Connect with us
[bsa_pro_ad_space id=12]

Alberta

Clean energy think tank says Alberta has the resources to lead Canada in carbon capture and storage

Published

4 minute read

From the Canadian Energy Centre

By Cody Ciona

In August, two new CCS projects in the province got the green light to proceed

Alberta has strategic advantages in carbon capture and storage (CCS), a core technology to achieve carbon neutrality, says a director with the low-carbon energy think tank Clean Prosperity.

“I think it’s important for us to remember that we have the people, we have the geography and we have that great policy environment to be able to lead on CCS across the country,” Adam Sweet said during a recent webinar.

According to the International Energy Agency, 45 commercial CCS facilities are in operation worldwide.

Alberta has five operational CCS projects, which have stored roughly 14 million tonnes of CO2, and dozens more projects are in various development stages.

The province is situated atop the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, which boasts an abundance of potential storage space for captured carbon.

According to a study by Clean Prosperity, Alberta has around 79,000 megatonnes of pore space available in underground saline aquifers and mature or depleted oil and gas wells.

“One of the main reasons why CCS is so big in Alberta is, frankly, we have the geology,” said Sweet.

In August, two new CCS projects in Alberta got the green light to proceed.

Shell and partner ATCO EnPower announced they will build a new CCS project at the Scotford refinery and chemicals complex near Edmonton, while on a smaller scale, Entropy Inc. will add a second phase of CCS at its Glacier gas plant near Grande Prairie.

Combined, the projects are expected to capture and store about 810,000 tonnes of CO2 per year, the equivalent of taking nearly 200,000 cars off the road annually. Entropy’s project is to start in 2026 and Shell/ATCO’s in 2028.

Sweet said that in addition to Alberta’s geological ability to store vast quantities of CO2 underground, the province has advantages including the Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction (TIER) regulation, an industrial carbon price that has existed for nearly 20 years.

This regulation covers around 60 per cent of Alberta’s total emissions and around half of Canada’s total industrial emissions, according to Clean Prosperity. The ability to generate carbon credits makes TIER attractive for companies considering CCS.

“Those facilities that invest in carbon capture and storage and can reduce or can create these carbon credits by coming underneath the benchmark, they can then sell those carbon credits,” said Sweet.

He said that in addition to the TIER regulation, Alberta’s expertise and knowledge of energy production are another key asset that makes it an attractive jurisdiction for CCS.

“We often forget that we have knowledge and experience of working underground, as well as working with everything from the valves to the pipes and all the different pieces that exist in this low carbon energy economy.”

Government support is helping drive new CCS development.

Alberta is finalizing its carbon capture incentive program, which covers up to 12 per cent of eligible capital costs, while the federal government has implemented its CCS investment tax credit, which covers up to 60 per cent of capture equipment and 37.5 per cent of the cost for transportation, storage or usage equipment.

Both governments have supported CCS projects in the past: Shell’s $1.3 billion Quest project received $745 million from Alberta’s government and $120 million from Ottawa, while the $1.2 billion Alberta Carbon Trunk Line received $495 million from Alberta and $63.2 million from the federal government.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Alberta

Jasper rebuilding delayed as province waits for federal and local government approvals

Published on

From Jason Nixon, MLA for Rimbey-Rocky Mountain House-Sundre and Alberta’s Minister of Seniors, Community and Social Services on X

Alberta’s government immediately took action to support those who lost their homes in the Jasper wildfire. We were on track to deliver 250 homes, but Alberta cannot do this without land. It’s been radio silence from Ottawa since Premier Danielle Smith sent a letter to the Prime Minister nearly a month ago. Read my full statement

Image

Continue Reading

Alberta

Before Trudeau Blames Alberta, Perhaps He Should Look in the Mirror

Published on

From EnergyNow.ca

By William Lacey

There has been a lot of talk about how Premier Danielle Smith did not sign a statement of support with the Government of Canada regarding a unified response to any tariff action taken by incoming President of the United States, Donald Trump.

Trudeau singles out Alberta premier for not putting ‘Canada first’ in break with other provinces

Thanks for reading William’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Pledge Your Support

While it is easy to throw stones at Premier Smith and call her actions one of selfishness, placing the interests of Alberta ahead of Canada, I think there are a number of reasons why one could reply that she was well within her right to act as she did. Over the last decade, Trudeau has gone out of his way to vilify the oil and gas industry, through his continual bad mouthing of the industry as being antiquated, and implementing policies that ensured that capital flight from the space accelerated, infrastructure projects were cancelled and massive levels of uncertainty were overlaid on the investment landscape going forward. Despite all this, the oil and gas sector still remains one of the most important economic contributors to the economy and is the largest component of exports from Canada to the United States, and it isn’t even close.

The Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC)

The ironic thing of all this? To get oil to the refineries in the east, you need to IMPORT it by pipeline from the United States or primarily by ship to Quebec and New Brunswick. Had the Energy East Pipeline been built, Canadian refineries could have had Canadian domiciled product to satiate them. Moreover, had Northern Gateway been built, we would have diversified our client list beyond the United States. Sure, the Trans Mountain Pipeline was built, at extraordinary cost and timelines, and some “credit” is due to the Government getting it done, but the proof is in the current landscape that we operate in.

Now, coming back to the beginning. Why do I think Trudeau should look in the mirror before throwing rocks at Premier Smith? I come back to 2015 when Trudeau said Canada is the world’s “first postnational state” and that “there is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada.” He has gone about taking away what many of us grew up with, namely a sense of Canadian identity, and tried to replace that with shame and no collective identity. What is a post nation state you may ask? Post-nationalism or non-nationalism is the process or trend by which nation states and national identities lose their importance relative to cross-nation and self-organized or supranational and global entities as well as local entities.

So, is it any wonder that people are starting to question what is Canadian any more? At a time when Canada is under significant threat, the irony that Alberta likely represents the best tool in this tools (Trudeau) economic toolbox, is wildly ironic. As they say, karma’s a bitch.

Thanks for reading William’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support for his work.

Pledge Your Support

Continue Reading

Trending

X