant’s “acceptable use” rules. The parent campaign group and Kingsley were vocal critics of obligatory Covid vaccination of children, forcing them to wear face masks, as well as school closures. And now PayPal has spelled it out. The Telegraph reported the account was terminated because of “content published by UsForThem relating to mandatory Covid-19 vaccinations and school closures.” PayPal had to reinstate the account less than a month after it was shut down in September 2022 because UK’s financial regulator FCA intervened. This was not the only account targeted, that belonged to groups and individuals opposed to Covid restrictions, but when they got shut down, PayPal chose not to officially explain why. Among those affected was Toby Young, a free speech advocate who’s Daily Skeptic blog was critical of Covid mandates, as well as lawyers gathered in the Law or Fiction group who shared similar views, and said that depriving them of access to their money on PayPal was a China-style “blatant assault on free speech.” The information PayPal has come out with now regarding UsForThem and Kingsley was revealed in (legal) pre-action phase documents, which also show that the company spent four months leading up to the September 2022 account freeze putting together “a dossier of information about Kingsley.” That dossier included quotes from her book, The Children’s Inquiry. Around the same time, the UK’s Counter Disinformation Unit – known for trying to suppress speech about lockdowns that was skeptical of the official line – was carrying out surveillance of Kingsley’s social media activity. PayPal is now refusing to comment on what it calls “individual customer accounts” but the company claims its approach is objective and not politics-driven. However, Kingsley believes that PayPal “appears to have admitted what we had suspected all along: that it was engaged in politically motivated debankings of those of us who criticized the government’s response to Covid, and the lockdown narrative in particular.” “For more than two years, PayPal has resisted my efforts to uncover what happened,” the campaigner added. |
If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.
|
You subscribe to Reclaim The Net because you value free speech and privacy. Each issue we publish is a commitment to defend these critical rights, providing insights and actionable information to protect and promote liberty in the digital age.
Despite our wide readership, less than 0.2% of our readers contribute financially. With your support, we can do more than just continue; we can amplify voices that are often suppressed and spread the word about the urgent issues of censorship and surveillance. Consider making a modest donation — just $5, or whatever amount you can afford. Your contribution will empower us to reach more people, educate them about these pressing issues, and engage them in our collective cause. Thank you for considering a contribution. Each donation not only supports our operations but also strengthens our efforts to challenge injustices and advocate for those who cannot speak out.
Thank you.
|
Canadian Court Upholds Ban on Clearview AI’s Unconsented Facial Data Collection
Trump Takes Over and Implements Communication Freeze at HHS, CDC, and NIH
World Economic Forum pushes digital globalism that would merge the ‘online and offline’
Emails obtained by CHD reveal government’s failure to monitor COVID vaccine injury reports
-
Artificial Intelligence2 days agoEveryone is freaking out over DeepSeek. Here’s why
-
Artificial Intelligence1 day agoDeepSeek: The Rise of China’s Open-Source AI Amid US Regulatory Shifts and Privacy Concerns
-
Economy2 days agoNewly discovered business case for Canadian energy could unleash economic boom
-
espionage1 day agoDemocracy Betrayed, The Scathing Truth Behind Canada’s Foreign Interference Report
-
Business2 days agoInstead of competing, Ontario’s Ford plans to spend billions to stimulate growth
-
Alberta1 day agoAlberta health ministry to ‘consider’ report calling for end to COVID shots for healthy kids
-
International1 day agoElon Musk calls for laws ‘short enough to be understandable by a normal person’
-
John Stossel2 days agoOne Year, Big Results! How Javier Milei Freed Markets, and Reduced Inflation