Connect with us

National

Canadian nurse fights to keep license after being accused of ‘transphobia’ for affirming biology

Published

5 minute read

Vancouver-area Nurse Amy Hamm

From LifeSiteNews

By Clare Marie Merkowsky

‘I strongly believe that in order for women, like I said, to preserve our privacy, our dignity and most importantly our safety, we deserve and are entitled to sex segregated spaces,’ Amy Hamm said.

A British Columbia nurse is testifying to keep her nursing license after she was accused of “transphobia” for defending women’s rights and spaces.

On November 3, after months of hearings, BC nurse Amy Hamm was given a chance to defend herself from accusations by the BC College of Nurses and Midwives (BCCNM) that she is unfit to work as a nurse because she believes that sex is based on biology.

“The issue isn’t about trans people,” Hamm said, according to the Post Millennial. “The issue is about having sex-segregated spaces that don’t have male bodies. Women have reason to fear male violence, and that is the reason that we got sex-segregated spaces in the first place.”

“But I don’t believe that it should be incumbent upon women to accept males into our sex segregated spaces to protect this particular group of biological males from other biological males,” she continued. “I would support third spaces, that sort of thing. But I strongly believe that in order for women, like I said, to preserve our privacy, our dignity and most importantly our safety, we deserve and are entitled to sex segregated spaces.”

Hamm warned that basing gender on anything other than biology puts women in dangerous situations. She recounted several instances in which violent male criminals were sent to female prisons because they claimed to be women. 

She further revealed that there is only one rape shelter in Canada that is restricted to actual women. The Vancouver Rape Relief had to fight for its right to deny entry to males in the Supreme Court.

“And since then, there have been constant campaigns to have them shut down,” Hamm added. “Trans activists have, in red paint, you know, written ‘TERF’ and other slurs on their building. They’ve had dead rats nailed to their building, because they don’t admit biological males. And the trans activists in Vancouver ran a campaign to have the city of Vancouver remove their city funding from this rape shelter, which the city of Vancouver actually did.” 

During her testimony, which came after she was forced to remain silent for multiple day-long sessions, Hamm revealed that her advocacy for women’s rights has always been separate from her work as a nurse.

Hamm found herself targeted by the BCCNM in 2020 when she co-sponsored a billboard reading, “I [heart] JK Rowling,” referring to the famous British author’s public comments defending women’s washrooms and other private spaces from being used by gender-confused men. 

The BCCNM accused Hamm of making “discriminatory and derogatory statements regarding transgender people [sic]” while identifying herself as a nurse or nurse educator.  

According to the College, Hamm’s statements were “made across various online platforms, including but not limited to podcasts, videos, published writings, and social media,” between July 2018 and March 2021.  

The investigation has been going on for three years, having begun in November 2020. So far, Hamm has appeared before the panel multiple times, including in September 2022 and October 2022, as well as in January and October of this year. The upcoming hearings are scheduled to continue in two blocks of sessions, from October 31 to November 3, and from November 6 to 8.   

Now, she underwent her fourth disciplinary hearing in an attempt to keep her license. Many are pointing to Hamm’s trial as an example of Canada’s ever increasing restrictions on free speech, with the National Post calling the investigation a “witch hunt.” However, Hamm said that the grueling experience has only made her stronger. 

“And through the onslaught of abuse–both from individuals and the BC College of Nurses–the years of legal troubles, the threat of losing everything, becoming a single mother and coming to terms with that fact–I became stronger than I ever imagined I could be,” she posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, after her last hearing.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Addictions

When pleasure becomes pain: How substance use damages the body and brain

Published on

By Alexandra Keeler

Sustained drug use profoundly impacts brain function and physical health, leading to irreversible damage and long-term health risks

On Jan. 3, the US’s top doctor made headlines for recommending that alcoholic drinks include health warnings about their cancer risks. Alcohol consumption is a leading preventable cause of cancer, U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy’s advisory notes.

Murthy’s recommendation comes amidst mounting attention to the health risks of alcohol consumption. In 2023, the World Health Organization sparked controversy when it said “no level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health.”

But all substance use affects the body, sources say, with illegal substances damaging nearly every organ in the body. Yet, the health effects of illegal substances receive relatively little attention.

“If you’ve ever looked at a population of people with substance use disorder [and] compared them to the general population, they would be worse off in terms of their cardiovascular risk,” said Dr. Christopher Labos, a Montreal-based cardiologist and host of The Body of Evidence podcast.

Several confounders

Illicit drugs like fentanyl, heroin and cocaine affect the body in all sorts of ways. But isolating their direct effects can be difficult, experts say, due to the social factors that often accompany addiction.

“People who are suffering from substance use disorder probably have poor nutrition, probably don’t exercise as much,” said Labos.

“Anybody who’s suffering from these problems is going to have several confounders that are going to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease.”

But Labos says cocaine is known to be the most damaging to the heart.

“In terms of which [illegal] substances are directly damaging to the heart, we clearly have a number one winner, and that would be cocaine,” Labos said.

“Cocaine is the one that’s very deliberately going to lead to higher rates of atherosclerosis [thickened artery walls] by increasing your heart rate, increasing your blood pressure and actually having a direct effect on thrombosis, so clogging of the arteries,” he added.

Opioids such as fentanyl and heroin also influence heart activity, Labos says. They lengthen the QT interval — a measure of heart electrical activity — which increases the risk of abnormal heart rhythms and potentially life-threatening cardiac issues.

Brain injury is another significant risk associated with illicit drug use.

Mauricio Garcia-Barrera, a psychology professor at the University of Victoria, says opioids such as fentanyl and heroin cause respiratory depression, leading to oxygen deprivation in the brain that damages brain cells.

“Between one to two minutes [after overdose, before resuscitation], the brain damage can start initiating, and between five minutes of cells in the brain not receiving oxygen, then we have the death of brain cells,” said Garcia-Barrera.

By contrast, stimulants like cocaine accelerate brain aging by damaging neurotransmitters, causing grey matter loss that leads to cognitive decline and impaired decision-making.

 

Our content is always free.

Subscribe to get BTN’s latest news and analysis, or donate to our journalism fund.

Brain changes

Neuropsychologist Carolyn Lemsky is the clinical director of Community Head Injury Resource Services, a Toronto not-for-profit that runs a brain rehabilitation program.

Lemsky says many of her patients want to quit using substances. But habitual drug use alters brain structure and function, making it difficult to quit.

“In people who use opioids and who have a lot of these non-fatal overdoses, their brain changes in many ways,” said Lemsky.

The brain atrophies in critical areas like the hippocampus, the region responsible for memory, and the temporal lobes. Simultaneously, neural pathways linked to habitual behaviour “get a little fatter,” reinforcing addiction.

This rewiring “tilts the brain toward immediate gratification,” Lemsky said. Meanwhile, impairments in the hippocampus diminish the ability to recall the negative consequences of past actions, making recovery even more challenging.

But Lemsky says alcohol remains the most problematic substance for her clients, due to its widespread use.

And while it is a legal substance, alcohol also affects the brain, she says. It leads to cognitive issues like memory and executive functioning problems. Many of her clients develop alcohol-related dementia due to vitamin deficiencies caused by chronic alcohol use.

Cannabis, another legal substance, has also become “more and more problematic” for her clients over the past 15 years, Lemsky says.

“Cannabis also interferes with cognitive functioning,” she said.

According to Health Canada’s 2024 cannabis survey, 80 per cent of Canadians recognize cannabis can be habit-forming and detrimental to youth brain development. Only 71 per cent said they were aware it is linked to mental health issues such as psychosis.

‘Further research is needed’

In a statement to Canadian Affairs, Health Canada said the long-term health consequences of illegal drug use require further study.

“Further research is needed to better understand long-term impacts of opioid-related harms, including the relationship between brain injury and substance use, as well as predisposing factors and long-term effects,” said Marie-Pier Burelle, a media relations advisor for Health Canada.

Lemsky says it is problematic that the Canadian Drugs and Substances Strategy — the government’s framework for addressing substance use-related harms — does not address the known health effects of illegal drugs.

“If you look at the Canada drug strategy, it doesn’t mention brain or cognition once,” she said.

In 2022, NDP MP Alistair MacGregor introduced Bill C-277, a private member’s bill that aims to establish a national strategy on brain injuries. The bill was at the report stage when Parliament was prorogued in early January. Further work on the bill could resume in the next parliamentary session.

“They need a brain injury strategy,” says Lemsky, explaining that cognitive impairment is the leading reason people disengage from medical support services, such as getting treatment for addiction.

“The treatment has too high a cognitive load and isn’t adapted to their needs,” she said. “They can’t manage, and they leave.”


This article was produced through the Breaking Needles Fellowship Program, which provided a grant to Canadian Affairs, a digital media outlet, to fund journalism exploring addiction and crime in Canada. Articles produced through the Fellowship are co-published by Break The Needle and Canadian Affairs.

Our content is always free.

Subscribe to get BTN’s latest news and analysis, or donate to our journalism fund.

Continue Reading

Business

Canada holds valuable bargaining chip in trade negotiations with Trump

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Alex Whalen and Jake Fuss

On the eve of a possible trade war with the United States, Canadian policymakers have a valuable bargaining chip they can play in any negotiations—namely, Canada’s “supply management” system.

During his first day in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump said he may impose “25 per cent” tariffs on Canadian and Mexican exports into the United States on Feb. 1. In light of his resounding election win and Republican control of both houses of congress, Trump has a strong hand.

In response, Canadian policymakers—including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Ontario Premier Doug Ford—have threatened retaliation. But any retaliation (tariffs imposed on the U.S., for example) would likely increase the cost of living for Canadians.

Thankfully, there’s another way. To improve our trade position with the U.S.—and simultaneously benefit Canadian consumers—policymakers could dismantle our outdated system of supply management, which restricts supply, controls imports and allows producers of milk, eggs and poultry to maintain higher prices for their products than would otherwise exist in a competitive market. Government dictates who can produce, what can be produced, when and how much. While some aspects of the system are provincial (such as certain marketing boards), the federal government controls many key components of supply management including import restrictions and national quotas.

How would this help Canada minimize the Trump threat?

In the U.S., farmers backed Trump by a three-to-one margin in the 2024 election, and given Trump’s overall views on trade, the new administration will likely target Canadian supply management in the near future. (Ironically, Trump has cried foul about Canadian tariffs, which underpin our supply management system.) Given the transactional nature of Trump’s leadership, Canadian negotiators could put supply management on the negotiating table as a bargaining chip to counter demands that would actually damage the Canadian economy, such as Trump’s tariffs. This would allow Trump to deliver increased access to the Canadian market for the farmers that overwhelmingly supported him in the election.

And crucially, this would also be good for Canadian consumers. According to a 2015 study, our supply management system costs the average Canadian household an estimated extra $300 to $444 annually, and higher prices hurt lower-income Canadians more than any other group. If we scrapped supply management, we’d see falling prices at the grocery store and increased choice due to dairy imports from the U.S.

Unfortunately, Parliament has been moving in the opposite direction. Bill C-282, which recently passed in the House of Commons and is now before the Senate, would entrench supply management by restricting the ability of Canadian trade negotiators to use increased market access as a tool in international trade negotiations. In other words, the bill—if passed—will rob Canadian negotiators of a key bargaining chip in negotiations with Trump. With a potential federal election looming, any party looking to strengthen Canada’s trade position and benefit consumers here at home should reject Bill C-282.

Trade negotiations in the second Trump era will be difficult so our policymakers in Ottawa and the provinces must avoid self-inflicted wounds. By dismantling Canada’s system of supply management, they could win concessions from Team Trump, possibly avert a destructive tit-for-tat tariff exchange, and reduce the cost of living for Canadians.

Alex Whalen

Director, Atlantic Canada Prosperity, Fraser Institute

Jake Fuss

Director, Fiscal Studies, Fraser Institute
Continue Reading

Trending

X