Connect with us
[bsa_pro_ad_space id=12]

International

Elon Musk mocks Trudeau as ‘insufferable tool’ who ‘won’t be in power for much longer’

Published

3 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

Elon Musk made the comments after Trudeau claimed Americans have gone backwards on ‘women’s progress’ because Donald Trump, not Kamala Harris, was elected president.

Tesla billionaire Elon Musk doled out some of his harshest words yet against Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, blasting the world leader as a “tool” who will not be in “power much longer.” 

Musk made the comments after Trudeau claimed Americans have gone backwards with respect to “women’s progress” because they elected Donald Trump, not Kamala Harris, as president. 

“He’s such an insufferable tool,” wrote Musk on X in reply to a post from Dr. Gad Saad, who had posted a video of Trudeau’s comments. 

 

“Won’t be in power for much longer.” 

Saad, who is a friend of Dr. Jordan Peterson and who also has a distaste for Trudeau, wrote on X Wednesday about the PM’s comments regarding the U.S. election, “There are no words, no sentiments, no non-verbal cues, no telepathic communications that can capture the extent to which this individual is grotesque.” 

The now-viral video of Trudeau blasting American voters for choosing Donald Trump over Kamala Harris happened at an Equal Voice Foundation gala in the nation’s capital of Ottawa, which was held on Tuesday. 

“We were supposed to be on a steady, if difficult sometimes, march towards progress,” Trudeau said to the gala attendees. 

“And yet, just a few weeks ago, the United States voted for a second time to not elect its first woman president. Everywhere, women’s rights and women’s progress is under attack. Overtly, and subtly.” 

Musk has a history of going after Trudeau. As reported by LifeSiteNews, last month he predicted that Trudeau would be “gone” in the 2025 election. 

As reported by LifeSiteNews Musk also remarked that it is “insane” that the Trudeau government’s proposed “Online Harms” bill would target internet speech retroactively if it becomes law. 

As for Trump, he recently took a shot at Trudeau after the PM flew to Mar-a-Lago for an impromptu visit, joking that he was looking forward to seeing the “Governor again soon so that we may continue our in depth talks on Tariffs and Trade, the results of which will be truly spectacular for all!”  

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Daily Caller

Sweeping Deportations to Begin in Chicago Day After Inauguration

Published on

 

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By Jason Hopkins

President-elect Donald Trump is expected to launch his promised large-scale deportation operation the day after he is sworn into office, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal.

The incoming Trump administration will immediately begin mass deportation efforts in major sanctuary cities across the United States, with Chicago predicted to be first on the docket, according to The Wall Street Journal. The raid in Chicago is anticipated to begin Tuesday morning and last the entire week, with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to deploy 100 to 200 agents to execute the operation.

Incoming border czar Tom Homan — who led ICE during the first Trump administration — previously told the Daily Caller News Foundation that the White House will focus on the “worst first,” prioritizing illegal migrants who have criminal histories and orders of removal. However, Homan also made clear that any illegal migrant in the U.S is fair game.

“Like the first Trump administration, we’re going to prioritize public safety threats, national security threats and fugitives,” Homan stated to the DCNF, adding that gang members and other criminals would be their main focus. “Those that had due process at great taxpayer expense, were given orders of deportation, never left and became a fugitive – them too, they’re a priority.”

“The ones who pose the biggest threat to the country – they come first. The worst first,” Homan went on. “But let’s be clear, if you’re in the country illegally, you’re not off the table.”

The Chicago City Council recently slapped down an attempt by two moderate aldermen to scale back the sanctuary city laws currently in place.

Aldermen Raymond Lopez and Silvana Tabares, both Democrats, proposed amending Chicago’s Welcoming City ordinance to allow for ICE cooperation when an illegal migrant has been arrested of certain criminal activities, arguing that such a policy would be a net benefit for the city’s immigrant community as it would allow deportation officers to better focus on criminals instead of making enforcement actions in the city at large. However, their proposal was quickly shot down by the council on Wednesday.

Other sanctuary cities in the U.S. have also expressed steep opposition to Trump’s enforcement agenda. Los Angeles passed its sanctuary law shortly after Trump emerged victorious in the presidential election, San Diego County doubled down on its existing law and Boston reaffirmed its sanctuary status in December.

Homan has said that city officials refusing to cooperate with ICE will not deter their agenda, and he added that those who knowingly harbor illegal migrants from law enforcement will be recommended for prosecution.

Along with large-scale deportation operations, Trump has also vowed to end birthright citizenship for those born on U.S. soil by illegal migrant parents, resume construction on the U.S.-Mexico border wall, bring back the Remain in Mexico program and implement other hawkish policies.

Continue Reading

International

Coup in Romania – Fascinating interview with Presidential hopeful Calin Georgescu

Published on

Funny how a lot of people branded “far right” by progressives and the corporate media sound pretty reasonable when you see / hear them in conversation.

Take Romanian Presidential candidate Calin Georgescu.  As an independent candidate, Georgescu found himself leading the current Presidential race in Romania when his campaign found itself under attack.

Georgescu opposes financial and military support of the war in neighbouring Ukraine.  For that he’s been called not pro-peace, but pro-Russian and anti-NATO.  His campaign effectively used TikTok as any other potenial candidate hoping to win an election in 2024 would do.  Opponents say his social media success simply has to be the result of Russian influence.  They have no proof, but they’re already in power so they don’t seem to need any.

Georgescu has an extremely interesting resume for someone who is apparently ‘far-right’. In 2015 and 2016 he was Executive Director of the United Nations International Institute for Sustainable Development.  His political experience in Romani comes from a long stint in the Office for the Environment including two years as Secretary General of the Ministry of Environment.

He followed that up with a long run as Executive Director of the National Centre for Sustainable Development  in Bucharest, before joining the United Nations.

Fascinating route to far-right extremism indeed.

Of course no one called him ‘ultranationalist, extremist, or far-right while he was polling around 5%.  But when his success in the first round catapulted him to 23% of the vote for President, putting him in the lead heading into the decisive second round of Presidential voting, the Constitutional Court of Romania annulled the results.

Among his “far-right” campaign initiatives were strengthening Romania’s defence capabilities, diversifying Romania’s diplomatic relations, increased support for farmers, promoting energy and food production, and reducing dependency on imports.

From Viva Frei on Rumble

Călin Georgescu’s unexpected success in the first round of the presidential election was attributed to a massive social media campaign on TikTok, which was later scrutinized for possible foreign influence, particularly from Russia. The court’s decision to annul the election results was based on these concerns and allegations of campaign finance irregularities. It is nothing less than the desecration of the democratic process.

 

Continue Reading

Trending

X