Connect with us
[bsa_pro_ad_space id=12]

COVID-19

Slovak COVID commissioner calls pandemic a ‘fabricated operation,’ calls for end to vaccines

Published

6 months ago

4 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Angeline Tan

Kotlár explained why he was calling for a stop to the use of mRNA COVID vaccines, asserting that SARS-CoV-2 was artificially created in a laboratory and deliberately spread worldwide. As a result, he urged for an end to Slovakia’s collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO)

Peter Kotlár, Slovak government commissioner for investigating the handling of COVID-19, regards mRNA injections to be hazardous and has urged for a ban on the novel injections, slamming the “pandemic” as an “act of bioterrorism” and a “fabricated operation.”

During an October 2 press conference, Kotlár, a member of the ruling Slovak National Party, elaborated on a report he was commissioned to compile on the previous government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the presser, Kotlár explained why he was calling for a stop to the use of mRNA COVID vaccines, asserting that SARS-CoV-2 was artificially created in a laboratory and deliberately spread worldwide. As a result, he urged for an end to Slovakia’s collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The full report will be made public, according to Kotlár, but not before the first session of the government.

“The most serious consequence of the whole fabricated operation called the COVID-19 pandemic is the endangerment of human health and the confirmation of the naivety of the world population to be subconsciously obedient,” Kotlár stated, according to an English translation by Interest of Justice.

“Let us at least make the right gesture together by stopping the administration of mRNA preparations until their effectiveness and safety have been proven,” he added.

In January 2024, the Slovak government appointed Kotlár to spearhead its official inquiry into the management of COVID-19.

“there is also clear evidence that there was no pandemic in Slovakia in terms of what a pandemic means, in terms of incidence and other measurable parameters, “ Kotlár told the National Council on the Extraordinary Health Committee, a parliamentary committee, in June.

Kotlár has long opposed the previous Slovak government’s COVID measures, particularly its promotion of the experimental vaccines.

Slovak Prime Minister Fico has echoed Kotlár’s stance towards the COVID-19 vaccines, saying, “You all know that I personally have always been against vaccination with experimental vaccines against COVID.”

Notably, the Slovak leader elaborated that he had “many acquaintances” who had experienced considerable health problems after the COVID vaccination. Moreover, Fico urged Kotlár to probe who in Slovakia had enriched themselves through the “unnecessary purchase of medical supplies and vaccines.”

I have submitted material to Dr. Kotlár detailing both the origins of SARS-CoV-2 viruses as well as the Eugenic Genetic Vaccines. The attached slides show the money paid to develop the SARS-CoV-2 viruses including U.S. DoD, the matching genetic sequences to the three viruses made and the paper published by Kariko and Weissman stating pseudouridine mRNA doesn’t work as a vaccine BUT does work as ‘gene therapy’.  Since I can only post one slide at a time on this site, the attached slide is from Kariko and Weissman’s paper where they show their mRNA doesn’t work for vaccine effect but is useful for ‘gene therapy.’

Related Topics:

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

More from this author
2025 Federal Election / 10 hours ago

As PM Poilievre would cancel summer holidays for MP’s so Ottawa can finally get back to work

Automotive / 12 hours ago

Canadians’ Interest in Buying an EV Falls for Third Year in a Row

2025 Federal Election / 12 hours ago

Poilievre Campaigning To Build A Canadian Economic Fortress

2025 Federal Election

Conservatives promise to ban firing of Canadian federal workers based on COVID jab status

Published on April 24, 2025

By

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

The Conservative platform also vows that the party will oppose mandatory digital ID systems and a central bank digital currency if elected.

Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party’s 2025 election platform includes a promise to “ban” the firing of any federal worker based “solely” on whether or not they chose to get the COVID shots.

On page 23 of the “Canada First – For A Change” plan, which was released on Tuesday, the promise to protect un-jabbed federal workers is mentioned under “Protect Personal Autonomy, Privacy, and Data Security.”

It promises that a Conservative government will “Ban the dismissal of federal workers based solely on COVID vaccine status.”

The Conservative Party also promises to “Oppose any move toward mandatory digital ID systems” as well as “Prohibit the Bank of Canada from developing or implementing a central bank digital currency.”

In October 2021, the Liberal government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced unprecedented COVID-19 jab mandates for all federal workers and those in the transportation sector. The government also announced that the unjabbed would no longer be able to travel by air, boat, or train, both domestically and internationally.

This policy resulted in thousands losing their jobs or being placed on leave for non-compliance. It also trapped “unvaccinated” Canadians in the country.

COVID jab mandates, which also came from provincial governments with the support of the federal government, split Canadian society. The shots have been linked to a multitude of negative and often severe side effects, such as death, including in children.

Many recent rulings have gone in favor of those who chose not to get the shots and were fired as a result, such as an arbitrator ruling that one of the nation’s leading hospitals in Ontario must compensate 82 healthcare workers terminated after refusing to get the jabs.

Beyond health concerns, many Canadians, especially Catholics, opposed the injections on moral grounds because of their link to fetal cell lines derived from the tissue of aborted babies.

Continue Reading

COVID-19

RFK Jr. Launches Long-Awaited Offensive Against COVID-19 mRNA Shots

Published on April 23, 2025

By

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH's avatar Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

As millions of Americans anxiously await action from the new HHS leadership against the COVID-19 mRNA injections—injected into over 9 million children this year—Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has finally gone publicly on the offensive:

Let’s go over each key point made by RFK Jr.:

The recommendation for children was always dubious. It was dubious because kids had almost no risk for COVID-19. Certain kids that had very profound morbidities may have a slight risk. Most kids don’t.

In the largest review to date on myocarditis following SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. COVID-19 vaccination, Mead et al found that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not only significantly more common but also more severe—particularly in children and young males. Our findings make clear that the risks of the shots overwhelmingly outweigh any theoretical benefit:

The OpenSAFELY study included more than 1 million adolescents and children and found that myocarditis was documented ONLY in COVID-19 vaccinated groups and NOT after COVID-19 infection. There were NO COVID-19-related deaths in any group. A&E attendance and unplanned hospitalization were higher after first vaccination compared to unvaccinated groups:

So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk? We’ve seen huge associations of myocarditis and pericarditis with strokes, with other injuries, with neurological injuries.

The two largest COVID-19 vaccine safety studies ever conducted, involving 99 million (Faksova et al) and 85 million people (Raheleh et al), confirm RFK Jr.’s concerns, documenting significantly increased risks of serious adverse events following vaccination, including:

  1. Myocarditis (+510% after second dose)
  2. Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (+278% after first dose)
  3. Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (+223% after first dose)
  4. Guillain-Barré Syndrome (+149% after first dose)
  5. Heart Attack (+286% after second dose)
  6. Stroke (+240% after first dose)
  7. Coronary Artery Disease (+244% after second dose)
  8. Cardiac Arrhythmia (+199% after first dose)

And this was clear even in the clinical data that came out of Pfizer. There were actually more deaths. There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group. We need to ask questions and we need to consult with parents.

Actually, according to the Pfizer’s clinical trial data, there were 43% more deaths in the vaccine group compared to the placebo group when post-unblinding deaths are included:

We need to give people informed consent, and we shouldn’t be making recommendations that are not good for the population.

Public acknowledgment of the grave harms of COVID-19 vaccines signals that real action is right around the corner. However, we must hope that action is taken for ALL age groups, as no one is spared from their life-reducing effects:

Alessandria et al (n=290,727, age > 10 years): People vaccinated with 2 doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during follow-up.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.

For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
Continue Reading

Trending

X