COVID-19
Look what they did to our antibodies
Our immune systems are supposed to fight viruses. Now they invite them round for tea. It’s all down to IgG4…
Have you heard about the IgG4 antibody switch? It’s been glossed over in official discussions about Covid-19 ‘vaccines’, but it’s the elephant in the room. Let’s break it down and explore why this may matter more than we’re being told.
The antibody switch: what’s the big deal?
Our immune system is like a well-trained army, with different types of antibodies serving as its soldiers. Among them, IgG antibodies are the frontline warriors, designed to neutralize viruses and protect us from infections. But here’s the catch: not all IgG antibodies are created equal. Think of IgG4 antibodies as the peacekeepers of the immune system. They’re not fighters like the other IgG subclasses—they’re more about tolerance, calming things down. They’re certainly not about launching an attack.
Now, here’s where it gets interesting (and worrying).
Studies have shown that repeated Covid-19 mRNA injections—especially after the second dose or booster—cause the body to switch from producing the more effective IgG3 antibodies to producing IgG4. Essentially, the immune system is shifting toward tolerance rather than attack.
Sounds harmless, right? Well, not so fast. Here’s a look at what this shift might mean:
1. More Covid-19 infections
Imagine your immune system being rewired to tolerate the virus instead of fighting it. That’s essentially what the IgG4 switch could entail. A study from the Cleveland Clinic found a troubling trend: the more Covid-19 vaccine doses a person received, the higher their risk of getting infected. This isn’t what we were promised with “safe and effective,” is it? The IgG4 antibodies might be making the body less effective at dealing with the virus, leaving vaccinated individuals more susceptible to reinfections.
2. The potential for worse outcomes
IgG4 antibodies are great if you’re dealing with allergies, as they help the body tolerate allergens. But when it comes to fighting a virus like SARS-CoV-2, this tolerance could backfire. Instead of neutralizing the virus, the immune system might let it hang around longer, potentially leading to more severe disease outcomes. It’s like inviting a burglar into your house and offering them tea instead of calling the police.
3. The risk of other conditions
This shift to IgG4 isn’t just about Covid-19. It could open the door to other IgG4-related diseases (known as IgG4-RD). These are a group of conditions where the immune system starts attacking various organs, causing inflammation and fibrosis (thickening or scarring of tissues). Examples include autoimmune pancreatitis, kidney disease, and even conditions affecting the lungs or brain. There have been reports of individuals developing these conditions after receiving the mRNA vaccines. Coincidence? Maybe. But it’s enough to warrant serious investigation.
Below is a list of IgG4-related diseases (IgG4-RD) and other pathologies associated with elevated IgG4 levels that could also be related to IgG4 rising after mRNA injections:
- Type 1 Autoimmune Pancreatitis (AIP): Chronic inflammation of the pancreas, often presenting with abdominal pain, jaundice, or weight loss. It is one of the most common manifestations of IgG4-RD.
- Sialadenitis (Mikulicz’s Disease): Enlargement of the salivary and lacrimal glands, leading to dry mouth and eyes. This is a classic presentation of IgG4-RD in the head and neck region (Stone et al., 2012).
- Retroperitoneal Fibrosis: Thickening and fibrosis of the tissue behind the peritoneum, which can lead to ureteral obstruction and kidney damage (Stone et al., 2012).
- Riedel’s Thyroiditis: A rare form of thyroiditis involving fibrosis of the thyroid gland. It can present as a hard, fixed thyroid mass that mimics malignancy (Stone et al., 2012).
- Küttner’s Tumor (Chronic Sclerosing Sialadenitis): Affects the submandibular glands, causing enlargement and fibrosis, often mistaken for a tumor (Stone et al., 2012).
- IgG4-Related Sclerosing Cholangitis: Involves the bile ducts, often associated with autoimmune pancreatitis. Can lead to jaundice and bile duct obstruction (Stone et al., 2012).
- IgG4-Related Ophthalmic Disease: Involves orbital inflammation and can cause proptosis (bulging eyes), double vision, or orbital masses (Stone et al., 2012; Uchida et al., 2022).
- IgG4-Related Aortitis and Periaortitis: Inflammation of the aorta and surrounding tissues, which may lead to aneurysms or vascular complications (Stone et al., 2012).
- IgG4-Related Kidney Disease: Includes tubulointerstitial nephritis and other renal manifestations, leading to kidney dysfunction or masses (Stone et al., 2012; Uchida et al., 2022).
- IgG4-Related Lung Disease: Pulmonary involvement, presenting with inflammatory pseudotumors, interstitial pneumonia, or pleural thickening (Stone et al., 2012).
- IgG4-Related Lymphadenopathy: Enlargement of lymph nodes that may mimic lymphoma (Stone et al., 2012).
- IgG4-Related Skin Disease: While less common, presents as various cutaneous lesions, including plaques or nodules (Stone et al., 2012).
- IgG4-Related Prostatitis: Enlargement of the prostate, causing lower urinary tract symptoms (Stone et al., 2012).
- IgG4-Related Hypophysitis: Involves inflammation of the pituitary gland, leading to hormonal imbalances such as adrenal insufficiency or diabetes insipidus (Stone et al., 2012).
- IgG4-Related Pachymeningitis: Inflammation of the dura mater (the outer membrane covering the brain and spinal cord), leading to headaches, cranial nerve palsies, or other neurological symptoms (Stone et al., 2012).
That’s not all. There are potentially broader implications of elevated IgG4 levels that we must consider:
- Repeated infections. Elevated IgG4 levels may impair the immune system’s ability to clear infections, as IgG4 is less effective at neutralizing pathogens (Aalberse, 2009; Irrgang, 2021).
- Autoimmune diseases. Elevated IgG4 levels may contribute to autoimmune processes, where the immune system attacks its own tissues (Watad, 2021).
- Cancer risks. Chronic inflammation caused by IgG4-related conditions may increase the risk of certain malignancies. While not directly caused by IgG4, this link warrants further research (Uchida, 2022).
- Idiopathic Interstitial Lung Disease. Chronic inflammation and fibrosis in the lungs may lead to respiratory symptoms, further complicating the clinical picture (Stone, 2012).
- Systemic Vasculitis. Inflammation of blood vessels associated with IgG4-RD can cause systemic complications and end-organ damage (Stone, 2012).
Why isn’t this being talked about?
Good question. The IgG4 switch is a complex phenomenon, and scientists are still trying to figure out its full implications. However, one thing is clear: this isn’t a simple black-and-white issue as the long-term effects of repeated mRNA shots are only now coming into focus.
Health agencies like the CDC and WHO argue that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks. But should we ignore potential red flags, especially when they involve changes to our immune system long term? Especially in populations that had virtually no risk from Covid-19 (i.e. children)? Absolutely not.
The science isn’t settled – but nor is this speculation
Elevated IgG4 levels are documented. Multiple studies confirm that repeated mRNA injections lead to a significant increase in IgG4 antibodies (Irrgang et al., 2021). This isn’t speculation—it’s a fact.
Case reports suggest a link. Individuals have developed IgG4-related diseases shortly after getting injected (Uchida et al., 2022). While these cases are rare, as not many practitioners have linked the Covid 19 gene therapy to a certain pathology, they highlight a potential connection that needs further investigation.
The immune response Is complex. The IgG4 switch might be the immune system’s way of adapting to repeated exposure to the spike protein in the vaccines. But this adaptation could come with unintended consequences, including reduced vaccine efficacy and heightened risk of certain diseases. And the most important question is the duration of this fact which we will only know in a decade.
More studies are needed. The science is evolving, and more research is needed to fully understand the implications of this antibody switch. For now, it’s clear that this isn’t a one-size-fits-all situation.
What can we do?
As individuals, the best thing we can do is stay informed. Ask questions if asked to be vaccinated: demand transparency, and weigh the risks and benefits of any medical intervention.
If you yourself have been affected by any of the pathologies above, even months or years after the Covid injections, ask your healthcare providers to assess a potential association. You can test for Covid antibodies (when over 1000 BAU, it is reasonable to assume that you are still producing spike proteins after the injections). You can also get tested for IgG4s (for Covid and generally), for spike proteins (in serum, immune cells, exosomes, body fluids) or for mRNA (in serum, exosomes or any body fluid).
For policymakers and health agencies, it’s crucial to continue monitoring these injections’ long-term effects and be honest about potential risks. Ignoring the elephant in the room won’t make it go away.
Final thoughts
The IgG4 switch is an alarming consequence of repeated Covid-19 mRNA vaccinations. The evidence so far suggests that this phenomenon could have significant implications for immunity, vaccine efficacy, and long-term health. It’s time to have an open, honest conversation about those ‘trade-offs’—and to keep the spotlight on the elephant in the room. This is certainly another red flag for the continuation of the Covid 19 gene therapy and adds to the calls for a moratorium of this technology. Especially considering further promotion of mRNA technologies in the US, Europe, and Russia, we urgently need independent scientists to gather at a roundtable with those pushing for even more use. The World Council for Health has repeatedly called for a moratorium on the technology. This is just the latest, essential piece we’re adding to the puzzle.
References
Aalberse, R. C., Stapel, S. O., Schuurman, J., & Rispens, T. (2009). Immunoglobulin G4: an odd antibody. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 39(4), 469-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.
Bergamaschi, C., Terpos, E., Rosati, M., Angel, M., Bear, J., Stellas, D., … & Felber, B. K. (2021). Systemic IL-15, IFN-γ, and IP-10/CXCL10 signature associated with effective immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine recipients. Cell Reports, 36(6), 109504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Uchida, K., Ito, S., Nakamura, Y., Hoshino, Y., Abe, Y., Ito, T., … & Okazaki, K. (2022). IgG4-related disease after BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: A case report. Vaccine, 40(22), 3079-3082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Irrgang, P., Gerling, J., Kocher, K., Lapuente, D., Steininger, P., Habenicht, K., … & Überla, K. (2021). Class switch towards non-inflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.
Kang, C. K., Kim, M., Lee, S., Kim, G., Choe, P. G., Park, W. B., … & Oh, M. D. (2022). Longitudinal analysis of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody responses after COVID-19 vaccination. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 37(4), e35. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.
Lozano-Ojalvo, D., Camara, C., Lopez-Granados, E., Nozal, P., Del Pino-Molina, L., Bravo-Gallego, L. Y., … & Paz-Artal, E. (2021). Differential effects of the second SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine dose on T cell immunity in naive and COVID-19 recovered individuals. Cell Reports, 36(8), 109570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Perugino, C. A., AlSalem, S. B., Mattoo, H., Della-Torre, E., Mahajan, V., Ganesh, G., … & Stone, J. H. (2021). Identification of galectin-3 as an autoantigen in patients with IgG4-related disease. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 147(2), 736-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Stone, J. H., Zen, Y., & Deshpande, V. (2012). IgG4-related disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(6), 539-551. https://doi.org/10.1056/
World Health Organization (WHO). (2023). COVID-19 vaccines: safety surveillance manual.
COVID-19
Chinese filmmaker sentenced to 3.5 years in prison for documentary about COVID tyranny
From LifeSiteNews
A 33 year-old Chinese filmmaker highlighted the biggest protests China has seen since Tiananmen Square using only film footage. For this crime of ‘provoking trouble,’ he has been sentenced to over three years in prison.
A Chinese filmmaker has been sentenced to three years and six months in prison for creating a documentary about protests against the Chinese government’s heavy-handed COVID-era restrictions.
A Shanghai court sentenced 33-year-old Chen Pinlin, CNN reported, following his conviction for “picking quarrels and provoking trouble,” a charge used to target dissenting Chinese political activists, including journalists.
Pinlin’s apparent crime was his creation of “Urumqi Middle Road,” a film that showed a glimpse of the Chinese government’s tyrannical COVID-19 crackdown and featured ensuing “White Paper” protests, named for white pieces of paper held up by street demonstrators in place of signs, to avoid Chinese Communist Party (CCP) censorship.
The protest movement was sparked by a deadly apartment fire in Urumqi which claimed at least 10 lives, reportedly due to COVID lockdown measures that prevented both the escape of inhabitants and timely rescue efforts. Street vigils cropped up in late November 2022 to remember the deceased, morphing into protests that caught on in several major cities of China, including Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Xi’an.
The protests became an outlet for the indignation and anguish caused by draconian COVID policies country-wide, and called for an end to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s zero-COVID policies, which mandated that citizens be cruelly locked in their own homes for weeks on end. In Shanghai, for example, the government enforced residence confinement in some cases by sealing or padlocking doors.
At the time, China expert Steve Mosher warned that the deadly toll of Shanghai’s ongoing lockdowns would be “much greater” than any potential lives lost due to COVID, and predicted deaths by starvation, strokes and heart attacks.
According to CNN, the White Paper protests, which often directly attacked Xi Jinping, were the largest China had seen since the 1989 student-led Tiananmen Square demonstration. Pinlin’s documentary, still available on YouTube outside of China, includes film footage of White Paper protestors crying, “We want dignity!” “We want the truth!” “We want human rights!”
Masses of protestors also called for Xi Jinping to step down. Some cried for the “removal of traitor Xi Jinping,” and one man can be heard shouting, “Without the Communist Party, there would be a new China!”
The name of the English version of Pinlin’s film is “Not the Foreign Force,” in objection to claims by the CCP that “foreign forces” had fomented protests against the Chinese government.
“I hope to explore why, whenever internal conflicts arise in China, foreign forces are always made the scapegoat,” wrote Pinlin. The answer is clear to everyone: the more the government misleads, forgets, and censors, the more we must speak up, remind others, and remember. Only by remembering the ugliness can we strive toward the light. I also hope that China will one day embrace its own light and future.”subscribe to our daily headlines
Chen “has only ever served the public interest by reporting on historical protests against the regime’s abuses and should never have been arrested. We call on democracies to increase pressure on Chinese authorities to ensure that all charges against Chen are dropped,” Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said in a statement in March.
COVID-19
Canadian judge orders Purolator to compensate employees fired for refusing COVID shot
From LifeSiteNews
On January 30, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Bradford Smith ruled that shipping giant Purolator must compensate employees it fired for refusing to take the COVID shot, in accordance with a Labor Arbitrator’s decision in December 2023.
A British Columbia Supreme Court judge has upheld a labor arbitrator’s decision that Purolator employees fired for refusing the COVID shot must be compensated.
On January 30, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Bradford Smith ruled that shipping giant Purolator must compensate employees it fired for refusing to take the COVID shot, in accordance with a Labor Arbitrator‘s decision in December 2023.
“I find there was no procedural unfairness to Purolator,” Smith wrote in his ruling.
Beginning September 15, 2021, Purolator, like many Canadian companies around that time, mandated that its workers get the COVID shot to continue working. Workers were given until December 25, 2021, to comply, with the full policy coming into force on January 10, 2022.
However, last December an arbitrator ruled that Purolator’s vaccine mandate was reasonable only until June 30, 2022, when evidence sufficiently proved that the COVID vaccine did not prevent transmission of the COVID virus.
“[The arbitrator] determined that the balancing of interests was not fixed in time, but something which could change as circumstances changed,” wrote Smith.
“He found that as of the end of June 2022, circumstances had indeed changed, such that the [vaccination policy], although reasonable when it was implemented, was no longer reasonable after that date,” he continued.
Regardless of this development, Purolator kept the mandate in place until June 2023, barring unvaccinated employees from working.
As a result, Arbitrator Nicholas Glass ruled that Purolator must give compensation to its hourly employees who did not get the COVID shots, which included the lost benefits and wages they would have earned between July 1, 2022, and May 1, 2023.
Purolator had also been ordered to give compensation to owner-operators beginning from the first date they lost income.
Following this decision, Purolator took the case to the B.C. Supreme Court, only to have the ruling upheld by Smith.
“The Arbitrator clearly proceeded on the basis that employees’ personal autonomy and bodily integrity interests were engaged, and it was reasonable for him to do so,” reads the decision.
“I find the Decision is transparent, intelligible and justified, and thus reasonable,” wrote Smith.
The favorable ruling for the Purolator workers is one of the latest positive outcomes for Canadians who lost income, or their jobs outright, for choosing not to get the COVID shots.
In October 2023, LifeSiteNews reported on how a Canadian arbitrator in Saskatchewan ruled in favor of two oil refinery workers who were discriminated against at their workplace for not complying with COVID dictates.
-
Business2 days ago
90% of Ukraine news outlets get funding from USAID: new report
-
DEI1 day ago
Liberal leadership candidate Mark Carney confirms he will pursue agenda of ‘inclusiveness’
-
Business17 hours ago
Exposing Global Affairs Canada’s crazy spending spree
-
Business2 days ago
Canada should match or eclipse Trump’s red-tape cutting plan
-
Business2 days ago
Improve competitiveness, end capital gains tax hike immediately
-
Business1 day ago
Trump’s FBI questionnaire exposes shocking conspiracy
-
illegal immigration22 hours ago
Many Catholics believe Catholic Charities accept ‘blood money’ when they facilitate illegal immigration
-
Business21 hours ago
Pay increase for Governor General since 2019 is more than average Canadian annual salary