Alberta
CEO of Alberta Securities Commission responds to editorial from the Parkland Institute

On Feb. 2, 2022, Todayville Red Deer republished an article entitled Alberta oilpatch may face lending crunch as financial regulators worry about the risks of climate change by Robert L.(Bob) Ascah of The Parkland Institute.
Within this article Mr. Ascah correctly referred to a set of proposed disclosure requirements recently published by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) for public comment. Those proposals would, among other things, call on all reporting issuers to report their greenhouse gas emissions or to explain why not. However, he incorrectly suggested that the Alberta Securities Commission (ASC) would intentionally slow the project down.
I can confirm that the ASC has been at the forefront and is co-leading the CSA’s work on climate change-related disclosure, in collaboration with all other CSA jurisdictions. Our original research and consultation project gave rise to CSA Staff Notice 51-354 Report on Climate change-related Disclosure and subsequent guidance in CSA Staff Notice 51-358 Reporting of Climate Change-related Risks.
The proposed rule, currently out for comment and under consideration, is intended to provide investors with decision-useful information in respect of emissions, governance, strategy and risk management, and is based in large part on the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. The ASC and other CSA regulators are united in our belief that a harmonized approach across the country, and across all industries, is critical to the successful implementation of any rule in this area. No industry will be exempt from its application.
Like other jurisdictions, the ASC has been actively seeking to both inform and engage market participants about this proposed rule. We have held conversations, hosted webinars, published the information and shared it with as many parties as possible. We believe the final rule will be stronger with full engagement and feedback from all parts of our diverse country.
It is worth noting that one of our important industries in Canada, the oil and gas industry, has shown leadership in providing disclosure that responds to increasing investor interest in environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters and has generally expressed support for standardized comparable disclosure.
We are proud to be one of only three jurisdictions in the world to be actively creating a rule that will provide clarity to issuers, regardless of industry, and provide decision-useful information for investors.
Regards,
Stan Magidson
Chair & CEO
Alberta Securities Commission
Alberta
Albertans have contributed $53.6 billion to the retirement of Canadians in other provinces

From the Fraser Institute
By Tegan Hill and Nathaniel Li
Albertans contributed $53.6 billion more to CPP then retirees in Alberta received from it from 1981 to 2022
Albertans’ net contribution to the Canada Pension Plan —meaning the amount Albertans paid into the program over and above what retirees in Alberta
received in CPP payments—was more than six times as much as any other province at $53.6 billion from 1981 to 2022, finds a new report published today by the Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan Canadian public policy think-tank.
“Albertan workers have been helping to fund the retirement of Canadians from coast to coast for decades, and Canadians ought to know that without Alberta, the Canada Pension Plan would look much different,” said Tegan Hill, director of Alberta policy at the Fraser Institute and co-author of Understanding Alberta’s Role in National Programs, Including the Canada Pension Plan.
From 1981 to 2022, Alberta workers contributed 14.4 per cent (on average) of the total CPP premiums paid—Canada’s compulsory, government- operated retirement pension plan—while retirees in the province received only 10.0 per cent of the payments. Alberta’s net contribution over that period was $53.6 billion.
Crucially, only residents in two provinces—Alberta and British Columbia—paid more into the CPP than retirees in those provinces received in benefits, and Alberta’s contribution was six times greater than BC’s.
The reason Albertans have paid such an outsized contribution to federal and national programs, including the CPP, in recent years is because of the province’s relatively high rates of employment, higher average incomes, and younger population.
As such, if Alberta withdrew from the CPP, Alberta workers could expect to receive the same retirement benefits but at a lower cost (i.e. lower payroll tax) than other Canadians, while the payroll tax would likely have to increase for the rest of the country (excluding Quebec) to maintain the same benefits.
“Given current demographic projections, immigration patterns, and Alberta’s long history of leading the provinces in economic growth, Albertan workers will likely continue to pay more into it than Albertan retirees get back from it,” Hill said.
Understanding Alberta’s Role in National Programs, Including the Canada Pension Plan
- Understanding Alberta’s role in national income transfers and other important programs is crucial to informing the broader debate around Alberta’s possible withdrawal from the Canada Pension Plan (CPP).
- Due to Alberta’s relatively high rates of employment, higher average incomes, and younger population, Albertans contribute significantly more to federal revenues than they receive back in federal spending.
- From 1981 to 2022, Alberta workers contributed 14.4 percent (on average) of the total CPP premiums paid while retirees in the province received only 10.0 percent of the payments. Albertans net contribution was $53.6 billion over the period—approximately six times greater than British Columbia’s net contribution (the only other net contributor).
- Given current demographic projections, immigration patterns, and Alberta’s long history of leading the provinces in economic growth and income levels, Alberta’s central role in funding national programs is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future.
- Due to Albertans’ disproportionate net contribution to the CPP, the current base CPP contribution rate would likely have to increase to remain sustainable if Alberta withdrew from the plan. Similarly, Alberta’s stand-alone rate would be lower than the current CPP rate.
Tegan Hill
Director, Alberta Policy, Fraser Institute
Alberta
Alberta Institute urging Premier Smith to follow Saskatchewan and drop Industrial Carbon Tax

From the Alberta Institute
Axe Alberta’s Industrial Carbon Tax
Aside from tariffs, carbon taxes have been the key topic of the election campaign so far, with Mark Carney announcing that the Liberals would copy the Conservatives’ long-standing policy to axe the tax – but with a big caveat.
You see, it’s misleading to talk about the carbon tax as if it were a single policy.
In fact, that’s what the Liberals would like you to think because it helps them hide all the other carbon taxes they’ve forced on Canadians and on the Provinces.
Broadly speaking, there are actually four types of carbon taxes in place in Canada:
- A federal consumer carbon tax
- A federal industrial carbon tax
- Various provincial consumer carbon taxes
- Various provincial industrial carbon taxes
Alberta was actually the first jurisdiction anywhere in North America to introduce a carbon tax in 2007, when Premier Ed Stelmach introduced a provincial industrial carbon tax.
Then, as we all know, the Alberta NDP introduced a provincial consumer carbon tax in 2017.
The provincial consumer carbon tax was short-lived, as the UCP repealed it in 2019.
But, unfortunately, the UCP failed to repeal the provincial industrial carbon tax at the same time.
Worse, by then, the federal Liberals had introduced a federal consumer carbon tax and a federal industrial carbon tax as well!
Flash forward to 2025, and the political calculus has changed dramatically.
Mark Carney might only be promising to get rid of the federal consumer carbon tax, but Pierre Poilievre is promising to get rid of both the federal consumer carbon tax and the federal industrial carbon tax.
This is a clear opportunity, and yesterday, Scott Moe jumped on it.
He announced that Saskatchewan will also be repealing its provincial industrial carbon tax.
Saskatchewan never had a provincial consumer carbon tax, which means that, within just a few weeks, people in Saskatchewan could be paying ZERO carbon tax of ANY kind.
Alberta needs to follow Saskatchewan’s lead.
The Alberta government should immediately repeal Alberta’s provincial industrial carbon tax.
There’s no excuse for our provincial government to continue burdening our industries with unnecessary costs that hurt competitiveness and deter investment.
These taxes make it harder for businesses to thrive, grow, and create jobs, especially when other provinces are taking action to eliminate similar policies.
Premier Danielle Smith must act now and eliminate the provincial industrial carbon tax in Alberta.
If you agree, please sign our petition calling on the Alberta government to Axe Alberta’s Industrial Carbon Tax today:
After you’ve signed, please send the petition to your friends, family, and wider network, so that every Albertan can have their voice heard!
– The Alberta Institute Team
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Poilievre refuses to bash Trump via trick question, says it’s possible to work with him and be ‘firm’
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Poilievre to let working seniors keep more of their money
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Voters should remember Canada has other problems beyond Trump’s tariffs
-
Community2 days ago
Support local healthcare while winning amazing prizes!
-
COVID-192 days ago
17-year-old died after taking COVID shot, but Ontario judge denies his family’s liability claim
-
Daily Caller2 days ago
Cover up of a Department of Energy Study Might Be The Biggest Stain On Biden Admin’s Legacy
-
International2 days ago
Vice President Vance, Second Lady to visit Greenland on Friday
-
Business2 days ago
While “Team Canada” attacks Trump for election points, Premier Danielle Smith advocates for future trade relations