Connect with us

espionage

CNN warns angry deep state workers might sell U.S. secrets out of spite

Published

4 minute read

MXM logo MxM News

Quick Hit:

CNN has raised alarms about potential risks to national security if President Donald Trump moves forward with plans to reduce staffing in intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA. The report suggests that disgruntled employees could be tempted to sell state secrets if they are fired, highlighting the delicate balance between maintaining national security and trimming government bureaucracy.

Key Details:

  • CNN’s report warns that mass firings at the CIA could make dismissed employees prime targets for foreign intelligence recruitment.
  • The article relies heavily on anonymous sources, raising concerns about credibility and journalistic standards.
  • Critics argue that if employees are willing to sell secrets out of resentment, they shouldn’t be trusted with sensitive information in the first place.

Diving Deeper:

CNN’s recent article,Ā ā€œHow Trumpā€™s Government-Cutting Moves Risk Exposing the CIAā€™s Secrets,ā€ suggests thatĀ reducing the workforce at the CIA could have severe national security implications. According to the report, current and former intelligence officials are concerned that dismissed employees may become vulnerable to recruitment by foreign adversaries such as China or Russia. The article implies that financially stressed or bitter former employees could sell classified information to the highest bidder, potentially jeopardizing U.S. intelligence operations.

The report, written by Katie Bo Lillis, Phil Mattingly, Natasha Bertrand, and Zachary Cohen, relies heavily on unnamed sources, citing ā€œcurrent and former US officials familiar with internal deliberations.ā€ Critics have pointed out that the extensive use of anonymous sourcing raises questions about the report’s reliability and objectivity. In fact, CNN uses unnamed sources 18 times throughout the article, only once attributing a quote to a named individual, Joseph Gioeli of the Fiscal Service.

This narrative raises an uncomfortable question: If intelligence personnel are indeed likely to betray their country over job loss, why are they entrusted with national secrets in the first place? Beth Brelje, writing for The Federalist, argues that if employees have such weak loyalty, they should be removed from sensitive positions immediately. ā€œThose with too little integrity to exit with grace should not be employed in jobs with access to sensitive information,ā€ Brelje writes, highlighting the paradox in CNN’s portrayal of these individuals as both valuable assets and potential security threats.

Critics also suggest that CNN’s coverage reflects a broader media agenda to undermine Trump’s efforts to reform government agencies. By framing standard budget cuts and workforce reductions as national security risks, the narrative portrays Trumpā€™s cost-cutting measures as reckless rather than fiscally responsible. This perspective aligns with concerns that the media is attempting to protect entrenched bureaucracies that have historically served as sources for politically charged leaks.

The implications of this report are significant. If CNNā€™s warnings are accurate, then the integrity and loyalty of the nationā€™s intelligence community must be questioned. On the other hand, if the article is merely speculative propaganda, it raises concerns about the mediaā€™s role in shaping public perception with anonymous claims and vague threats. As President Trump continues to implement government reforms, the question remains: Who truly poses the greater risk to national security ā€” the whistleblowers or the bureaucrats they expose?

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Business

The NSAā€™s Secret Sex Chats

Published on

Ā 

Intelligence officials maintained a chatroom to discuss polyamory and transgender surgeries, internal documents reveal.

The ā€œintelligence communityā€ is one of the most powerful parts of the American national security apparatus. In theory, it works tirelessly to keep the nation safe. But according to internal documents that we obtained, some intelligence agency employees have another on-the-job priority: sex chats.

We have cultivated sources within the National Security Agencyā€”one current employee and one former employeeā€”who have provided chat logs from the NSAā€™s Intelink messaging program. According to an NSA press official, ā€œAll NSA employees sign agreements stating that publishing non-mission related material on Intelink is a usage violation and will result in disciplinary action.ā€ Nonetheless, these logs, dating back two years, are lurid, featuring wide-ranging discussions of sex, kink, polyamory, and castration.

One popular chat topic was male-to-female transgender surgery, which involves surgically removing the penis and turning it into an artificial vagina. ā€œ[M]ine is everything,ā€ said one male who claimed to have had gender reconstruction surgery. ā€œ[I]ā€™ve found that i like being penetrated (never liked it before GRS), but all the rest is just as important as well.ā€ Another intelligence official boasted that genital surgery allowed him ā€œto wear leggings or bikinis without having to wear a gaff under it.ā€

These employees discussed hair removal, estrogen injections, and the experience of sexual pleasure post-castration. ā€œ[G]etting my butthole zapped by a laser was . . . shocking,ā€ said one transgender-identifying intel employee who spent thousands on hair removal. ā€œLook, I just enjoy helping other people experience boobs,ā€ said another about estrogen treatments. ā€œ[O]ne of the weirdest things that gives me euphoria is when i pee, i donā€™t have to push anything down to make sure it aims right,ā€ a Defense Intelligence Agency employee added.

These revelations come at a moment of heightened scrutiny for the intelligence community. President Donald Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard have each made the case that the intelligence agencies have gone ā€œwoke,ā€ prioritizing left-wing activism over national security. These chat logs confirm their suspicions and raise fundamental questions about competence and professionalism.

According to our sources, the sex chats were legitimized as part of the NSAā€™s commitment to ā€œdiversity, equity and inclusion.ā€ Activists within the agency used LGBTQ+ ā€œemployee resource groupsā€ to turn their kinks and pathologies into official work duties. According to the current NSA employee, these groups ā€œspent all day” recruiting activists and holding meetings with titles such as ā€œPrivilege,ā€ ā€œAlly Awareness,ā€ ā€œPride,ā€ and ā€œTransgender Community Inclusion.ā€ And they did so with the full support of NSA leadership, which declared that DEI was ā€œnot only mission critical, but mission imperative.ā€

In this case, ā€œdiversityā€ was not a byword for racialism, but rather a euphemism for sex talk. Last January, chatroom members discussed their practice of polyamory, or ā€œethical non-monogamy.ā€ ā€œ[A] polycule is a polyamorous group,ā€ one employee explained. ā€œA is my [girlfriend], and B-G are her partners. . . . then B&C are dating but not C&D, nor E, F, or G with any of the others, though there are several MWB (metas-with-benefits) connections.ā€ Another employee claimed to be part of a nine-member ā€œpolycule,ā€ adding that ā€œsome of our friends are practically poly-mers, with all the connected compounds.ā€

At other times, the conversations became explicit. The active source at the NSA claimed to have witnessed hundreds of sexually provocative discussions, which, he added, occurred mostly on taxpayer time. The former NSA source who was familiar with the chats recalled being ā€œdisgustedā€ by a particularly shocking thread discussing weekend ā€œgangbangs.ā€

The NSA sources also raised the question of some staffersā€™ mental fitness for the job. In one chat, an NSA employee insists on using ā€œitā€ pronouns in lieu of the human ā€œheā€ or ā€œsheā€ pronouns. ā€œ[I]t/its user here. While I understand we can make some people uncomfortable, keep in mind that the dehumanizing aspect either a) doesnā€™t apply or b) is a positive effect when weā€™re requesting it.ā€ A commenter who disagreed was quickly dismissed by employees of the NSA and CIA, who claimed that refusing to use ā€œit/itsā€ pronouns amounted to ā€œerasingā€ a transgender identity.

ā€œThese are folks with top secret clearances believing they are an IT!ā€ said the NSA source.

With the Trump administration taking over, we may see changes. The NSA source said that staffers involved in employee resource groups fear the end of DEI. ā€œ[T]here are legal restrictions in place, but this admin has shown they donā€™t give a f**k about legality,ā€ a staffer in space intelligence remarked about DEI staffers being placed on leave. Others have expressed opposition to Trumpā€™s cabinet nominees.

A conflict is coming. These NSA chat logs suggest the presence of at least hundreds of gender activists within the intelligence services who cannot distinguish between male and female, and who believe that discussing castration, polyamory, and ā€œgangbangsā€ is an appropriate use of public resources. For psychological and ideological reasons, these kinds of people will not be easily sidelined. The Trump administration should not only dismantle the structure of DEI but also terminate the employees who use it to advance gender activism at the expense of national security.

A guest post by
Hannah Grossman

Hannah is a Member of the World Jewish Congress Diplomatic Corps where she focuses on Holocaust research and education.

Subscribe to Christopher F. Rufo.

For the full experience,Ā upgrade your subscription.

Continue Reading

Digital ID

Wales Becomes First UK Testbed for Citywide AI-Powered Facial Recognition Surveillance

Published on

Wales is that part of the UK the authorities have picked as the testbed for the first citywide deployment of what some consider to currently be the most radical form of mass biometric surveillance in public places – “AI”-powered live facial recognition.
What is likely to be the reason behind the “trial,” privacy campaigners are warning, is the eventual permanent deployment of this type of biometric surveillance throughout the country.
South Wales Police said that Cardiff will be covered by a network of CCTV cameras with facial recognition tech embedded in them, while the excuse is providing security during the international Six Nations rugby event. But the police also characterized the move as “semi-permanent.”
This appears to be a distinction between what the police in the UK have used thus far to carry out surveillance based on live facial recognition: vans with one camera.
The decision to move to position a host of cameras in the central zone of Cardiff makes this a significant expansion of the technique.
And while the police are reassuring citizens that expanding live facial recognition “really enhances” law enforcement’s ability to do their job –Ā  theĀ Big Brother WatchĀ privacy group slammed the move as a “shocking” development and the creation of an “Orwellian biometric surveillance zone.”
And while capturing everyone’s biometric data, and in that way, according to Big Brother Watch’s Senior Advocacy Officer Madeleine Stone, turning Brits into “walking barcodes” and “a nation of suspects” – in terms of solving crime, this is proving to be a waste of public money.
“This network of facial recognition cameras will make it impossible for Cardiff residents and visitors to opt out of a biometric police identity check,” Stone underlined.
And yet, over the three years that live facial recognition has been in use at sporting venues (only) – the use of the technology has not led to any arrests.
“No other democracy in the world spies on its population with live facial recognition in this cavalier and chilling way,” Stone warned, adding, “South Wales Police must immediately stop this dystopian trial.”
The technology works by capturing the faces of every person passing through an area covered, in real time, to then compare them to a database of those described in reports as “wanted criminals.”
However, when South Wales Police spoke about who is on their “watchlist,” it also included people “banned from the area” and those “who pose a risk to the public.”
Continue Reading

Trending

X