Connect with us
[bsa_pro_ad_space id=12]

Business

Trump to Counter Foreign Social Media Censorship Demands and Defend Free Speech Online

Published

2 minute read

logo
President Donald Trump has signed a new directive aimed at protecting American businesses from what his administration describes as “overseas extortion.” The directive renews efforts to challenge digital services taxes (DSTs) imposed by foreign governments, which the administration argues unfairly target American companies operating internationally and promote online censorship.
“President Trump will not allow foreign governments to appropriate America’s tax base for their own benefit,” the White House stated, underscoring its commitment to defending US economic interests.
The memorandum directs the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to reopen investigations into DSTs under Section 301, revisiting cases first launched during President Trump’s first term.
Additionally, it calls for scrutiny of other nations implementing DSTs that allegedly discriminate against American companies.
The administration also plans to evaluate European Union and United Kingdom policies that could push US businesses toward practices that, according to the memorandum, undermine free speech or contribute to censorship.
Key regulations under review include the European Union’s Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act, which dictate how American firms interact with consumers in the region. The White House has signaled potential countermeasures, including tariffs if these regulations are deemed harmful to US business interests.
The memorandum asserts that foreign governments have imposed DSTs as a way to extract revenue from successful American firms rather than fostering economic growth within their own countries. “America’s economy will not be a source of revenue for countries that have failed to cultivate economic success of their own,” the administration declared.
The White House estimates that billions of dollars could be siphoned from US companies annually through these taxes, further arguing that such financial burdens stifle American innovation and reduce global economic competitiveness.
The directive highlights the United States’ digital economy, which has outpaced the total GDP of several developed nations, including Australia and Canada.
The administration attributes this dominance to American technology companies and the entrepreneurial spirit that fuels them.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Business

Trump backs Musk’s ultimatum as ‘great’ idea, but some aren’t responding

Published on

From The Center Square

By 

Some federal agencies aren’t planning to tell billionaire cost-cutting boss Elon Musk what they accomplished last week as President Donald Trump looks to reshape the federal workforce.

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, which serves as the federal government’s human resources office, sent a short email Saturday to all federal employees asking them what they accomplished last week. It asked them to respond with five bullets of what they accomplished and to include their supervisor on the reply. Musk, the Tesla boss and White House advisor, said he wanted to know how many employees were actually checking emails and said the bar was low for responses.

Trump said Monday the email was a “great” idea.

“We have people that don’t show up to work and nobody even knows if they work for the government so by asking the question ‘tell us what you did this week,’ what [Elon’s] doing is saying are you actually working?” Trump said. “And then, if you don’t answer, you’re sort of semi-fired or you’re fired because a lot of people aren’t answering because they don’t exist, that’s how badly various parts of our government were run.”

Musk called the email “a very basic pulse check.”

“The reason this matters is that a significant number of people who are supposed to be working for the government are doing so little work that they are not checking their email at all!” Musk wrote on X. “In some cases, we believe non-existent people or the identities of dead people are being used to collect paychecks. In other words, there is outright fraud.”

Some unions immediately pushed back on the email. The American Federation of Government Employees, which represents about 800,000 federal employees, said it was a bullying technique.

“It has become even more clear that the thoughtless and bullying email was meant to intimidate federal employees and cause mass confusion. Agencies across the federal government have acknowledged that confusion and that they were unaware the email was being sent,” AFGE National President Everett Kelley said. “Though we believe the email and the resulting agency instructions are improper, we advise that you comply with any directive that has come from your agency. Simply put, if your agency has asked you to reply, you should do so and highlight the important work that you do for the American people.”

Kelley also said union members who do respond should ask for overtime.

“If you wish to respond, you may wish to ask your supervisor for any overtime or compensatory time that you may be entitled,” he wrote.

But some federal agencies are ignoring the email. Justice Department employees were told they don’t need to respond. FBI Director Kash Patel told his employees to “pause any responses” to the OPM email. Other agencies not planning to participate include the State Department, the National Institutes of Health and the National Security Agency.

The largest federal agency also isn’t playing along. In a letter to Department of Defense employees, Darin Selnick, who is performing the duties of the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, said it does its own performance reviews.

“DoD personnel may have received an email from OPM requesting information. The Department of Defense is responsible for reviewing the performance of its personnel and it will conduct any review in accordance with its own procedures,” Selnick wrote. “When and if required, the Department will coordinate responses to the email you have received from OPM. For now, please pause any response to the OPM email titled, ‘What did you do last week.'”

Patel’s response at the FBI was similar.

“The FBI, through the Office of the Director, is in charge of all of our review processes and will conduct reviews in accordance with FBI procedures,” Patel wrote. “When and if further information is required, we will coordinate the responses. For now, please pause any responses.”

Since returning to the White House, Trump has promised to overhaul the federal workforce through mass layoffs, plans to shutter some federal agencies and efforts to get rid of waste and redundancy.

Continue Reading

Business

Biden’s $20B grant to climate groups involved “self-dealing”

Published on

Quick Hit:

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has raised concerns about the Biden administration’s $20 billion in climate project grants, alleging “a lot of self-dealing” and potential conflicts of interest. Zeldin pointed to the $2 billion allocated to Power Forward Communities (PFC), a group linked to Stacey Abrams, as a clear example of waste and abuse.

Key Details:

  • Zeldin questioned the $2 billion grant to PFC, noting the group only reported $100 in revenue within its first three months after being founded in late 2023.
  • He criticized the grant agreement, which gave PFC three weeks to distribute the funds and 90 days to complete a training course on budget development.
  • Zeldin stated the Justice Department has been investigating the issue, thanking the EPA for its cooperation in tracking the funds.

Diving Deeper:

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin appeared on Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo to discuss his concerns about the Biden administration’s $20 billion climate grant program. He alleged that the grant distribution involved “a lot of self-dealing” and lacked proper oversight, leading to potential conflicts of interest. Zeldin pointed to a specific case involving Power Forward Communities (PFC), a group linked to former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, which received $2 billion in grants despite only reporting $100 in revenue during its first three months.

Zeldin criticized the grant’s terms, which allowed PFC three weeks to distribute the $2 billion and required the group to complete a budget development training course within 90 days. “I would say that any entity that needs training on how to develop a budget shouldn’t be actually distributing money before they take that training,” Zeldin argued. He further alleged that the rapid distribution of funds resembled a “gold bar scheme,” citing a leaked video where a Biden EPA political appointee described the process as “throwing gold bars off the Titanic.”

When asked about the potential for criminal activity, Zeldin suggested the Department of Justice would need to investigate but characterized the grant to PFC as “a clear cut case of waste and abuse.” He noted that the Justice Department had been actively investigating the matter and expressed appreciation for the EPA’s cooperation in tracking down the missing funds.

Zeldin also mentioned his discussions with President Donald Trump, emphasizing their shared commitment to restoring accountability at the EPA. The controversy has drawn attention from other lawmakers, including Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL), who questioned why PFC received $2 billion when its reported revenue was only $100.

Continue Reading

Trending

X