Connect with us
[bsa_pro_ad_space id=12]

International

Ukraine negotiations still murky after Trump’s joint Congress address

Published

5 minute read

From The Center Square

After a turbulent several days between the U.S. and Ukraine, President Donald Trump gave no clear signs that American aid to Ukraine would be unpaused in his joint address to Congress on Tuesday night.

Trump touched briefly on U.S. relations with Ukraine, saying he was working to end the Russia-Ukraine war but not signifying a change toward Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskky after pausing American aid Monday evening.

“I am also working tirelessly to end the savage conflict in Ukraine. Millions of Ukrainians and Russians have been needlessly killed or wounded in this horrific and brutal conflict, with no end in sight,” Trump said.

“Do you want to keep it going for another five years?… Pocahontas says yes,” Trump quipped, referring to Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-MA.

Since Friday, when negotiations between Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance and Zelenskyy broke down before signing a mineral rights deal, Trump has publicly communicated that Zelenskyy is not ready for a peace deal. He has suggested that Zelenskyy isn’t really interested in an end to the war as long as Ukraine is receiving billions of dollars in aid from the U.S.

Talks soured at the White House between the leaders when Trump was talking of a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia and Zelenskyy continued to emphasize the importance of security promises from the U.S. Trump and Vance insisted that he had not shown sufficient gratitude for America’s help.

Trump also said Tuesday evening that the U.S. has given more to Ukraine’s war effort than Europe, something he has said repeatedly, citing a $350 billion figure that may be unique to the president alone. Some present loudly objected to this remark. The State Department said this week aide to Ukraine since 2014 totals around $170 billion.

“Europe has sadly spent more money buying Russian Oil and Gas than they have spent on defending Ukraine, by far. Think of that.” Trump said. “And we’ve spent perhaps $350 billion, like taking candy from a baby. That’s what happened. And they’ve spent $100 billion.”

French President Emmanual Macron and United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer both attempted to correct the president on some similar claims during their White House visits last week.

The unsigned minerals deal with Ukraine was supposed to give America access to rare earth minerals in that country as a form of repayment for its aid throughout the war.

“Later this week, I will also take historic action to dramatically expand production of Critical Minerals and Rare Earths here in the USA,” Trump said.

Trump said he received a letter from Zelenskyy Tuesday communicating what Zelenskyy had posted to X that morning.

“I would like to reiterate Ukraine’s commitment to peace,” Zelenskyy wrote. “Ukraine is ready to come to the negotiating table as soon as possible to bring lasting peace closer.”

He went on to describe a potential partial ceasefire, expressed thanks to America for its support and finished with a word on the minerals deal.

“Regarding the agreement on minerals and security, Ukraine is ready to sign it in any time and in any convenient format. We see this agreement as a step toward greater security and solid security guarantees,” he continued, “and I truly hope it will work effectively.”

Trump said he appreciated the letter, but added that Russia has communicated to the U.S. that it is “ready for peace.”

“It’s time to stop this madness. It’s time to halt the killing,” Trump said. “If you want to end wars, you have to talk to both sides.”

Morgan Sweeney

Morgan Sweeney

Staff Reporter

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Crime

Reporter Exposed The Left’s $20 Billion Climate Slush Fund

Published on

From from undercover news report from Project Veritas

 

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By Michael Bastasch

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) — yes, the agency that’s supposed to make sure the air and water is clean — has been caught red-handed in what, at least on the outside, looks like one of the most brazen and high-dollar left-wing political payouts of the century.

In what Trump EPA described in a letter to the agency inspector general’s office as “an unprecedented arrangement,” Biden-era bureaucrats used private Citibank bank accounts to squirrel away $20 billion in taxpayer funds — that’s right, billion with a “b” — much of which is earmarked for lefty “pass-through” organizations the agency itself determined “lacked basic financial competency.”

This $20 billion was ostensibly meant for “green banks” to finance all sorts of nice-sounding “climate justice” and green energy projects — but instead it steered billions upon billions to groups deeply tied into the Democratic Party machinery.

For instance, the current and former chairmen of one of the pass-throughs, called the Coalition for Green Capital (CGC), are both Democratic Party donors, each cutting sizable checks to Kamala Harris’ ill-fated 2024 run. CGC was on track to get $5 billion from Biden’s EPA.

In another case, a left-wing consortium tied to Stacey Abrams’s voter mobilization group was awarded $2 billion. In its letter to the IG, Trump’s EPA noted the former administration itself determined these groups “lacked basic financial competency,” but earmarked the cash anyway.

So, here we have billions in taxpayer funds being directed to Democratic insiders and donors — paging DOGE! No wonder bureaucrats shoveled this money into a seemingly untouchable Citibank account in the waning days of the Biden administration.

One former Biden EPA official was reportedly caught on tape gleefully comparing it to “tossing gold bars off the Titanic.”

Taken together, this looks like the left-wing political payout of the century. Rarely is rank political patronage so nakedly on display.

The U.S. Justice Department (DOJ) and FBI are currently asking tough questions of career EPA officials about these “gold bars,” but it’s unclear if the Trump EPA will be able to claw back any of the funds.

Accountability — after four years of virtually none of it — would not only be a victory for taxpayers, but also for good journalism.

It’s important to remember we’re only talking about this Biden EPA scandal because of the tireless efforts of one journalist. Long before the EPA inspector general, DOJ, the FBI, or even the Department of Government Efficiency, were alerted to this political payout, a reporter named Nick Pope was on the case.

Back in November 2023, when the Biden EPA announced it was handing out billions to so-called “green banks” in the name of “climate justice” and other high causes, Pope thought this might be the perfect cover for the Democratic Party to enrich itself at taxpayer expense.

No slouch, Pope dug in, and soon he saw smoke. Huge, billowing clouds of smoke. His first piece, published that same month, laid out in detail how the “green banks” on the shortlist for Biden EPA funding “all feature numerous individuals on their boards who work for influential organizations aligned with the Democratic Party or previously worked for Democratic administrations.”

But this was no one-off. Pope followed up when the EPA announced it was handing billions to the very groups he had just exposed as essentially being Democratic Party pass-throughs.

Government watchdog groups were put on alert. Congress eventually got involved, demanding answers from the Biden EPA about how something like this could even happen. Pope’s colleague Adam Pack left his own mark, first reporting about the billions going to the liberal consortium affiliated with Abrams’ get-out-the-vote efforts.

Even after the FBI got involved, Pope didn’t rest, pushing out yet another hard-hitting investigation exposing how heads of the groups slated to get billions in Biden bucks “collectively made hundreds of thousands of dollars in personal political donations to Democratic candidates and organizations in recent years.”

If Trump is actually able to claw back these “gold bars,” make sure to thank Nick Pope. Heck, even if we don’t get the money back, thank him anyway. Good journalism should be rewarded even if the ultimate outcome isn’t exactly what we wanted.

Besides, they don’t give out Pulitzers for exposing Democratic corruption, now do they?

While trust in media plummets, and the legacy press continues its liberal bootlicking, it’s even more important we support good journalists, like Pope and the rest of the Daily Caller News Foundation team, who are unafraid to report the truth and hold the powerful accountable.

Mike Bastasch is editor-in-chief of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Continue Reading

International

Commerce Secretary on Oval Office debacle: Zelensky flies to Washington to sign deal then scuttles it

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Conservative Treehouse

U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick gave a brutally honest take on the clash between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office this past Friday, calling him a ‘troublemaker,’ not a ‘peacemaker.’

We’ve watched a lot of different takes on the explosive Friday oval office meeting between Volodymyr Zelensky and President Trump, however this explanation from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is exceptional.

Secretary Lutnick explains what the administration team anticipated from Zelensky versus what took place. Knowing the context of the congressional team that met with Zelensky prior to the Oval Office meeting, the explanation from Lutnick takes on even more sunlight. This is a very brutally honest take from a great member of the Trump administration. Watch:

 

 

 

 

President Trump’s repeated position that Zelensky is refusing to discuss peace because the U.S. is standing close with him, is exactly the reason President Trump is now going to create distance.

CUT HIM OFF – President Trump is going to force Ukraine to stand without U.S. support, only supported by the EU and U.K. It’s essentially a peacekeeping standoff. President Trump wants peace, the Ukrainian people want peace, Zelensky and the EU/U.K. are willing to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian.

It’s not about sending U.S. military goods into Ukraine, the Trump play can be twofold. (1) We stop paying for their government operations; and (2) potentially we turn off the U.S. satellite targeting systems that Ukraine is using. Then watch what happens.

Continue Reading

Trending

X