Connect with us

National

Canadians are not buying the ‘climate change’ narrative: government poll

Published

5 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Clare Marie Merkowsky

In-house Privy Council research shows that Canadians are not concerned with ‘climate change,’ despite the constant fear-mongering by the ruling Liberal Party

Government polling reveals that most Canadians are not alarmed over “climate change” and will continue to eat meat. 

According to in-house Privy Council research obtained by Blacklock’s Reporter, over one third of Canadians think “climate change” could benefit Canada while almost half believe that “adapting to the impacts of climate change is cheaper than preventing it.” 

“The purpose of this study is to provide the Privy Council, Department of Environment and Department of Natural Resources with high quality data and information on Canadians’ beliefs, attitudes and behaviour relating to climate change,” the report said. “This includes support for existing and proposed climate policy and programs.”  

The research, which questioned 13,700 Canadians, discovered that climate change is not at the forefront of Canadians’ minds, with many pointing out that prediction models are not accurate, and Canada could actually benefit from climate change.   

The poll found that 35% of Canadians felt that “the impacts of climate change in Canada will be overwhelmingly positive because it is a cold country.” 

Similarly, nearly half of those polled believe that “adapting to the impacts of climate change is cheaper than preventing it.”  

At the same time, 24% believed that most climate models are not accurate in their predictions.   

According to the poll, 27% revealed that they have “never” discussed “climate change or its impacts,” with family or friends. 23% reported that they discussed it “once in the last two months.”  

Similarly, the poll showed Canadians are very much attached to their current diet and are not interested in changing it in the name of “climate change.”

“How frequently or infrequently have you made efforts to eat a more plant-based diet?” the survey questioned, to which 30% said “never,” 25% said “occasionally,” and 19% said “rarely.”  

In Canada,  the dubious”climate change” narrative has been routinely used by the Trudeau government to levy taxes against citizens.

Since taking office in 2015, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government has continued to push a radical environmental agenda like the agendas being pushed by the World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” and the United Nations’ “Sustainable Development Goals.” 

When it comes to so-called man-caused “climate change,” which leftists have been preaching about for years, a June 2017 peer-reviewed study by two scientists and a veteran statistician found that most of the recent global warming data have been “fabricated by climate scientists to make it look more frightening.” 

Meanwhile, Western Canadians involved in oil, gas and manufacturing are routinely attacked by the federal government. However, two court rulings have dealt a blow to Trudeau’s environmental laws, after provinces Alberta and Saskatchewan took on the federal government over laws impacting important industries.

The most recent was when the Federal Court of Canada last November overturned the Trudeau government’s ban on single-use plastic, calling it “unreasonable and unconstitutional.” 

The second ruling comes after Canada’s Supreme Court sided in favor of provincial autonomy when it comes to natural resources. The Supreme Court ruled that Trudeau’s law, C-69, dubbed the “no-more pipelines” bill, is “mostly unconstitutional.” This was a huge win for Alberta and Saskatchewan, which challenged the law in court. The decision returned authority over resource pipelines to provincial governments, meaning oil and gas projects headed up by the provinces should be allowed to proceed without federal intrusion. 

The Trudeau government, however, seems insistent on defying the rulings by pushing forward with its various regulations.  

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Bruce Dowbiggin

Trudeau Unrepentant: Sorry Seems to Be The Hardest Word

Published on

There’s a grim irony in seeing Justin Trudeau leave the country to find people still willing to buy his act. But find them he did in the U.S. media capital of New York where flash-frozen spares like Stephen Colbert or the ladies of The View are still re-living the 2016 presidential election.

Could it be that Justin’s real constituency all along has been these voidoids of Wokeness, not Canadians? Apparently so, judging from the cringeworthy interaction between Canada’s defrocked PM and Colbert. Like mammoths in a tar pit, fatuous Trudeau and fawning Colbert thrashed around in their irrelevance, steering clear of what will be a historic electoral drubbing of Mr. Happy Ways. It’s amazing Colbert didn’t hold Trudeau’s hand during the lovefest.

Colbert’s staff might have come up with multiple lines of questioning on why the former GQ squish is now reviled north of the border. Instead the two re-heated 2015 talking points from when Skippy was elected and Hillary was throwing away the 2016 election to Trump.

There were multiple softballs for a smirking Trudeau, but the PM’s entire detachment from reality could be summed up by a healthcare question pitched by Colbert. (Americans love the Canadian healthcare myth the way Kamala loves a suburban lawn). Trudeau was asked to reflect on the U.S. alternative.

“It would be a lot easier if you guys had universal health care,” he riposted. The self-satisfied grin on Trudeau’s face told us he knows he was among friends in the CBS TV studio. Colbert’s audience of midwits slapped their flippers after Trudeau inserted himself in the current American presidential election. As his Papa once said during the October Crisis: “There’s a lot of bleeding hearts around who don’t like to see people with helmets and guns,” Trudeau remarked jauntily. “All I can say is, go on and bleed…”

Anyone with a shred of journalistic integrity might have replied, “This year, Canadian patients faced a median wait of 27.7 weeks for medically necessary treatment from a specialist after being referred by a general practitioner. That’s over six months—the longest ever recorded. It’s a slight increase from last year’s median wait—and a 198 percent increase from the 9.3-week median wait that patients faced in 1993, the year that Fraser Institute began tracking wait times. But let’s accept it as received that Colbert and the Kamala left are not given to intellectual rigour.

In his new persona as Michael Scott from The Office, Trudeau is the only guy not in on the joke he’s become while wielding power and teddy bears. (Dunning Kruger Effect states that some people are too stupid to know they’re stupid.) Politics can have that effect on those who take themselves just a little too seriously like (checks notes) Justin Trudeau. But Skippy has this syndrome to the Nth degree.

Trudeau makes a convenient avatar for the entire managerial class that sins greatly but uses its privilege to avoid accountability. Watching him slough off the poor clods he represents as PM, Trudeau is as stand-in for every politician and Blob creature who employed, to use one example, Covid to trample all that’s sacred in society without ever having to say sorry.

Sorry for what? 2023 meta-analysis of 40 high-quality studies shows that, despite the apocalyptic predictions off the elites, COVID death rate in 2020 for people younger than 70 was 0.07%. That’s 1-in-1,500. The death rate from COVID for those aged 0-19 years was 0.0003%. That’s 1-in-333,333. This is not a pandemic.

Still, while Skippy hid in the Rideau cottage, federal and provincial health officials churned out specious daily statistics on “positive cases” as justification to shut drown schools, work places and even the beaches. The social cost of grandparents dying alone and children denied schooling was incalculable. When Trump said the death rate from COVID was lower than 3.4 percent, the media angrily accused him of “misinformation.”

When the initial hysteria abated, bully boy Trudeau turned to vaccines to whip the herd. He removed the civil and financial rights of dissenters, incarcerating them in hotels. His followers actively talked of isolating vaccine deniers to work camps while denying them healthcare. When truckers objected he sent in the police on horseback. Because, as Naomi Klein bragged, events like the covid lockdowns are a Once-in-a-Century Chance to Make Our World More Equitable.

In this theatre of the grotesque Trudeau has become the epitome of the Ugly Canadian. As we wrote in the fall of 2015. “The scold impulse is never far from the Canadian id as we stare balefully south at the Excited States. In Canada it’s not so important that we have things such as single-payer health care and non-gun culture as that Americans don’t have them.

Trudeau represents that most vile class of Canadian, those who leap to print to disparage their nation in front of the world. Citing research (as yet unpublished) on attitudes in the Balkans, French Polynesia and Equatorial Guinea toward Canada, we are told that Canada’s reputation as a noble, compassionate nation is now in tatters. In Boy Trudeau’s Gatling-gun delivery, the government’s refusal to bend to the UN secretary general’s dictates has made us a travishamockery in the league of nations. See if Robert Redford ever comes here again.

This is always a rich vein to mine In Canadian politics. In a land that thinks Lester Pearson won the Nobel Peace Prize yesterday, lamenting Canada’s fallen status is considered a political kill shot by the media.” Trudeau embraces the model.

It’s hard to square his unapologetic tough guy with the obsequious Trudeau of the Colbert show. But he knows that as long as there are pandering cretins such as Colbert he doesn’t have to apologize for causing citizens for not taking a for-profit experimental product with manufacturer immunity. His future is assured. Were that Canadians’ futures looked as rosy.

Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster  A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, he’s a regular contributor to Sirius XM Canada Talks Ch. 167. His new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.

Continue Reading

Business

Time to finally privatize Canada Post

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Vincent Geloso

In the 10 years following privatization, prices for stamps and other postal services fell by 11 per cent in Austria, 15 per cent in the Netherlands and 17 per cent in Germany (adjusted for inflation). All these countries now have lower postal prices than the European average.

Canada Post wants to increase the price of a stamp by 25 cents to $1.24 to keep up with inflation and rising costs. But Canada Post has often relied on this reasoning for previous price increases since it stopped being a government department and became a Crown corporation in 1981. Since then, it’s jacked up prices every time it’s had “financial difficulties.”

The source of these difficulties has changed over time. It used to be the modernization of infrastructure, then the problems of pensions, then the rise of the Internet. The answer is, however, always the same. Prices must increase. Indeed, since 1981 stamp prices have increased 98 per cent (after adjusting for inflation). In other words, the price for stamps have increased far beyond the rate of inflation.

Why does Canada Post keep getting away with this?

Because it has a monopoly over most of the letter market in Canada. And while it competes with private companies (UPS, for example) in the parcel market, Canada Post can borrow money at much lower costs than its rivals because it is a Crown corporation ultimately backed by taxpayers. That’s a huge advantage.

Normally, a company facing losses and declining demand would innovate and reduce costs. Otherwise, it would likely be bought out by competitors or go bankrupt. However, due to its monopoly over most of the letter market, Canada Post lacks this incentive. In can simply pass the burden onto consumers by raising prices, which is exactly what it has done since the 1980s. And as a Crown corporation, it cannot be purchased by another company without express approval from Ottawa.

So, what’s the solution?

In Europe, due to a directive from the European Commission, all letters regardless of weight have been open to competition since 2013. The directive does not mandate the privatization of state-owned postal companies; it simply ends postal monopolies. Combined with local liberalization efforts before 2013, this directive has forced state-owned postal service providers to better control costs because they cannot turn to taxpayers (for subsidies) or consumers (by raising prices) to bail them out.

Some countries such as the Netherlands, Austria and Germany went further and privatized their postal operators. With privatization, the discipline of competition is combined with the discipline imposed by shareholders seeking to maximize profits and increase sales.

In the 10 years following privatization, prices for stamps and other postal services fell by 11 per cent in Austria, 15 per cent in the Netherlands and 17 per cent in Germany (adjusted for inflation). All these countries now have lower postal prices than the European average.

Predictably, postal service providers in these countries found new methods of organizing their activities, tying multiple services together to generate economies of scale, and moved fast in adopting new information and logistical technologies. Due to the incentives of competition, providers focused their efforts on controlling costs—a focus Canada Post will never achieve as long as it’s a Crown corporation with a monopoly.

If approved by federal regulators, Canada Post’s latest price increase would go into effect in January. Policymakers in Ottawa should finally put postal liberalization and privatization on the table. Otherwise, it’s only a matter of time before a new problem emerges, which Canada Post will use to justify another price increase.

Continue Reading

Trending

X