Economy
Deputy PM Chrystia Freeland irks Canadian senators with request to pass budget bill sight unseen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54c74/54c7489425b043392f623c25836d33188b6c0fa2" alt=""
From LifeSiteNews
One senator called it ‘an embarrassment’ to be asked to vote on a bill without reading it.
Many Canadian senators were furious after Finance Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland asked them to pass the Liberal governmentās 2024 budget bill without reading it.
Last Friday, senate managers had asked for approval to spend an additional $8.9 billion without the actual text of the bill being available to view.
Senator Patti LaBoucane-Benson, who serves as the cabinetās legislative deputy in the Senate, tried to brush off the notion of the cabinetās failure to publish the billās full text, saying it was a āHouse of Commons problem.ā
However, Senator Elizabeth Marshall said, āYou need the bill to vote on it,ā adding, āI havenāt seen the bill.ā
āItās not posted. I donāt know how we can vote on a bill that we havenāt seen,ā the senator said.
Last Thursday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeauās 2024 budget bill was passed by the House of Commons in less than 10 minutes. It was then sent to the Senate.
Senator Donald Plett said that it was āan embarrassmentā to have been asked to vote on a ābill I havenāt seen,ā adding, that senators āneed to get a copy of the bill so we know what weāre voting on.ā
Senator Denise Batters observed that when it comes to having been asked to vote on a bill of which the text was not even made available, āThis is not the first time this sort of thing has happened.ā
Indeed, in 2020 at the start of the COVID crisis, spending bills were passed using special powers by the Trudeau government without the text ever being made available until after the laws were passed. Trudeauās cabinet then used the special powers to spend an extra $350 billion by March 31, 2020.
As for Freeland, she has deep connections to the globalist group behind the socialistĀ āGreat Resetā agenda headed by Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum (WEF).
Freeland, currentlyĀ servingĀ as a member of the WEF Board of Trustees,Ā attended aĀ WEF meeting in January and participated in a public panel on Ukraine.
The ties between the WEF and the Trudeau Liberals run deep. Schwab once told Freeland that he has ācountedā on her to make sure hisĀ globalist goalsĀ see the light of day.
Business
Worst kept secretāred tape strangling Canadaās economy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e0f5/5e0f52b80defc7d9e489df94188a8f13eed4e3f9" alt=""
From the Fraser Institute
By Matthew Lau
In the past nine years, business investment in Canada has fallenĀ while increasing more than 30 per cent in the U.S. on a real per-person basis. Workers in Canada now receiveĀ barely halfĀ as much new capital per worker than in the U.S.
According to a new Statistics CanadaĀ report, government regulation has grown over the years and itās hurting Canadaās economy. The report, which uses a regulatory burden measure devised by KPMG and Transport Canada, shows government regulatory requirements increased 2.1 per cent annually from 2006 to 2021, with the effect of reducing the business sectorās GDP, employment, labour productivity and investment.
Specifically, the growth in regulation over these years cut business-sector investment by an estimated nine per cent and āreduced business start-ups and business dynamism,ā cut GDP in the business sector by 1.7 percentage points, cut employment growth by 1.3 percentage points, and labour productivity by 0.4 percentage points.
While the report only covered regulatory growth through 2021, in the past four years an avalanche of new regulations has made the already existing problem of overregulation worse.
The Trudeau government in particular hasĀ intensified its regulatory assaultĀ on the extraction sector with a greenhouse gas emissions cap, new fuel regulations and new methane emissions regulations. In the last few years, federal diktats and expansions of bureaucratic control have swept theĀ auto industry,Ā child care,Ā supermarketsĀ and manyĀ other sectors.
Again, the negative results are evident. Over the pastĀ nine years, Canadaās cumulative real growth in per-person GDP (an indicator of incomes and living standards) has been a paltry 1.7 per cent and trending downward, compared to 18.6 per cent and trending upward in the United States. Put differently, if the Canadian economy had tracked with the U.S. economy over the past nine years, average incomes in Canada would be much higher today.
Also in the past nine years, business investment in Canada hasĀ fallenĀ while increasing more than 30 per cent in the U.S. on a real per-person basis. Workers in Canada now receiveĀ barely halfĀ as much new capital per worker than in the U.S., and only about two-thirds as much new capital (on average) as workers in other developed countries.
Consequently, Canada is mired in anĀ economic growth crisisāa fact that even the Trudeau government does not deny. āWe have more work to do,āĀ saidĀ Anita Anand, then-president of the Treasury Board, last August, āto examine the causes of low productivity levels.ā The Statistics Canada report, if nothing else, confirms what economists and the business community alreadyĀ knewāthe regulatory burden is much of the problem.
Of course, regulation is not the only factor hurting Canadaās economy. Higher federalĀ carbon taxes, higherĀ payroll taxesĀ and higherĀ top marginal income tax ratesĀ are also weakening Canadaās productivity, GDP, business investment and entrepreneurship.
Finally, while the Statistics Canada report shows significant economic costs of regulation, the authors note that their estimate of the effect of regulatory accumulation on GDP is āmuch smallerā than the effect estimated in an AmericanĀ studyĀ published several years ago in theĀ Review of Economic Dynamics. In other words, the negative effects of regulation in Canada may be even higher than StatsCan suggests.
Whether Statistics Canada has underestimated the economic costs of regulation or not, one thing is clear: reducing regulation and reversing the policy course of recent years would help get Canada out of its current economic rut. The country isĀ effectively in a recessionĀ even if, as a result of rapid population growth fuelled by record levels of immigration, the GDP statistics do not meet the technical definition of a recession.
With dismal GDP and business investment numbers, a turnaroundāboth in policy and outcomesācanāt come quickly enough for Canadians.
Business
āOut and out fraudā: DOGE questions $2 billion Biden grant to left-wing āgreen energyā nonprofit`
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1217/d1217cc6791eba64eff5099600b484dedaa9e99c" alt=""
From LifeSiteNews
The EPA under the Biden administration awarded $2 billion to a āgreen energyā group that appears to have been little more than a means to enrich left-wing activists.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Biden administration awarded $2 billion to a āgreen energyā nonprofit that appears to have been little more than a means to enrich left-wing activists such as former Democratic candidate Stacey Abrams.
Founded in 2023 as a coalition of nonprofits, corporations, unions, municipalities, and other groups,Ā Power Forward Communities (PFC) bills itself as āthe first national program to finance home energy efficiency upgrades at scale, saving Americans thousands of dollars on their utility bills every year.ā It says it āwill help homeowners, developers, and renters swap outdated, inefficient appliances with more efficient and modernized options, saving money for years ahead and ensuring our kids can grow up with cleaner, pollutant-free air.ā
The organizationāsĀ websiteĀ boasts more than 300 member organizations across 46 states but does not detail actual activities. It does have job postings for three open positions and a form for people to sign up for more information.
The Washington Free BeaconĀ reportedĀ that the Trump administrationās Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) project, along with new EPA administrator Lee Zeldin, are raising questions about the $2 billion grant PFCĀ receivedĀ from the Biden EPAās National Clean Investment Fund (NCIF), ostensibly for the āaffordable decarbonization of homes and apartments throughout the country, with a particular focus on low-income and disadvantaged communities.ā
PFCās announcement of the grant is the organizationās only press release to date and is alarming given that the organization had somehow reported only $100 in revenue at the end of 2023.
āI made a commitment to members of Congress and to the American people to be a good steward of tax dollars and Iāve wasted no time in keeping my word,ā Zeldin said. āWhen we learned about the Biden administrationās scheme to quickly park $20 billion outside the agency, we suspected that some organizations were created out of thin air just to take advantage of this.ā Zeldin previously announced the Biden EPA had deposited the $20 billion in a Citibank account, apparently to make it harder for the next administration to retrieve and review it.
āAs we continue to learn more about where some of this money went, it is even more apparent how far-reaching and widely accepted this waste and abuse has been,ā he added. āItās extremely concerning that an organization that reported just $100 in revenue in 2023 was chosen to receive $2 billion. Thatās 20 million times the organizationās reported revenue.ā
Daniel Turner, executive director of energy advocacy group Power the Future, told the Beacon that in his opinion āfor an organization that has no experience in this, that was literally just established, and had $100 in the bank to receive a $2 billion grant ā it doesnāt just fly in the face of common sense, itās out and out fraud.ā
Prominent among PFCās insiders is Abrams, the former Georgia House minority leader best known forĀ persistent false claims about having the stateās gubernatorial election stolen from her in 2018. Abrams founded two of PFCās partner organizations (Southern Economic Advancement Project and Fair Count) and serves as lead counsel for a third group (Rewiring America) in the coalition. A longtime advocate of left-wing environmental policies, Abrams is also a member of the national advisory board for advocacy group Climate Power.
DOGE is currently conducting a thorough review of federal executive-branch spending for the Trump administration, efforts that left-wing activists are challenging in court. The official DOGE website currentlyĀ claims creditĀ for a total estimated savings of $55 billion.
-
Indigenous21 hours ago
Trudeau govāt to halt funds for āunmarked gravesā search after millions spent, no bodies found
-
Censorship Industrial Complex2 days ago
Bipartisan US Coalition Finally Tells Europe, and the FBI, to Shove It
-
Business2 days ago
Federal Heritage Minister recommends nearly doubling CBC funding and reducing accountability
-
Business1 day ago
Argentinaās Javier Milei gives Elon Musk chainsaw
-
International1 day ago
Jihadis behead 70 Christians in DR Congo church
-
Business20 hours ago
Apple removes security feature in UK after govāt demands access to user data worldwide
-
Addictions1 day ago
BC overhauls safer supply program in response to widespread pharmacy scam
-
Business2 days ago
New climate plan simply hides the costs to Canadians