Connect with us
[bsa_pro_ad_space id=12]

COVID-19

Protests are done. Covid is endemic. This is what is really behind Canada’s Emergency Measures Act

Published

6 minute read

Canada’s MP’s have given approval to the Emergency Measures Act.  The federal government has sweeping powers to kill any protest it wishes. As harsh as that sounds a much more powerful tool has also been officially approved.  The federal government can now literally starve to death any Canadian who dares to oppose the government mandates on vaccination by freezing their bank accounts so they will not be able to purchase, anything.

Over the last week, police officers were bused or perhaps flown into Ottawa to crack down on the flag waving, horn beeping hordes who were enjoying themselves at the expense of the eardrums of many in downtown Ottawa.  This Parliament Hill protest was the last of three which were cited as “THE” reason for the invocation of the Emergency Measures Act.  The blockade protest at Windsor was ended before the Emergency Measures Act was even invoked.  The blockade protest at Coutts shut down when organizers became concerned it might turn violent.  The Ottawa protest lasted a few more days before it wrapped up over this weekend.  In other words, even if one agreed these measures were necessary, they certainly aren’t anymore.

So why was the vote on the EMA even necessary?  The protest blockades cited as the reason for the invocation have ended. The omicron virus has effectively turned the pandemic into an endemic all over the world.  So what is this all about?

Could it be that the EMA is not really about protests, or even Covid-19?  That certainly sounds like a conspiracy theory to most Canadians, but there are a few million now (and the number grows daily) who have been seeking to inform themselves beyond what they’re being told by the legacy media. What a few million Canadians are putting together, and what most are still completely ignorant about, is that the fight against mandates is actually critically important to the future of democracy in this country.

All over the country, friends and family have been fracturing over a dangerous division in society.  Many will incorrectly call this a fight between left and right.  It is not.  It all comes down to where you get your information from.  If you rely solely on the media sources of information that we’ve always depended upon, you simply don’t know the whole story.  Not your fault, but you owe it to yourself, your family, your community, and your country to become informed beyond what we’re being told by the regular media.

The following snippets and full interview are shocking and disturbing even to those who’ve been searching for the truth through alternative media and some incredibly well informed interviews NOT featured by legacy media.  To those who have for whatever reason, hesitated to venture beyond regular legacy media outlets, this will be even harder to take in.  But.  Perhaps you’re finally tired of trying to make sense out of the ridiculous and flawed pandemic response.  If you are trying to understand why this Emergency Measures Act was invoked. This conversation will start to put it all together for you.

This conversation outlines how the World Economic Forum has managed to “penetrate” (in their own words) Canada’s federal cabinet as well as several other nations.   Check out this snippet of a much longer conversation between journalist Maajid Nawaz and Joe Rogan.

 

If you wish to confirm for yourself that several of Canada’s Federal Cabinet Ministers, including Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, as well as NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh are active or alumni members of the World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders group.. Here’s a link to the list of Active and Alumni members of the World Economic Forums, Forum of Young Global Leaders from North America.  You can click through the active and alumni members.

 

Here’s further discussion on how the WEF is infiltrating governments in an effort to introduce digital passes which will feature Chinese style social governance scores.

If you don’t have 3 hours to watch / listen to this today, you could cut that commitment in half if you start at the 1 hr and 25 minute mark. There you can begin at the point in this conversation when Maajid Nawaz  really begins to outline how Covid-19 is being used by the World Economic Forum, many of the world’s richest companies, and by China, to secure their stranglehold on power and wealth permanently.

After 15 years as a TV reporter with Global and CBC and as news director of RDTV in Red Deer, Duane set out on his own 2008 as a visual storyteller. During this period, he became fascinated with a burgeoning online world and how it could better serve local communities. This fascination led to Todayville, launched in 2016.

Follow Author

2025 Federal Election

Conservatives promise to ban firing of Canadian federal workers based on COVID jab status

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

The Conservative platform also vows that the party will oppose mandatory digital ID systems and a central bank digital currency if elected.

Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party’s 2025 election platform includes a promise to “ban” the firing of any federal worker based “solely” on whether or not they chose to get the COVID shots.

On page 23 of the “Canada First – For A Change” plan, which was released on Tuesday, the promise to protect un-jabbed federal workers is mentioned under “Protect Personal Autonomy, Privacy, and Data Security.”

It promises that a Conservative government will “Ban the dismissal of federal workers based solely on COVID vaccine status.”

The Conservative Party also promises to “Oppose any move toward mandatory digital ID systems” as well as “Prohibit the Bank of Canada from developing or implementing a central bank digital currency.”

In October 2021, the Liberal government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced unprecedented COVID-19 jab mandates for all federal workers and those in the transportation sector. The government also announced that the unjabbed would no longer be able to travel by air, boat, or train, both domestically and internationally.

This policy resulted in thousands losing their jobs or being placed on leave for non-compliance. It also trapped “unvaccinated” Canadians in the country.

COVID jab mandates, which also came from provincial governments with the support of the federal government, split Canadian society. The shots have been linked to a multitude of negative and often severe side effects, such as death, including in children.

Many recent rulings have gone in favor of those who chose not to get the shots and were fired as a result, such as an arbitrator ruling that one of the nation’s leading hospitals in Ontario must compensate 82 healthcare workers terminated after refusing to get the jabs.

Beyond health concerns, many Canadians, especially Catholics, opposed the injections on moral grounds because of their link to fetal cell lines derived from the tissue of aborted babies.

Continue Reading

COVID-19

RFK Jr. Launches Long-Awaited Offensive Against COVID-19 mRNA Shots

Published on

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH's avatar Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

As millions of Americans anxiously await action from the new HHS leadership against the COVID-19 mRNA injectionsinjected into over 9 million children this year—Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has finally gone publicly on the offensive:

Let’s go over each key point made by RFK Jr.:

The recommendation for children was always dubious. It was dubious because kids had almost no risk for COVID-19. Certain kids that had very profound morbidities may have a slight risk. Most kids don’t.

In the largest review to date on myocarditis following SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. COVID-19 vaccination, Mead et al found that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not only significantly more common but also more severe—particularly in children and young males. Our findings make clear that the risks of the shots overwhelmingly outweigh any theoretical benefit:

The OpenSAFELY study included more than 1 million adolescents and children and found that myocarditis was documented ONLY in COVID-19 vaccinated groups and NOT after COVID-19 infection. There were NO COVID-19-related deaths in any group. A&E attendance and unplanned hospitalization were higher after first vaccination compared to unvaccinated groups:

So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk? We’ve seen huge associations of myocarditis and pericarditis with strokes, with other injuries, with neurological injuries.

The two largest COVID-19 vaccine safety studies ever conducted, involving 99 million (Faksova et al) and 85 million people (Raheleh et al), confirm RFK Jr.’s concerns, documenting significantly increased risks of serious adverse events following vaccination, including:

  1. Myocarditis (+510% after second dose)
  2. Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (+278% after first dose)
  3. Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (+223% after first dose)
  4. Guillain-Barré Syndrome (+149% after first dose)
  5. Heart Attack (+286% after second dose)
  6. Stroke (+240% after first dose)
  7. Coronary Artery Disease (+244% after second dose)
  8. Cardiac Arrhythmia (+199% after first dose)

And this was clear even in the clinical data that came out of Pfizer. There were actually more deaths. There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group. We need to ask questions and we need to consult with parents.

Actually, according to the Pfizer’s clinical trial data, there were 43% more deaths in the vaccine group compared to the placebo group when post-unblinding deaths are included:

We need to give people informed consent, and we shouldn’t be making recommendations that are not good for the population.

Public acknowledgment of the grave harms of COVID-19 vaccines signals that real action is right around the corner. However, we must hope that action is taken for ALL age groups, as no one is spared from their life-reducing effects:

Alessandria et al (n=290,727, age > 10 years): People vaccinated with 2 doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during follow-up.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.

For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
Continue Reading

Trending

X