Dan McTeague
Call out ‘net zero’ for what it is, a scam

From Canadians for Affordable Energy
Net Zero emissions by 2050. Have you heard this line? It is increasingly hard to miss. Every trendy business, bank, corporation and government boasts about their commitment to it. But what exactly do they mean by it?
In short, Net Zero by 2050 means our country either emits no greenhouse gases or offsets whatever it does emit through measures such as buying carbon credits or investing in carbon capture technology.
Net Zero has been a central project of groups such as the World Economic Forum, the United Nations and other globalist institutions. Theyāve spent the past several years pressuring governments around the world to commit to Net Zero and to make those commitments legally binding, so it will be difficult for elected officials to roll them back in the future.
Thatās whatās happening here in Canada. This has been a major priority for Justin Trudeau. The Liberals have spent years championing the push to Net Zero,Ā mandating it by law in 2021.
But law or not, Net Zero isnāt actually going to happen.
It is a ludicrous goal, in part because achieving it would be unimaginably expensive. So expensive, in fact, governments the world over donāt even attempt to estimate the total cost. Whenever theyāre asked, they just say āthe cost of doing nothing will be higher.ā But if they donāt know how expensive their own plan is, how on earth could they know that it would be cheaper than not doing it?
External estimates place the cost for Canada alone somewhere in the neighborhood of $2 trillion. That number is so staggering it is impossible to fully comprehend it. It is more than our nationās entire Gross Domestic Product! Look at it this way ā that is the equivalent of spending $1 a second for 63,417 YEARS.
But the fact Net Zero will ultimately fail doesnāt mean attempting it isnāt going to negatively affect your daily life. It will.
Under the umbrella of Net Zero youāll find,
- Carbon taxes
- Clean Fuel Standards
- Just Transition
- Emissions caps
- Cancelled pipelines
- Electrification strategies
- Gas and diesel car bans
- Electric vehicle subsidies
- Costly building codes
- Curtailed food production
The list goes on and on.
But beyond the economic impact and the personal hardship, we must remember the end game of this Green Agenda isnāt really about reducing carbon emissions. No, it is much more insidious than that.
At the heart of this Net Zero movement is a desire to fundamentally change our economy and way of life. They are looking for a complete transition from the economy that has made Canada the great nation that it is.
āYou will own nothing and be happy.ā Remember those words attributed to Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum (WEF)? Well take those words to heart, because he means it.
The implications of Net Zero are broad and overreaching. And they will have the effect of fundamentally affecting our quality of life.
It will make energy more expensive. It will raise the cost of everything. It will make us less competitive in the global economy, especially against countries such as China because, you will not be surprised to learn, China has not signed on to this suicide pact. (But they are keen for other countries to stifle their economy in pursuit of this absurd goal, not least because they produce 70% of the worldās solar panels.)
Net Zero regulations, policies and mandates are a direct assault on affordable energy, and an affordable way of life. That is the goal of the Green agenda, and if they have their way, Canada, its standard of living and its way of life will suffer.
Net Zero is a scam.
Dan McTeague is President of Canadians for Affordable Energy
2025 Federal Election
When it comes to pipelines, Carneyās words flow both ways

Ā Dan McTeague
Well, youāve got to hand it to Mark Carney. Though heās only just entered politics ā after years of flirting with the idea, while serving on Team Trudeau behind-the-scenes ā and despite the fact that he hasnāt been elected to anything yet, heās become well versed in the ancient political art of speaking out of both sides of his mouth. Like many men seeking high office before him, Carney is happy to say to whoever happens to be in front of him whatever he thinks they want to hear, even if it contradicts what he said to someone else the day before.
Of course, that isnāt so easy to pull off these days. Nowadays pretty much everything a politician says in public is going to pop up on the internet within hours. Which is why itās been so easy to keep tabs on Carneyās policy flip-flopping.
For just the latest example, last week in Calgary Carney opened his pitch to a sceptical province by saying, āYou donāt need to tell me what Alberta is like. Iām from Alberta!ā He proclaimed that āCanada has a tremendous opportunity to be the worldās leading energy superpower,ā and that āwe must invest in our natural strengths and ensure our economic sovereignty!ā He promised to āidentify projects of national interest,ā and fast-track them, while acknowledging that āany major energy project that comes from this great province is going to pass the boundaries of other provinces.ā
The implication was that voting for a Carney-led Liberal government would mean a major course correction from the āLost Decadeā of Liberal governance, that oil and gas from Alberta should be harnessed to power Canada to prosperity, with pipeline projects (maybe a revived Energy East) spanning every province (presumably over the objections of the government of Quebec, these being projects in the ānational interestā and all), and the construction of terminals ā of the type for which Trudeau previously said there wasĀ no ābusiness caseāĀ ā enabling us to get Canadian Natural Gas onto tankers bound for Europe and Asia. What else could he have meant by āglobal energy superpower,ā āself-sufficiency,ā and the promise to invest in Albertaās energy infrastructure?
But then Carney found himself being interviewed in Montreal, and his approach was quite different. After his interviewer poked some fun at Carneyās tendency to crib policy proposals from the Conservatives ā ādo you find Mr. Poilievre has good ideas?ā ā Carney was asked about his āenergy superpowerā comments, and he hedged, saying that Canada should work to develop its own resources āif there is social acceptability.ā Asked about pipelines specifically, Carney said āWe must choose a few projects, a few big projects. Not necessarily pipelines, but maybe pipelines, weāll see.ā
Now, if you think that all of this sounds strangely familiar, youāre not crazy. Carney has been doing this dance since he first stepped out from behind the curtain, saying one thing out west and another back east.
Speaking in B.C. in February he aped a Donald Trump line byĀ sayingĀ he wanted Canada to ābuild, baby, build,ā and promised to use āthe emergency powers of the federal government to accelerate the major projects that we need in order to build this economy and take on the Americans,ā clarifying toĀ CBCĀ that those major projects included pipelines. But then, in a French-languageĀ interview, he was asked if he planned to force Quebec to accept a pipeline, and he answered, āI would never impose [a pipeline] on Quebec.ā
These examples should be enough to demonstrate that Mark Carney is a Con Man. But who, exactly, is his mark? Is he telling the truth in Quebec, where heās looking to syphon off support from the Bloc QuĆ©bĆ©cois? Or is he telling the truth in Alberta, where heād love to snatch a few more urban ridings from the Conservatives?
The answer is that, actually, weāreĀ allĀ his mark. Carney doesnāt really care about Quebecās sovereignty, or any contentious constitutional question like that. And he certainly has no desire to build pipelines and LNG terminals in order to turn Canada into a global energy superpower. AĀ glanceĀ at his long career, as both a public and private sector Net-Zero activist, pressuring both individual corporations and national governments to adopt his environmentalist ideology, will tell you as much.
Once you accept that, you start to notice Carneyās sleight-of-hand on questions of energy and affordability. Heās taking credit for āAxing the Carbon Tax,ā when in reality heĀ merely zeroed out part of it, while doubling down on the other half. Heās set it up so that he can bring the Consumer Carbon Tax back whenever he likes, without a vote. Meanwhile, our economy will beĀ slowly strangledĀ by the Industrial Carbon Tax, and our everyday lives will get more expensive as businesses pass the cost down to us.
HeĀ remains committed to Bill C-69, the āNo More Pipelines Act,ā which theĀ Supreme Court saidĀ overstepped the federal governmentās constitutional authority, which itself shows that his mealy-mouthed talking points on pipelines and energy infrastructure donāt amount to a real commitment to anything. And he still supports the Trudeau governmentās emissions caps, which target our Natural Resource Sector, theĀ beating heartĀ of Canadaās economy.
And of course he does, because long ago Mark Carney pledged allegiance to theĀ destructive Net-Zero ideology, and it is that, more than anything else, which is the groundwork for how he will actually govern.
So, whatever you do, donāt buy the con. Mark Carney has spent an entire career, before the start of this campaign, telling usĀ exactly who he is. Donāt let him pull the wool over your eyes now.
Dan McTeague is President of Canadians for Affordable Energy.
Support Dan’s Work to Keep Canadian Energy Affordable!
Canadians for Affordable Energy is run by Dan McTeague, former MP and founder of Gas Wizard. We stand up and fight for more affordable energy.
2025 Federal Election
I donāt believe these polls!

Dan McTeague
Cards on the table, Iām skeptical of the current state of the polling in this election. My sense is that Mark Carney and the Liberalsā numbers are, at least in part, a byproduct of sympathetic pollsters over-sampling their key demographics, and those being trumpeted to high heaven by the publicly-funded media. That, coupled with votersā justifiable annoyance at Donald Trumpās ā51st Stateā cracks and tariff threats, has contributed to an illusion of enthusiasm, a sense that they are running away with this thing.
That said, one polling data point has struck me as being both real and important. A recent Abacus DataĀ pollĀ showed that, when you cut out all the distractions, Canadiansā biggest concern remains our inflated cost of living. And that is an issue which clearly favors Poilievre and the Conservatives.
Thatās because the dire state of our economy can largely be laid at the feet of the Liberals, whoāve been running the show for the past decade. Yes, theyāve made a change at the top, but not much of one. On top of being aĀ globe-trotting member of the āGreenā Elite, andĀ champion of environmentalist banking, Mark Carney was a Liberal advisor for years, a key part of the Trudeau ābrain trustā ā trust me, I use that term loosely ā that cooked up a whole raft of economy smothering āGreenā policies which have done nothing to reduce global carbon emissions, but have succeeded in lightening our wallets.
Under Trudeau, our annual GDP growth noticeably shifted from the 3% range towards the end of the Harper years to the 1% range more recently. Household debt-to-income ratios rose steadily in the same period, while real household spending per capita dropped 2-3% below 2019 levels by 2024, as costs and interest rates went up. Disposable income growth has been outpaced by inflation and taxes, and bankruptcy filings have risen 40% since just 2019.
Canadian food prices have exploded by 35-40%, with family spending up over 50% over the past decade. Consequently, food insecurity rose to 23% by 2023, from around 8% in 2015, and Food Banks Canada has reported a 78% surge in usage from 2019 to 2023.
Meanwhile, Canadaās national debt, which was just over $600 billion when Justin Trudeau was handed the federal credit card, has roughly doubled, reaching over $1.2 trillion by the time he left. And provincial debt has risen by about $1 trillion in the same period.
Itās a frightening financial snapshot. And many of these negatives can be attributed to the Liberalsā war on oil and gas, which remains ā however much Carney might wish otherwise ā theĀ backboneĀ of our national economy.
So much of the Liberalsā time and effort in government has been spent kneecapping the resource sector, and for purely ideological reasons. From Bill C-48, the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act of 2019, which significantly reduces our ability to sell oil and gas abroad, to Bill C-69, which added mountains of red tape for infrastructure projects, so much so that it was nicknamed the āNo More Pipelinesā Act.
Youāll remember that the Supreme Court ruled the āNo More Pipelinesā act largely unconstitutional two years ago. Even so, Carney recently said he has no intention of repealing it, prompting Poilievre toĀ tweet out, āThis Liberal law blocked BILLIONS of dollars of investment in oil & gas projects, pipelines, LNG plants, mines, and so much more,ā with an excellent infographic attached, listing the various cancelled energy projects throughout Canada since the Liberals came to power.
And then of course, thereās the Consumer Carbon Tax, which started out at $20 per tonne of CO2 emitted in 2019, small enough that many Canadians barely noticed they were paying it, but increased every year until it hit $80 per tonne.
By that point it became so noticeable and unpopular that the Liberals felt they had no choice but to ācancelā it (āzero it outā isĀ more accurate), before it could reach the $170 by 2030 which theyād planned. Still, it remains on the books, ready to be raised again, without a vote, if Carney so chooses.
Even if he doesnāt, Carney has doubled down on the Industrial Carbon Tax. While the Liberals claim this is an improvement because it isnāt paid by working Canadians, only by big evil āpolluters.ā Of course, they said something similar about the Consumer Tax, that by some financial wizardry, we regular folks would get back more than we paid in, which turned out to be total bunk.
Meanwhile, the Industrial Tax makes our lives more expensive in essentially the same way as the Consumer Tax. It raises the cost of doing business, of heating our homes, of filling up our car, of our grocery bills. It just does so by a less direct route, by taxing businesses instead of individuals, so that we pay when the price of goods and services goes up in response.
The Industrial Carbon Tax, much like TrudeauāsĀ Clean Fuel Regulations, is ultimately a hidden tax, and that suits Carney just fine. Heād prefer that we not know who to blame as our cost of living skyrockets.
The Liberal Partyās economic record over since 2015 has been atrocious, and it will be no different under Mark Carney. He is complicit, and he continues to support policies which would make us poorer, likeĀ Bill S-243, the āClimate-Aligned Finance Act,ā which CarneyĀ testified before the SenateĀ in support of last year. That bill sought to make it nearly impossible for banks to invest in, or loan money to, oil and gas projects in Canada, and tried to force financial institutions to appoint board members ideologically opposed to fossil fuels.
Canada needs to change course, and soon. As things stand, it will be tough for even a good captain to navigate us through the rough seas the Liberals have steered us into over the past ten years. A few more, and with Mark Carney at the helm, might make that impossible.
Dan McTeague is President of Canadians for Affordable Energy.
Support Dan’s Work to Keep Canadian Energy Affordable!
Canadians for Affordable Energy is run by Dan McTeague, former MP and founder of Gas Wizard. We stand up and fight for more affordable energy.
-
Business2 days ago
Is Government Inflation Reporting Accurate?
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Carneyās Hidden Climate Finance Agenda
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
When it comes to pipelines, Carneyās words flow both ways
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Study links B.C.ās drug policies to more overdoses, but researchers urge caution
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Polls say Canadians will give Trump what he wants, a Carney victory.
-
2025 Federal Election1 day ago
Carney Liberals pledge to follow āgender-based goals analysisā in all government policy
-
2025 Federal Election1 day ago
Poilievreās Conservatives promise to repeal policy allowing male criminals in female jails
-
2025 Federal Election1 day ago
Trump Has Driven Canadians Crazy. This Is How Crazy.