Alberta
Clean energy think tank says Alberta has the resources to lead Canada in carbon capture and storage

From the Canadian Energy Centre
By Cody Ciona
In August, two new CCS projects in the province got the green light to proceed
Alberta has strategic advantages in carbon capture and storage (CCS), a core technology to achieve carbon neutrality, says a director with the low-carbon energy think tank Clean Prosperity.
“I think it’s important for us to remember that we have the people, we have the geography and we have that great policy environment to be able to lead on CCS across the country,” Adam Sweet said during a recent webinar.
According to the International Energy Agency, 45 commercial CCS facilities are in operation worldwide.
Alberta has five operational CCS projects, which have stored roughly 14 million tonnes of CO2, and dozens more projects are in various development stages.
The province is situated atop the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, which boasts an abundance of potential storage space for captured carbon.
According to a study by Clean Prosperity, Alberta has around 79,000 megatonnes of pore space available in underground saline aquifers and mature or depleted oil and gas wells.
“One of the main reasons why CCS is so big in Alberta is, frankly, we have the geology,” said Sweet.
In August, two new CCS projects in Alberta got the green light to proceed.
Shell and partner ATCO EnPower announced they will build a new CCS project at the Scotford refinery and chemicals complex near Edmonton, while on a smaller scale, Entropy Inc. will add a second phase of CCS at its Glacier gas plant near Grande Prairie.
Combined, the projects are expected to capture and store about 810,000 tonnes of CO2 per year, the equivalent of taking nearly 200,000 cars off the road annually. Entropy’s project is to start in 2026 and Shell/ATCO’s in 2028.
Sweet said that in addition to Alberta’s geological ability to store vast quantities of CO2 underground, the province has advantages including the Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction (TIER) regulation, an industrial carbon price that has existed for nearly 20 years.
This regulation covers around 60 per cent of Alberta’s total emissions and around half of Canada’s total industrial emissions, according to Clean Prosperity. The ability to generate carbon credits makes TIER attractive for companies considering CCS.
“Those facilities that invest in carbon capture and storage and can reduce or can create these carbon credits by coming underneath the benchmark, they can then sell those carbon credits,” said Sweet.
He said that in addition to the TIER regulation, Alberta’s expertise and knowledge of energy production are another key asset that makes it an attractive jurisdiction for CCS.
“We often forget that we have knowledge and experience of working underground, as well as working with everything from the valves to the pipes and all the different pieces that exist in this low carbon energy economy.”
Government support is helping drive new CCS development.
Alberta is finalizing its carbon capture incentive program, which covers up to 12 per cent of eligible capital costs, while the federal government has implemented its CCS investment tax credit, which covers up to 60 per cent of capture equipment and 37.5 per cent of the cost for transportation, storage or usage equipment.
Both governments have supported CCS projects in the past: Shell’s $1.3 billion Quest project received $745 million from Alberta’s government and $120 million from Ottawa, while the $1.2 billion Alberta Carbon Trunk Line received $495 million from Alberta and $63.2 million from the federal government.
2025 Federal Election
Next federal government should recognize Alberta’s important role in the federation

From the Fraser Institute
By Tegan Hill
With the tariff war continuing and the federal election underway, Canadians should understand what the last federal government seemingly did not—a strong Alberta makes for a stronger Canada.
And yet, current federal policies disproportionately and negatively impact the province. The list includes Bill C-69 (which imposes complex, uncertain and onerous review requirements on major energy projects), Bill C-48 (which bans large oil tankers off British Columbia’s northern coast and limits access to Asian markets), an arbitrary cap on oil and gas emissions, numerous other “net-zero” targets, and so on.
Meanwhile, Albertans contribute significantly more to federal revenues and national programs than they receive back in spending on transfers and programs including the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) because Alberta has relatively high rates of employment, higher average incomes and a younger population.
For instance, since 1976 Alberta’s employment rate (the number of employed people as a share of the population 15 years of age and over) has averaged 67.4 per cent compared to 59.7 per cent in the rest of Canada, and annual market income (including employment and investment income) has exceeded that in the other provinces by $10,918 (on average).
As a result, Alberta’s total net contribution to federal finances (total federal taxes and payments paid by Albertans minus federal money spent or transferred to Albertans) was $244.6 billion from 2007 to 2022—more than five times as much as the net contribution from British Columbians or Ontarians. That’s a massive outsized contribution given Alberta’s population, which is smaller than B.C. and much smaller than Ontario.
Albertans’ net contribution to the CPP is particularly significant. From 1981 to 2022, Alberta workers contributed 14.4 per cent (on average) of total CPP payments paid to retirees in Canada while retirees in the province received only 10.0 per cent of the payments. Albertans made a cumulative net contribution to the CPP (the difference between total CPP contributions made by Albertans and CPP benefits paid to retirees in Alberta) of $53.6 billion over the period—approximately six times greater than the net contribution of B.C., the only other net contributing province to the CPP. Indeed, only two of the nine provinces that participate in the CPP contribute more in payroll taxes to the program than their residents receive back in benefits.
So what would happen if Alberta withdrew from the CPP?
For starters, the basic CPP contribution rate of 9.9 per cent (typically deducted from our paycheques) for Canadians outside Alberta (excluding Quebec) would have to increase for the program to remain sustainable. For a new standalone plan in Alberta, the rate would likely be lower, with estimates ranging from 5.85 per cent to 8.2 per cent. In other words, based on these estimates, if Alberta withdrew from the CPP, Alberta workers could receive the same retirement benefits but at a lower cost (i.e. lower payroll tax) than other Canadians while the payroll tax would have to increase for the rest of the country while the benefits remained the same.
Finally, despite any claims to the contrary, according to Statistics Canada, Alberta’s demographic advantage, which fuels its outsized contribution to the CPP, will only widen in the years ahead. Alberta will likely maintain relatively high employment rates and continue to welcome workers from across Canada and around the world. And considering Alberta recorded the highest average inflation-adjusted economic growth in Canada since 1981, with Albertans’ inflation-adjusted market income exceeding the average of the other provinces every year since 1971, Albertans will likely continue to pay an outsized portion for the CPP. Of course, the idea for Alberta to withdraw from the CPP and create its own provincial plan isn’t new. In 2001, several notable public figures, including Stephen Harper, wrote the famous Alberta “firewall” letter suggesting the province should take control of its future after being marginalized by the federal government.
The next federal government—whoever that may be—should understand Alberta’s crucial role in the federation. For a stronger Canada, especially during uncertain times, Ottawa should support a strong Alberta including its energy industry.
Alberta
Province announces plans for nine new ‘urgent care centres’ – redirecting 200,000 hospital visits

Expanding urgent care across Alberta
If passed, Budget 2025 includes $17 million in planning funds to support the development of urgent care facilities across the province.
As Alberta’s population grows, so does the demand for health care. In response, the government is making significant investments to ensure every Albertan has access to high-quality care close to home. Currently, more than 35 per cent of emergency department visits are for non-life-threatening conditions that could be treated at urgent care centres. By expanding these centres, Alberta’s government is enhancing the health care system and improving access to timely care.
If passed, Budget 2025 includes $15 million to support plans for eight new urgent care centres and an additional $2 million in planning funds for an integrated primary and urgent care facility in Airdrie. These investments will help redirect up to 200,000 lower-acuity emergency department visits annually, freeing up capacity for life-threatening cases, reducing wait times and improving access to care for Albertans.
“More people are choosing to call Alberta home, which is why we are taking action to build capacity across the health care system. Urgent care centres help bridge the gap between primary care and emergency departments, providing timely care for non-life-threatening conditions.”
“Our team at Infrastructure is fully committed to leading the important task of planning these eight new urgent care facilities across the province. Investments into facilities like these help strengthen our communities by alleviating strains on emergency departments and enhance access to care. I am looking forward to the important work ahead.”
The locations for the eight new urgent care centres were selected based on current and projected increases in demand for lower-acuity care at emergency departments. The new facilities will be in west Edmonton, south Edmonton, Westview (Stony Plain/Spruce Grove), east Calgary, Lethbridge, Medicine Hat, Cold Lake and Fort McMurray.
“Too many Albertans, especially those living in rural communities, are travelling significant distances to receive care. Advancing plans for new urgent care centres will build capacity across the health care system.”
“Additional urgent care centres across Alberta will give Albertans more options for accessing the right level of care when it’s needed. This is a necessary and substantial investment that will eventually ease some of the pressures on our emergency departments.”
The remaining $2 million will support planning for One Health Airdrie’s integrated primary and urgent care facility. The operating model, approved last fall, will see One Health Airdrie as the primary care operator, while urgent care services will be publicly funded and operated by a provider selected through a competitive process.
“Our new Airdrie facility, offering integrated primary and urgent care, will provide same-day access to approximately 30,000 primary care patients and increase urgent care capacity by around 200 per cent, benefiting the entire community and surrounding areas. We are very excited.”
Alberta’s government will continue to make smart, strategic investments in health facilities to support the delivery of publicly funded health programs and services to ensure Albertans have access to the care they need, when and where they need it.
Budget 2025 is meeting the challenge faced by Alberta with continued investments in education and health, lower taxes for families and a focus on the economy.
Quick facts
- The $2 million in planning funds for One Health Airdrie are part of a total $24-million investment to advance planning on several health capital initiatives across the province through Budget 2025.
- Alberta’s population is growing, and visits to emergency departments are projected to increase by 27 per cent by 2038.
- Last year, Alberta’s government provided $8.4 million for renovations to the existing Airdrie Community Health Centre.
Related information
-
Uncategorized1 day ago
Poilievre on 2025 Election Interference – Carney sill hasn’t fired Liberal MP in Chinese election interference scandal
-
Business1 day ago
Cuba has lost 24% of it’s population to emigration in the last 4 years
-
2025 Federal Election1 day ago
2025 Election Interference – CCP Bounty on Conservative Candidate – Carney Says Nothing
-
2025 Federal Election11 hours ago
Chinese Election Interference – NDP reaction to bounty on Conservative candidate
-
Business2 days ago
Tariff-driven increase of U.S. manufacturing investment would face dearth of workers
-
Aristotle Foundation1 day ago
Canada has the world’s MOST relaxed gender policy for minors
-
2025 Federal Election1 day ago
2025 Federal Election Interference from China! Carney Pressed to Remove Liberal MP Over CCP Bounty Remark
-
International1 day ago
Trump signs executive order to make Washington D.C. “safe and beautiful”